Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros












Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Eye Res ; 49(1): 33-38, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37823373

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This was a pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of digital polymerase chain reaction detection of Demodex in eyelid margin swabs for the diagnosis of Demodex blepharitis. This study aims to explore the possibility of digital polymerase chain reaction detection to improve the diagnostic accuracy of Demodex blepharitis detection. METHODS: Volunteers were prospectively recruited and classified by experienced doctors into suspected Demodex blepharitis or healthy controls using slit-lamp evaluation of the eyelid margin and an inquiry about symptoms. Three eyelashes from each eyelid were epilated from participants in each group for microscopic observation and mite counting. Then, swabs from the eyelid margins of each eye were collected after the eyelashes were epilated and stored at -80 °C for future DNA extraction and digital polymerase chain reaction detection. The positive or negative results of both methods were compared for diagnostic accuracy, and the Kappa value was also calculated to evaluate their consistency. RESULTS: The accuracy of the digital polymerase chain reaction detection was 71.6% and that of the mite counting method was 75%. Their combined accuracy was improved to 77.3%. The Kappa value of the two methods was 0.505, indicating moderate consistency. CONCLUSION: Digital polymerase chain reaction detection of Demodex from ocular surface swabs was painless and noninvasive and is a potentially accurate quantitative method available for diagnosing Demodex blepharitis. This method is also complementary to the conventional mite counting method, particularly when a sufficient number of eyelashes cannot be effectively epilated.


Assuntos
Blefarite , Infecções Oculares Parasitárias , Infestações por Ácaros , Ácaros , Animais , Humanos , Blefarite/diagnóstico , Infecções Oculares Parasitárias/diagnóstico , Infestações por Ácaros/diagnóstico , Ácaros/genética , Projetos Piloto , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase
2.
Transl Vis Sci Technol ; 11(2): 29, 2022 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35179557

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore if 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing can improve the conventional diagnosis of causative pathogens for bacterial corneal infection. METHODS: Corneal scraping and conjunctiva and eyelid margin swab samples from infected eyes of patients diagnosed with "bacterial corneal infection" and conjunctiva and eyelid margin swab samples from a random eye of healthy participants were collected. Each swab was used for both aerobic and anaerobic cultures and 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing. The V3 to V4 region of the 16S rDNA was amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 Sequencing Platform. RESULTS: The overall culture positivity rate for all 72 samples was 69% (72% in the bacterial keratitis group and 67% in the healthy control group), whereas 1719 operational taxonomic units in total were generated using 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing with each sample showing 123 to 337 different genera. Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Propionibacterium, and Micrococcus most frequently appeared in culture, whereas Streptococcus, Acinetobacter, and Lactobacillus were the most common genera, with large ratios in 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing. The causative pathogens detected by the two methods were inconsistent for most samples, except for several corneal samples. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that a combination of different techniques, such as clinical observation, microscopic analysis, culture, and next-generation sequencing techniques including 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing, should be used to comprehensively analyze pathogens in corneal and external ocular infections. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This paper uses a basic research methodology for studying the microbiome in ocular samples to help improve the diagnostic accuracy of corneal and external ocular infections.


Assuntos
Infecções Oculares Bacterianas , Ceratite , Bactérias/genética , DNA Bacteriano/análise , DNA Bacteriano/genética , DNA Ribossômico/genética , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Ceratite/diagnóstico , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Análise de Sequência de DNA
3.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 8: 768849, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34950683

RESUMO

Purpose: To investigate the composition and diversity of the microbiota on the ocular surface of patients with blepharitis in northwestern China via 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing. Methods: Thirty-seven patients with blepharitis divided into groups of anterior, posterior and mixed blepharitis and twenty healthy controls from northwestern China were enrolled in the study. Samples were collected from the eyelid margin and conjunctival sac of each participant. The V3-V4 region of bacterial 16S rDNA in each sample was amplified and sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing platform, and the differences in taxonomy and diversity among different groups were compared. Results: The composition of the ocular surface microbiota of patients with blepharitis was similar to that of healthy subjects, but there were differences in the relative abundance of each bacterium. At the phylum level, the abundances of Actinobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Atribacteria were significantly higher in the blepharitis group than in the healthy control group, while the relative abundance of Firmicutes was significantly lower (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U). At the genus level, the abundances of Lactobacillus, Ralstonia, Bacteroides, Akkermansia, Bifidobacterium, Escherichia-Shigella, Faecalibacterium, and Brevibacterium were significantly higher in the blepharitis group than in the healthy control group, while the relative abundances of Bacillus, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Acinetobacter were significantly lower in the blepharitis group (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U). The microbiota of anterior blepharitis was similar to that of mixed blepharitis but different from that of posterior blepharitis. Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium are biomarkers of posterior blepharitis, and Ralstonia is a biomarker of mixed blepharitis. There was no significant difference in the ocular surface microbiota between the eyelid margin and conjunctival sac with or without blepharitis. Conclusion: The ocular surface microbiota of patients with blepharitis varied among different study groups, according to 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing analysis. The reason might be due to the participants being from different environments and having different lifestyles. Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Akkermansia, Ralstonia, and Bacteroides may play important roles in the pathogenesis of blepharitis.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...