Pediatric peri-insular hemispherotomy and functional hemispherectomy for severe medically refractory epilepsy: comparison of two techniques.

PURPOSE: Since it was first described in the 1970s, functional hemispherotomy has been an essential tool in treating disabling, medically refractory epilepsy resulting from diffuse unilateral hemispheric disease. We report our experience with 23 patients who underwent hemispherotomy, both using the functional hemispherotomy (FH) as well as a modified peri-insular hemispherotomy (PIH) technique. We present the surgical technique for the latter, review outcomes following disconnection surgery and discuss the differences between the techniques when it comes to complications and postoperative results. METHODS: A retrospective study of 23 patients with refractory seizures who underwent cerebral hemispherectomy. A thorough analysis of the clinical, imaging, surgical features and postoperative results was performed. We also present the surgical technique for a modified PIH technique. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2020, 23 pediatric patients with refractory seizures underwent hemispherotomy (12 FHs, 11 modified PIHs). 91.3% of patients were seizure free at 6 months, 87% at 1 year, and 78.3% at last follow-up. None of the 23 patients presented Engel IV outcome. FH was found to have statistically longer surgical duration (5 ± 1.5 vs. 3.83 ± 0.5 h; p = <0.001). Neurocognition was improved in two thirds of the patients (66.9%). Our study also shows improvement of motor activity in the majority of the patients, regardless of the pathology and surgical technique. In the present report we modified the Cook et al. technique by implementing an amygdalohippocampectomy with resection of the tail of the hippocampus posteriorly and medially, to achieve temporo-occipital disconnection, instead of a complete temporal lobectomy. CONCLUSION: When patients are wisely selected, the hemispherectomy procedure should be considered as a most attractive and curative treatment for children with refractory seizures, not only giving the patient a high chance of seizure freedom but also providing an improvement in motor and cognitive skills. In our particular case and based on the present study, the modified PIH proves to be a highly effective technique. It not only has a shorter surgical time but also a very low complication rate.

[Endoscopic vs. microscopic techniques for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Our experience at an Argentine care center]. / Descompresión microvascular endoscópica versus microscópica en neuralgia trigeminal en un Centro argentino.

INTRODUCTION: Trigeminal neuralgia is a highly invalidating pathology, whose natural course has been modified thanks to decompressive microvascular surgery. The intervention can be carried out either with a microscope or via an endoscopic technique. Our goal was to compare these two techniques for the treatment of this complex pathology. METHODS: Retrospective, analytical study of a cohort of patients treated by a single surgeon at our institution, in the period between 2015 and 2021. RESULTS: We identified 31 patients and divided them into two groups: 15 (49%) treated using the microscopic technique (group M), and 16 (51%) exclusively via an endoscopic one (group E). Differences were observed between the means of the size of the craniectomy in group M (3.7 cm) compared to group E (2.5 cm); The mean length of hospital stay for patients in group E was shorter (4.46 days compared to that of patients in group M, whose hospital stay averaged 2.43 days). There were no differences between the two groups regarding the length of the procedure. In both groups, the predominant compression was due to the superior cerebellar artery (SCA). Pain outcomes were equivalent, with every patient in both groups having an improved postoperative Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Score (BNI). DISCUSSION: Endoscopic microvascular decompression is an attractive option for the resolution of neurovascular conflict as it provides functional results similar to the microscope technique, without requiring an extensive craniectomy and associated to shorter in-hospital stay, which is beneficial for both the patient and the institution.

Introducción: La descompresión microvascular (DMV) en la neuralgia trigeminal es una técnica quirúrgica cuyo objetivo es revertir la compresión a la que se ve sometido un nervio por una estructura vascular. El objetivo de este estudio fue realizar una comparación directa entre la descompresión microvascular endoscópica (DMV-E) y la misma a través del uso del microscopio (DMV-M) en el tratamiento de la neuralgia del trigémino. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de pacientes operados de neuralgia de trigémino, por un mismo cirujano, entre 2015 y 2021 en nuestra institución, tanto por técnica microquirúrgica como endoscópica. Resultados: Se obtuvieron un total de 31 pacientes divididos en dos grupos: Grupo M correspondiente a 15 (49%) pacientes abordados con técnica microscópica y Grupo E, con 16 (51%) pacientes intervenidos con técnica endoscópica. Se identificaron diferencias en el tamaño de la craniectomía, más pequeña en el grupo E (2.50 cm vs 3.70 cm grupo M); y en el tiempo de internación, de 2.43 días en el grupo E vs. 4.46 días en el grupo M. El tiempo de cirugía fue similar para ambas técnicas quirúrgicas La principal compresión fue dada por la arteria cerebelosa superior (ACS) en ambos grupos. Todos los pacientes presentaron mejoría del Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Score (BNI) en el postoperatorio en ambos grupos. Discusión: La DMV-E constituye una alternativa quirúrgica interesante a la ya conocida DMV-M para el tratamiento de la neuralgia trigeminal, por requerir menores dimensiones en la incisión cutánea y tamaño de la craniectomía, acortando el tiempo de internación, lo cual no solo implica un beneficio para el paciente, sino que también representa menor costo de internación.

Descompresión microvascular endoscópica versus microscópica en neuralgia trigeminal en un centro Argentino / Endoscopic vs. microscopic techniques for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Our experience at an Argentine care center

Resumen Introducción: La descompresión microvascular (DMV) en la neuralgia trigeminal es una técnica quirúrgica cuyo objetivo es revertir la compresión a la que se ve someti do un nervio por una estructura vascular. El objetivo de este estudio fue realizar una comparación directa entre la descompresión microvascular endoscópica (DMV-E) y la misma a través del uso del microscopio (DMV-M) en el tratamiento de la neuralgia del trigémino. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospec tivo de pacientes operados de neuralgia de trigémino, por un mismo cirujano, entre 2015 y 2021 en nuestra institución, tanto por técnica microquirúrgica como endoscópica. Resultados: Se obtuvieron un total de 31 pacientes divididos en dos grupos: Grupo M correspondiente a 15 (49%) pacientes abordados con técnica microscópica y Grupo E, con 16 (51%) pacientes intervenidos con técnica endoscópica. Se identificaron diferencias en el tamaño de la cra niectomía, más pequeña en el grupo E (2.50 cm vs 3.70 cm grupo M); y en el tiempo de internación, de 2.43 días en el grupo E vs. 4.46 días en el grupo M. El tiempo de cirugía fue similar para ambas técnicas quirúrgicas La principal compresión fue dada por la arteria ce rebelosa superior (ACS) en ambos grupos. Todos los pacientes presentaron mejoría del Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Score (BNI) en el postoperatorio en ambos grupos. Discusión: La DMV-E constituye una alternativa qui rúrgica interesante a la ya conocida DMV-M para el tratamiento de la neuralgia trigeminal, por requerir menores dimensiones en la incisión cutánea y tamaño de la craniectomía, acortando el tiempo de internación, lo cual no solo implica un beneficio para el paciente, sino que también representa menor costo de internación.

Abstract Introduction: Trigeminal neuralgia is a highly invali dating pathology, whose natural course has been modi fied thanks to decompressive microvascular surgery. The intervention can be carried out either with a microscope or via an endoscopic technique. Our goal was to compare these two techniques for the treatment of this complex pathology. Methods: Retrospective, analytical study of a cohort of patients treated by a single surgeon at our institution, in the period between 2015 and 2021. Results: We identified 31 patients and divided them into two groups: 15 (49%) treated using the microscopic technique (group M), and 16 (51%) exclusively via an endoscopic one (group E). Differences were observed between the means of the size of the craniectomy in group M (3.7 cm) compared to group E (2.5 cm); The mean length of hospital stay for patients in group E was shorter (4.46 days compared to that of patients in group M, whose hospital stay averaged 2.43 days). There were no differences between the two groups regarding the length of the procedure. In both groups, the predomi nant compression was due to the superior cerebellar artery (SCA). Pain outcomes were equivalent, with every patient in both groups having an improved postoperative Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Score (BNI). Discussion: Endoscopic microvascular decompression is an attractive option for the resolution of neurovas cular conflict as it provides functional results similar to the microscope technique, without requiring an exten sive craniectomy and associated to shorter in-hospital stay, which is beneficial for both the patient and the institution.

Posterior Fossa Calcifying Pseudoneoplasm of the Neuraxis (CAPNON): Presentation of Three Surgical Cases.

BACKGROUND: Calcifying pseudoneoplasm of the neuraxis (CAPNON) is an extremely rare entity with fewer than 150 cases reported in the literature and mostly with a supratentorial or spinal location. Posterior fossa CAPNON has been reported scarcely, and association with perilesional edema is a topic not yet approached which might play a significant role in treatment decision and clinical progression. Our objective is to report, to our knowledge, the first series of 3 posterior fossa CAPNON surgically treated in a single institution and assess features that help provide a systematic approach to diagnosis and timely treatment. METHODS: This was a monocentric, retrospective study of surgical patients diagnosed with a posterior fossa CAPNON in the last 5 years. A thorough bibliographic research was conducted. RESULTS: Three patients were included. Locations involved IV ventricle, right cerebellopontine angle with extension to foramen magnum, and cerebellar vermis. Two of them presented with symptoms linked to acute hydrocephalus, and the other one presented with progressive cranial nerve palsy and brainstem compression signs. The 3 of them showed radiological signs of perilesional edema on their preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Gross total resection was accomplished in one case, with near and subtotal resections in the others. There were no complications. The outcome was favorable in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: It is essential to contemplate this infrequent diagnosis in cases of calcified lesions involving the posterior fossa. When symptoms manifest, surgery should be considered. Perilesional edema could be associated with symptomatic progression and hence a sign suggesting the need for surgical treatment.