Intranasal antihistamines and corticosteroids in allergic rhinitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is insufficient systematized evidence on the effectiveness of individual intranasal medications in allergic rhinitis (AR). OBJECTIVES: We sought to perform a systematic review to compare the efficacy of individual intranasal corticosteroids and antihistamines against placebo in improving the nasal and ocular symptoms and the rhinoconjunctivitis-related quality of life of patients with perennial or seasonal AR. METHODS: The investigators searched 4 electronic bibliographic databases and 3 clinical trials databases for randomized controlled trials (1) assessing adult patients with seasonal or perennial AR and (2) comparing the use of intranasal corticosteroids or antihistamines versus placebo. Assessed outcomes included the Total Nasal Symptom Score, the Total Ocular Symptom Score, and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. The investigators performed random-effects meta-analyses of mean differences for each medication and outcome. The investigators assessed evidence certainty using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. RESULTS: This review included 151 primary studies, most of which assessed patients with seasonal AR and displayed unclear or high risk of bias. Both in perennial and seasonal AR, most assessed treatments were more effective than placebo. In seasonal AR, azelastine-fluticasone, fluticasone furoate, and fluticasone propionate were the medications with the highest probability of resulting in moderate or large improvements in the Total Nasal Symptom Score and Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. Azelastine-fluticasone displayed the highest probability of resulting in moderate or large improvements of Total Ocular Symptom Score. Overall, evidence certainty was considered "high" in 6 of 46 analyses, "moderate" in 23 of 46 analyses, and "low"/"very low" in 17 of 46 analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Most intranasal medications are effective in improving rhinitis symptoms and quality of life. However, there are relevant differences in the associated evidence certainty.

Assessing medication use patterns by clinical outcomes severity among inpatients with COVID-19: A retrospective drug utilization study.

PURPOSE: This study assessed medication patterns for inpatients at a central hospital in Portugal and explored their relationships with clinical outcomes in COVID-19 cases. METHODS: A retrospective study analyzed inpatient medication data, coded using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system, from electronic patient records. It investigated the association between medications and clinical severity outcomes such as ICU admissions, respiratory/circulatory support needs, and hospital discharge status, including mortality (identified by ICD-10-CM/PCS codes). Multivariate analyses incorporating demographic data and comorbidities were used to adjust for potential confounders and understand the impact of medication patterns on disease progression and outcomes. RESULTS: The analysis of 2688 hospitalized COVID-19 patients (55.3% male, average age 62.8 years) revealed a significant correlation between medication types and intensity and disease severity. Cases requiring ICU admission or ECMO support often involved blood and blood-forming organ drugs. Increased use of nervous system and genitourinary hormones was observed in nonsurvivors. Corticosteroids, like dexamethasone, were common in critically ill patients, while tocilizumab was used in ECMO cases. Medications for the alimentary tract, metabolism, and cardiovascular system, although widely prescribed, were linked to more severe cases. Invasive mechanical ventilation correlated with higher usage of systemic anti-infectives and musculoskeletal medications. Trends in co-prescribing blood-forming drugs with those for acid-related disorders, analgesics, and antibacterials were associated with intensive interventions and worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights complex medication regimens in managing severe COVID-19, underscoring specific drug patterns associated with critical health outcomes. Further research is needed to explore these patterns.

Unveiling the future: precision pharmacovigilance in the era of personalized medicine.

In the era of personalized medicine, pharmacovigilance faces new challenges and opportunities, demanding a shift from traditional approaches. This article delves into the evolving landscape of drug safety monitoring in the context of personalized treatments. We aim to provide a succinct reflection on the intersection of tailored therapeutic strategies and vigilant pharmacovigilance practices. We discuss the integration of pharmacogenetics in enhancing drug safety, illustrating how genetic profiling aids in predicting drug responses and adverse reactions. Emphasizing the importance of phase IV-post-marketing surveillance, we explore the limitations of pre-marketing trials and the necessity for a comprehensive approach to drug safety. The article discusses the pivotal role of pharmacogenetics in pre-exposure risk management and the redefinition of pharmacoepidemiological methods for post-exposure surveillance. We highlight the significance of integrating patient-specific genetic profiles in creating personalized medication leaflets and the use of advanced computational methods in data analysis. Additionally, we examine the ethical, privacy, and data security challenges inherent in precision medicine, emphasizing their implications for patient consent and data management.

Intranasal antihistamines and corticosteroids in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Intranasal antihistamines and corticosteroids are some of the most frequently used drug classes in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. However, there is uncertainty as to whether effectiveness differences may exist among different intranasal specific medications. This systematic review aims to analyse and synthesise all evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness of intranasal antihistamines and corticosteroids in rhinitis nasal and ocular symptoms and in rhinoconjunctivitis-related quality-of-life. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search four electronic bibliographic databases and three clinical trials databases for RCTs (1) assessing patients ≥12 years old with seasonal or perennial allergic rhinitis and (2) comparing the use of intranasal antihistamines or corticosteroids versus placebo. Assessed outcomes will include the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ). We will assess the methodological quality of included primary studies by using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Certainty in the body of evidence for the analysed outcomes will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. We will perform a random-effects meta-analysis for each assessed medication and outcome, presenting results as pooled mean differences and standardised mean differences. Heterogeneity will be explored by sensitivity and subgroup analyses, considering (1) the risk of bias, (2) the follow-up period and (3) the drug dose. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical considerations will not be required. Results will be disseminated in a peer-review journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023416573.

Motivation and Knowledge of Portuguese Community Pharmacists Towards the Reporting of Suspected Adverse Reactions to Medicines: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

The close contact between patients and community pharmacists, along with the extensive geographical distribution of pharmacies in Portugal, offer exceptional conditions to detect and report adverse drug reactions (ADR). This study aimed to evaluate the motivation and knowledge of spontaneous reporting of ADR by community pharmacists of Porto, Portugal. Secondly, we aimed to generate real-world evidence on the main factors determining ADR report and at raising potential alternatives to the current reporting procedure in community pharmacy. We performed a descriptive, cross-sectional, observational, anonymous web survey-based study. Between April and July 2021, a web survey was implemented, targeting community pharmacists in the Porto district, Portugal. We validated 217 surveys from pharmacists. Regular notifiers seem to be more familiarised than non-regular notifiers with the Portuguese Pharmacovigilance System (PPS), with the Portal RAM for reporting suspected ADR, and with the update of the concept of ADR. Moreover, regular notifiers seem to be more proactive with their care in questioning patients about ADR and have more self-knowledge to identify suspected ADR. Conversely, non-regular notifiers, seem to be more reluctant to be judged by their ADR reporting activities. Respondents suggested to simplify and optimise the reporting process (31% of the suggestions), or to integrate a reporting platform into the pharmacy's software (27%). This study identified opportunities to promote the ADR reporting process by community pharmacists, namely receiving feedback from the PPS on the reported case and its regulatory implications, implementing training programs in pharmacovigilance, and creating solutions to simplify the reporting process.

INCISIONAL HERNIA AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY: ONLY THE PHYSICAL EXAMINATION IS ENOUGH?

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is characterized by a bulging of the abdominal wall caused by the prolapse of intracavitary structures, such as a segment of the small intestine, through the trocar orifice. Ultrasonography and physical examination are used in the diagnosis of incisional hernia. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the difference between physical examination and abdominal ultrasonography at the diagnosis of incisional hernia in patients who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery. METHODS: A total of 123 patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass type bariatric surgery performed by laparoscopy were analyzed for the presence or absence of hernia by physical and ultrasonography examination at each trocar incision site. RESULTS: In our results, a total of 7 hernias were detected by physical examination, while ultrasonography detected a total of 56 hernias in at least one of the incision sites. Lin's concordance analysis showed that the tests are not concordant. The association between body mass index and hernia detection (p=0.04 for physical examination and p=0.052 for ultrasonography) was observed. Ultrasonography detected more incisional hernias in 10-mm or larger trocars than in 5-mm trocars (p<0.0001, p<0.05). No differences were noted among the trocar types that were used. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal ultrasonography showed to have a higher accuracy than physical examination, resulting in a substantial increase in incisional hernia detection at the trocar sites.

A comprehensive review of adverse events to drugs used in COVID-19 patients: Recent clinical evidence.

BACKGROUND: Since the breakthrough of the pandemic, several drugs have been used to treat COVID-19 patients. This review aims to gather information on adverse events (AE) related to most drugs used in this context. METHODS: We performed a literature search to find articles that contained information about AE in COVID-19 patients. We analysed and reviewed the most relevant studies in the Medline (via PubMed), Scopus and Web of Science. The most frequent AE identified were grouped in our qualitative analysis by System Organ Class (SOC), the highest level of the MedDRA medical terminology for each of the drugs studied. RESULTS: The most frequent SOCs among the included drugs are investigations (n = 7 drugs); skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (n = 5 drugs); and nervous system disorders, infections and infestations, gastrointestinal disorders, hepatobiliary disorders, and metabolism and nutrition disorders (n = 4 drugs). Other SOCs also emerged, such as general disorders and administration site conditions, renal and urinary disorders, vascular disorders and cardiac disorders (n = 3 drugs). Less frequent SOC were eye disorders, respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders, musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, and immune system disorders (n = 2 drugs). Psychiatric disorders, and injury, poisoning and procedural complications were also reported (n = 1 drug). CONCLUSIONS: Some SOCs seem to be more frequent than others among the COVID-19 drugs included, although neither of the studies included reported causality analysis. For that purpose, further clinical studies with robust methodologies, as randomised controlled trials, should be designed and performed.

Incisional hernia after bariatric surgery: only the physical examination is enough? / Hérnia incisional após a cirurgia bariátrica: apenas o exame físico é suficiente?

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is characterized by a bulging of the abdominal wall caused by the prolapse of intracavitary structures, such as a segment of the small intestine, through the trocar orifice. Ultrasonography and physical examination are used in the diagnosis of incisional hernia. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the difference between physical examination and abdominal ultrasonography at the diagnosis of incisional hernia in patients who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery. METHODS: A total of 123 patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass type bariatric surgery performed by laparoscopy were analyzed for the presence or absence of hernia by physical and ultrasonography examination at each trocar incision site. RESULTS: In our results, a total of 7 hernias were detected by physical examination, while ultrasonography detected a total of 56 hernias in at least one of the incision sites. Lin's concordance analysis showed that the tests are not concordant. The association between body mass index and hernia detection (p=0.04 for physical examination and p=0.052 for ultrasonography) was observed. Ultrasonography detected more incisional hernias in 10-mm or larger trocars than in 5-mm trocars (p<0.0001, p<0.05). No differences were noted among the trocar types that were used. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal ultrasonography showed to have a higher accuracy than physical examination, resulting in a substantial increase in incisional hernia detection at the trocar sites.

RESUMO RACIONAL: A hérnia incisional é caracterizada por um abaulamento da parede abdominal causada por um prolapso das estruturas intracavitárias, como um segmento do intestino delgado, através de um orifício de trocarte. A ultrassonografia e o exame físico são usados no diagnóstico da hérnia incisional. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a diferença entre o exame físico e a ultrassonografia abdominal no diagnóstico da hérnia incisional em pacientes submetidos a cirurgia bariátrica por videolaparoscopia. MÉTODOS: O total de 123 pacientes submetidos à cirurgia bariátrica, tipo derivação gástrica em Y de Roux, foram avaliados para a presença ou ausência de hérnia incisional por exame físico e ultrassonografia, nos sítios incisionais de cada trocarte. RESULTADOS: O total de sete hérnias foram detectados por exame físico, enquanto a ultrassonografia detectou um total de 56 hérnias em pelo menos um sítio incisional. A análise de concordância de Lin mostrou que os testes empregados não são concordantes. A associação entre o Índice de Massa Corpórea e a detecção de hérnia foi observada (p=0.04, para exame físico, p=0.052 para ultrassonografia). A ultrassonografia detectou mais hérnias incisionais em trocartes de 10 mm ou mais do que em trocartes de 5 mm (p<0,0001, p<0.05). Não foi observada diferença entre os tipos de trocartes empregados. CONCLUSÕES: A ultrassonografia abdominal demonstrou ter acurácia mais elevada que o exame físico, resultando em um aumento substancial na detecção de hérnia incisional nos locais de inserção dos trocartes.

[Looking back on 20 years of work at the Porto Pharmacovigilance Centre, Portugal]. / Retrospectiva de 20 anos de atividade da Unidade de Farmacovigilância do Porto, Portugal.

Since 1963, the World Health Organization has acknowledged pharmacovigilance as a priority area in global public health, guaranteeing permanent monitoring of drug safety. This study aimed to characterize the reports of adverse drug reactions received by the Porto Pharmacovigilance Centre (UFPorto), Portugal, in the unit's two decades of work. The analysis included all reports of suspected adverse drug reactions received from January 2001 to December 2019. We calculated the annual reporting rates and distribution by origin, type of notifier and place of work, severity, prior knowledge, and causality of the reported adverse drug reactions. During the study period, UFPorto received 9,711 notifications of suspected adverse drug reactions. Hospital institutions reported the most suspected adverse drug reactions (n = 6,003; 64%), as did physicians among healthcare workers (n = 5,284; 54.4%). The most frequently reported adverse events were severe (n = 6,275; 72%) and are described in the respective Summary of Product Characteristics (n = 6,978; 72%). Most of the reports received by UFPorto were evaluated as having "probable" causality (n = 7,473; 77%), independently of the type of notifier. The results are consistent with other data previously reported in the international medical literature and official national reports. However, the underreporting rates are still higher than expected. In approximately 20 years, UFPorto has experienced an increase in its activity in various areas of drug safety.

Desde 1963 que a farmacovigilância foi reconhecida como uma área prioritária na saúde pública a nível global pela Organização Mundial da Saúde, garantindo a monitorização permanente da segurança dos medicamentos. O objetivo deste trabalho foi caracterizar as reações adversas a medicamentos recebidas pela Unidade de Farmacovigilância do Porto (UFPorto), Portugal, ao longo de duas décadas de atividade. Foram consideradas todas as notificações de suspeitas de reações adversas a medicamentos recebidas entre janeiro de 2001 e dezembro de 2019. Foram calculadas as taxas de notificação anuais, assim como a sua distribuição por origem, tipo de notificador e local de exercício da atividade, gravidade, conhecimento prévio e causalidade das reações adversas a medicamentos notificadas. No período em estudo, a UFPorto recebeu 9.711 notificações de suspeitas de reações adversas a medicamentos. As instituições hospitalares são aquelas que mais notificam (n = 6.003; 64%), assim como o médico entre os profissionais de saúde (n = 5.284; 54,4%). Os eventos adversos mais frequentemente reportados são graves (n = 6.275; 72%) e encontram-se descritos no respectivo Resumo das Características do Medicamento (n = 6.978; 72%). À maioria das notificações avaliadas pela UFPorto foi atribuído o grau de causalidade "provável" (n = 7.473; 77%), independentemente do tipo de notificador. Os resultados obtidos são concordantes com outros dados previamente reportados na literatura médica internacional e em relatórios oficiais nacionais. Contudo, continua-se a verificar taxas de subnotificação acentuadas, face ao esperado. Ao longo de aproximadamente 20 anos de atividade da UFPorto, tem-se verificado um aumento da sua atividade nas diversas vertentes da segurança do medicamento.

Desde 1963 la farmacovigilancia fue reconocida por la Organización Mundial de la Salud, como un área prioritaria en la salud pública a nivel global, garantizando la monitorización permanente de la seguridad de los medicamentos. El objetivo de este trabajo fue caracterizar las reacciones adversas a medicamentos recibidas por la Unidad de Farmacovigilancia de Oporto (UFPorto), Portugal, a lo largo de dos décadas de actividad. Se consideraron todas las notificaciones de sospechas de reacciones adversas a medicamentos, recibidas entre enero de 2001 y diciembre de 2019. Se calcularon las tasas de notificación anuales, así como su distribución por origen, tipo de notificador y lugar de ejercicio de la actividad, gravedad, conocimiento previo y causalidad de las reacciones adversas a medicamentos notificadas. En el período de estudio, la UFPorto recibió 9.711 notificaciones de sospechas reacciones adversas a medicamentos. Las instituciones hospitalarias son quienes más notifican (n = 6.003; 64%), así como el médico entre los profesionales de salud (n = 5.284; 54,4%). Los eventos adversos más frecuentemente reportados son graves (n = 6.275; 72%) y se encuentran descritos en lo respectivo Resumen de las Características del Medicamento (n = 6 978; 72%). A la mayoría de las notificaciones evaluadas por la UFPorto se le atribuyó el grado de causalidad "probable" (n = 7.473; 77%), independientemente del tipo de notificador. Los resultados obtenidos son concordantes con otros datos previamente reportados en la literatura médica internacional y en informes oficiales nacionales. No obstante, se continúa verificando tasas de subregistro acentuadas, frente a lo esperado. A lo largo de aproximadamente 20 años de actividad de la UFPorto, se ha verificado un aumento de su actividad en las diversas vertientes de la seguridad del medicamento.

Guiding axes for drug safety management of pharmacovigilance centres during the COVID-19 era.

The COVID-19 pandemic presents several challenges to the organisation and workflow of pharmacovigilance centres as a result of the massive increase in reports, the need for quick detection, processing and reporting of safety issues and the management of these within the context of lack of complete information on the disease. Pharmacovigilance centres permanently monitor the safety profile of medicines, ensuring risk management to evaluate the benefit-risk relationship. However, traditional pharmacovigilance approaches of spontaneous reporting, are not suitable in the context of a pandemic; the scientific community and regulators need information on a near real-time point. The aim of this commentary is to suggest six interrelated multidimensional guiding axes for drug safety management by pharmacovigilance centres during the COVID-19 pandemic. This working plan can increase knowledge on COVID-19 and associated therapeutic approaches, support decisions by the regulatory authorities, oppose fake news and promote more efficient public health protection.

Underexpression of miR-126-3p in Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the expression of miR-126-3p and its potential as a biomarker for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and to better understand the prognosis, comorbidities, and lifestyle habits associated with the disease. METHODS: Fifty-nine individuals were distributed into either the study group (38 CCA patients) or the control group (21 individuals without liver diseases). Total RNA was extracted, cDNA synthesis was performed, and miR-126-3p expression was assessed using real-time PCR. For statistical analysis, alpha error was set at 5%. RESULTS: MiR-126-3p was found to be underexpressed in the study group relative to the controls (0.42; P=0.001). Additionally, marked underexpression was found in the study group in when associated with smoking (0.28; P=0.0001), alcoholism (0.19; P=0.0001), hypertension (0.29; P=000.1), and diabetes (0.12; P=0.0003) relative to the controls. No association was found between miR-126-3p expression and tumor subtypes (iCCA=0.42; pCCA=0.45; dCCA=0.72; P=0.9155). A total of 67% of dCCA patients were event-free at 16 months of follow up, while both pCCA and iCCA exhibited event-free survival rates of 25%, though there was no significant difference between these subgroups (P=0.273). CONCLUSION: The underexpression of mir-126-3p is associated with cholangiocarcinoma and can be potentiated by alcoholism, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking, the latter of which is an independent risk factor for this cancer. Furthermore, dCCA patients exhibit higher survival rates relative to patients with pCCA and iCCA.
.

Burden, Stress, and Depression in Informal Caregivers of Patients Pre and Post Liver Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Caring for a patient with chronic liver disease involves exposure to factors that increase family caregivers' vulnerability to developing mental disorders. This study reassessed the scores of burden, stress, and depression in informal (family) caregivers of patients with liver disease after liver transplant. METHODS: In this observational and descriptive study, the caregivers were reassessed for the same outcomes 4 to 10 years following the initial assessment pre-transplant. The data were obtained from the identification card, the interview script, the Brazilian version of the Caregiver Burden Scale, the Lipp Inventory of Stress Symptoms for Adults, and the Beck Depression Inventory. Descriptive statistics of pre- and post-liver transplant phases were calculated, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the burden scores. RESULTS: The 5 caregivers were women, with a mean age of 51.6 (SD, 8.38) years. All of the caregivers' (100%) burden score increased, 2 caregivers needed to seek some form of help, and 3 caregivers showed an indication of burden risk. Regarding stress symptoms, 3 caregivers (60%) maintained a score indicating no stress, 2 caregivers (40%) presented increased scores, and the predominant symptoms changed from psychological to physical. Regarding depression, 3 caregivers (60%) maintained the minimum level of symptoms for depression, and 2 caregivers (40%) presented increased scores. CONCLUSION: After liver transplant, caregivers' burden scores increased, and levels of stress and depression increased for caregivers who already showed symptoms in the pre-transplant phase.

Retrospectiva de 20 anos de atividade da Unidade de Farmacovigilância do Porto, Portugal / Looking back on 20 years of work at the Porto Pharmacovigilance Centre, Portugal / Retrospectiva de 20 años de actividad de la Unidad de Farmacovigilancia de Oporto, Portugal

Resumo: Desde 1963 que a farmacovigilância foi reconhecida como uma área prioritária na saúde pública a nível global pela Organização Mundial da Saúde, garantindo a monitorização permanente da segurança dos medicamentos. O objetivo deste trabalho foi caracterizar as reações adversas a medicamentos recebidas pela Unidade de Farmacovigilância do Porto (UFPorto), Portugal, ao longo de duas décadas de atividade. Foram consideradas todas as notificações de suspeitas de reações adversas a medicamentos recebidas entre janeiro de 2001 e dezembro de 2019. Foram calculadas as taxas de notificação anuais, assim como a sua distribuição por origem, tipo de notificador e local de exercício da atividade, gravidade, conhecimento prévio e causalidade das reações adversas a medicamentos notificadas. No período em estudo, a UFPorto recebeu 9.711 notificações de suspeitas de reações adversas a medicamentos. As instituições hospitalares são aquelas que mais notificam (n = 6.003; 64%), assim como o médico entre os profissionais de saúde (n = 5.284; 54,4%). Os eventos adversos mais frequentemente reportados são graves (n = 6.275; 72%) e encontram-se descritos no respectivo Resumo das Características do Medicamento (n = 6.978; 72%). À maioria das notificações avaliadas pela UFPorto foi atribuído o grau de causalidade "provável" (n = 7.473; 77%), independentemente do tipo de notificador. Os resultados obtidos são concordantes com outros dados previamente reportados na literatura médica internacional e em relatórios oficiais nacionais. Contudo, continua-se a verificar taxas de subnotificação acentuadas, face ao esperado. Ao longo de aproximadamente 20 anos de atividade da UFPorto, tem-se verificado um aumento da sua atividade nas diversas vertentes da segurança do medicamento.

Abstract: Since 1963, the World Health Organization has acknowledged pharmacovigilance as a priority area in global public health, guaranteeing permanent monitoring of drug safety. This study aimed to characterize the reports of adverse drug reactions received by the Porto Pharmacovigilance Centre (UFPorto), Portugal, in the unit's two decades of work. The analysis included all reports of suspected adverse drug reactions received from January 2001 to December 2019. We calculated the annual reporting rates and distribution by origin, type of notifier and place of work, severity, prior knowledge, and causality of the reported adverse drug reactions. During the study period, UFPorto received 9,711 notifications of suspected adverse drug reactions. Hospital institutions reported the most suspected adverse drug reactions (n = 6,003; 64%), as did physicians among healthcare workers (n = 5,284; 54.4%). The most frequently reported adverse events were severe (n = 6,275; 72%) and are described in the respective Summary of Product Characteristics (n = 6,978; 72%). Most of the reports received by UFPorto were evaluated as having "probable" causality (n = 7,473; 77%), independently of the type of notifier. The results are consistent with other data previously reported in the international medical literature and official national reports. However, the underreporting rates are still higher than expected. In approximately 20 years, UFPorto has experienced an increase in its activity in various areas of drug safety.

Resumen: Desde 1963 la farmacovigilancia fue reconocida por la Organización Mundial de la Salud, como un área prioritaria en la salud pública a nivel global, garantizando la monitorización permanente de la seguridad de los medicamentos. El objetivo de este trabajo fue caracterizar las reacciones adversas a medicamentos recibidas por la Unidad de Farmacovigilancia de Oporto (UFPorto), Portugal, a lo largo de dos décadas de actividad. Se consideraron todas las notificaciones de sospechas de reacciones adversas a medicamentos, recibidas entre enero de 2001 y diciembre de 2019. Se calcularon las tasas de notificación anuales, así como su distribución por origen, tipo de notificador y lugar de ejercicio de la actividad, gravedad, conocimiento previo y causalidad de las reacciones adversas a medicamentos notificadas. En el período de estudio, la UFPorto recibió 9.711 notificaciones de sospechas reacciones adversas a medicamentos. Las instituciones hospitalarias son quienes más notifican (n = 6.003; 64%), así como el médico entre los profesionales de salud (n = 5.284; 54,4%). Los eventos adversos más frecuentemente reportados son graves (n = 6.275; 72%) y se encuentran descritos en lo respectivo Resumen de las Características del Medicamento (n = 6 978; 72%). A la mayoría de las notificaciones evaluadas por la UFPorto se le atribuyó el grado de causalidad "probable" (n = 7.473; 77%), independientemente del tipo de notificador. Los resultados obtenidos son concordantes con otros datos previamente reportados en la literatura médica internacional y en informes oficiales nacionales. No obstante, se continúa verificando tasas de subregistro acentuadas, frente a lo esperado. A lo largo de aproximadamente 20 años de actividad de la UFPorto, se ha verificado un aumento de su actividad en las diversas vertientes de la seguridad del medicamento.

Validation of the Adapted Social Assessment Instrument for Liver Transplantation Candidates.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Assessment is considered a duty, as well as a part of the tasks of social workers; in addition, they have an ethical commitment to improve their working tools. This study aimed at validating the Adapted Social Assessment Instrument used in a transplant center in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, for liver transplantation candidates, requiring its improvement and strengthening. METHODS: The methodology was based on both Marxian dialectics and the method of content validation. The content validation analysis was performed by 5 social workers from 3 Brazilian transplant centers. They evaluated the 5 domains of the instrument: identification, socio-demographic profile, eligibility criteria, evaluation, and social interventions. Descriptive statistics of data were performed, and qualitative analysis was associated to the participant observation. RESULTS: The 5 professionals (100%) assigned the scores 3 and 4, which have demonstrated clarity, relevance, and feasibility, pointing out suggestions for improvement, some of which were considered. CONCLUSIONS: The instrument was evaluated with an approval percentage of above 80%; therefore, the instrument is a valid measure.