Pre-Operative Traction in Femoral Fractures for Pain Management: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

Objectives: This meta-analysis studies and assesses the pain relief effect of different pre-operative traction systems in proximal and femoral shaft fractures as this subject is still debated and no clear guidelines are established. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Google Scholar (page 1-20) were searched until January 2024. The clinical outcomes collected consisted of pain scales following traction. Results: Two randomized clinical trials were included to compare skeletal (72 patients) to skin traction (80 patients) and eight randomized clinical trials with one prospective study were included to compare traction (457 patients) versus no traction (439 patients). Our results revealed no differences in terms of post-operative pain VAS between both the skeletal and skin traction as well as between traction and no traction. Conclusion: No added benefit of traction was observed when pain relief is the main consideration. Furthermore, with their different potential complications, systematic pre-operative traction should not be implemented in all femoral fractures.

Hip Labral Repair versus Reconstruction: Meta-analysis.

The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the postoperative outcomes and complications of labral repair with those of labral reconstruction. An electronic search strategy was conducted from 1986 until August 2023 using the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20). The primary objectives included the postoperative clinical outcomes determined by the number of patients who reached minimal clinical important difference (MCID) on the visual analog scale (VAS), modified Harris hip score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Life (HOS-ADL), and International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12). In addition, analysis of the rate of revision arthroscopy, the rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), the postoperative VAS, mHHS, HOS-SS, HOS-ADL, iHOT-12, nonarthritic hip score (NAHS), patient satisfaction, lower extremity function scale (LEFS), and the SF-12 (12-item shortform) was also performed. Any differences arising between the investigators were resolved by discussion. Seventeen studies were relevant to the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. A higher rate of patients who reached MCID in the mHHS (P=0.02) as well as a higher rate of revision arthroscopy was observed for labral repair (P=0.03). The remaining studied outcomes were comparable. Despite the greater predictability of success in the reconstruction group, conduct of additional studies will be required for evaluation of the benefits of such findings. In addition, labral reconstruction is more technically demanding than a labral repair.

Hip Strengthening After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.

Objectives: As the population is growing older, incidence of knee osteoarthritis is largely increasing and the rate total knee arthroplasty surgery is following that same trend. However, patients post-operatively are retaining weakness in the quadriceps and hip abductors for a period reaching up to 3 years following surgery. The current literature results on the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs that also includes hip strengthening exercises are still highly contradicting. This meta-analysis studies and assesses the efficacy of hip strengthening exercises following total knee arthroplasty surgery. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Google Scholar (page 1-20) were searched till January 2024. The clinical outcomes consisted of the post-operative tests (6MWT, TUG, SLS), pain, and range of motion (flexion and extension). Results: Three randomized clinical studies were included in the meta-analysis. When compared to the standard rehabilitation, hip strengthening exercises proved a better improvement of single leg stance with no difference observed in the remaining outcomes. Conclusion: Hip strengthening exercise protocols ensured a better improvement of single leg stance scores. However, no difference was observed in the remaining analyzed outcomes. This contradictions between studies can be explained by the different physical therapy protocols used. Nevertheless, more randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm such results.

Acromioclavicular joint dislocation and concomitant labral lesions: a systematic review.

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations frequently co-occur with intra-articular glenohumeral pathologies. Few comprehensive studies have focused on labral tears specifically associated with AC joint trauma. This systematic review will address this gap. A comprehensive electronic search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) spanning from 1976 to May 19, 2023. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review, consisting of three retrospective studies and four case series. These studies collectively involved 1,044 patients, of whom 282 had concomitant labral lesions. The pooled prevalence of intra-articular labral injuries associated with acute AC joint dislocation was 27%. The prevalence of these labral lesions varied significantly between studies, ranging from 13.9% to 84.0% of patients, depending on the study and the grade of AC joint dislocation. Various types of labral tears were reported, with superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions being the most common. The prevalence of SLAP lesions ranged from 7.2% to 77.4%, with higher grades of AC joint dislocations often associated with a higher prevalence of SLAP tears. Moreover, grade V dislocations exhibited a complete correlation with SLAP tears. The studies yielded contradictory findings regarding older age and higher grades of AC joint dislocation as risk factors for concurrent labral lesions. This review underscores the frequent association between labral lesions and AC joint dislocations, particularly in cases of lower-grade injuries. Notably, SLAP lesions emerged as the predominant type of labral tear.

Bridge enhanced ACL repair vs. ACL reconstruction for ACL tears: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is one of the most frequent ligamentous injuries. The gold standard for ACL tears is autograft reconstruction. However, ACL repair has regained enthusiasm with more recent results showing comparable outcomes to its reconstructive counterpart. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pp. 1-20) were searched until November 2022. The clinical outcomes consisted of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the side-to-side difference in Anteroposterior (AP) knee laxity, the forces of the hamstring, quadriceps, and hip abduction as well as hopping tests. RESULTS: Only two studies were included in this meta-analysis. ACL repair was shown to have better Hamstrings strength. The rest of the analyzed outcomes were comparable. DISCUSSION: This is the first meta-analysis comparing these two treatments. The ACL repair showed no differences in muscle strength (quadriceps and hip abductors), postoperative knee scores, and knee joint laxity when compared to ACL reconstruction. However, it showed better hamstring strength. Further randomized clinical studies will be needed to compare both of these techniques.

Beirut massive blast explosion: A unique injury pattern of the wounded population.

INTRODUCTION: On August 4, 2020, a massive explosion of a warehouse holding 2,700 metric tons of ammonium nitrate took place in the port of Beirut, Lebanon. This incident, which is considered as one of the largest industrial disasters lead to the death of at least 220 people and more than 6000 injuries. Hospitals near the blast were damaged significantly which made it difficult to treat injured patients. The objective of this study is to report the epidemiology and characteristics of the injuries and their initial management that could be useful for healthcare workers and policymakers in case of a similar massive accident in the future. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted. All charts of patients admitted to the emergency room and outpatient clinics on the day of the blast and during the following 2 weeks were thoroughly reviewed. Due to initial chaos during triage, direct phone contact with patients was utilized in certain situations to confirm their identity or for further information. All acute injuries were recorded based on the region, severity, degree of emergency, initial and later management, type of injured organs, and surgical procedures. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients presented to our facility. 153 patients presented to the ER on the same day of the blast. The mean age was 47.07 years and around 60% of the patients were males (n = 93). Most of the patients presented either from zone 1 (n = 67, 42%) or zone 3 (n = 68, 43%). The majority of injuries were secondary injuries due to glass (n = 131, 82.3%), with the head (34%) and upper extremities (31.2%) being most commonly affected. A total of 94 patients (62.6%) underwent a type of imaging and 64 patients (40.2%) had at least one surgery performed during their hospitalization in which 71% of the surgeries being related to the limbs. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a unique injury pattern due to this type of blast. Injuries were mostly due to glass shrapnel. Contrary to bomb blasts, most injuries were located in the head and upper extremities rather than on the lower extremities.

Telemedicine and diabetic foot ulcer outcomes. A meta-analysis of controlled trials.

Telemedicine (TM) has been advanced as an effective approach to wound care management. In this era of COVID-19 pandemic, it is paramount to assess the evidence behind the use of TM in treating diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). This meta-analysis aims at evaluating the efficacy of TM versus face-to-face attendance in managing DFU. In total, four controlled studies were included in the meta-analysis comprising 3 randomized trials. The total pooled sample comprised 816 patients (816 ulcers): 337 in TM group and 479 in the control group. The results were as follows: (a) healing rate OR was 1.35, in favor of TM (p = 0.4), (b) time to heal with means of 73 ± 24.1 days and 83.5 ± 28.4 days, for the TM and control group, respectively (p = 0.35), c) the amputation rate OR was 0.48 (p = 0.007) in favor of the TM group, d) the mortality rate OR was 1.66 (p = 0.2), and e) a trend for lesser cost than face-to-face group (p = 0.4). While future research using large-sampled controlled studies is warranted, the present meta-analysis demonstrated that treating DFU via TM could be at least as effective as to face-to-face attendance. In times where clinic visits are reduced or not possible such as during this COVID-19 pandemic and the likely-to-happen future outbreaks, TM could be a valuable alternative.