Retained wood penetrating the inferior orbital fissure removed after several months from injury: A case report and a comprehensive literature review.

Background: Intraorbital wooden foreign bodies (IOWFBs) constitute a relatively rare ocular trauma. Clinically, it can be difficult to diagnose them due to their wide variety of clinical manifestations. In addition, radiologic diagnosis of IOWFBs is always uncertain and challenging since their low density and low intensity on initial images are identical to air and fat. Therefore, IOWFBs are commonly missed and may not be confirmed for days or months after the initial injury. This article endeavors to contribute to the existing literature on IOWFBs by adding a case of an unusual occurrence of retained wood penetrating the inferior orbital fissure (IOF). To date, there have been no documented instances of a similar occurrence in this particular anatomical location. Case Description: A 58-year-old female with a history of trauma sustained by a slipping accident 10 months before her referral to our hospital. She underwent multiple surgeries and was referred to us due to persistent right eye pain, periorbital swelling, recurrent eye discharge, and inferior orbital paresthesia. The imaging revealed a retained foreign body located in the right orbital floor inferior to the inferior rectus muscle extending to the sub-temporal fossa through the IOF. The residue was successfully removed without complications. Conclusion: A history of trauma followed by persistent symptoms should raise the suspicion of a retained foreign body, regardless of the severity of trauma or the time between trauma and clinical presentation. Appropriate and timely imaging, followed by surgical removal, remains the cornerstone of treatment with a favorable prognosis.

Role of C5 inhibitors in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders with seropositive anti-aquaporin-4 antibody: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by relapses of inflammation and demyelination primarily affecting the optic nerve and the spinal cord. C5 complement inhibition is an effective therapeutic approach in the treatment of NMOSD. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to determine the role of C5 inhibitors in the treatment of patients with seropositive anti-aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4+IgG) NMOSD. METHODS: This systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Relevant articles were systematically searched through Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science databases until October 6th, 2023. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that investigated the treatment with C5 inhibitors compared to placebo in patients with seropositive NMOSD. The primary endpoint was the rates of first adjudicated relapse. Secondary endpoints included different disability and quality of life measures. The random-effects model was used for all statistical analyses. RESULTS: Two RCTs with a total of 201 patients were included. C5 inhibitors demonstrated significant reduction of first adjudicated relapse (risk ratio (RR) = 0.05, 95 % CI 0.01-0.15) and Hauser Ambulation Index (HAI) (mean difference (MD): -0.79, 95 % CI -1.27 to -0.31). There was no significant difference between the two groups in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (MD -0.23, 95 % CI -0.54-0.08). C5 inhibitors significantly improved the mean change in EQ-5D index (MD 0.08, 95 % CI 0.01-0.14; P = 0.02); however, no significant difference was shown in the mean change in EQ-5D VAS (MD 3.79, 95 % CI -1.61 to 9.19; P = 0.17). Safety measures were comparable between C5 inhibitors and placebo. CONCLUSION: NMOSD Patients with AQP4+IgG receiving C5 inhibitors have lower rate of relapses and improved levels of disability and quality of life. Real-world studies are warranted to establish the long-term safety of C5 inhibitors.

The perception of pediatric sickle cell anemia patient's caregivers toward hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (single-center experience, Saudi Arabia).

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a relatively common genetic disorder in Saudi Arabia characterized by the predominance of sickle hemoglobin (HbS). Although multiple supportive care options exist for patients with SCD, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only cure available and has become highly successful, with an almost 91% overall survival rate. However, pursuing this procedure is still restrained as a curative treatment option. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the perception of parents' caregivers at the National Guard Hospital pediatric hematology clinic regarding using HSCT as a curative approach for their children with SCD. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of the interviewer-administered survey distributed utilizing electronic devices to caregivers of pediatric patients with SCD. Subjects were recruited from Pediatric Hematology & Oncology clinics at National Guard Hospital Affairs in King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. An estimated sample size of 100 was initially calculated out of 140 pediatric SCD patients; 72 responses were collected from participants. All study participants gave informed consent. All results were analyzed using SPSS; moreover, statistics were set at a CI of 95% and a p < 0.05. In addition, inferential and descriptive statistics were done. Results: Of all respondents, 42 (67.8%) would accept HSCT if their hematologist recommended it. However, approximately 7 (11.3%) were not interested in the procedure, and the rest, 13 (21%), were uncertain. The most reported reasons for HSCT rejection among all respondents were attributed to side effects 31 (50.8%), lack of knowledge 8 (13.1%), and misconception toward the procedure 22 (36.1%). Conclusion: The results of this study were consistent with the fact that most caregivers would follow along with HSCT if it seemed to be fit and was recommended by their hematologists. However, to the best of our knowledge, our study being the first of its kind in the region, further research in the kingdom on the perception of HSCT is needed. Nonetheless, further patient education, an increase in caregivers' knowledge, and enlightenment of the medical team on HSCT as a curative option for sickle cell disease are vital.

Experience and perception of utilizing virtual clinic in neurological assessment in Saudi Arabia.

Introduction: The World Health Organization defined electronic health as "the unified usage of information technology and electronic communications in the health sector." In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, outpatient encounters were largely shifted to virtual clinics due to the crisis caused by COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate the neurology consultants', specialists', and residents' experience and perception of utilizing virtual services for neurological assessment in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted by sending an anonymous online survey to neurologists and neurology residents in Saudi Arabia. The survey was developed by the authors and contained three main sections: demographics, subspecialty and years of experience after residency, and virtual clinics during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Result: A total of 108 neurology-practicing physicians in Saudi Arabia responded to the survey. Overall, 75% experienced virtual clinics, and 61% of them used phones for consultation. In neurology clinical practice, there was a significant difference (P < 0.001) regarding the teleconsultations for follow-up patients compared to the newly referred patients, being more suitable for the follow-up cases. Additionally, most neurology practicing physicians showed more confidence in performing history-taking tasks virtually (82.4%) than in physical examination. However, it was found that consultants were significantly (P < 0.03) more confident to virtually perform the cranial nerve, motor, coordination, and extrapyramidal assessments than the neurology residents. Physicians deemed it more suitable to conduct teleconsultations for patients with headaches and epilepsy than for those with neuromuscular and demyelinating diseases/multiple sclerosis. Furthermore, they agreed that patients' experiences (55.6%) and physicians' acceptance (55.6%) were the two main limitations to implementing virtual clinics. Discussion: This study revealed that neurologists were more confident in performing history-taking in virtual clinics than in physical exams. On the contrary, consultants were more confident in handling the physical examination virtually than the neurology residents. Moreover, the most accepted clinics to be handled electronically were the headache and epilepsy clinics in comparison to the other subspecialties, being mainly diagnosed using history. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to observe the level of confidence in performing different duties in neurology virtual clinics.

Influenza vaccine effect on risk of stroke occurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Stroke is a significant global cause of mortality and long-term disability, potentially influenced by infections that heighten systemic inflammation and thrombotic events. The full impact of influenza vaccination on stroke remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between influenza immunization and stroke incidence. Methods: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control, and cohort studies published in PubMed/Medline, Cochrane-Central-Register-of-Controlled-Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase until 5 December 2022, and identified articles investigating the effect of influenza vaccine on stroke occurrence. All articles were screened by two independent reviewers. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the risk of stroke occurrence in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated individuals. The random-effects model was used in all statistical analyses. Results: Among the 26 articles meeting our criteria, 10 were retrospective cohort studies, 9 were case-control studies, 3 were prospective cohort studies, 3 were RCTs and 1 case-series. Overall, the studies showed a significant decrease in the risk of stroke incidence/hospitalization among vaccinated patients (OR = 0.81, 95% CI [0.77-0.86], p = 0.00001). Furthermore, studies showed flu vaccine decreases the occurrence of mortality among stroke patients (OR = 0.50, 95% CI [0.37-0.68], p = 0.00001). Sub-group analysis revealed significant protective effect for patients with specific comorbidities including atrial fibrillation (OR = 0.68, 95% CI [0.57-0.81], p = 0.0001), diabetes (OR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.66-0.87], p = 0.0001), Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 0.70, 95% CI [0.61-0.81], p = 0.00001), and hypertension (OR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.70-83], p = 0.00001). Conclusion: The current meta-analysis further supports prior findings that influenza vaccination reduces stroke risk, particularly in patients with comorbidities. Guidelines should promote vaccination for at-risk individuals.