Pickleball- and Paddleball-Related Injuries to the Upper Extremity.

Introduction While pickleball and paddleball are rapidly growing as popular sports in the United States, research on the incidence of hand and upper extremity injuries and treatments in outpatient clinics are lacking. This study evaluates the incidence rates and treatment options, both surgically and nonsurgically, for patients presenting with pickleball/paddleball-related injuries. Methods A retrospective database search of our multispecialty, multilocation electronic medical record (EMR) system from 2015 to 2022 identified 204 patients with outpatient pickleball- and paddleball-related injuries. The data from these patients' charts were reviewed for injury incidences, treatment trends, and demographics. Results  The majority of patients suffered wrist fractures due to a fall/dive and were treated nonsurgically. The most common surgical treatment, when required, was open reduction and internal fixation of the distal radius. We found that pickleball and paddleball players who sustained wrist fractures required surgery at a higher rate than the general population if above the age of 65. Conclusion As pickleball and paddleball continue to gain popularity, hand surgeons should be aware of the types of injuries that can occur and, when possible, counsel patients accordingly to try to prevent them. Additionally, hand surgeons should recognize the common treatments and outcomes that arise from pickleball/paddleball-related injuries.

Abnormal Patterns of Biceps and Triceps Co-Contraction Following Elbow Surgery May Result in Elbow Stiffness.

Objectives: This study examines the pattern of muscular contraction and the intensity of this contraction of the biceps and triceps following elbow surgery. Methods: We performed a prospective electromyographic study of 16 patients undergoing 19 surgical procedures on the elbow joint. We measured the resting EMG signal intensity of the biceps and triceps of the operated and the normal sides at 90 degrees. We then calculated the peak EMG signal intensity during passive elbow flexion and extension of the operated side. Results: Seventeen of 19 elbows (89%) displayed a co-contraction pattern of the biceps and triceps near the end of flexion and extension during the passive range of motion. The co-contraction pattern was observed near the end of the range of motion in both flexion and extension. In addition to the observed co-contraction patterns, we detected higher contraction intensities for the biceps and triceps muscles in all patients in both flexion and extension for the elbows, which had been treated surgically. Further analysis suggests an inverse correlation between the biceps contraction intensity and the arc of motion measured at the latest follow-up. Conclusion: The co-contraction pattern and increased contraction intensity of periarticular muscle groups may result in internal splinting mechanisms, contributing to the development of elbow joint stiffness, which is frequently observed following elbow surgery.

All-Inside Versus Outside-in Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Peripheral Tears.

PURPOSE: Triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) peripheral tears with persistent wrist pain can be treated with arthroscopic surgical repair owing to vascularization of the peripheral region. The safety and efficacy of all-inside repair has been shown in prior case series. The purpose of this study was to compare two methods of arthroscopic peripheral TFCC repair: all-inside vertical mattress and outside-in horizontal mattress. METHODS: A 5-year retrospective review was performed on patients treated from 2016 to 2021 with wrist arthroscopy and TFCC repair for Palmer 1B tears. Patients with ulnar extrinsic ligament repair, distal radioulnar joint instability, concomitant ulnar shortening osteotomy, and extensor carpi ulnaris instability were excluded. Patient therapy and office visit records were reviewed. Outcomes including Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH); range of motion; grip strength; immobilization time; complications; and need for revision procedures were compared. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were included in the study, 32 in the outside-in group and 20 in the all-inside group. The average follow-up length was 24.8 weeks, with similar range of motion and strength in both groups. The average postoperative QuickDASH score was 13 in the outside-in group and 9 in the all-inside group at 43.5 months, compared with the preoperative QuickDASH scores of 47 and 50, respectively. Mean immobilization time was longer for outside-in than for all-inside (5.25 vs 2.0 weeks, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: All-inside arthroscopic peripheral TFCC repair showed range of motion, grip strength, complications, revisions, and postoperative improvement in QuickDASH scores similar to those with the outside-in technique. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV; retrospective comparative study.

A Prospective Evaluation of the Prevalence of Persistent Median Artery in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Background: The median artery is an embryonic structure that typically regresses during gestation. Occasionally, the artery remains and is then termed a persistent median artery (PMA). A PMA can be associated with other anatomic anomalies, and has been known to contribute to carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Recent literature has observed an increase in PMA prevalence, speculated to indicate microevolutionary change. We performed a prospective observational study to investigate the current prevalence rate of PMA in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR). Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained. From October 2020 to January 2021, patients ≥18 years old undergoing open CTR by 9 orthopaedic hand surgeons were included in analysis. Patients undergoing endoscopic CTR were excluded. Intraoperatively, the carpal tunnel was evaluated for the presence of a PMA, median nerve anomalies, or any other anatomic anomalies. If a patient underwent bilateral CTR during the study, only one side was included in analysis as determined randomly. Results: Three hundred and sixty open CTRs in 327 patients were performed during the study. Twenty-seven PMAs were identified, for an overall prevalence rate of 8.3%. The average age of patients with a PMA was 63.6 years (SD 13.3 years), consisting of 15 men and 12 women. There were no statistical differences in age, gender, or laterality between patients that did and did not have a PMA. Thirty-three patients underwent bilateral CTR during the study, with 3 being found to have a PMA unilaterally, and zero having a PMA bilaterally. Two bifid median nerves (0.6%) were also identified. Conclusion: This study represents the highest prevalence rate of PMA directly observed in CTR patients reported to date (8.3%). A PMA is not a rare finding, and it should be recognized and protected during CTR. Occasionally, a PMA can be the cause of an acute presentation of CTS.

Outpatient Visit Current Procedural Terminology Code Level Selection Trends in Hand Surgery Following Criteria Changes by the American Medical Association.

INTRODUCTION:  Beginning on January 1, 2021, the American Medical Association (AMA) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented considerable revisions with regard to the outpatient evaluation and management (E/M) criteria dictating the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code level selection. The primary goal of the current study was to determine how the recent E/M coding criteria changes have impacted code level selection by orthopedic hand surgeons in the outpatient setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS:  All outpatient visits within the hand and wrist surgery division of a single orthopedic practice were collected during two timeframes: March 1, 2019, to June 30, 2019, and March 1, 2021, to June 30, 2021. Procedure codes and insurance categories were collected for each visit. The primary endpoint analyzed was the visit level of care based on CPT E/M codes. For each timeframe, we determined the number of total visits that were coded at each level and expressed them as a percentage of the total visits for that time period. The insurance plan billed for each visit was recorded and classified as Medicare, Medicaid, Workers' Compensation, or commercial. RESULTS:  In 2019, prior to the billing level requirement changes, 7.2% of all visits were billed as level 2, 84.8% of all visits were billed as level 3, and 7.8% of all visits were billed as level 4. In 2021, 1.9% of visits were billed as level 2, 47.3% of visits were billed as level 3, and 50.5% of visits were billed as level 4. Level 1 and 5 visits did not exceed 0.5% in either timeframe. Within each insurance category, the proportion of visit levels of care followed a similar trend of reduced level 2 and 3 visits and increased level 4 visits from 2019 to 2021. CONCLUSION: We noted a significant trend toward higher code level selection following the recent code level changes, and we anticipate these recent code selection trends to have major financial implications moving forward.

Tramadol Versus Codeine in Hand Surgery.

Introduction Tramadol and codeine are both commonly prescribed in the setting of surgery or injury to the upper extremity. Despite their comparable strength in terms of opioid receptor affinity, the drugs differ pharmacologically and thus are not completely interchangeable. Methods This study analyzes all prescriptions for codeine and tramadol by a group of hand surgeons over a one-year period and tests the central hypothesis that the prescribing and refill patterns of these two drugs would be similar. Results Despite similar prescription amounts in terms of morphine equivalents, patients receiving tramadol required prescription refills at a significantly higher amount than those receiving codeine, and these individuals tended to be older. Additionally, patients treated nonoperatively were prescribed significantly more tramadol than those treated surgically. Conclusion Our findings suggest that codeine and tramadol are not equivalent in managing upper extremity pain. Further study is needed to articulate the situations in which physicians and patients are better served by tramadol versus codeine.

Do Postoperative Telehealth Visits Require a High Rate of Redundant In-Person Evaluation After Upper Extremity Surgery?

Background Telehealth platforms may save resources for patients and providers, but the precise impact of their incorporation during the postoperative period is not well understood. The goal of this study is to determine whether telehealth incorporation in the postoperative period leads to an overall increase in healthcare utilization after upper extremity surgery. Methodology Patients seen for a postoperative telehealth visit after upper extremity surgery were randomly selected and retrospectively enrolled. Complications and the total number of postoperative visits before clinical discharge were recorded and compared to controls matched by surgery type and surgeon. Results A total of 56 patients were seen for 60 telehealth visits. The most common surgical procedures were distal radius open-reduction internal fixation (n = 8), open carpal tunnel release (n = 8), and endoscopic carpal tunnel release (n = 6). One telehealth visit (1.7%) required conversion to in-person evaluation due to suspected superficial infection necessitating in-person physical examination. The average number of postoperative visits prior to clinical discharge was 2.6 in the telehealth group compared to 2.7 in matched controls (p = 0.886). Complication rates were similar between groups. Conclusions The rate of necessary in-person evaluation after postoperative telehealth visits was less than 2%. The incorporation of telehealth visits did not appear to increase healthcare utilization after upper extremity surgery. Accordingly, the postoperative period is likely an ideal application for safe and effective telehealth implementation.

An Evaluation of the Source and Content of Dupuytren's Disease Information Available on the Internet.

Introduction The internet continues to expand in both size and number of users, and patients are using the internet with increasing frequency to research orthopedic conditions and treatment options. Despite the prevalence of patients searching for medical information, the quality of the available information varies substantially. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and accuracy of the information available on the internet for Dupuytren's disease. We hypothesized that the informational content found on the internet regarding this condition would be of acceptable quality. Methods The search phrasing "'Dupuytren' OR 'Dupuytren's'" was used to mimic how patients would likely search for information on the disease. These terms were entered into the five English-language search engines with the most frequent use on the internet. On each search engine, the first 50 URLs were recorded, including sponsored sites. The 250 total sites were filtered to remove duplicate sites and URLs linking to other search engines, resulting in a final list of 84 websites for informational scoring. A previously published information evaluation protocol was used to grade each website. Each site was graded according to these guidelines by two authors and scored based on authorship, content, disease summary, treatment options, pathogenesis, complications, and results. A third author resolved any conflict on authorship or content before analysis. The resultant "informational value" is the sum of the disease summary, treatment options, pathogenesis, complications, and results and can range from 0-100.  Results The mean total information score for all sites was 47.5 out of 100 points. Forty-three (51.2%) of the websites evaluated were authored by a physician or academic institution, and thirty-four (40.5%) of the sites were commercial in nature. The final seven websites (8.3%) had nonphysician, unidentified, or lay authorship. Physician and academic institution authored websites had an average informational score of 55.5 out of 100 points, compared to 39.7 out of 100 for all other websites. This difference was statistically significant (p <0.01). The mean informational score for the 10 sponsored websites was 16.4 out of 100. Conclusion We concluded that internet information on Dupuytren's disease is of poor quality and incomplete. Academic and physician authored sites have higher quality than commercial sites, but significant room for improvement still exists. Patients should be advised to identify the authorship of the websites they obtain information from and avoid advertisements and commercial sites.

A Prospective Evaluation of Postoperative Readmissions After Outpatient Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery.

Introduction Hand and upper extremity surgeries are largely performed in free-standing ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). Rates of unexpected hospitalizations or visits to the urgent care or emergency departments in the month following hand and upper extremity surgery have been widely varied in the literature. We prospectively followed patients after hand and upper extremity outpatient surgery to determine the rate of unplanned health care utilization with the hypothesis that hospital admissions, emergency room visits, and urgent care center visits would be higher than the rates currently reported by retrospective studies. Methods All patients undergoing outpatient hand and upper extremity surgery by five hand surgeons were prospectively followed to monitor for hospital readmissions, emergency room visits, and urgent care presentations. The patients' postoperative course was evaluated for direct transfers from the surgical center to the hospital. In addition, any urgent care or emergency room visits and hospital admissions for the first month after surgery were tabulated. Points of review of the patients' postoperative course included the following: (1) phone contact on the first postoperative day, (2) routine ASC postoperative phone calls two to three days postoperatively, (3) first postoperative office at approximately one to two weeks, and (4) phone contact or office evaluation one-month postoperatively based on surgeon preference for follow-up. Results A total of 583 patients were identified for participation, of whom 22 patients were excluded; thus, 561 patients were included for evaluation, with 47.2% women (n=265) and 52.8% men (n=296). The average age was 54 years (range: 14-102 years). Nine (1.6%) patients presented postoperatively for further evaluation at an urgent care or hospital (95% C.I. 0.8-3.1%). Five patients presented to an emergency room and four patients presented to an urgent care facility. Of those patients, two were admitted to the hospital due to shortness of breath (0.35%; 95% CI: -0.08 to 1.4%). Emergency room and urgent care visits that did not lead to admission accounted for 1.25% (95% CI: 0.6-2.6%). No patients were transferred from the ASC to the hospital or emergency room. Conclusion There was a low rate of postoperative utilization of urgent care and emergency room services with hand and upper extremity surgery performed at free-standing, ASCs. Hospital readmissions were rare, and no patients required transfer from an ambulatory care center to the hospital. Outpatient hand and upper extremity surgery is safe in an ambulatory care center, with low postoperative transfers and readmissions in the month following surgery.

A Prospective Evaluation of Complications after Use of Exposed Pins in the Hand and Wrist.

BACKGROUND: Kirschner wires are commonly used during hand surgical procedures. These pins are often left exposed (protruding from the skin) for ease of removal. Complications such as loosening, migration, or infection are not uncommon (ranging from 7 to 18 percent in current retrospective studies) and can compromise surgical outcome. This study evaluated the frequency of Kirschner wire-related complications. METHODS: All patients who had Kirschner wires placed as part of their surgical procedure in the hand or wrist by one of 12 attending hand surgeons over a 6-month period were enrolled prospectively. Complications were recorded by the attending surgeon at follow-up visits. Demographics and patient comorbidities including diabetes mellitus and smoking history were recorded. RESULTS: There were 141 patients enrolled and 230 pins used, including 65 women and 76 men. The mean age was 40.7 years. Thirteen patients were smokers, and eight had a history of diabetes. There were 35 soft-tissue procedures and 106 fractures. There were 35 complications (25 percent). There was a 12 percent rate of infection (n = 17), including two cases of osteomyelitis. There were 18 other complications, nine of which were major complications (6.4 percent). Smoking, age, and location (hand/fingers versus wrist) were significantly associated with infection. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, one in four patients treated with Kirschner wires developed a minor or major complication, a rate that is substantially higher than reported in existing retrospective studies. Although Kirschner wires are often needed during hand surgery, surgeons should be aware that adverse events are frequent. Patients and surgeons should be vigilant in the perioperative period. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

An Evaluation of Digital Imaging Studies in an Outpatient Orthopedic Setting.

BACKGROUND: Distribution of radiographic images in the outpatient setting on compact discs-recordable (CD-R) is commonplace. Opening, manipulating and interpreting these can be challenging. This study evaluated the availability and ease of use of CD-R to evaluate digital images in an outpatient orthopedic setting. METHODS: 118 CD-R containing diagnostic studies were evaluated by seven board certified orthopaedic surgeons. Surgeon age and self-perceived "tech savvy" scores were tabulated using a visual analog scale (VAS). Surgeons evaluated: ability and number of computers to open, autorun, and specific reader software. Time to load was recorded in seconds, type of study, presence of "not for diagnostic use", and if the disc required additional software. Studies were graded using a VAS for ease of opening, ability to move from image to image and/or between series, to manipulate the image, and to zoom and pan. RESULTS: There were 79 radiographs, 29 MRI's, and 10 CT scans. Seven (6%) had to be manually opened and four (3%) required software installation. Thirteen (11%) contained a warning that the studies should not be used for diagnostic purposes. Six (5%) of the studies could not be opened. For the opened studies, average time from disk insertion to image was 43.7 seconds overall (range 3-350), 65.3 seconds (range 21-191) for MRI and CT, and 35.2 seconds (range 5-177) for radiographs. CONCLUSION: The present digital imaging systems include different software types and a variety of interfaces. Improving this would decrease time and effort necessary to open and evaluate these studies, and improve efficiency. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Patient Satisfaction in the Preoperative Period: Preparing for Hand Surgery.

Background: The potential impact of the number and type of preoperative encounters on satisfaction rates prior to elective surgical procedures is unclear, specifically scheduling and medical clearance encounters. Methods: Questionnaires investigating satisfaction with the preoperative process were collected for 200 patients presenting for elective hand surgery. The number of telephone, surgeon, and medical clearance encounters were recorded, and satisfaction was determined for each type based on a 4-category Likert scale. All patients 18 years or older were included, while only patients providing incomplete questionnaires were excluded. Outcome data were assessed for associations between different encounter totals or types and satisfaction rates. Results: Among 200 patients, 197 completed the questionnaire and were included. Overall satisfaction with the preoperative process was 92.9%, with only 3% of patients dissatisfied. There was a significant association between satisfaction and the number of telephone and total encounters. Satisfaction fell below 90% after 4 or more telephone calls (66.6%, P = 0.005) and 5 or more total encounters (80%, P = 0.008). When considered individually, there was no significant association between satisfaction and the number of surgeon (P = 0.267) or medical office encounters (P = 0.087), or a patient's perceived health status (P = 0.14). Conclusions: Greater than 3 telephone or 4 total encounters significantly decreases patient satisfaction, while surgeon and medical office visits are not associated with satisfaction rates when considered individually. This suggests the number, not the type, of preoperative encounters impact satisfaction and highlight the importance of efficient communication between patients and providers.