Efficacy of Nissen Sleeve Gastrectomy on Mid-term Barrett's Esophagus Regression.

INTRODUCTION: Sleeve gastrectomy is the most commonly performed bariatric operation globally. The main complication is GERD. In the medium term, it can increase the incidence of Barrett's esophagus (BE), which is a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Following conventional sleeve gastrectomy, BE is noted in up to 16% of patients postoperatively. Recently, Nissen sleeve gastrectomy (NSG) has been shown to reduce the frequency of postoperative GERD compared to conventional sleeve gastrectomy. This study aims to evaluate the impact of NSG on the incidence and remission of BE in the long term. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This bicentric retrospective study included 692 patients who received NSG from September 2013 to July 2021. All patients underwent preoperative upper GI endoscopy and were then scheduled to receive upper GI endoscopy between 1 and 2 years and then between 3 and 5 years postoperatively. BE was systematically confirmed by biopsies. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients had endoscopic suspicion of BE, which was confirmed on 54/692 patients by histology. The BE lesions consisted of 18.5% intestinal metaplasia and 75.9% fundal metaplasia. Among these 54 patients, 38 underwent endoscopic investigation within 2 years postoperatively. The biopsies showed healed BE in 25/38 patients (64.1%). At 5 years, two patients had proven BE. Concerning the incidence of BE post NSG: 234 performed the follow-up endoscopy within 2 years. The incidence of de novo BE is nil. CONCLUSION: The NSG is associated with healing of known BE in approximately two-thirds of patients at 2-year follow-up. This is consistent with the GERD improvement that has been shown with NSG.

Evaluating the impact of the antrum size following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a randomized multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains discordant and highly related to the surgical technique. GERD and weight regain are probably understudied by prospective clinical studies depending on different technical factors. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to evaluate the effect of extent to which the antrum is resected on GERD following LSG but also on early complications and short-term weight loss results. SETTING: University Hospital, France. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned in group A (172 patients), LSG with antral resection, or group B (174 patients), LSG with antral preservation. The baseline characteristics collected were demographic characteristics and anthropometric data (age, sex, body mass index), presence of GERD clinical characteristics, ± pH-metry, postoperative complications, or gastrin level. RESULTS: A total of 279 patients underwent LSG and they were included in the final analysis. The GERD analyzed at 3 months postoperatively by pH-metry was observed for 57.8% in group A and for 52.4% of patients in group B (P = .4819). There was no statistically significant difference (P = .3755) between the 2 groups at 1 year after surgery (group A, 49.5% versus group B, 43.6%). The gastrin serum level was analyzed 1 year after surgery for a total of 107 patients. For group A, the mean gastrin level was 97.4 ± 85.9 pg/mL, which was inferior compared with group B (150.6 ± 152.4 pg/mL) with no statistical difference (P = .067). The recorded excess weight loss for group A was 79.67% (± 28.88) with no statistically significant difference with group B 74.46% (± 36.61) (P = .3678). The mortality rate was nil. We recorded 5 cases of staple line leakage (3 in group A and 2 in group B); 11 patients presented bleeding (3 in group A and 8 group B), and 4 patients presented with gastric stenosis (2 in group A and 2 in group B). CONCLUSIONS: The antrum preservation has no significant difference in terms of reflux, weight loss, or complications at 3 or 12 months following LSG. The only significant difference was achieved for nausea and vomiting symptoms, which were more significant for the antrum resection group. Further clinical trials with newer procedures will indicate the factors that can diminish the reflux following LSG. Furthermore, the conservation of a large part of the antrum may be helpful to convert the sleeve to another bariatric procedure (transit bipartition).

Levothyroxine dose adjustment in hypothyroid patients following gastric sleeve surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Euthyroid patients show decreased TSH level following sleeve gastrectomy. However, studies of levothyroxine absorption after bariatric surgery reported contradictory results and data on levothyroxine dose adjustment according to weight are sparse. The aim of this study was to evaluate levothyroxine dose adjustment during weight loss following sleeve surgery. METHOD: This retrospective study assessed change in levothyroxine dose in patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy at the university hospital center of Nîmes (France) between January 2010 and March 2016. Patients were receiving standard bariatric surgery follow-up with levothyroxine therapy for hypothyroidism. RESULTS: Fifty-two of the 271 patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (19.2%) were being treated with levothyroxine. Among these patients, 31 were followed up for 12 months, including 12 who were followed up for 24 months. Mean weight loss was 35±11kg at 12 months and 41.8±10.2 kg at 24 months. Daily levothyroxine dose decreased from 108 [88-144] µg/day to 94 [63-125] µg/day at 12 months and 69 [44-134] µg/day at 24 months, with positive correlation between dose and weight loss at 12 months (P=0.03). Weight-adjusted dose was 1.04 [0.81-1.24] µg/kg/day at baseline, 1.14 [0.85-1.66] µg/kg/day at 12 months, and 0.85 [0.53-2.10] µg/kg/day at 24 months, showing no correlation with weight loss. Median TSH level dropped to 1.30 [0.63-2.27] mIU/l at 12 months and 1.48 [1.08-2.42] mIU/l at 24 months. CONCLUSION: Despite a decrease in daily levothyroxine dose correlating with weight loss at 12 months, the absence of correlation with weight-adjusted dose suggests the involvement of confounding factors such as poor levothyroxine absorption or altered thyroid function. Further studies are required to elucidate the absorption of levothyroxine.