Disappearing colorectal liver metastases in the era of state-of-the-art triple-modality diagnostic imaging.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic therapy can result in disappearance of colorectal liver metastases in up to 40% of patients. This might be an overestimation caused by suboptimal imaging modalities. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of imaging modalities and the incidence, management and outcome of patients with disappearing liver metastases (DLMs). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients treated for colorectal liver metastases at a high volume hepatobiliary centre between January 2013 and January 2015 after receiving induction or neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Main outcomes were use of imaging modalities, incidence, management and longterm outcome of patients with DLMs. RESULTS: Of 158 patients included, 32 (20%) had 110 DLMs. Most patients (88%) had initial diagnostic imaging with contrast enhanced-CT, primovist-MR and FDG-PET and 94% of patients with DLMs were restaged using primovist-MR. Patients with DLMs had significantly smaller metastases and the median initial size of DLMs was 10 mm (range 5-61). In the per lesion analysis, recurrence after "watch & wait" for DLMs occurred in 36%, while in 19 of 20 resected DLMs no viable tumour cells were found. Median overall (51 vs. 28 months, p < 0.05) and progression free survival (10 vs. 3 months, p = 0.003) were significantly longer for patients with DLMs. CONCLUSION: Even state-of-the-art imaging and restaging cannot solve problems associated with DLMs. Regrowth of these lesions occurs in approximately a third of the lesions. Patients with DLMs have better survival.

Defining enhanced recovery after resection of peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) has not been described in the literature. This study examined patients undergoing pCCA resection within a standard post hepatectomy ERAS pathway to define achievable targets suitable for these patients. METHODS: Patients undergoing pCCA resection at University Hospital Aintree (January 2009-October 2017) were identified. Achievement of key ERAS outcomes was assessed. Patients were stratified on incidence of major complications and pre-operative cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Chi Square and Mann Whitney analyses were undertaken as appropriate. Achievable ERAS targets were derived from patients who did not develop a major complication. RESULTS: 46 patients underwent resection with enhanced recovery. Median age 65 (24 male: 22 female). Key ERAS outcomes in patients who did not experience major complications are described as medians (interquartile range): length of stay 8 days (6-13), duration critical care 2 days (2-4), inotropes 6 h (0-24), epidural 3 days (3-4), early mobilization day 1 (1-2), full mobilization day 3 (3-4), urinary catheter removal day 4 (3-5), NGT removal day 1 (1-2) and restoration oral nutrition day 2 (2-4). Patients deemed high risk pre-operatively or those who developed major complications post-operatively required significantly longer critical care (p = 0.008 and p = 0.002 respectively). Other ERAS targets remained achievable in similar timeframes. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS for pCCA is achievable. Applicable ERAS standards are defined which take into account minor complications. High risk patients and those with major complications can be appropriately managed in an ERAS pathway, though there is increased need for critical care support.

PARAGON II - A single arm multicentre phase II study of neoadjuvant therapy using irinotecan bead in patients with resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Perioperative chemotherapy confers a 3-year progression free survival advantage following resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), but is associated with significant toxicity. Chemoembolisation using drug eluting PVA microspheres loaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) allows sustained delivery of drug directly to tumour, maximising response whilst minimising systemic exposure. This phase II single arm study examined the safety and feasibility of DEBIRI before resection of CRLM. METHODS: Patients with resectable CRLM received lobar DEBIRI 1 month prior to surgery, with a radiological endpoint of near stasis. The trial had a primary end-point of tumour resectability (R0 resection). Secondary end-points included safety, pathologic tumour response and overall survival. RESULTS: 40 patients received DEBIRI, with a median dose of 103 mg irinotecan (range 64-175 mg). Morbidity was low (2.5%, CTCAE grade 2) with no evidence of systemic chemotoxicity. All patients proceeded to surgery, with 38 undergoing resection (95%, R0 resection rate 74%). 30-day post-operative mortality was 5% (n = 2), with neither death TACE related. 66 lesions were resected, with histologic major or complete pathologic response seen in 77.3% of targeted lesions. At median follow up of 40.6 months, 12 patients (34.3%) had died of recurrent disease with a median overall survival of 50.9 months. Nominal 1, 3 and 5-year OS was 93, 78 & 49% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Resection after neoadjuvant DEBIRI for CRLM is feasible and safe. Single treatment with DEBIRI resulted in tumour pathologic response and median overall survival comparable to that seen after systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00844233).

Adherence to early mobilisation: Key for successful enhanced recovery after liver resection.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has been proven effective in liver surgery. Adherence to the ERAS pathway is variable. This study seeks to evaluate adherence to key components of an ERAS protocol in liver resection, and identify the components associated with successful clinical outcomes. METHOD: All patients undergoing liver resections for two consecutive years were included in our ERAS pathway. Six key components of ERAS included preoperative assessment, nutrition and gastrointestinal function, postoperative analgesia, mobilisation and discharges. Successful accomplishment of ERAS was defined as hospital discharge by postop day (POD) 6. Adherences of these elements were compared between the successful and un-successful groups. RESULTS: During the studied period, 223 patients underwent liver resections, among which 103 had major hepatectomies. N = 147 patients (66%) were discharged within our ERAS protocol target (6 days). On multivariable analysis, sitting out of bed by POD 1 (p < 0.03), walking by POD 3 (p = 0.03), removal of urinary catheter by POD 3 (p < 0.01), and avoiding major complications (p < 0.01) were factors associated with successful completion to our ERAS protocol; whereas advanced age (p = 0.34) and discontinuation of PCA/epidural by POD 3 (p = 0.50) were not significant parameters. There was a significant difference in the length of stay (p < 0.01) following major and minor liver resection, of which the indications for surgery also varied significantly. There was no difference in hospital re-admission rate, and morbidity and mortality between major and minor liver resection. CONCLUSIONS: Facilitating early mobilisation and reducing postoperative complications are keys to successful outcomes of ERAS in liver resection.

Objective assessment of trainee operative experience in a tertiary hepatobiliary unit.

INTRODUCTION: Indicative numbers for completion of training (CCT) in the UK requires 35 upper Gastrointestinal/Hepatobiliary resections and 110 (50 non HPB trainees) cholecystectomies. We aim to identify whether the training experience in our centre meets the CCT requirements for hepatobiliary surgery and compare training opportunities to those in international fellowships. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our hospital's operating theatre database for all patients undergoing a liver or gallbladder resection between January 2008 and July 2015 using corresponding procedural codes and consultant name. The cohort was categorized based on case and primary operating surgeon. The training grade of the surgeon was split into junior registrar (ST3/5), senior registrar (ST6/8) and senior fellow (post-CCT). RESULTS: Over a 7.5 year period we performed 2301 hepatobiliary procedures. The senior fellows and senior registrars performed a median of 42 liver resections (range 15-94) and 77 (range 35-110) cholecystectomies as the primary operator in any given 12 month period. The academic output for the unit was 104 over this period, with a median publication rate of 1.34 papers/trainee in any given 12 months. 15/16 senior fellow/senior registrars went on to secure substantive hepatobiliary consultant posts. CONCLUSIONS: Our centre delivers in excess of the required operative volume and clinical competencies for CCT in Hepatobiliary surgery in a 12 month period and exposure of trainees to operative experience is commensurate to the best performing international fellowships.

Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation before planned liver resection.

BACKGROUND: Patients with low fitness as assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) have higher mortality and morbidity after surgery. Preoperative exercise intervention, or prehabilitation, has been suggested as a method to improve CPET values and outcomes. This trial sought to assess the capacity of a 4-week supervised exercise programme to improve fitness before liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis. METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of a 4-week (12 sessions) high-intensity cycle, interval training programme in patients undergoing elective liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. The primary endpoint was oxygen uptake at the anaerobic threshold. Secondary endpoints included other CPET values and preoperative quality of life (QoL) assessed using the SF-36®. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were randomized (20 to prehabilitation, 18 to standard care), and 35 (25 men and 10 women) completed both preoperative assessments and were analysed. The median age was 62 (i.q.r. 54-69) years, and there were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Prehabilitation led to improvements in preoperative oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold (+1·5 (95 per cent c.i. 0·2 to 2·9) ml per kg per min) and peak exercise (+2·0 (0·0 to 4·0) ml per kg per min). The oxygen pulse (oxygen uptake per heart beat) at the anaerobic threshold improved (+0·9 (0·0 to 1·8) ml/beat), and a higher peak work rate (+13 (4 to 22) W) was achieved. This was associated with improved preoperative QoL, with the overall SF-36® score increasing by 11 (95 per cent c.i. 1 to 21) (P = 0·028) and the overall SF-36® mental health score by 11 (1 to 22) (P = 0·037). CONCLUSION: A 4-week prehabilitation programme can deliver improvements in CPET scores and QoL before liver resection. This may impact on perioperative outcome. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01523353 (https://clinicaltrials.gov).

Blood cultures in acute surgical admissions.

INTRODUCTION: Obtaining blood cultures prior to the administration of antimicrobial therapy was a key recommendation of the 2012 UK Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Few studies have examined the effect blood cultures have on clinical management and there have been none on acute surgical admissions. This retrospective study sought to evaluate the effect of blood cultures on clinical management in acute surgical admissions. METHODS: Data on acute surgical patients admitted between 1 January and 31 December 2012 were extracted from hospital records. Patients given intravenous antibiotics within 24 hours of admission were identified. Data collected included antibiotics administered, blood culture results, admission observations and white blood cell count. Case notes were reviewed for patients with positive cultures to establish whether the result led to a change in management. RESULTS: Of 5,887 acute surgical admissions, 1,346 received intravenous antibiotics within 24 hours and 978 sets of blood cultures were taken in 690 patients. The recommended two sets of cultures were obtained in 246 patients (18%). Patients who had blood cultures taken had the same in-hospital mortality as those who had none taken (3.6% vs 3.5%, p=0.97). Blood cultures were positive in 80 cases (11.6%). The presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome did not increase positivity rates (12.9% vs 10.3%, p=0.28). Overall, cultures altered management in two patients (0.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Blood cultures rarely affect clinical management. In order to assess the additional value that blood cultures bring to sepsis management in acute surgical admissions, a prospective randomised trial focusing on outcome is needed.

A systematic review of the role of hepatectomy in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

AIM: This review sought to systematically appraise the literature to establish the role of hepatectomy in treating renal cell carcinoma hepatic metastases. METHOD: Medline and EMBASE were systematically searched for papers reporting survival of patients who underwent hepatectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. RESULTS: Six studies containing 140 patients were included. There were no randomised controlled trials. Perioperative mortality was 4.3%, with reported morbidity between 13 and 30%. Patients with metachronous presentation, and a greater time interval between resection of primary tumour and development of metachronous metastases, appeared to have better survival. There was no difference in survival between patients with solitary and multiple metastases. CONCLUSION: Few patients with hepatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma are suitable for hepatectomy as metastatic disease is usually widespread. Selected patients may experience a survival benefit, but identifying these patients remains difficult.

Controversies in the oncosurgical management of liver limited stage IV colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common cancer diagnosis in the world (around 1.2 million diagnoses each year), and accounts for the second highest number of deaths. Over half of patients with colorectal cancer will develop liver metastases, with one quarter presenting in stage IV. There is growing evidence that patients with liver-limited disease represent a distinct biological cohort who will benefit from aggressive management. Only a minority of patients are technically resectable, but around 40% of patients with resected liver limited disease are alive 5 years after diagnosis compared with less than 1% for those with disseminated disease. Novel surgical techniques have been developed to allow more patients to undergo resection and there is also growing recognition that the chemotherapeutic manipulation of irresectable disease may bring some patients to resection with good long-term outcome. Perioperative chemotherapy can also improve long-term outcome through improved biological selection and destruction of occult micrometastases. This review outlines current oncosurgical treatment strategies for liver-limited stage IV colorectal cancer, and discusses some of the controversies surround the management of these complex patients.

The Liverpool uveal melanoma liver metastases pathway: outcome following liver resection.

AIM: To determine the outcome of patients that underwent liver resection for metastases from uveal melanoma. METHODS: Over a 9-year period, patients referred with uveal melanoma metastases were included. Following treatment of primary uveal melanoma, high-risk patients were offered to be enrolled into a 6-monthly non-contrast liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance. Following detection of liver metastases, patients were staged with a contrast-enhanced (Primovist(®)) liver MRI, computer tomography (CT) of the thorax and staging laparoscopy. RESULTS: 155 patients were referred with uveal melanoma liver metastases, of which 17 (11.0%) patients had liver resection and one patient was treated with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation. The majority of patients undergoing liver resection were treated with multiple metastectomies (n = 8) and three patients had major liver resections. The overall median survival for patients treated with surgery/ablation was 27 (14-90) months, and this was significantly better compared to patients treated palliatively [median = 8(1-30) months, P < 0.001]. Following surgery, 11 patients had recurrent disease [median = 13(6-36) months]. Patients who had undergone a major liver resection had a significantly poorer disease-free survival (P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who can undergo surgical resection for metastatic uveal melanoma have a more favorable survival compared to those who do not.

FDG-PET-CT is effective in selecting patients with poor long term survivals for colorectal liver metastases.

AIMS: Having incorporated PET-CT as part of the staging process for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in our unit since 2008, this study aims to evaluate the survival outcomes of all patients managed by our specialist multi-disciplinary team (MDT). METHODS: All patients with colorectal liver metastases referred to a single liver MDT between 2008 and 2011 were examined. Overall survival (OS) for palliative groups due to occult extrahepatic disease detected by PET-CT (A) and those upfront palliative patients with extensive multi-site disease as identified on baseline CT or disease progression during chemotherapy (B), and resected (C) groups were evaluated and compared. Different extents of occult extrahepatic disease as characterised by PET-CT were also compared. RESULTS: 532 patients were included in the study. Median OS for group A (n = 80), B (n = 161) and C (n = 291) were 10.9, 12.0 and 46.7 months, with a 5-year OS approaching 6.5%, 6.1% and 43.0% respectively. There were significant differences in OS of C vs. A & B (p < 0.001). Single compartment metastases had a significant better survival outcomes than non-torso metastases (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: This is the first report of OS of patients with CRLM excluded from surgery on the basis of PET-CT. We have confirmed that PET-CT is effective in selecting patients with occult extrahepatic disease, which has poor survival outcomes. However, a subgroup with single compartment extrahepatic disease has a better than expected outcome.

Renal cell carcinoma metastases to gallbladder.

A 74-year old man underwent a radical cholecystectomy for presumed gallbladder cancer. The histology of the resected specimen in fact revealed the lesion to be metastatic renal cell carcinoma from his resected right nephrectomy performed 14 years previously.

Radiological assessment of response to neoadjuvant transcatheter hepatic therapy with irinotecan-eluting beads (DEBIRI(®)) for colorectal liver metastases does not predict tumour destruction or long-term outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter hepatic therapy with irinotecan-eluting beads (DEBIRI(®)) allows targeted delivery of irinotecan direct to liver tissue and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Accurate assessment of tumour response to therapy is vital to guide optimal treatment. Preliminary work has suggested existing criteria for radiological response may not reflect pathological response after neoadjuvant DEBIRI. This study assessed the relationship between existing and novel radiological response criteria and pathological tumour response as well as long-term outcome. METHODS: Patients with easily resectable CRLM were treated with DEBIRI 4 weeks prior to resection and pathological tumour response graded using a validated system. Radiological response was assessed using RECIST and novel morphological response criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with 37 lesions were treated with DEBIRI. Median residual tumour was 20% (range 0-80), median necrosis 45% (10-100) and median fibrosis 10% (10-70). Twenty patients (91%) demonstrated stable disease by RECIST, with 11 (50%) demonstrating partial morphological response. Neither radiological response criteria correlated with pathological response. Overall median disease free survival (DFS) was 13.6 months (95% CI 4.7-22.5). Radiological response was not associated with DFS. CONCLUSION: Existing criteria reporting short-term radiological response to DEBIRI do not accurately predict pathological tumour response or long-term outcome. Further work is necessary to define the optimum timing and method of assessing response to DEBIRI.

Microwave ablation with or without resection for colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: Ablation with or without resection for colorectal liver metastases has been suggested as a potential method of improving survival if complete surgical resection is not possible. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of surgical microwave ablation (MWA) with or without resection for colorectal liver metastases. METHODS: A retrospective case series was reviewed. Data was extracted for all patients treated with open MWA with or without resection for colorectal liver metastases. Endpoints included postoperative 30-day morbidity and mortality, local treatment failure, disease free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients with technically irresectable disease were treated with MWA; 28 underwent combined MWA and resection, whilst 15 underwent MWA as the sole treatment modality. Overall post-operative morbidity was 35%, 30-day postoperative mortality 2%. At a median follow-up of 15 months, local treatment failure was observed in 4% of ablated lesions. 3-year OS was 36% for MWA group, compared to 45% for the combined ablate/resect group with 3-year DFS of 32% and 8% respectively. CONCLUSION: Microwave ablation with or without resection is a safe and effective method of achieving local disease control. Ablation with or without resection is associated with good long-term outcomes, and may be a suitable treatment option for small non-resectable colorectal liver metastases.

Perioperative chemotherapy for resectable colorectal liver metastases: where now?

Following the publication of the EORTC trial (40983), perioperative chemotherapy has become the standard of care for all patients with resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). However recently presented data suggest that the earlier advantage seen in progression free survival (PFS) may not translate over into a meaningful overall survival (OS) advantage. At the other end of the spectrum, patients with irresectable but liver limited CRLM continue to be offered treatment based on improving PFS, at the expense of regimens with greater response rates (but maybe poorer PFS rates) that could bring them to potentially curative liver resection. We therefore argue that patients with liver limited CRLM should be managed in three separate groups: Group One: those with easily resectable disease who should be offered immediate surgery, followed by adjuvant therapy if considered appropriate. Group Two: those with borderline resectable or high recurrence risk CRLM who could be offered appropriate systemic neoadjuvant therapy prior to planned liver surgery. Group Three: those with inoperable but liver limited CRLM who should be offered the most effective and appropriate systemic therapy with the primary purpose of achieving maximal disease response (and not PFS) with the intention of conversion to surgical resectability with curative intent.

Hepatic activation of irinotecan predicts tumour response in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with DEBIRI: exploratory findings from a phase II study.

PURPOSE: The response of colorectal liver metastases to the cytotoxic agent irinotecan varies widely. Attempts to correlate tumour metabolism with response have been mixed. This study investigated the hepatic metabolism of irinotecan as a potential predictor of tumour response to irinotecan-eluting beads (DEBIRI). METHODS: Ten patients with colorectal liver metastases were treated with 200 mg irinotecan (as DEBIRI) as part of the PARAGON II study. Hepatic expression of key metabolising enzymes was measured using mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Serum drug concentrations and hepatic irinotecan metabolism were characterised and correlated with tumour response. RESULTS: Serum concentrations of irinotecan metabolites did not correlate with hepatic metabolism or pathological response. There was a strong correlation between hepatic CES-2 expression and activation of irinotecan (r (2) = 0.96, p < 0.001). Patients with a UGT1A1*28 6/7 SNP showed no difference in drug metabolism or pathological response. Hepatic CES-2 mediated activation of irinotecan clearly correlated with tumour replacement by fibrosis (r (2) = 0.54, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study provides the first evidence that hepatic activation of irinotecan predicts tumour response. Delivery of liver-targeted irinotecan to normal liver tissue rather than tumour may be a more rational approach to maximise response.

Routine staging laparoscopy has no place in the management of colorectal liver metastases.

AIMS: Staging laparoscopy has been recommended in the management of patients with colorectal liver metastases prior to hepatectomy in order to reduce the incidence and associated morbidity of futile laparotomies. The utility of staging laparoscopy has not been assessed in patients undergoing CT, PET-CT and MRI as standard preoperative staging. METHODS: All patients undergoing attempted open hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases between 1/4/2008 and 31/3/2012 were identified from a prospectively maintained research database. All patients who underwent futile laparotomy were identified, with demographics and operative notes subsequently analysed. RESULTS: A total of 274 patients underwent attempted open hepatectomy during the study period. At laparotomy 12 (4.4%) patients were found to have irresectable disease. There were no unifying demographic factors within the patients undergoing futile laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: With modern imaging, the potential yield of staging laparoscopy is low. Staging laparoscopy should not be used routinely, but may have a role in the case of specific clinical concerns.

Effect of specialist decision-making on treatment strategies for colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: One hundred and ten patients were treated with palliative chemotherapy, of whom 53 had liver-only disease and had not been reviewed by a specialist liver surgeon. One scan was excluded as all reviewers felt it to be of insufficient quality to assess. Improved surgical technique and better chemotherapeutic manipulation of metastatic disease has increased the number of patients eligible for potentially curative resection of colorectal liver metastases. The rapid evolution in this field suggests that non-specialist decision-making may lead to inappropriate management. This study aimed to assess the management of colorectal liver metastases by non-liver surgeons. METHODS: All patients who underwent chemotherapy with palliative intent for metastatic colorectal cancer at a regional oncology centre between 1 January and 31 December 2009 were identified from a prospectively maintained local database. Six resectional liver surgeons blinded to patient management and outcome reviewed pretreatment imaging and assigned each scan a score based on their own management choice. A consensus decision was reached on the appropriateness of palliative chemotherapy. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients were treated with palliative chemotherapy, of whom 53 had liver-only disease and had not been reviewed by a specialist liver surgeon. One scan was excluded as all reviewers felt it to be of insufficient quality to assess [corrected]. Tumours in 33 patients (63 per cent) were considered potentially resectable, with a high level of interobserver agreement (κ = 0 · 577). When individual approach to management was considered, interobserver agreement was less marked (κ = 0 · 378). CONCLUSION: Management of patients with colorectal liver metastases without the involvement of a specialist liver multidisciplinary team can lead to patients being denied potentially curative treatments. Management of these patients must involve a specialist liver surgeon to ensure appropriate management.

Cholecystectomy-related bile duct and vasculobiliary injuries.

BACKGROUND: Combined vasculobiliary injury is a serious complication of cholecystectomy. This study examined medium- to long-term outcomes after such injury. METHODS: Patients referred to this institution with Strasberg type E bile duct injuries were identified from a prospectively maintained database (1990-2010). Long-term outcomes were evaluated by chart review. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were referred with bile duct injury alone (45 patients) or vasculobiliary injury (18). Thirty patients (48 per cent) had septic complications before transfer. Twenty-six patients (41 per cent) had long-term biliary complications over a median follow-up of 96 (range 12-245) months. Nine patients (3 with bile duct injury, 6 with vasculobiliary injury) required further interventions after a median of 22 (8-38) months; five required biliary surgical revision and four percutaneous dilatation of biliary strictures. Vasculobiliary injury and injury-related sepsis were independent risk factors for treatment failure: hazard ratio 7·79 (95 per cent confidence interval 2·80 to 21·70; P < 0·001) and 4·82 (1·69 to 13·68; P = 0·003) respectively. CONCLUSION: Outcome following bile duct injury repair was worse in patients with concomitant vasculobiliary injury and/or sepsis.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of follow-up after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: The evidence surrounding optimal follow-up after liver resection for colorectal metastases remains unclear. A significant proportion of recurrences occur in the early postoperative period, and some groups advocate more intensive review at this time. METHODS: A systematic review of literature published between January 2003 and May 2010 was performed. Studies that described potentially curative primary resection of colorectal liver metastases that involved a defined follow-up protocol and long-term survival data were included. For meta-analysis, studies were grouped into intensive (more frequent review in the first 5 years after resection) and uniform (same throughout) follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria, involving 7330 patients. Only five specifically addressed follow-up. Patients undergoing intensive early follow-up had a median survival of 39·8 (95 per cent confidence interval 34·3 to 45·3) months with a 5-year overall survival rate of 41·9 (34·4 to 49·4) per cent. Patients undergoing routine follow-up had a median survival of 40·2 (33·4 to 47·0) months, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 38·4 (32·6 to 44·3) months. CONCLUSION: Evidence regarding follow-up after liver resection is poor. Meta-analysis failed to identify a survival advantage for intensive early follow-up.