Exploring opportunities for collaboration between the corporate sector and the dental education community.

The ultimate purpose of both dental industry and dental education is to improve the oral health of the public. This report provides background information on the different roles and objectives of the dental industry and dental education communities, the different operating environment of each sector and also areas of common interest where collaboration will be of mutual benefit. The report addresses five areas for potential collaboration between the dental industry and the dental education communities: 1. Contribution to joint activities. 2. Effectiveness and efficiency. 3. Workforce needs. 4. Middle- and low-income countries. 5. The future of International Federation of Dental Educators and Associations (IFDEA). The traditional areas of support and their limitations that have been provided by industry are outlined in the report and some new approaches for collaboration are considered. Industry-based research has been an important factor in developing new products and technologies and in promoting oral health. However there is a need to facilitate the introduction of these developments at an early stage in the education process. Industry has to operate in an efficient manner to remain competitive and maximise its returns and therefore survive. The academic sector operates in a different environment and under different governance structures; although some trends are noted towards adoption of greater efficiency and financial accountability similar to industry. Opportunities to jointly develop best business practices should be explored. Industry has responded well to the oral health needs of the public through the development of new products and technologies. The education community needs to respond in a similar way by examining different healthcare delivery models worldwide and developing programmes to train members of the dental team to cater for future needs and demands of communities in different regions of the world. The reputation of industry-based scientists and clinicians is high, and their role in contributing to the dental education process in practical ways needs to be explored and further developed. Closer relationships between industry scientists and faculty and students could assist industrys need and desire to develop new technologies for the broader dental care system. The corporate sector can play a key role in the future success of IFDEA by providing support and expertise in developing areas such as regional leadership institutes, a Global Faculty and Network and in collaborating in developing continuing education programmes as well as involvement in its governance. Thirteen recommendations are made in the report. These are considered to be important initial steps in developing the already strong relationship between the education and corporate sectors. Partnership and collaborating more effectively along the lines suggested should, almost certainly, generate mutually beneficial outcomes, whilst serving over the long term to elevate the publics oral health status on a global basis.

Pilot study of correlation of pulp stones with cardiovascular disease.

We propose that calcification of dental pulp may have a similar pathogenesis as calcified atheromas and could lead to use of routine dental radiographs as a rapid screening method for early identification of potential cardiovascular disease (CVD). Fifty-five dental patients ages 20 to 55 were chosen because pulp stones in pulpally noninflamed teeth were not expected in this age group. They completed a questionnaire regarding their CVD status and that of their parents and siblings. Entry criteria included at least one asymptomatic, minimally restored, noncarious molar and no history of gout, renal disease, or renal lithiasis. Patients' periapical radiographs of record were viewed to determine the presence of pulp stones. There was a significant relationship between pre-existing CVD and pulp stones (odds ratio of 4.4 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.1, 18.7), but no relationship was found for family history of CVD and pulp stones (odds ratio of 1.7 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.5, 5.5). Seventy-four percent (14/19) of patients with reported CVD had detectable pulp stones while only 39% (14/36) of patients without a history of CVD had pulp stones. This pilot study demonstrates that patients with CVD have an increased incidence of pulp stones in teeth with noninflamed pulps compared to patients with no history of CVD. No relationship was found between presence of pulp stones and family history of CVD. The findings suggest that dental radiographic determination of the presence or absence of pulp stones may have possibilities for use in CVD screening.

Predictable multiple site root coverage using an acellular dermal matrix allograft.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this randomized, controlled, blinded clinical investigation was to determine if orientation of an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) allograft, basement membrane side against the tooth or connective tissue side against the tooth, affected the percent root coverage. Additional aims were to: 1) compare results of this study with results obtained from other root coverage studies; 2) determine if multiple additional sites could be successfully covered with the same surgery; 3) determine the effect of the procedure on keratinized tissue; and 4) evaluate the amount of creeping attachment obtained. METHODS: Ten patients with 2 Miller Class I or II buccal recession defects > or =3 mm were treated with a coronally positioned flap plus ADM and followed for 12 months. Test sites received ADM with the basement membrane side against the root (AB), while the control sites received the connective tissue side against the root (AC). Multiple additional recession sites were treated with the same flap procedure. RESULTS: Mean baseline recession for the AB sites was 4.2 mm and for the AC sites, 3.7 mm. Mean root coverage of 95% was obtained for both AB and AC sites. Sixty-eight additional Class I or II AB and AC sites obtained about 93% root coverage. The mean increase in keratinized tissue for both treatments was 0.80 mm. No additional root coverage was gained due to creeping attachment between 2 and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ADM was an effective and predictable procedure for root coverage. The orientation of the material did not affect the treatment outcome for any of the parameters tested.

Nonsurgical periodontal therapy.

Regular home care by the patient in addition to professional removal of subgingival plaque is generally very effective in controlling most inflammatory periodontal diseases. When disease does recur, despite frequent recall, it can usually be attributed to lack of sufficient supragingival and subgingival plaque control or to other risk factors that influence host response, such as diabetes or smoking. Causative factors contributing to recurrent disease include deep inaccessible pockets, overhangs, poor crown margins and plaque-retentive calculus. In most cases, simply performing a thorough periodontal debridement under local anesthesia will stop disease progression and result in improvement in the clinical signs and symptoms of active disease. If however, clinical signs of disease activity persist following thorough mechanical therapy, such as increased pocket depths, loss of attachment and bleeding on probing, other pharmacotherapeutic therapies should be considered. Augmenting scaling and root planing or maintenance visits with adjunctive chemotherapeutic agents for controlling plaque and gingivitis could be as simple as placing the patient on an antimicrobial mouthrinse and/or toothpaste with agents such as fluorides, chlorhexidine or triclosan, to name a few. Since supragingival plaque reappears within hours or days after its removal, it is important that patients have access to effective alternative chemotherapeutic products that could help them achieve adequate supragingival plaque control. Recent studies, for example, have documented the positive effect of triclosan toothpaste on the long-term maintenance of both gingivitis and periodontitis patients. Daily irrigation with a powered irrigation device, with or without an antimicrobial agent, is also useful for decreasing the inflammation associated with gingivitis and periodontitis. Clinically significant changes in probing depths and attachment levels are not usually expected with irrigation alone. Recent reports, however, would indicate that, when daily irrigation with water was added to a regular oral hygiene home regimen, a significant reduction in probing depth, bleeding on probing and Gingival Index was observed. A significant reduction in cytokine levels (interleukin-1beta and prostaglandin E2, which are associated with destructive changes in inflamed tissues and bone resorption also occurs. If patient-applied antimicrobial therapy is insufficient in preventing, arresting, or reversing the disease progression, then professionally applied antimicrobial agents should be considered including sustained local drug delivery products. Other, more broadly based pharmacotherapeutic agents may be indicated for multiple failing sites. Such agents would include systemic antibiotics or host modulating drugs used in conjunction with periodontal debridement. More aggressive types of juvenile periodontitis or severe rapidly advancing adult periodontitis usually require a combination of surgical intervention in conjunction with systemic antibiotics and generally are not controlled with nonsurgical anti-infective therapy alone. It should be noted, however, that, to date, no home care products or devices currently available can completely control or eliminate the pathogenic plaques associated with periodontal diseases for extended periods of time. Daily home care and frequent recall are still paramount for long-term success. Nonsurgical therapy remains the cornerstone of periodontal treatment. Attention to detail, patient compliance and proper selection of adjunctive antimicrobial agents for sustained plaque control are important elements in achieving successful long-term results. Frequent re-evaluation and careful monitoring allows the practitioner the opportunity to intervene early in the disease state, to reverse or arrest the progression of periodontal disease with meticulous nonsurgical anti-infective therapy.

Treatment of periodontitis by local administration of minocycline microspheres: a controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Periodontitis is an inflammatory condition of tooth-supporting tissues that is usually treated by mechanical removal of plaque and microorganisms that adhere to teeth. This treatment, known as scaling and root planing, is not optimally effective. Adjunctive therapy with locally delivered antimicrobials has resulted in improved clinical outcomes such as probing depth reduction. This article reports on the efficacy and safety of locally administered microencapsulated minocycline. METHODS: Seven hundred forty-eight (748) patients with moderate to advanced periodontitis were enrolled in a multi-center trial and randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms: 1) scaling and root planing (SRP) alone; 2) SRP plus vehicle; or 3) SRP plus minocycline microspheres. The primary outcome measure was probing depth reduction at 9 months. Clinical assessments were performed at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 9 months. RESULTS: Minocycline microspheres plus scaling and root planing provided substantially more probing depth reduction than either SRP alone or SRP plus vehicle. The difference reached statistical significance after the first month and was maintained throughout the trial. The improved outcome was observed to be independent of patients' smoking status, age, gender, or baseline disease level. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse effects among treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Scaling and root planing plus minocycline microspheres is more effective than scaling and root planing alone in reducing probing depths in periodontitis patients.

A comparison of porous and non-porous teflon membranes plus demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of class II buccal/lingual furcation defects: a clinical reentry study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this 9-month reentry study was to compare the regenerative healing using porous (P) and non-porous (NP) teflon barrier membranes plus demineralized freeze dried bone allografts (DFDBA) in Class II buccal/lingual furcation defects. METHODS: Twenty-four patients, 13 males and 11 females, ages 38 to 75 (mean 54 +/- 10), were included in this study. Each patient had adult periodontitis and one Class II furcation defect measuring > or = 3 mm open horizontal probing depth. Twelve patients were randomly selected to receive the NP treatment and 12 received the P membrane. All defects received a DFDBA graft. Measurements were performed by a masked examiner. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences (P>0.05) were found between NP and P groups at any time with respect to any open or closed measure. Improvement in mean open horizontal probing depth was significant for both the NP (2.33 +/- 0.78 mm) and P (2.75 +/- 0.75 mm) groups. Mean clinical attachment level gains at 9 months were significant for both NP (1.50 +/- 1.62 mm) and P (2.50 +/- 2.11 mm) groups. Seventeen of 24 defects had an intrabony component and > or = 50% fill was obtained in 100% of these defects. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this 9-month reentry study comparing the use of porous and non-porous barrier membranes with a DFDBA graft indicate that there were no statistically significant differences between groups. Both groups showed a statistically significant improvement following the treatment of Class II furcation defects in humans.

Position paper: sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontics. Research, Science and Therapy Committee of the American Academy of Periodontology.

Ultrasonic and sonic scalers appear to attain similar results as hand instruments for removing plaque, calculus, and endotoxin. Ultrasonic scalers used at medium power seem to produce less root surface damage than hand or sonic scalers. Due to instrument width, furcations may be more accessible using ultrasonic or sonic scalers than manual scalers. It is not clear whether root surface roughness is more or less pronounced following power-driven scalers or manual scalers. It is also unclear if root surface roughness affects long-term wound healing. Periodontal scaling and root planing includes thorough calculus removal, but complete cementum removal should not be a goal of periodontal therapy. Studies have established that endotoxin is weakly adsorbed to the root surface, and can be easily removed with light, overlapping strokes with an ultrasonic scaler. A significant disadvantage of power-driven scalers is the production of contaminated aerosols. Because ultrasonics and sonics produce aerosols, additional care is required to achieve and maintain good infection control when incorporating these instrumentation techniques into dental practice. Preliminary evidence suggests that the addition of certain antimicrobials to the lavage during ultrasonic instrumentation may be of minimal clinical benefit. However, more randomized controlled clinical trials need to be conducted over longer periods of time to better understand the long-term benefits of ultrasonic and sonic debridement.

Trends in surgical and nonsurgical periodontal treatment.

BACKGROUND: New research is demonstrating that a person's total health is indeed related to his or her oral health. Elimination of all oral infections, including gingivitis and periodontis, is important to overall health. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This article reviews recent evidence on the systemic and oral connection and discusses these findings as they relate to patient care. The article examines trends in nonsurgical and surgical therapy that will successfully arrest periodontal infections. Opportunities for early diagnosis and prevention will play an increasing role in dental practice in the future as patients understand the importance of oral health to overall health.

The effect of locally delivered controlled-release doxycycline or scaling and root planing on periodontal maintenance patients over 9 months.

BACKGROUND: This research report evaluates clinical changes resulting from local delivery of doxycycline hyclate (DH) or traditional scaling and root planing (SRP) in a group of patients undergoing supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). METHODS: In all, 141 patients received either DH (67) or SRP (74) treatment in sites > or =5 mm on one-half of their dentition at baseline and month 4. RESULTS: Clinical results were determined at month 9. Baseline mean probing depth recordings were similar between the two groups (DH = 5.9 mm; SRP = 5.9 mm). Mean month 9 results showed similar clinical results for attachment level gain (DH 0.7 mm; SRP 0.8 mm) and probing depth reduction (DH 1.3 mm; SRP 1.1 mm). Percentage of sites showing > or =2 mm attachment level gain at month 9 was 24.7% in the DH group and 21.2% in the SRP group. Thirty-nine percent (39%) of DH sites and 38% of SRP sites showed > or =2 mm probing depth reduction. When treated sides of the dentition were compared to untreated sides, DH showed a difference in disease activity (> or =2 mm attachment loss) from 19.3% (untreated) to 7.2% (treated); and SRP from 14.3% (untreated) to 8.1% (treated). CONCLUSIONS: Results show that both DH without concomitant mechanical instrumentation and SRP were equally effective as SPT in this patient group over the 9-month study period.

Improved closure rate of Class III furcations using a layered GTR technique.

In this study, 24 furcation defects in 12 patients were treated by either (1) a polylactide resorbable membrane (Guidor) plus a polyglactin mesh (Vicryl) and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA), or (2) a polylactide resorbable membrane and DFDBA. All defects were reentered after 9 months. Class III furcations closed 66% of the time when treated by the first method, while the closure rate was only 33% when treated by the second method (no polyglactin mesh). Defects with a vertical opening of < or = 4 mm closed 74% of the time, while those with vertical openings > 4 mm closed only 11% of the time.

Hard tissue ridge augmentation using a resorbable membrane and a particulate graft without complete flap closure.

Twelve patients with isolated alveolar ridge defects bordered by teeth on each side were treated and followed for 12 months. The treatment involved use of a resorbable membrane and a particulate graft without complete flap closure. Measurements taken at 12 months showed a significant mean osseous gain of 3.27 +/- 3.73 mm in mid-defect ridge width and an increase in height of 1.90 +/- 2.50 mm.

Improved bone regeneration and root coverage using a resorbable membrane with physically assisted cell migration and DFDBA.

Twelve patients with 2 Miller Class I or II buccal recession defects measuring > or = 3.0 mm were treated using the principles of guided tissue regeneration and followed for 12 months. The effectiveness of a polylactide (Guidor) resorbable membrane (GA sites) was compared to a combination treatment of polylactide membrane plus polyglactin root-lining mesh (Vicryl) and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) (GVB sites) designed to enhance cell migration and bone regeneration. There was 90% mean soft tissue root coverage for the GVB sites and 78% for the GA sites. The mean osseous dehiscence area coverage with hard tissue was 75% for GVB sites and 30% for GA sites.

Initial preparation: anti-infective therapy.

The primary aim of anti-infective therapy is to eliminate or reduce the subgingival plaque and to arrest tissue breakdown associated with chronic or progressive periodontitis. Four to six weeks following anti-infective therapy, initial healing is usually complete, and the clinical status should be re-evaluated. After assessing the reduction in probing depths, bleeding on probing and clinical attachment levels, the clinician must decide whether the anti-infective therapy has arrested the disease. If it is determined that maximum healing has occurred, the initial phase of therapy is complete, and the patient is placed into the maintenance program. In sites that remain > or = 6 mm following anti-infective therapy, surgical debridement may be indicated to increase visualization of the roots for deposit removal because the evidence points to better calculus removal in an open versus closed environment. During surgical root preparation, fine diamonds or finishing burs produce the smoothest root surface followed by manual and power-driven scalers. Endoscopic cameras that enable the clinician to see subgingival calculus without benefit of surgical access may prove to be a valuable diagnostic tool for sites that do not respond to therapy. Diamond-coated ultrasonic inserts are available from some manufacturers and have been shown to be efficient and effective in surgical root preparation. New designs and finer grits may enable clinicians to use these instruments in nonsurgical applications in the future. Finally, new evidence from one group in Belgium has shown that significantly more attachment gain and probing depth reduction is achieved when scaling and root planing is done in one or two visits within 24 hours compared with the traditional method of scaling quadrant by quadrant over four visits. These preliminary results need to be confirmed by others but hold a great deal of promise for improving the outcomes from nonsurgical root preparation in the future.

The effect of postsurgical naproxen and a bioabsorbable membrane on osseous healing in intrabony defects.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports in the literature have shown that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) may affect osseous tissues by either stimulating or inhibiting bone formation. This effect can be drug specific and different NSAIDs may produce opposite results. There are also reports showing that NSAIDs inhibit bone loss due to inflammatory disease process. The purpose of this randomized, controlled, blinded, clinical investigation was to determine the effect of a one week course of postsurgical naproxen on the osseous healing in intrabony defects. METHODS: Twenty-four vertical osseous defects in 24 patients were treated with either a bioabsorbable membrane plus twice daily postsurgical naproxen 500 mg for one week (test or GPN group) or with a polylactide bioabsorbable membrane alone (control or GA group). Twelve patients were included in each group. Treatment was performed on either 2- or 3-wall or combination defects. All measurements were taken from a stent by a calibrated, blinded examiner and open measurements were repeated at the 9-month second stage surgery. Power analysis to determine superiority of naproxen treatment showed that a 12 per group sample size would yield 87% power to detect a 2.0 mm difference and 64% power to detect a 1.5 mm difference. RESULTS: Open defect measurements from baseline to 9 months showed a statistically significant (P < 0.05) mean defect fill of 1.96 +/- 1.27 mm and 2.04 +/- 1.71 for the GPN and GA groups, respectively. This corresponded to a mean defect fill of 42% and a mean defect resolution of approximately 75% for both groups. The differences between GPN and GA groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Defect fill of > or = 50% was seen in 6 defects (50%) in the GPN group and in 5 defects (42%) in the GA group. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of postsurgical naproxen failed to produce osseous healing that was statistically superior to that obtained with polylactide bioabsorbable membranes alone.

The effect of postsurgical antibiotics and a bioabsorbable membrane on regenerative healing in Class II furcation defects.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this randomized, controlled, blinded, clinical investigation was to determine the effect of postsurgical antibiotics on osseous healing in Class II furcation defects. METHODS: Twenty-four Class II furcation defects in 24 patients were treated with either a polylactide bioabsorbable membrane, demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) plus antibiotics (GBA or test group) or with a polylactide membrane and DFDBA alone (GB or control group). Twelve patients were included in each group. The antibiotic regimen consisted of ciprofloxacin 250 mg twice daily and metronidazole 250 mg tid for 1 week followed by a 7-week regimen of doxycycline hyclate 50 mg daily. Treatment was performed on either mandibular buccal or lingual, or maxillary buccal Class II furcation defects. Defects were randomly selected by a coin toss for treatment and all open and closed measurements were performed by a blinded examiner. Final open and closed measures from a stent were repeated at the 9-month second stage surgery. Power analysis to determine superiority of antibiotic treatment showed that a 12 per group sample size would yield 93% power to detect a 1.5 mm difference and 64% power to detect a 1 mm difference. RESULTS: Mean open horizontal probing depth reductions at 9 months were greater for the GBA group than for the GB group (2.92+/-1.78 versus 2.50+/-1.62 mm); however, these differences were not statistically significant. Seven of 12 furcations (58%) in the GBA group demonstrated >50% vertical defect fill at 9 months compared to 8 of 12 furcations (67%) in the GB group. There were no significant differences in mean open horizontal probing depth reduction between smokers and non-smokers in either the GBA or GB groups. Membrane exposure did not appear to affect regenerative healing in either the GBA or GB groups. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of postsurgical antibiotics did not produce statistically superior osseous healing of Class II furcation defects. This result may be attributable to membrane design which facilitates connective tissue ingrowth, thereby preventing bacterial downgrowth and contamination of the newly regenerated tissues.

Root trunk dimensions of 5 different tooth types.

The primary purpose of this study was to document mean, standard deviation, and range of root trunk dimensions of multirooted tooth types. A total of 412 extracted teeth were examined and classified as: maxillary first molars, maxillary second molars, maxillary first premolars, mandibular first molars, and mandibular second molars. The distance from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to the root groove and from the CEJ to the root division was measured. Mean CEJ to root groove distances ranged from 1.35 to 1.65 mm for maxillary first molars, from 1.49 to 1.89 mm for maxillary second molars, from 1.71 to 1.73 mm for maxillary first premolars, from 1.16 to 1.22 mm for mandibular first molars, and from 1.53 to 1.76 mm for mandibular second molars.

Two multi-center studies evaluating locally delivered doxycycline hyclate, placebo control, oral hygiene, and scaling and root planing in the treatment of periodontitis.

BACKGROUND: The clinical efficacy and safety of doxycycline hyclate (8.5% w/w) delivered subgingivally in a biodegradable polymer (DH) was compared to placebo control (VC), oral hygiene (OH), and scaling and root planing (SRP) in 2 multi-center studies. METHODS: Each study entered 411 patients who demonstrated moderate to severe periodontitis. Patients had 2 or more quadrants each with a minimum of 4 qualifying pockets > or =5 mm that bled on probing. At least 2 of the pockets were > or =7 mm. Treatment with DH, VC, OH, or SRP was provided at baseline and again at month 4. Clinical parameters were recorded monthly. RESULTS: DH and SRP resulted in nearly identical clinical changes over time in both studies. Mean 9 month clinical attachment level gain (ALG) was 0.8 mm for the DH group and 0.7 mm for the SRP group in Study 1, and 0.8 mm (DH) and 0.9 mm (SRP) in Study 2. Mean probing depth (PD) reduction was 1.1 mm for the DH group and 0.9 mm for the SRP group in Study 1 and 1.3 mm for both groups in Study 2. Frequency distributions showed an ALG > or =2 mm in 29% of DH sites versus 27% of SRP sites in Study 1 and 31% of DH sites versus 34% of SRP sites in Study 2. PD reductions > or =2 mm were seen in 32% of DH sites versus 31% of SRP sites in Study 1 and 41% of DH sites versus 43% of SRP sites in Study 2. Comparisons between DH, VC, and OH treatment groups showed DH treatment to be statistically superior to VC and OH. Safety data demonstrated a benign safety profile with use of the DH product. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this trial demonstrate that treatment of periodontitis with subgingivally delivered doxycycline in a biodegradable polymer is equally effective as scaling and root planing and superior in effect to placebo control and oral hygiene in reducing the clinical signs of adult periodontitis over a 9-month period. This represents positive changes resulting from the use of subgingivally applied doxycycline as scaling and root planing was not limited regarding time of the procedure or use of local anesthesia.

Root coverage using Alloderm acellular dermal graft material.

This report describes a surgical technique for root coverage using an acellular dermal graft material and a coronally positioned flap. Video clips of a root coverage surgery are included using the graft material to cover multiple teeth in the same quadrant. Three additional completed cases are presented in which a mean root coverage of 97% was achieved, resulting in 100% coverage on 9 of 11 teeth. The results from this case series conform with the available evidence on the use of acellular dermal graft material in root coverage procedures.

Furcation depth and interroot separation dimensions for 5 different tooth types.

The purpose of this study was to document mean, standard deviation, and range of furcation depth and Interroot separation dimensions of 5 multirooted tooth types. A total of 412 extracted teeth were examined and classified as: maxillary first molar, maxillary second molar, maxillary first premolar, mandibular first molar, and mandibular second molar. The furcation depth was measured at the level of the furcation dome and 3 and 5 mm apical to the dome. Interroot separation was measured 3 and 5 mm apical to the furcation dome. Mean furcation depth at the dome was 7.48 mm buccally and 6.67 mm mesiodistally for maxillary first molars; 6.69 mm buccally and 5.94 mm mesiodistally for maxillary second molars; 3.54 mm mesiodistally for maxillary first premolars; 7.96 mm buccolingually for mandibular first molars; and 7.46 mm buccolingually for mandibular second molars. Interroot separation dimensions 3 mm apical to the dome were: 2.58 mm buccally, 4.17 mm mesially, and 4.48 mm distally for maxillary first molars; 1.92 mm buccally, 3.89 mm mesially, and 4.04 mm distally for maxillary second molars; 2.47 mm mesially and 2.58 mm distally for maxillary first premolars; 3.15 mm buccally and 2.95 mm lingually for mandibular first molars; and 2.54 mm buccally and 2.75 mm lingually for mandibular second molars.