RESUMO
Ganglioside-monosialic acid (GM1) gangliosidosis (ICD-10: E75.1; OMIM: 230500, 230600, 230650) is a rare autosomal recessive hereditary disease, lysosomal storage disorder caused by mutations in the GLB1 gene that lead to the absence or insufficiency of ß-galactosidase. In this study, we report a case of a Russian family with a history of GM1 gangliosidosis. The family had a child who, from the age of 6 months, experienced a gradual loss of developmental skills, marked by muscle flaccidity, psychomotor retardation, hepatosplenomegaly, and the onset of tonic seizures by the age of 8 months. Funduscopic examination revealed a «cherry red spot¼ in the macula, which is crucial for the diagnosis of lipid storage disorders. To find the pathogenic variants responsible for these clinical symptoms, the next-generation sequencing approach was used. The analysis revealed two variants in the heterozygous state: a frameshift variant c.699delG (rs1452318343, ClinVar ID 928700) in exon 6 and a missense variant c.809A>C (rs371546950, ClinVar ID 198727) in exon 8 of the GLB1 gene. The spouses were advised to plan the pregnancy with assisted reproductive technology (ART), followed by preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorder (PGT-M) on the embryos. Trophectoderm biopsy was performed on 8 out of 10 resulting embryos at the blastocyst stage. To perform PGT-M, we developed a novel testing system, allowing for direct analysis of disease-causing mutations, as well as haplotype analysis based on the study of polymorphic markers-short tandem repeats (STR), located upstream and downstream of the GLB1 gene. The results showed that four embryos were heterozygous carriers of pathogenic variants in the GLB1 gene (#1, 2, 5, 8). Two embryos had a compound heterozygous genotype (#3, 4), while the embryos #7 and 9 did not carry disease-causing alleles of the GLB1 gene. The embryo #7 without pathogenic variants was transferred after consideration of its morphology and growth rate. Prenatal diagnosis in the first trimester showed the absence of the variants analyzed in the GLB1 gene in the fetus. The pregnancy resulted in the delivery of a female infant who did not inherit the disease-causing variants in the GLB1 gene.
RESUMO
We report on the phenotype and the reproductive history of an adult female patient with an unbalanced karyotype: 8p23 and 18p11.3 terminal deletions and 8p22 duplication. The indication for karyotyping of the 28-year-old patient was a structural rearrangement in her miscarriage specimen: 45,ХХ,der(8;18)t(8;18)(p23;p11.3). Unexpectedly, the patient had the same karyotype with only one normal chromosome 8, one normal chromosome 18, and a derivative chromosome, which was a product of chromosomes 8 and 18 fusion with loss of their short arm terminal regions. Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed that derivative chromosome was a pseudodicentric with an active centromere of chromosome 8. Array comparative genomic hybridization confirmed 8p and 18p terminal deletions and additionally revealed 8p22 duplication with a total of 43 OMIM annotated genes being affected by the rearrangement. The patient had minor facial and cranial dysmorphia and no pronounced physical or mental abnormalities. She was socially normal, had higher education and had been married since the age of 26 years. Considering genetic counseling, the patient had decided to conceive the next pregnancy through in vitro fertilization (IVF) with preimplantation genetic testing for structural chromosomal aberrations (PGT-SR). She underwent four IVF/PGT-SR cycles with a total of 25 oocytes obtained and a total of 10 embryos analyzed. Only one embryo was balanced regarding chromosomes 8 and 18, while the others were unbalanced and demonstrated different combinations of the normal chromosomes 8 and 18 and the derivative chromosome. The balanced embryo was transferred, but the pregnancy was not registered. After four unsuccessful IVF/PGT-SR cycles, the patient conceived naturally. Non-invasive prenatal testing showed additional chromosome 18. The prenatal cytogenetic analysis of chorionic villi revealed an abnormal karyotype: 46,ХХ,der(8;18)t(8;18)(p23;p11.3)mat,+18. The pregnancy was terminated for medical reasons. The patient has a strong intention to conceive a karyotypically normal fetus. However, genetic counseling regarding this issue is highly challenging. Taking into account a very low chance of balanced gametes, emotional stress caused by numerous unsuccessful attempts to conceive a balanced embryo and increasing age of the patient, an IVF cycle with a donor oocyte should probably be considered.
