RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown contradictory results between early application of antiplatelet therapy and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for mild acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 0-5. OBJECTIVE: To compare the benefits and risks of antiplatelet therapy and IVT in patients with mild AIS. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library was conducted from database inception until July 2023, without language restriction. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) or observational studies were selected. The primary outcomes were 90-day functional outcomes, measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. The protocol has been registered before data collection. RESULTS: Two RCTs and four observational studies with relatively low risk of bias that enrolled 3975 patients were analysed (2454 in antiplatelet therapy and 1521 in IVT therapy). There were no significant differences between antiplatelet therapy and IVT in 90-day functional outcomes (mRS 0-1, OR 1.08 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.58); mRS 0-2, OR, 1.04 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.73)), death (OR, 0.64 (95% CI 0.19 to 2.13)) and stroke recurrence (OR, 0.71 (95% CI 0.28 to 1.79)). Antiplatelet therapy was associated with a reduced risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) compared with IVT (OR, 0.20 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.69)). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with mild AIS, compared with IVT, early application of antiplatelet therapy was not significantly associated with improved functional outcomes, reduced death or stroke recurrence, but was significantly associated with a reduced risk of sICH. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023447862.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is widely used by patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, their reasons and experience in using TCM have received insufficient attention. Therefore, we conducted a mixed method study to gain insights into this issue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on the basis of the China Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Registry of Patients with Traditional Chinese Medicine (CARE-TCM). Data were collected from Dongzhimen Hospital through a mixed method approach, including a questionnaire and a semi-structured interview. Patients with ALS who were using TCM when they were initially registered with CARE-TCM and who had been followed-up for over six months were recruited. The questionnaires' outcomes were statistically outlined, and the interview transcripts were thematically analysed to identify themes and sub-themes. RESULTS: Fifty-two and sixteen patients were included in the questionnaire and semi-structured interview groups, respectively. Patients used TCM with the hope of regulating their body holistically to improve nonmotor symptoms and quality of life (QOL). Those who recognised TCM as ineffective tended to discontinue it after a three-month trial period. Although quality was a major concern, herbal medicine (HM) was the most frequently used modality among all participants (n = 52), with the majority (n = 44, 84.6%) continuing to use it. Patients emphasised in-person consultations as a crucial part of TCM treatment. However, the disability caused by disease often made this interaction unattainable. CONCLUSION: Nonmotor symptoms and QOL hold substantial importance for patients with ALS using TCM. HM is a more suitable modality than other TCM treatment modalities, but patients are facing challenges in seeking HM treatment. It is necessary to promote the implementation of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment, thus making TCM more accessible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04885374 (registered on May 13, 2021).
Assuntos
Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa , Humanos , Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica/tratamento farmacológico , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa/métodos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Idoso , China , Adulto , Qualidade de Vida , Pesquisa QualitativaRESUMO
Background: The Delphi method has been extensively used to reach a consensus in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome diagnosis research when subjective judgment is not uniform and objective evidence is lacking. The conduct and reporting of the Delphi method in TCM syndrome diagnosis research have never been critiqued. Our study aims to explore the consistency of using this technique and assess the reporting quality. Methods: A cross-sectional study was employed to scope articles reporting the conduct of the Delphi method in TCM syndrome diagnosis research. We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang and SinoMed databases with the restriction of Chinese and English language from their inception to March 25, 2023. A standardized extraction form was designed to collect demographics and methodological processes reflecting the rigor and transparency in TCM syndrome diagnosis research. Results: A total of 1832 studies were screened, and 50 were included. The median number of panels was 30 (IQR 20-34.5) and only 12 (24.0 %) studies were with a heterogeneous sample of panels. Two rounds was most common (37/50; 74.0 %), followed by three (7/50; 14.0 %), and only 13 (26.0 %) studies determined the number of rounds a priori. The reporting quality varied, with 18.0 % (9/50) reporting anonymity, 30.0 % (15/50) describing the controlled feedback, 20.0 % (10/50) reporting the procedure duration (7.14 ± 3.29 months) and 26.0 % (13/50) predefining the consensus. Conclusion: The Delphi method is inconsistently conducted and nontransparently reported in TCM syndrome diagnosis research. Standardized criteria are urgently needed for best practices in future research.
RESUMO
Mitophagy, the selective removal of damaged mitochondria, plays a critical role in kidney diseases, but its involvement in hypertensive nephropathy (HTN) is not well understood. To address this gap, we investigated mitophagy-related genes in HTN, identifying potential biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment. Transcriptome datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus database were analyzed, resulting in the identification of seven mitophagy related differentially expressed genes (MR-DEGs), namely PINK1, ULK1, SQSTM1, ATG5, ATG12, MFN2, and UBA52. Further, we explored the correlation between MR-DEGs, immune cells, and inflammatory factors. The identified genes demonstrated a strong correlation with Mast cells, T-cells, TGFß3, IL13, and CSF3. Machine learning techniques were employed to screen important genes, construct diagnostic models, and evaluate their accuracy. Consensus clustering divided the HTN patients into two mitophagy subgroups, with Subgroup 2 showing higher levels of immune cell infiltration and inflammatory factors. The functions of their proteins primarily involve complement, coagulation, lipids, and vascular smooth muscle contraction. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed that mitophagy was most significant in proximal tubule cells (PTC) in HTN patients. Pseudotime analysis of PTC confirmed the expression changes observed in the transcriptome. Intercellular communication analysis suggested that mitophagy might regulate PTC's participation in intercellular crosstalk. Notably, specific transcription factors such as HNF4A, PPARA, and STAT3 showed strong correlations with mitophagy-related genes in PTC, indicating their potential role in modulating PTC function and influencing the onset and progression of HTN. This study offers a comprehensive analysis of mitophagy in HTN, enhancing our understanding of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of HTN.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.
RESUMO
Background: Stroke is the major cause of mortality and permanent disability and is associated with an astonishing economic burden worldwide. In the past few decades, accumulated evidence has indicated that Xuesaitong (XST) has therapeutic benefits in cases of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Our study aimed to provide the best current body of evidence of the efficacy and safety of XST for patients with AIS. Methods: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched eight electronic databases from inception to 17 July 2023 for relevant RCTs. The investigators independently screened trials, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. A meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 and STATA 16.0 software. Results: In total, 46 RCTs involving 7,957 patients were included. The results showed that XST improved the long-term functional outcomes with lower modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores (MD = -0.67; 95% CI [-0.92 to -0.42]; p < 0.00001) and a higher proportion of functional independence (mRS ≤2) (RR = 1.08; 95% CI [1.05 to 1.12]; p < 0.00001). Low-quality evidence indicated that XST improved the activities of daily living (MD = 10.17; 95% CI [7.28 to 13.06]; p < 0.00001), improved the neurological impairment (MD = -3.39; 95% CI [-3.94 to -2.84]; p < 0.00001), and enhanced the total efficiency rate (RR = 1.19; 95% CI [1.15 to 1.23]; p < 0.00001). No significant difference was found in the all-cause mortality or incidence of adverse events between the XST and control groups. The certainty of evidence was estimated as moderate to very low. Conclusion: Presently, the administration of XST within 14 days of AIS is associated with favorable long-term functional outcomes. In addition, XST can improve activities of daily living, alleviate neurological deficits, and has shown good tolerability. However, the current evidence is too weak, and the confidence of evidence synthesis was restricted by the high risk of bias. Given the insufficient evidence, appropriately sized and powered RCTs investigating the efficacy and safety of XST for patients with AIS are warranted. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=446208, CRD42023446208.
RESUMO
Background: Moyamoya disease (MMD) is a leading cause of stroke in children and young adults, whereas no specific drugs are available. Antiplatelet therapy (APT) has been considered a promising treatment option, but its effectiveness remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to comprehensively evaluate the benefits and risks of APT for MMD. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library electronic databases from their inception to 30 June 2022 and conducted a systematic review. All-cause mortality was taken as the primary outcome. Results: Nine studies that enrolled 16,186 patients with MMD were included. The results from a single study showed that APT was associated with lower mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.50-0.71); p < 0.01] and improved bypass patency after surgical revascularization [HR = 1.57; 95% CI (1.106-2.235); p < 0.05]. The results of the meta-analysis showed that APT reduced the risk of hemorrhagic stroke [HR = 0.47; 95% CI (0.24-0.94); p < 0.05] but neither reduced the risk of ischemic stroke [HR = 0.80; 95% CI (0.33-1.94); p = 0.63] nor increased the proportion of independent patients [RR = 1.02; 95% CI (0.97-1.06); p = 0.47]. Conclusion: Current evidence showed that APT was associated with a reduced risk of hemorrhagic stroke in MMD patients but did not reduce the risk of ischemic stroke or increase the proportion of independent patients. There was insufficient evidence about the benefit of APT on survival and postoperative bypass patency after surgical revascularization. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously because of the limited number of studies. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.
RESUMO
Growing evidence has indicated that the characteristics of gut microbiota are associated with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Phlegm-heat syndrome (PHS), a specific pathological state of the AIS, is one of the common traditional Chinese syndromes of stroke. The long duration of PHS in patients with AIS could lead to poor clinical outcomes. Gut microbiota characteristics in patients with both AIS and PHS, and their relationship remains unknown. This study was designed to investigate the alterations in gut microbiota in patients with AIS and PHS through a cross-sectional study. Fecal samples were collected from 10 patients with AIS and non-PHS (ntAIS), 7 patients with AIS and PHS (tAIS), and 10 healthy controls (HC). Samples were profiled via Illumina sequencing of the 16S rRNA V3-V4. Stroke severity was assessed at admission by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and modified Rankin scale (mRS); their correlation with gut microbiota was investigated. The alpha-diversity of the bacterial communities was significantly higher in the fecal samples of patients with tAIS than in patients with ntAIS (Shannon index, P = 0.037). In addition, the combined tAIS and ntAIS group (tntAIS) exhibited higher microbiotic diversity when compared with HC (chao1, P = 0.019). The structure of intestinal microbiota was effectively distinguished between the tAIS and ntAIS group (ANOSIM, r = 0.337, P = 0.007). Additionally, the gut microbiota structure was significantly different between the tntAIS and HC groups (ANOSIM, r = 0.217, P = 0.005). The genera, Ruminococcaceae_ UCG_002 and Christensenellaceae_R-7_group, were implicated in the discrimination of PHS from non-PHS. The order Lactobacillales and family Lachnospiraceae were significantly negatively correlated with NIHSS and mRS at admission (P < 0.05). By contrast, the order Desulfovibrionales, families Christensenellaceae and Desulfovibrionaceae, and genera Ruminococcaceae UCG-014 and Ruminococcaceae UCG-002 were significantly positively correlated with NIHSS and mRS at admission (P < 0.05). This study is the first to profile the characteristics of gut microbiota in patients with AIS and PHS, compared with those with non-PHS. The genera, Ruminococcaceae_ UCG_002 and Christensenellaceae_R-7_group, may be objective indicators of this traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome in AIS. Furthermore, it provides a microbe-inspired biological basis for TCM syndrome differentiation.
Assuntos
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , AVC Isquêmico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/genética , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Temperatura Alta , Estudos Transversais , Síndrome , Clostridiales/genéticaRESUMO
Background: Naoshuantong capsules (NC) are commonly used for the treatment of ischemic stroke. Experimental research and small-sample clinical trials have demonstrated that NC is effective in improving neurological recovery. Yet, there is a substantial lack of high-quality evidence on the precision treatment population of NC and long-term safety when making real-world clinical decisions. The acquisition of prospective longitudinal data in the real-world setting is essential to fully characterize the effectiveness and safety profile of NC for patients with ischemic stroke. Methods: The Vital real-world Experience regarding Naoshuantong capsules for Unselected ischemic Stroke (VENUS) registry is a prospective, multicenter, observational study aiming to register 5,000 patients. Eligible adult patients diagnosed with ischemic stroke and newly treated with NC within 30 days of symptom onset will be consecutively registered from 84 participating sites across the Chinese mainland. Baseline data will be recorded at the patient registry, and all patients will be regularly followed up at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the initial patient registry, and 180 days after ischemic stroke onset. The primary outcome is the distribution of scores on the modified Rankin Scale at 12 weeks after initial patient registry. Adverse events will be recorded during the study for NC safety assessment. Results: A total of 4,185 patients with ischemic stroke were enrolled, among which 37.06% patients were female. The average age of all patients was 65.22 years. The proportion of patients whose course of ischemic stroke was less than 14 days accounted for 93.45%. Conclusion: The VENUS registry is designed to comprehensively document medical data regarding NC treatment for ischemic stroke in real-world settings. The findings of this study will provide valuable insights into the clinical management of patients with ischemic stroke and the subsequent outcomes of the use of NC when included in the best clinical practice. Study registration: This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx, Unique identifier: ChiCTR1900025053).
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) have restricted pharmacotherapy options and thus resort to herbal medicines (HMs), despite limited and conflicting evidence. Therefore, use of HMs needs to be assessed in patients with ALS. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the benefits of HMs in ALS and to describe the characteristics of HM users. STUDY DESIGN: The correlation between HMs and prognosis was determined based on data obtained from the largest ALS database with high-quality clinical trials. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to address confounding and selection bias. METHODS: In total, 321 and 231 HM users with at least a 4-week HM prescription were identified and PS-matched with non-HM users at a 1:1 ratio based on predefined confounders. Time-to-event models with censoring at 12 or 18 months were established for survival analyses. For evaluating activity limitation and respiratory function, 320 and 376 HM users were included, respectively, and analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). RESULTS: The profiles of 321 HM users indicated a better condition compared with that of non-HM users before PS-matching, including higher weight (median [IQR], 77.90 [21.8] kg vs. 74.00 [21.2] kg, p < 0.01), higher body mass index (26.00 [5.4] vs. 25.20 [5.8], p < 0.01), more percentage of limb onset (261 [81.3%] vs. 2366 [67.2%], p < 0.01), and slower progression (0.47 [0.5] vs. 0.51 [0.5], p = 0.03). HM did not significantly affect survival at 12 months (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-1.03; log-rank p = 0.069), but it significantly prolonged survival at 18 months (adjusted HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56-0.98; log-rank p = 0.038). After imputation of missing data, MANOVA revealed significant effectiveness of HMs in improving activity limitation (Pillai trace, 0.0195; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: PS-based methods eliminated baseline differences between HM and non-HM users. Overall, the use of HM to treat patients with ALS is favored based on their association with prolonged overall survival within 18 months and improved activity limitation.
Assuntos
Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica , Plantas Medicinais , Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica/complicações , Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica/tratamento farmacológico , Progressão da Doença , Medicina Herbária , Humanos , Pontuação de Propensão , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
Background: The effect of herbal medicine (HM) on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is controversial. Clinical trials investigating HMs continue; however, the use of HM is still questioned. We aimed to systematically review the literature pertaining to the effects and safety of HM in ALS. Methods: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the efficacy of HMs in ALS patients compared to any types of controls were identified. Nine databases and six registers were searched from their inception dates to 25 March 2022. Per the PRISMA guidelines, trials were identified and extracted. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane's tool. Certainty of evidence was assessed as per the GRADE criteria. Forest plots were constructed to assess the effect size and corresponding 95% CIs using fixed-effect models, and random-effect models were employed when required. The primary outcome was the activity limitation measured by validated tools, such as the revised ALS Functional Rating Scale. Results: Twenty studies (N = 1,218) were eligible. Of these, only five studies were double-blinded, and two were placebo-controlled. Fourteen HMs (fifty-one single botanicals) were involved; Astragalus mongholicus Bunge, Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz., and Glycyrrhiza glabra L. were commonly used in nine, eight, and six trials, respectively. For delaying activity limitation, Jiweiling injection (MD, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.21 to 4.46; p = 0.0006) and Shenmai injection (SMD, 1.07; 0.69 to 1.45; p < 0.00001) were significantly more efficacious than Riluzole, but the evidence was low quality. For ameliorating motor neuron loss, Jiweiling injection [right abductor pollicis brevis (APB): MD, 32.42; 7.91 to 56.93; p = 0.01 and left APB: MD, 34.44; 12.85 to 56.03; p = 0.002] was favoured, but the evidence was very low quality. Nine studies reported one hundred and twenty-three adverse events, twenty-six of which occurred in the treatment groups and ninety-seven in the control groups. Conclusion: Very low to low quality of evidence suggests that HMs seem to produce superior treatment responses for ALS without increased risk of adverse events. Additional studies with homogeneous participants, reduced methodological issues, and more efficient outcome measures are required to provide confirmatory evidence. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42021277443.
RESUMO
Background: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a common cause of death and long-term disability worldwide. Recent trials of platelet-activating factor receptor antagonists (PAFRA) appeared to indicate that they could play a neuroprotective role in the treatment of AIS; therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of PAFRA in patients with AIS. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in seven electronic databases from inception to 11 March 2022. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which patients were treated with PAFRA strategies within 7 days of stroke onset were included. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was selected as the primary outcome of this systematic review. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed based on the Cochrane Collaborations tool. The review protocol was previously registered (PROSPERO CRD42020182075). Results: Fifteen RCTs comprising a total of 3,907 participants were included in this study. The PAFRA-related compounds included natural preparations of terpenoids, flavonoids, and saponins, namely, ginkgo endoterpene diester meglumine (GEDM, seven RCTs), ginkgo biloba dropping pill (GBDP, one RCT), ginkgolide injection (GDI, four RCTs), hesperidin (HES, one RCT), ginsenoside Rd injection (GSRI, one RCT), and hydroxysafflor yellow A (HSYA, one RCT). All studies were conducted in China between 2017 and 2021, employing a two-arm parallel design with sample sizes ranging from 40 to 1,113. Eight studies (53.3%) provided no information on their method of randomization, and only two studies (13.3%) utilized the double-blind design. Treatment was associated with improved clinical outcomes for (1) GEDM, GDI, and GBDP in patients treated with conventional treatment (CM) [GEDM + CM for AIS on mRS: MDmRS = -0.42, 95% CI (-0.47, -0.37), five trials, p < 0.00001; GEDM + CM for AIS on NIHSS: MDNIHSS = -1.02, 95% CI (-1.51, -0.52), four trials, p < 0.0001]; (2) GEDM and GDI in patients treated with neuroprotective agent (NPA) [GEDM + NPA + CM for AIS on mRS: MDmRS = -0.40, 95% CI (-0.54, -0.26), p < 0.00001; GEDM + NPA + CM for AIS on NIHSS: MDNIHSS = -3.93, 95%CI (-7.72, -0.14), p = 0.04]; (3) GBDP in patients treated with CM; (4) GDI and GSRI in patients treated with IV rt-PA therapy (IVT); and (5) HSYA in patients compared with Dengzhan Xixin injection (DZXXI). No access to improved clinical outcome was associated with HES in patients treated with IVT. Seven RCTs reported adverse events (AEs) but found that taking PAFRA-related preparations was not associated with an increased incidence of AEs. Conclusions: This systematic review not only makes an important contribution to the existing body of current evidence but also lays a well-conducted basis for providing opinions and recommendation on the evaluation of PAFRA-based medicine, which could also highlight the need for well-designed clinical trials of PAFRA for AIS to increase the quality of available evidence. Further research is required, using standardized functional outcome measures for AIS, adequate blinding and suitable comparator groups reflecting current best practice.
RESUMO
Background: Due to limited time windows and technical requirements, only a small percentage of patients can receive reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Previous studies have shown that LongShengZhi (LSZ) capsule can improve neurological outcomes in patients after AIS, yet those results have not been finally verified through rigorous randomized controlled trials. Thus, this trial was designed to further clarify the efficacy and safety of LSZ capsule for patients with AIS. Methods: LSZ capsule on Functional Recovery after Acute Ischemic Stroke (LONGAN) trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, superiority trial that enrolls patients from stroke and rehabilitation units in China. We will enroll 1,376 patients aged 18 years or older with AIS within 7 days of symptom onset and a National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 4-15. Eligible patients will be randomized to receive either 2 g LSZ capsules three times a day or placebo LSZ capsules for 90 days. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with favorable outcomes, as measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 90 days after randomization. The main safety outcome is the proportion of severe adverse events. Conclusion: This study will be the first randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LSZ capsule in patients with AIS. In order to improve the transparency and reproducibility of the trial, the data will be analyzed in accordance with this pre-specified plan for statistical analysis to reduce bias due to selective analysis and reporting. This trial aims to provide high-quality evidence for the efficacy and safety of LSZ capsule for AIS.
RESUMO
Background: Edaravone alleviates neurological deficits among patients with intracerebral hemorrhage; however, its effects on mortality and long-term functional outcomes remain unknown. Objective: To assess clinical outcomes associated with edaravone initiated within 7 days of symptoms onset in intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CiNii, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese VIP information, Wanfang Data, and SinoMed for relevant randomized controlled trials from their inception to 1 May 2021 and conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019147801). All-cause mortality and long-term functional outcomes were taken as the primary outcomes. Results: A total of 38 randomized controlled trials including 3,454 participants with acute intracerebral hemorrhage were included. The selected articles were of poor quality. Meta-analysis revealed that edaravone could not reduce all-cause mortality [relative risk (RR) = 0.51; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.11-2.32); p = 0.38]. No studies reported on long-term functional outcomes in those trials. In addition, edaravone alleviated neurological deficits [mean difference (MD) = -5.44; 95% CI (-6.44 to -4.44); p<0.00001], improved the activities of daily living [MD = 8.44; 95% CI (7.65-9.23); p<0.00001], reduced the hematoma volume [MD = -4.71; 95% CI (-5.86 to -3.56); p<0.00001], and increased treatment response [RR = 1.26; 95% CI (1.22-1.31); p<0.00001]. In terms of safety outcome, there was no significant difference between the edaravone group and the control groups [RR = 1.67; 95% CI (0.92 to 3.06); p = 0.09]. Conclusion: Till date, edaravone does not associate with mortality reduction when initiated within 7 days of intracerebral hemorrhage onset. The effect of edaravone on long-term functional outcomes remains unknown due to lack of data. Although edaravone alleviated neurological deficits, improved activities of daily living, and reduced hematoma volume, we cautiously interpreted the results owing to the overall poor quality and high heterogeneity of the included trials. Presently, the results are insufficient to support edaravone as a routine treatment option for acute intracerebral hemorrhage.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with ischemic stroke (IS) have worse functional outcomes and poorer quality of life after suffering a stroke than younger patients. The identification of effective agents is critical to optimizing the therapy of IS in elderly patients. PURPOSE: To examine the efficacy of diterpene ginkgolides meglumine injection (DGMI) vs. Ginaton in treating patients with IS, across different age subgroups. METHODS: Efficacy was determined through the post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled study, which had a cohort of 998 patients with IS. Participants were pooled and grouped by age (elderly [aged ≥â 65 yr] vs. non-elderly [aged <â 65 yr]). The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ranging from 0 to 1 at 90 d. The secondary outcomes were neurological deficit (tested using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score) and quality of life (tested using the EuroQol-5 Dimension [EQ-5D] and EQ visual analog scale [EQ-VAS] questionnaires). RESULTS: There were 399 (40%) patients in the elderly group (average age = 69.8±3.3 yr) and 599 (60%) patients in the non-elderly group (average age = 55.8±6.8 yr). The randomized treatment groups had similar baseline characteristics. For the elderly group, 174 (94%) of the 185 participants in the DGMI group and 169 (79%) of the 214 participants in the Ginaton group achieved the main outcome of a mRS score of 0-1 after three months (odds ratio [OR] = 0.87 [95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.81-0.93], p<0.001). For the non-elderly group, 301 (96%) of the 314 participants in the DGMI group and 237 (83%) of the 214 participants in the Ginaton group achieved the main outcome of a mRS score of 0-1 after three months (OR = 0.88 [95% CI = 0.84-0.92], p<0.001). The overall mean EQ-5D index score and EQ-VAS of the DGMI group were higher than that of the Ginaton group for elderly patients. After controlling other covariates including treatments, gender, weight, height and medical history, the results of mRS score, NIHSS score, EQ-5D index score, and EQ-VAS based on generalized linear model were similar to those of the single covariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: DGMI demonstrated a superior efficacy to Ginaton for patients with IS in both elderly and non-elderly ages.
Assuntos
AVC Isquêmico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Idoso , Ginkgolídeos/farmacologia , Ginkgolídeos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Meglumina/farmacologia , Meglumina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Background: BuqiTongluo (BQTL) granules are herbal phenotypic drugs for Qi deficiency and blood stasis (QDBS) syndrome. Its discovery relied primarily on knowledge of observable phenotypic changes associated with diseases. Although BQTL granules have been widely advocated by Chinese Medicine (CM) practitioners, its use lacks empirical support. Aim of the study: In this basket trial, the efficacy of BQTL granules in multiple diseases that have the QDBS syndrome in common will be compared with placebo. Materials and Methods: The BuqiTongluo granule for Qi deficiency and blood stasis syndrome (BOSS) study is a basket herbal trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04408261). It will be a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel, multicenter, clinical trial. In total, 432 patients (1:1:1 ischemic stroke, stable angina pectoris, and diabetic peripheral neuropathy), who meet the operationalized diagnostic criteria for QDBS syndrome, have been recruited and randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to receive 6 weeks' treatment with BQTL granules or placebo. The primary outcome is the change in the QDBS syndrome score at week 6 from baseline. Secondary outcomes include objective outcome measures for the three diseases and adverse events. Omics will help to understand these responses by molecular events. Conclusion: QDBS syndrome is a common phenotypic marker that was hypothesized to predict whether patients with multiple diseases would respond to this targeted therapy. No previous basket trial has assessed the potential efficacy of an herbal intervention for multiple diseases. The unique promise of the trial is its ability to exploit a disease phenotype to discover novel treatments for three diseases for which the root cause is unknown, complex, or multifactorial, and for which scientific understanding is insufficient to provide valid molecular targets.
RESUMO
Background: Given the complexity of stroke treatment and the current widespread use of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in the absence of robust, large, long-term effectiveness and safety studies, and the lack of nationwide epidemiology and clinical characteristics of patients with stroke receiving TCM treatment, the acquisition of data from longitudinal cohorts is essential. We intend to generate the major clinical characteristics of patients with stroke who receive TCM treatment and to investigate the effectiveness and safety of TCM in the Chinese population. Methods: The China Stroke Registry for Patients with Traditional Chinese Medicine (CASES-TCM) study is a prospective, multicenter, observational disease registry aiming to register 20,000 hospitalized patients. Eligible adult patients with clearly diagnosed acute ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage within 7 days of symptom onset will be consecutively registered from 126 participating sites across China. Baseline data will be recorded, and all patients will be regularly followed up at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after stroke onset. Collected data will be entered into a web-based system with high-level data security. The primary outcomes include the distribution of scores on the modified Rankin Scale at the 3-months follow-up, and recurrent stroke events within the 12-months follow-up. Conclusion: To our knowledge, the CASES-TCM study is the first and largest nationwide registry to document comprehensive data on TCM treatment in patients with acute stroke. The findings of this study will be valuable to improve our knowledge about TCM treatment for patients with stroke and its subsequent outcomes in the actual clinical setting, consequently facilitating and standardizing the optimization of individualized interventions with TCM for stroke prevention and treatment in China. Study registration: This study was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, Unique identifier: NCT04921397).
RESUMO
Background: Xingnaojing injection (XNJ) is the only Chinese herbal injection approved for both intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke (IS) first-aid on ambulances in China; many systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) of XNJ on stroke have been published. The purpose of this research was to evaluate and summarize the current evidence on XNJ for IS. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted for SRs and MAs of XNJ on IS in seven databases up to January 1, 2021. Two authors independently identified SRs and MAs, extracted data, assessed the quality of the included SRs and MAs using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2), and assessed quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: A total of 10 SRs met the inclusion criteria. The quality of included SRs using AMSTAR 2 was critically low as the critical items were poorly reported. Only 10% of SRs reported 50% of the 16 items, while the remaining 90% SRs reported just less than half of the items on AMSTAR 2. For GRADE, 7 (35%) of outcomes had low-quality evidence, 10 (50%) with very low, and 3 (15%) with moderate quality evidence. Very low to low quality of evidence indicated XNJ plus conventional therapy (CT) alleviated the neurological deficits of acute IS. Moderate-quality evidence showed XNJ plus CT reduced mortality when compared to Danshen injection plus CT, and very low-quality evidence showed XNJ plus CT could not improve the degree of coma, while low-quality evidence indicated the opposite. Mild adverse events in the CT group were less than those in the XNJ plus CT group, and there were no serious adverse events, but there was no statistical difference between the two groups. The included 10 SRs indicated that XNJ was used for acute IS, but only four SRs (40%) reported the course of disease. Conclusion: XNJ appears to be effective and safe for acute IS in improving the neurological deficits, but the evidence is not robust enough. However, whether administering XNJ immediately after or within 24 h of IS is best remains unknown due to the lack of data. Well-designed large-scale randomized controlled trials with measurable outcomes are required in future studies.
RESUMO
Background: Although revascularization treatment is recommended as the first-line therapy for patients with non-minor acute ischemic stroke (AIS), it only benefits a minority of patients. Previous studies have reported the positive effects of Panax notoginseng saponins (PNS) (Xueshuantong lyophilized powder) on AIS, however, there have been no rigorous trials. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of PNS therapy for patients with AIS. Methods: The Evaluation of Xueshuantong in Patients with acutE ischemiC sTroke (EXPECT) trial is a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study aiming to enroll 480 patients in China. Eligible patients with AIS within 72 h of symptom onset will randomly receive either PNS or PNS placebo for 10 days and subsequently be followed up to 90 days. The primary outcome will be a change in the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score from baseline to 10 post-randomization days. The secondary outcomes include early neurological improvement (proportion of patients with NIHSS score 0-1), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Scale for Stroke score at 10 post-randomization days, the proportion of patients with life independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1), the proportion of patients with a favorable outcome (Barthel Index ≥90), and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life score at 90 days. Adverse events or clinically significant changes in vital signs and laboratory parameters, regardless of the severity, will be recorded during the trial to assess the safety of PNS. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this study is the first double-blind trial to assess the efficacy and safety of PNS in patients with AIS. Findings of the EXPECT trial will be valuable in improving evidence regarding the clinical application of PNS therapy in patients with AIS ineligible for revascularization treatment in the reperfusion era.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: With the threat of a worldwide pandemic of COVID-19, it is important to identify the prognostic factors for critical conditions among patients with non-critical COVID-19. Prognostic factors and models may assist front-line clinicians in rapid identification of high-risk patients, early management of modifiable factors, appropriate triaging and optimising the use of limited healthcare resources. We aim to systematically assess the clinical, laboratory and imaging predictors as well as prediction models for severe or critical illness and mortality in patients with COVID-19. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: All peer-reviewed and preprint primary articles with a longitudinal design that focused on prognostic factors or models for critical illness and mortality related to COVID-19 will be eligible for inclusion. A systematic search of 11 databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Data, SinoMed, bioRxiv, Arxiv and MedRxiv will be conducted. Study selection will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data extraction will be performed using the modified version of the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies checklist and quality will be evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool. The association between prognostic factors and outcomes of interest will be synthesised and a meta-analysis will be conducted with three or more studies reporting a particular factor in a consistent manner. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was not required for this systematic review. We will disseminate our findings through publication in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD 42020178798.