Prognostic factors for significant 6-month recovery in dysthyroid optic neuropathy in a tertiary center: A series of 69 eyes in 38 patients.

PURPOSE: To identify initial features associated with significant recovery in patients with Graves' disease dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) treated according to EUGOGO guidelines by intravenous glucocorticoids (ivGC) and decompression surgery in first and second-line, respectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients referred to our expert multidisciplinary consultation over a 6-year period underwent systematic exploration: endocrine assessment, ophthalmic examination and radiological exploration. Visual recovery, based on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and visual field (VF), were evaluated at baseline, 1week and 6months. Baseline parameters were then tested for prognostic value on univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (69 eyes) with DON were included. Significant recovery at 6months was found in 48/69 eyes (70%), partial recovery in 18/69 (26%), and no recovery in 3/69 (4%). Fifty-one eyes (28 patients) required surgical decompression after ivGC. These patients showed more severe presentation at diagnosis, had received significantly less GC for Graves' orbitopathy before onset of DON, and showed greater fat prolapse on CT scans compared to non-operated patients. On multivariate analysis, male gender (P=0.001), cumulative GC dose>1g before DON diagnosis (P=0.048) and initial BCVA≤0.3 (P=0.004) were significantly associated with better outcomes, whereas Clinical Activity Score>5 (P=0.013) was associated with a poorer outcome. CONCLUSION: This study confirms a generally favorable 6-month recovery rate in DON treated according to EUGOGO guidelines and provides new information on baseline predictors of poor evolution. These results may help the respective indications for medical and surgical treatment to be more effectively combined in the future.

Assessment of three MR perfusion software packages in predicting final infarct volume after mechanical thrombectomy.

AIMS: To evaluate the performance of three MR perfusion software packages (A: RAPID; B: OleaSphere; and C: Philips) in predicting final infarct volume (FIV). METHODS: This cohort study included patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy following an admission MRI and undergoing a follow-up MRI. Admission MRIs were post-processed by three packages to quantify ischemic core and perfusion deficit volume (PDV). Automatic package outputs (uncorrected volumes) were collected and corrected by an expert. Successful revascularization was defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score ≥2B. Uncorrected and corrected volumes were compared between each package and with FIV according to mTICI score. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were included, of whom 67 (71.28%) had a mTICI score ≥2B. In patients with successful revascularization, ischemic core volumes did not differ significantly from FIV regardless of the package used for uncorrected and corrected volumes (p>0.15). Conversely, assessment of PDV showed significant differences for uncorrected volumes. In patients with unsuccessful revascularization, the uncorrected PDV of packages A (median absolute difference -40.9 mL) and B (median absolute difference -67.0 mL) overestimated FIV to a lesser degree than package C (median absolute difference -118.7 mL; p=0.03 and p=0.12, respectively). After correction, PDV did not differ significantly from FIV for all three packages (p≥0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Automated MRI perfusion software packages estimate FIV with high variability in measurement despite using the same dataset. This highlights the need for routine expert evaluation and correction of automated package output data for appropriate patient management.

Safety and efficacy of prophylactic levetiracetam for prevention of epileptic seizures in the acute phase of intracerebral haemorrhage (PEACH): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of early seizures (occurring within 7 days of stroke onset) after intracerebral haemorrhage reaches 30% when subclinical seizures are diagnosed by continuous EEG. Early seizures might be associated with haematoma expansion and worse neurological outcomes. Current guidelines do not recommend prophylactic antiseizure treatment in this setting. We aimed to assess whether prophylactic levetiracetam would reduce the risk of acute seizures in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage. METHODS: The double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 PEACH trial was conducted at three stroke units in France. Patients (aged 18 years or older) who presented with a non-traumatic intracerebral haemorrhage within 24 h after onset were randomly assigned (1:1) to levetiracetam (intravenous 500 mg every 12 h) or matching placebo. Randomisation was done with a web-based system and stratified by centre and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at baseline. Treatment was continued for 6 weeks. Continuous EEG was started within 24 h after inclusion and recorded over 48 h. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of at least one clinical seizure within 72 h of inclusion or at least one electrographic seizure recorded on continuous EEG, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which comprised all patients who were randomly assigned to treatment and who had a continuous EEG performed. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02631759, and is now closed. Recruitment was prematurely stopped after 48% of the recruitment target was reached due to a low recruitment rate and cessation of funding. FINDINGS: Between June 1, 2017, and April 14, 2020, 50 patients with mild-to-moderate severity intracerebral haemorrhage were included: 24 were assigned to levetiracetam and 26 to placebo. During the first 72 h, a clinical or electrographic seizure was observed in three (16%) of 19 patients in the levetiracetam group versus ten (43%) of 23 patients in the placebo group (odds ratio 0·16, 95% CI 0·03-0·94, p=0·043). All seizures in the first 72 h were electrographic seizures only. No difference in depression or anxiety reporting was observed between the groups at 1 month or 3 months. Depression was recorded in three (13%) patients who received levetiracetam versus four (15%) patients who received placebo, and anxiety was reported for two (8%) patients versus one (4%) patient. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events in the levetiracetam group versus the placebo group were headache (nine [39%] vs six [24%]), pain (three [13%] vs ten [40%]), and falls (seven [30%] vs four [16%]). The most frequent serious adverse events were neurological deterioration due to the intracerebral haemorrhage (one [4%] vs four [16%]) and severe pneumonia (two [9%] vs two [8%]). No treatment-related death was reported in either group. INTERPRETATION: Levetiracetam might be effective in preventing acute seizures in intracerebral haemorrhage. Larger studies are needed to determine whether seizure prophylaxis improves functional outcome in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage. FUNDING: French Ministry of Health.