Potential dose reduction and image quality improvement in chest CT with a photon-counting CT compared to a new dual-source CT.

PURPOSE: To compare potential dose reduction and quality improvement in chest CT images with Photon-Counting CT (PCCT) versus a Dual-Source CT (DSCT). METHODS: Acquisitions on phantoms were performed on a DSCT and a PCCT at 5 dose levels (9.5/7.5/6.0/2.5/0.4 mGy). Noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were calculated to assess noise magnitude and noise texture (fav) and spatial resolution (f50), respectively. Computed detectability indexes (d') modelled the detection of 2 chest lesions: subsolid pulmonary nodules (SPN) and high-contrast pulmonary nodules (HCN). Two radiologists subjectively assessed the quality of chest images on an anthropomorphic phantom. RESULTS: For all dose levels, noise magnitude was significantly lower with PCCT than with DSCT (-44.7 ± 3.0 %; p < 0.05). Identical outcomes were found for noise texture (fav; -6.2 ± 0.5 %; p < 0.05). f50 values were significantly higher with DSCT than with PCCT from 9.5 to 6 mGy for iodine insert (p < 0.05) and from 7.5 to 2.5 mGy for air insert (p < 0.05), but similar for both inserts at other dose levels. For all dose levels, d' values were significantly higher with PCCT than DSCT (71.9 ± 5.4 % for HCN and 65.6 ± 13.5 % for SPN). From 9.5 to 2.5 mGy, the potential dose reduction was -59.0 ± 3.9 % for both lesions with PCCT compared to DSCT. Chest images were rated satisfactory for clinical use by the radiologists with both CTs for all dose levels, except at 0.4 mGy. CONCLUSION: Noise magnitude and detectability of chest lesions were better with PCCT than with the DSCT. PCCT may offer great potential for dose reduction in patients undergoing chest CT examinations.

Comparison of the spectral performance between two dual-source CT systems on low-energy virtual monoenergetic images: A phantom study.

PURPOSE: To compare the spectral performance of two different DSCT (DSCT-Pulse and DSCT-Force) on virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) at low energy levels. METHODS: An image quality phantom was scanned on the two DSCTs at three dose levels: 11/6/1.8 mGy. Level 3 of an advanced modeled iterative reconstruction algorithm was used. Noise power spectrum and task-based transfer function were computed on VMIs from 40 to 70 keV to assess noise magnitude and noise texture (fav) and spatial resolution (f50). A detectability index (d') was computed to assess the detection of one contrast-enhanced abdominal lesion as a function of the keV level used. RESULTS: For all dose levels and all energy levels, noise magnitude was significantly higher (p < 0.05) with DSCT-Pulse than with DSCT-Force (12.6 ± 2.7 % at 1.8 mGy, 9.1 ± 2.9 % at 6 mGy and 4.0 ± 2.7 % at 11 mGy). For all energy levels, fav values were significantly higher (p < 0.05) with DSCT-Pulse than with DSCT-Force at 1.8 mGy (4.8 ± 3.9 %) and at 6 mGy (5.5 ± 2.5 %) but similar at 11 mGy (0.2 ± 3.6 %; p = 0.518). For all energy levels, f50 values were significantly higher with DSCT-Pulse than with DSCT-Force (12.7 ± 5.6 % at 1.8 mGy, 17.9 ± 4.5 % at 6 mGy and 13.1 ± 2.6 % at 11 mGy). For all keV, similar d' values were found with both DSCT-Force and DSCT-Pulse at 11 mGy (-1.0 ± 3.1 %; p = 0.084). For other dose levels, d' values were significantly lower with DSCT-Pulse than with DSCT-Force (9.1 ± 3.2 % at 1.8 mGy and -6.3 ± 3.9 % at 6 mGy). CONCLUSION: Compared with the DSCT-Force, the DSCT-Pulse improved noise texture and spatial resolution, but noise magnitude was slightly higher and detectability slightly lower, particularly when the dose level was reduced.

Abdominal image quality and dose reduction with energy-integrating or photon-counting detectors dual-source CT: A phantom study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess image-quality and dose reduction potential using a photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) system by comparison with two different dual-source CT (DSCT) systems using two phantoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Acquisitions on phantoms were performed using two DSCT systems (DSCT1 [Somatom Force] and DSCT2 [Somatom Pro.Pulse]) and one PCCT system (Naeotom Alpha) at four dose levels (13/6/3.4/1.8 mGy). Noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were computed to assess noise magnitude and noise texture and spatial resolution (f50), respectively. Detectability indexes (d') were computed to model the detection of abdominal lesions: one unenhanced high-contrast task, one contrast-enhanced high-contrast task and one unenhanced low-contrast task. Image quality was subjectively assessed on an anthropomorphic phantom by two radiologists. RESULTS: For all dose levels, noise magnitude values were lower with PCCT than with DSCTs. For all CT systems, similar noise texture values were found at 13 and 6 mGy, but the greatest noise texture values were found for DSCT2 and the lowest for PCCT at 3.4 and 1.8 mGy. For high-contrast inserts, similar or lower f50 values were found with PCCT than with DSCT1 and the opposite pattern was found for the low-contrast insert. For the three simulated lesions, d' values were greater with PCCT than with DSCTs. Abdominal images were rated satisfactory for clinical use by the radiologists for all dose levels with PCCT and for 13 and 6 mGy with DSCTs. CONCLUSION: By comparison with DSCTs, PCCT reduces image-noise and improves detectability of simulated abdominal lesions without altering the spatial resolution and image texture. Image-quality obtained with PCCT seem to indicate greater potential for dose optimization than those obtained with DSCTs.

Comparison of low-energy virtual monoenergetic images between photon-counting CT and energy-integrating detectors CT: A phantom study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess image quality and dose level using a photon-counting CT (PCCT) scanner by comparison with a dual-source CT (DSCT) scanner on virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) at low energy levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom was scanned using a DSCT and a PCCT with a volume CT dose index of 11 mGy, and additionally at 6 mGy and 1.8 mGy for PCCT. Noise power spectrum and task-based transfer function were evaluated from 40 to 70 keV on VMIs to assess noise magnitude and noise texture (fav) and spatial resolution on two iodine inserts (f50), respectively. A detectability index (d') was computed to assess the detection of two contrast-enhanced lesions according to the energy level used. RESULTS: For all energy levels, noise magnitude values were lower with PCCT than with DSCT at 11 and 6 mGy, but greater at 1.8 mGy. fav values were higher with PCCT than with DSCT at 11 mGy (8.6 ± 1.5 [standard deviation [SD]%), similar at 6 mGy (1.6 ± 1.5 [SD]%) and lower at 1.8 mGy (-17.8 ± 2.2 [SD]%). For both inserts, f50 values were higher with PCCT than DSCT at 11- and 6 mGy for all keV levels, except at 6 mGy and 40 keV. d' values were higher with PCCT than with DSCT at 11- and 6 mGy for all keV and both simulated lesions. Similar d' values to those of the DSCT at 11 mGy, were obtained at 2.25 mGy for iodine insert at 2 mg/mL and at 0.96 mGy for iodine insert at 4 mg/mL at 40 keV. CONCLUSION: Compared to DSCT, PCCT reduces noise magnitude and improves noise texture, spatial resolution and detectability on VMIs for all low-keV levels.

Reducing windmill artifacts in clinical spiral CT using a deep learning-based projection raw data upsampling: Method and robustness evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) requires an interpolation between adjacent detector rows during backprojection. Not satisfying the Nyquist sampling condition along the z-axis results in aliasing effects, also known as windmill artifacts. These image distortions are characterized by bright streaks diverging from high contrast structures. PURPOSE: The z-flying focal spot (zFFS) is a well-established hardware-based solution that aims to double the sampling rate in longitudinal direction and therefore reduce aliasing artifacts. However, given the technical complexity of the zFFS, this work proposes a deep learning-based approach as an alternative solution. METHODS: We propose a supervised learning approach to perform a mapping between input projections and the corresponding rows required for double sampling in the z-direction. We present a comprehensive evaluation using both a clinical dataset obtained using raw data from 40 real patient scans acquired with zFFS and a synthetic dataset consisting of 100 simulated spiral scans using a phantom specifically designed for our problem. For the clinical dataset, we utilized 32 scans as training set and 8 scans as validation set, whereas for the synthetic dataset, we used 80 scans for training and 20 scans for validation purposes. Both qualitative and quantitative assessments are conducted on a test set consisting of nine real patient scans and six phantom measurements to validate the performance of our approach. A simulation study was performed to investigate the robustness against different scan configurations in terms of detector collimation and pitch value. RESULTS: In the quantitative comparison based on clinical patient scans from the test set, all network configurations show an improvement in the root mean square error (RMSE) of approximately 20% compared to neglecting the doubled longitudinal sampling by the zFFS. The results of the qualitative analysis indicate that both clinical and synthetic training data can reduce windmill artifacts through the application of a correspondingly trained network. Together with the qualitative results from the test set phantom measurements it is emphasized that a training of our method with synthetic data resulted in superior performance in windmill artifact reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning-based raw data interpolation has the potential to enhance the sampling in z-direction and thus minimize aliasing effects, as it is the case with the zFFS. Especially a training with synthetic data showed promising results. While it may not outperform zFFS, our method represents a beneficial solution for CT scanners lacking the necessary hardware components for zFFS.

Raw data consistent deep learning-based field of view extension for dual-source dual-energy CT.

BACKGROUND: Due to technical constraints, dual-source dual-energy CT scans may lack spectral information in the periphery of the patient. PURPOSE: Here, we propose a deep learning-based iterative reconstruction to recover the missing spectral information outside the field of measurement (FOM) of the second source-detector pair. METHODS: In today's Siemens dual-source CT systems, one source-detector pair (referred to as A) typically has a FOM of about 50 cm, while the FOM of the other pair (referred to as B) is limited by technical constraints to a diameter of about 35 cm. As a result, dual-energy applications are currently only available within the small FOM, limiting their use for larger patients. To derive a reconstruction at B's energy for the entire patient cross-section, we propose a deep learning-based iterative reconstruction. Starting with A's reconstruction as initial estimate, it employs a neural network in each iteration to refine the current estimate according to a raw data fidelity measure. Here, the corresponding mapping is trained using simulated chest, abdomen, and pelvis scans based on a data set containing 70 full body CT scans. Finally, the proposed approach is tested on simulated and measured dual-source dual-energy scans and compared against existing reference approaches. RESULTS: For all test cases, the proposed approach was able to provide artifact-free CT reconstructions of B for the entire patient cross-section. Considering simulated data, the remaining error of the reconstructions is between 10 and 17 HU on average, which is about half as low as the reference approaches. A similar performance with an average error of 8 HU could be achieved for real phantom measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed approach is able to recover missing dual-energy information for patients exceeding the small 35 cm FOM of dual-source CT systems. Therefore, it potentially allows to extend dual-energy applications to the entire-patient cross section.

Deep learning-based forward and cross-scatter correction in dual-source CT.

PURPOSE: Dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) uses two source-detector pairs offset by about 90°. In addition to the well-known forward scatter, a special issue in DSCT is cross-scattered radiation from X-ray tube A detected in the detector of system B and vice versa. This effect can lead to artifacts and reduction of the contrast-to-noise ratio of the images. The purpose of this work is to present and evaluate different deep learning-based methods for scatter correction in DSCT. METHODS: We present different neural network-based methods for forward and cross-scatter correction in DSCT. These deep scatter estimation (DSE) methods mainly differ in the input and output information that is provided for training and inference and in whether they operate on two-dimensional (2D) or on three-dimensional (3D) data. The networks are trained and validated with scatter distributions obtained by our in-house Monte Carlo simulation. The simulated geometry is adapted to a realistic clinical setup. RESULTS: All DSE approaches reduce scatter-induced artifacts and lead to superior results than the measurement-based scatter correction. Forward scatter, under the presence of cross-scatter, is best estimated either by our network that uses the current projection and a couple of neighboring views (fDSE 2D few views) or by our 3D network that processes all projections simultaneously (fDSE 3D). Cross-scatter, under the presence of forward scatter, is best estimated using xSSE XDSE 2D, with xSSE referring to a quick single scatter estimate of cross scatter, or by xDSE 3D that uses all projections simultaneously. By using our proposed networks, the total scatter error in dual could be reduced from about 18 HU to approximately 3 HU. CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning-based scatter correction can reduce scatter artifacts in DSCT. To achieve more accurate cross-scatter estimations, the use of a cross-scatter approximation improves the results. Also, the ability to leverage across different projection angles improves the precision of the algorithm.

Deep learning-based coronary artery motion estimation and compensation for short-scan cardiac CT.

PURPOSE: During a typical cardiac short scan, the heart can move several millimeters. As a result, the corresponding CT reconstructions may be corrupted by motion artifacts. Especially the assessment of small structures, such as the coronary arteries, is potentially impaired by the presence of these artifacts. In order to estimate and compensate for coronary artery motion, this manuscript proposes the deep partial angle-based motion compensation (Deep PAMoCo). METHODS: The basic principle of the Deep PAMoCo relies on the concept of partial angle reconstructions (PARs), that is, it divides the short scan data into several consecutive angular segments and reconstructs them separately. Subsequently, the PARs are deformed according to a motion vector field (MVF) such that they represent the same motion state and summed up to obtain the final motion-compensated reconstruction. However, in contrast to prior work that is based on the same principle, the Deep PAMoCo estimates and applies the MVF via a deep neural network to increase the computational performance as well as the quality of the motion compensated reconstructions. RESULTS: Using simulated data, it could be demonstrated that the Deep PAMoCo is able to remove almost all motion artifacts independent of the contrast, the radius and the motion amplitude of the coronary artery. In any case, the average error of the CT values along the coronary artery is about 25 HU while errors of up to 300 HU can be observed if no correction is applied. Similar results were obtained for clinical cardiac CT scans where the Deep PAMoCo clearly outperforms state-of-the-art coronary artery motion compensation approaches in terms of processing time as well as accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The Deep PAMoCo provides an efficient approach to increase the diagnostic value of cardiac CT scans even if they are highly corrupted by motion.