Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros












Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 230, 2024 May 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38809307

RESUMO

The influence of anatomical parameters on urinary continence (UC) after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) remains uncharted. Our objective was to evaluate their association with UC at 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively. Data from patients who underwent RS-RARP were prospectively collected. Continence was defined as no pad use. Anatomic variables were measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of UC at each time point. We included 158 patients with a median age of 60 years, most of whom had a localized tumor (≤ cT2). On multivariate analyses, at 3 months post-surgery, urinary incontinence (UI) rises with age, odds ratio (OR) 1.07 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.004-1.142] and with prostate volume (PV), OR 1.029 (95% CI 1.006-1.052); it reduces with longer membranous urethral length (MUL), OR 0.875 (95% CI 0.780-0.983) and with higher membranous urethral volume (MUV), OR 0.299 (95% CI 0.121-0.737). At 6 months, UI rises with PV, OR 1.033 (95% CI 1.011-1.056) and decreases with MUV, OR 0.1504 (95% CI 0.050-0.444). Significantly, at 12 months post-surgery, the only predictor of UI is MUL, OR 0.830 (95% CI 0.706-0.975), establishing a threshold associated with a risk of UI of 5% (MUL > 15 mm) in opposition to a risk of 25% (MUL < 10 mm). This single institutional study requires external validation. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective cohort study supporting MUL as the single independent predictor of UC at 12 months post-surgery. By establishing MUL thresholds, we enable precise patient counseling.


Assuntos
Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Uretra , Incontinência Urinária , Humanos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Incontinência Urinária/prevenção & controle , Uretra/diagnóstico por imagem , Uretra/cirurgia , Idoso , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Próstata/cirurgia , Próstata/patologia , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Fatores de Tempo
2.
J Robot Surg ; 17(5): 2503-2511, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37528286

RESUMO

Urinary incontinence is one of the main concerns for patients after radical prostatectomy. Differences in surgical experience among surgeons could partly explain the wide range of frequencies observed. Our aim was to evaluate the association between the surgeons` experience and center caseload with relation to urinary continence recovery after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP). Prospective observational single-center study. Five surgeons consecutively operated 405 patients between July 2017 and February 2022. Continence recovery was evaluated with pad count and by employing the short form of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-SF), pre- and postoperatively at 1 year. Non-parametric tests were used. Median age was 63 years, 30% of patients presented with local advanced disease; the positive surgical margin rate (over 3 mm length) was 16%. Complication rate was 1% (Clavien-Dindo > II). One year after surgery, continence was assessed in 282 patients, of whom 87% were pad free and 51% never leaked (ICIQ-SF = 0). With respect to the mean annual number of procedures per surgeon, divided in < 20, 20-39 and ≥ 40, pad-free rates were achieved in 93%, 85%, and 84% and absence of urine leak rates in 47%, 62% and 48% of patients, respectively. Postoperative median ICIQ-SF was five. We acknowledge the limitation of a 12-month follow-up and the fact that we are a medium-volume center. There is no statistically significant association between continence recovery, surgeon's experience and center caseload. Continence recovery at 1 year after surgery is adequate and robust to surgeon's experience.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Cirurgiões , Incontinência Urinária , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Próstata/cirurgia , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Incontinência Urinária/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...