Improving the management of chronic kidney disease in primary care by enhancing laboratory reports with additional information and follow-up procedures.

Identifying people at risk for progressive chronic kidney disease and connecting them with recommended care is crucial for providing timely and optimal treatment. The ASSIST-CKD (A programme to Spread eGFR [estimated glomerular filtration rate] graph Surveillance for the early identification, Support and Treatment of people with progressive CKD [chronic kidney disease]) trial evaluated the effect of graphical eGFR reporting to primary care physicians on late presentation to a nephrologist in the United Kingdom. Trial data were obtained from the UK Renal Registry. Although the results were neutral, the data generated from the ASSIST-CKD trial are informative and provide useful estimates of the intervention effect. The trial also provides valuable insights into the challenges of implementing complex interventions in busy health care environments, which can be used to guide the designs of future interventions.

Long-Term Kidney Outcomes after Pediatric Acute Kidney Injury.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in hospitalized children. Pediatric AKI receiving acute kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is associated with long-term chronic kidney disease (CKD), hypertension, and death. We aim to determine the outcomes after AKI in children who did not receive acute KRT, since these remain uncertain. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all hospitalized children (0-18 years) surviving AKI without acute KRT between 1996-2020 in Ontario, Canada, identified by validated diagnostic codes in provincial administrative health databases. Children with prior KRT, CKD, or AKI were excluded. Cases were matched with up to four hospitalized comparators without AKI by age, neonatal status, sex, intensive care unit admission, cardiac surgery, malignancy, hypertension, hospitalization era, and a propensity score for AKI. Patients were followed until death, provincial emigration, or censoring in March 2021. The primary outcome was long-term major adverse kidney events (MAKE-LT; a composite of all-cause mortality, long-term KRT, or incident CKD). RESULTS: We matched 4,173 pediatric AKI survivors with 16,337 hospitalized comparators. Baseline covariates were well-balanced following propensity score matching. During median 9.7-year follow-up, 18% of AKI survivors developed MAKE-LT vs. 5% of hospitalized comparators (hazard ratio [HR] 4.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6-4.4). AKI survivors had higher rates of long-term KRT (2% vs. <1%; HR 11.7, 95%CI 7.5-18.4), incident CKD (16% vs. 2%; HR 7.9, 95%CI 6.9-9.1), incident hypertension (17% vs. 8%; HR 2.3, 95%CI 2.1-2.6), and AKI during subsequent hospitalization (6% vs. 2%; HR 3.7, 95%CI 3.1-4.5), but no difference in all-cause mortality (3% vs. 3%; HR 0.9, 95%CI 0.7-1.1). CONCLUSIONS: Children surviving AKI without acute KRT were at higher long-term risk of CKD, long-term KRT, hypertension, and subsequent AKI vs. hospitalized comparators.

Comparison of COVID-19 Hospitalization and Death Between Solid Organ Transplant Recipients and the General Population in Canada, 2020-2022.

Background: Solid organ transplant recipients have a high risk of severe outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection. A comprehensive understanding of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across multiple waves in the solid organ transplant population and how this compares to the general population is limited. We conducted a population-based cohort study using linked administrative healthcare databases from Ontario, Canada to answer this question. Methods: We included 15 306 solid organ transplant recipients and 12 160 904 individuals from the general population. Our primary outcome was the rate (per 100 person-years) of severe COVID-19 (ie, hospitalization or death with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test) occurring between January 25, 2020, and November 30, 2022. Results: Compared with the general population, solid organ transplant recipients had almost a 6 times higher rate of severe COVID-19 (20.39 versus 3.44 per 100 person-years), with almost 5.5 times as high a rate of death alone (4.19 versus 0.77 per 100 person-years). Transplant recipients with severe COVID-19 were substantially younger (60.1 versus 66.5 y) and had more comorbidities. The rate of severe COVID-19 declined over time in the solid organ transplant population, with an incidence rate of 41.25 per 100 person-years in the first wave (January 25, 2020, to August 31, 2020) and 18.41 in the seventh wave (June 19, 2022, to November 30, 2022, Omicron era). Conclusions: Solid organ transplant recipients remain at high risk of severe outcomes when they are infected with SARS-CoV-2. Resources and strategies to mitigate the impact of SARS-CoV-2 exposure are needed in this vulnerable patient population.

COVID-19 vaccine uptake among Ontario physicians: a descriptive population-based retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine COVID-19 vaccine uptake among physicians in Ontario, Canada from 14 December 2020 to 13 February 2022. DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study. SETTING: All registered physicians in Ontario, Canada using data from linked provincial administrative healthcare databases. PARTICIPANTS: 41 267 physicians (including postgraduate trainees) who were Ontario residents and registered with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario were included. Physicians who were out of province, had not accessed Ontario Health Insurance Plan-insured services for their own care for ≥5 years and those with missing identifiers were excluded. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were the proportions of physicians who were recorded to have received at least one, at least two and three doses of a Health Canada-approved COVID-19 vaccine by study end date. Secondary outcomes were how uptake varied by physician characteristics (including age, sex, specialty and residential location) and time elapsed between doses. RESULTS: Of 41 267 physicians, (56% male, mean age 47 years), 39 359 (95.4%) received at least one dose, 39 148 (94.9%) received at least two doses and 35 834 (86.8%) received three doses of a COVID-19 vaccine. Of those who received three doses, the proportions were 90.4% among those aged ≥60 years and 81.2-89.5% among other age groups; 88.7% among family physicians and 89% among specialists. 1908 physicians (4.6%) had no record of vaccination, and this included 3.4% of family physicians and 4.1% of specialists; however, 28% of this group had missing specialty information. CONCLUSIONS: In Ontario, within 14 months of COVID-19 vaccine availability, 86.8% of physicians had three doses of a COVID-19 vaccine, compared with 45.6% of the general population. Findings may signify physicians' confidence in the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines.

Thirty-day risk of digoxin toxicity among older adults co-prescribed trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus amoxicillin: A population-based cohort study.

IMPORTANCE: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) may increase digoxin concentration, a medication with a narrow therapeutic index. Small changes in digoxin concentration could predispose individuals to the risk of toxicity. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the risk of digoxin toxicity in older adults taking digoxin following co-prescription of TMP-SMX compared with co-prescription of amoxicillin. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada (2002-2020) using linked health care data. Participants comprised 47,961 older adults taking digoxin (58% women; median age 80 years [interquartile range 74-86]) who were newly treated with TMP-SMX (n = 10,273) compared with those newly treated with amoxicillin (n = 37,688). EXPOSURE: Co-prescription of TMP-SMX versus amoxicillin in older adults concurrently taking digoxin. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: The primary outcome was a hospital encounter (i.e., hospital admission or emergency department visit) with digoxin toxicity within 30 days of the antibiotic prescription. Inverse probability of treatment weighting on the propensity score was used to balance comparison groups on indicators of baseline health. Weighted risk ratios (RR) were obtained using modified Poisson regression and weighted risk differences (RD) using binomial regression. The number needed to harm (NNH) was calculated as 1/RD. RESULTS: A hospital encounter with digoxin toxicity occurred in 49/10,273 (0.48%) patients treated with TMP-SMX versus 32/37,688 (0.08%) in those treated with amoxicillin (weighted RR, 5.71 [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.19 to 10.24]; weighted RD, 0.39% [95% CI, 0.25% to 0.53%]; NNH 256 [95% CI, 233 to 400]). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In older adults taking digoxin, the 30-day risk of a hospital encounter with digoxin toxicity was nearly 6 times higher in those co-prescribed TMP-SMX versus amoxicillin, although the absolute risk difference was low (0.4%). Physicians should prescribe an alternative antibiotic when clinically appropriate. If TMP-SMX must be co-prescribed with digoxin (if the benefit is believed to outweigh the risk), digoxin should be dose-reduced on an individual basis.

Association Between the Dialysate Bicarbonate and the Pre-dialysis Serum Bicarbonate Concentration in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: It is unclear whether the use of higher dialysate bicarbonate concentrations is associated with clinically relevant changes in the pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration. Objective: The objective is to examine the association between the dialysate bicarbonate prescription and the pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration. Design: This is a retrospective cohort study. Setting: The study was performed using linked administrative health care databases in Ontario, Canada. Patients: Prevalent adults receiving maintenance in-center hemodialysis as of April 1, 2020 (n = 5414) were included. Measurements: Patients were grouped into the following dialysate bicarbonate categories at the dialysis center-level: individualized (adjustment based on pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration) or standardized (>90% of patients received the same dialysate bicarbonate concentration). The standardized category was stratified by concentration: 35, 36 to 37, and ≥38 mmol/L. The primary outcome was the mean outpatient pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration at the patient level. Methods: We examined the association between dialysate bicarbonate category and pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate using an adjusted linear mixed model. Results: All dialysate bicarbonate categories had a mean pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration within the normal range. In the individualized category, 91% achieved a pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate ≥22 mmol/L, compared to 87% in the standardized category. Patients in the standardized category tended to have a serum bicarbonate that was 0.25 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.93, 0.43) mmol/L lower than patients in the individualized category. Relative to patients in the 35 mmol/L category, patients in the 36 to 37 and ≥38 mmol/L categories tended to have a serum bicarbonate that was 0.70 (95% CI = -0.30, 1.70) mmol/L and 0.87 (95% CI = 0.14, 1.60) mmol/L higher, respectively. There was no effect modification by age, sex, or history of chronic lung disease. Limitations: We could not directly confirm that all laboratory measurements were pre-dialysis. Data on prescribed dialysate bicarbonate concentrations for individual dialysis sessions were not available, which may have led to some misclassification, and adherence to a practice of individualization could not be measured. Residual confounding is possible. Conclusions: We found no significant difference in the pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration irrespective of whether an individualized or standardized dialysate bicarbonate was used. Dialysate bicarbonate concentrations ≥38 mmol/L (vs 35 mmol/L) may increase the pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration by 0.9 mmol/L.

Contexte: On ignore si des concentrations plus élevées de bicarbonate dans le dialysat sont associées à des changements cliniquement significatifs dans le taux de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse. Objectif: Examiner l'association entre la prescription de bicarbonate du dialysat et le taux de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse. Conception: Étude de cohorte rétrospective. Cadre: Étude réalisée en Ontario (Canada) à partir des données administratives de santé. Sujets: Ont été inclus les adultes prévalents qui recevaient une hémodialyse chronique en centre le 1er avril 2020 (n=5 414). Mesures: Les sujets ont été regroupés dans les catégories suivantes de concentration en bicarbonate dans le dialysat utilisée dans leur unité de dialyse: individualisée (ajustée selon le taux de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse) ou normalisée (même concentration pour >90% des sujets). La catégorie « standardisée ¼ a été stratifiée selon la concentration: 35 mmol/L, 36 à 37 mmol/L et ≥38 mmol/L. Le principal critère d'évaluation était le taux moyen de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse en ambulatoire au niveau du patient. Méthodologie: Nous avons examiné l'association entre la catégorie de concentration en bicarbonate du dialysat et le taux de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse à l'aide d'un modèle linéaire mixte corrigé. Résultats: Pour toutes les catégories de concentration en bicarbonate du dialysat, le taux moyen de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse était dans la plage normale. Dans la catégorie « individualisée ¼, 91% des sujets avaient un taux de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse de ≥22 mmol/L, comparativement à 87% dans la catégorie « standardisée ¼. Les patients de la catégorie « standardisée ¼ tendaient à avoir un taux de bicarbonate sérique de 0,25 mmol/L (IC 95%: -0,93 à 0,43) inférieur à celui des patients de la catégorie « individualisée ¼. Comparé aux patients de la catégorie 35 mmol/L, les patients des catégories 36 à 37 mmol/L et ≥38 mmol/L tendaient respectivement à avoir un taux de bicarbonate sérique de 0,70 mmol/L (IC 95%: -0,30 à 1,70) et de 0,87 mmol/L (IC 95%: 0,14 à 1,60) plus élevé. L'âge, le sexe ou les antécédents de maladie pulmonaire chronique n'ont pas semblé modifier l'effet. Limites: Il n'a pas été possible de confirmer directement que toutes les mesures de laboratoire avaient été effectuées avant la dialyse. Les données sur les concentrations de bicarbonate prescrites pour les séances de dialyse individuelles n'étaient pas disponibles, ce qui peut avoir conduit à une classification erronée. De plus, l'observance d'une pratique d'individualisation n'a pas pu être mesurée. Une confusion résiduelle est possible. Conclusion: Nous n'avons observé aucune différence significative dans les taux de bicarbonate sériques prédialyse, qu'on ait utilisé une concentration individualisée ou standardisée de bicarbonate dans le dialysat. L'utilisation d'un dialysat à ≥38 mmol/L (c. 35 mmol/L) de bicarbonate peut entraîner une hausse de 0,9 mmol/L du taux de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse.

Hypertension and Kidney Function After Living Kidney Donation.

Importance: Recent guidelines call for better evidence on health outcomes after living kidney donation. Objective: To determine the risk of hypertension in normotensive adults who donated a kidney compared with nondonors of similar baseline health. Their rates of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline and risk of albuminuria were also compared. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective cohort study of 924 standard-criteria living kidney donors enrolled before surgery and a concurrent sample of 396 nondonors. Recruitment occurred from 2004 to 2014 from 17 transplant centers (12 in Canada and 5 in Australia); follow-up occurred until November 2021. Donors and nondonors had the same annual schedule of follow-up assessments. Inverse probability of treatment weighting on a propensity score was used to balance donors and nondonors on baseline characteristics. Exposure: Living kidney donation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] ≥140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure [DBP] ≥90 mm Hg, or antihypertensive medication), annualized change in eGFR (starting 12 months after donation/simulated donation date in nondonors), and albuminuria (albumin to creatinine ratio ≥3 mg/mmol [≥30 mg/g]). Results: Among the 924 donors, 66% were female; they had a mean age of 47 years and a mean eGFR of 100 mL/min/1.73 m2. Donors were more likely than nondonors to have a family history of kidney failure (464/922 [50%] vs 89/394 [23%], respectively). After statistical weighting, the sample of nondonors increased to 928 and baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. During a median follow-up of 7.3 years (IQR, 6.0-9.0), in weighted analysis, hypertension occurred in 161 of 924 donors (17%) and 158 of 928 nondonors (17%) (weighted hazard ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.75-1.66]). The longitudinal change in mean blood pressure was similar in donors and nondonors. After the initial drop in donors' eGFR after nephrectomy (mean, 32 mL/min/1.73 m2), donors had a 1.4-mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI, 1.2-1.5) per year lesser decline in eGFR than nondonors. However, more donors than nondonors had an eGFR between 30 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at least once in follow-up (438/924 [47%] vs 49/928 [5%]). Albuminuria occurred in 132 of 905 donors (15%) and 95 of 904 nondonors (11%) (weighted hazard ratio, 1.46 [95% CI, 0.97-2.21]); the weighted between-group difference in the albumin to creatinine ratio was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.88-1.19). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of living kidney donors and nondonors with the same follow-up schedule, the risks of hypertension and albuminuria were not significantly different. After the initial drop in eGFR from nephrectomy, donors had a slower mean rate of eGFR decline than nondonors but were more likely to have an eGFR between 30 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at least once in follow-up. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00936078.

The Ottawa Statement implementation guidance document for cluster randomized trials in the hemodialysis setting.

Research teams are increasingly interested in using cluster randomized trial (CRT) designs to generate practice-guiding evidence for in-center maintenance hemodialysis. However, CRTs raise complex ethical issues. The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials, published in 2012, provides 15 recommendations to address ethical issues arising within 7 domains: justifying the CRT design, research ethics committee review, identifying research participants, obtaining informed consent, gatekeepers, assessing benefits and harms, and protecting vulnerable participants. But applying the Ottawa Statement recommendations to CRTs in the hemodialysis setting is complicated by the unique features of the setting and population. Here, with the help of content experts and patient partners, we co-developed this implementation guidance document to provide research teams, research ethics committees, and other stakeholders with detailed guidance on how to apply the Ottawa Statement recommendations to CRTs in the hemodialysis setting, the result of a 4-year research project. Thus, our work demonstrates how the voices of patients, caregivers, and all stakeholders may be included in the development of research ethics guidance.

Impact of the 2021 CKD-EPI eGFR Equation on Kidney Care Referral Criteria in Ontario, Canada: A Population-based Cross-sectional Study.

Background: In some jurisdictions, individuals become eligible or recommended for referral for different types of kidney care using criteria based on their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Historically, GFR was estimated with an equation developed in 2009, which included a Black race term. An updated, race-free equation was developed in 2021. It is unclear how adoption of the 2021 equation will influence the number of individuals meeting referral criteria to receive different types of kidney care. Objective: To develop population-based estimates on how the number of individuals meeting the eGFR-based referral criteria to receive three different types of kidney care (nephrologist consultation, care in a multi-care specialty clinic, kidney transplant evaluation) changes when the 2021 versus 2009 equation is used to calculate eGFR. Design: Population-based, cross-sectional study. Setting: Ontario, Canada's most populous province with 14.2 million residents as of 2021. Less than 5% of Ontario's residents self-identify as being of Black race. Patients: Adults with at least one outpatient serum creatinine measurement in the 2 years prior to December 31, 2021. Measurements: Referral criteria to 3 different types of kidney care: nephrologist consultation, multi-care specialty clinic, and evaluation for a kidney transplant. The eGFR thresholds used to define referral eligibility or recommendation for these kidney health services were based on guidelines from Ontario's provincial renal agency. Methods: The number of individuals meeting referral criteria for the 3 different healthcare services was compared between the 2009 and 2021 equations, restricted to individuals not yet receiving that level of care. As individual-level race data were not available, estimates were repeated, randomly assigning a Black race status to 1%, 5%, and 10% of the population. Results: We had an outpatient serum creatinine measurement available for 1 048 110 adults. Using the 2009 equation, 37 345 individuals met the criteria to be referred to a nephrologist, 10 019 met the criteria to receive care in a multi-care specialty clinic, and 10 178 met the criteria to be referred for kidney transplant evaluation. Corresponding numbers with the 2021 equation (and the percent relative to the 2009 equation) were 26 645 (71.3%), 9009 (89.9%), and 8615 (84.6%) individuals, respectively. These numbers were largely unchanged when Black race was assumed in up to 10% of the population. Limitations: Referral criteria based solely on urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio were not assessed. Self-reported race data were unavailable. Conclusions: For healthcare planning, in regions where a minority of the population is Black, a substantial number of individuals may no longer meet referral criteria for different types of kidney healthcare following adoption of the new 2021 eGFR equation.

Contexte: Dans certaines régions, les individus sont dirigés vers différents types de soins rénaux, ou y deviennent admissibles, selon des critères fondés sur le débit de filtration glomérulaire estimé (DFGe). Historiquement, le DFG était estimé avec une équation développée en 2009 comportant un terme qui tenait compte du fait d'être une personne de race noire. Une nouvelle équation sans mention de la race a été développée en 2021. Il est difficile de savoir comment l'adoption de l'équation de 2021 influencera le nombre de personnes qui répondront aux critères pour recevoir divers types de soins rénaux. Objectifs: Établir des estimations populationnelles de la variation du nombre de personnes qui répondent aux critères d'orientation fondés sur le DFGe pour recevoir trois différents types de soins rénaux (consultation avec un néphrologue, soins dans une clinique multidisciplinaire spécialisée, évaluation pour une transplantation rénale) selon que le DFGe est calculé avec l'équation de 2021 ou de 2009. Conception: Étude populationnelle transversale rétrospective. Cadre: L'Ontario, la province la plus peuplée du Canada avec 14,2 millions d'habitants en 2021. Moins de 5 % des résidents de l'Ontario s'identifient comme étant de race noire. Sujets: Des adultes avec au moins une mesure de la créatinine sérique en ambulatoire au cours des deux ans précédant le 31 décembre 2021. Mesures: Les critères d'orientation vers trois différents types de soins rénaux : consultation avec un néphrologue, soins en clinique multidisciplinaire spécialisée et évaluation pour une transplantation rénale. Les seuils de DFGe utilisés pour définir l'admissibilité à ­ ou l'orientation vers ­ ces services de santé rénale étaient fondés sur les lignes directrices de l'agence provinciale de soins rénaux de l'Ontario. Méthodologie: On a comparé les nombres d'individus répondant aux critères d'orientation pour les trois différents services de santé, calculés avec les équations de 2009 et de 2021, en se limitant aux personnes qui ne recevaient pas encore de tels soins. Les données individuelles sur la race n'étant pas disponibles, les estimations ont été répétées en attribuant aléatoirement un statut de race noire à 1 %, à 5 % et à 10 % de la population étudiée. Résultats: Une mesure de la créatinine sérique en ambulatoire était disponible pour un total de 1 048 110 adultes. Avec l'équation de 2009, 37 345 personnes répondaient aux critères pour être dirigées vers un néphrologue, 10 019 répondaient aux critères pour recevoir des soins dans une clinique multidisciplinaire spécialisée et 10 178 répondaient aux critères pour être évaluées pour une transplantation rénale. Avec l'équation de 2021, ces mêmes nombres de personnes (pourcentage par rapport à l'équation de 2009) étaient respectivement 26 645 (71,3 %), 9 009 (89,9 %) et 8 615 (84,6 %). Des chiffres qui sont demeurés majoritairement inchangés même en assumant une proportion de jusqu'à 10 % de personnes de race noire dans la population. Limites: Les critères d'orientation fondés uniquement sur le rapport albumine/créatinine urinaire n'ont pas été évalués. Les données autodéclarées sur la race n'étaient pas disponibles. Conclusion: Pour la planification des soins de santé, dans les régions où une minorité de la population est noire, un nombre important de personnes pourraient ne plus répondre aux critères d'orientation vers différents types de soins rénaux après l'adoption de l'équation de 2021 pour le calcul du DFGe.

Comparison of Acute Health Care Utilization Between Patients Receiving In-Center Hemodialysis and the General Population: A Population-Based Matched Cohort Study From Ontario, Canada.

Background: Patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis have multiple comorbidities and are at high risk of presenting to the hospital. However, the incidence and cost of acute health care utilization in the in-center hemodialysis population and how this compares with other populations is poorly understood. Objective: To determine the rate, pattern, and cost of emergency department visits and hospitalizations in patients receiving in-center hemodialysis compared with a matched general population. Design: Population-based matched cohort study. Setting: We used linked administrative health care databases from Ontario, Canada. Patients: We included 25 379 patients (incident and prevalent) receiving in-center hemodialysis between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2018. Patients were matched on birth date (±2 years), sex, and cohort entry date using a 1:4 ratio to 101 516 individuals from the general population. Measurements: Our primary outcomes were emergency department visits (allowing for multiple visits per individual) and hospital admissions from the emergency department. We also assessed all-cause hospitalizations, all-cause readmissions within 30 days of discharge from the original hospitalization, length of stay for hospital admissions (including multiple visits per individual), and the financial cost of these admissions. Methods: We presented the rate, percentage, median (25th, 75th percentiles), and incidence rate per 1000 person-years for emergency department visits and hospitalizations. Individual-level health care costs for emergency department visits and all-cause hospitalization were estimated using resource intensity weights multiplied by the cost per weighted case. Results: Patients receiving in-center hemodialysis had substantially more comorbidities (eg, diabetes) than the matched general population. Eighty percent (n = 20 309) of patients receiving in-center hemodialysis had at least 1 emergency department visit compared with 56% (n = 56 452) of individuals in the matched general population, over a median follow-up of 1.8 years (25th, 75th percentiles: 0.7, 3.6) and 5.2 (2.5, 8.4) years, respectively. The incidence rate of emergency department visits, allowing for multiple visits per individual, was 2274 per 1000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2263, 2286) for patients receiving in-center hemodialysis, which was almost 5 times as high as the matched general population (471 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI: 469, 473). The rate of hospital admissions from the emergency department and the rate of all-cause hospital admissions in the in-center hemodialysis population was more than 7 times as high as the matched general population (hospital admissions from the emergency department: 786 vs 101 per 1000 person-years; all-cause hospital admissions: 1056 vs 139 per 1000 person-years). The median number of all-cause hospitalization days per patient year was 4.0 (0, 16.5) in the in-center hemodialysis population compared with 0 (0, 0.5) in the matched general population. The cost per patient-year for emergency department visits in the in-center hemodialysis population was approximately 5.5 times as high as the matched general population while the cost of hospitalizations in the in-center hemodialysis population was approximately 11 times as high as the matched general population (emergency department visits: CAN$ 1153 vs CAN$ 209; hospitalizations: CAN$ 21 151 vs CAN$ 1873 [all costs in 2023 CAN$]). Limitations: External generalizability and we could not determine whether emergency department visits and hospitalizations were preventable. Conclusions: Patients receiving in-center hemodialysis have high acute health care utilization. These results improve our understanding of the burden of disease and the associated costs in the in-center hemodialysis population, highlight the need to improve acute outcomes, and can aid health care capacity planning. Additional research is needed to address the risk of hospitalization after controlling for patient comorbidities. Trial registration: This is not applicable as this is a population-based matched cohort study and not a clinical trial.

Contexte: Les patients qui suivent des traitements d'hémodialyse d'entretien présentent de multiples comorbidités et sont hautement susceptibles de se présenter à l'hôpital. On en sait toutefois peu sur l'incidence de l'utilization des soins de santé aigus chez les patients hémodialysés en center, sur les coûts qui y sont associés, ainsi que sur la manière dont cela se compare à d'autres populations. Objectif: Déterminer, dans une population de patients hémodialysés en center, les taux d'hospitalizations et de visites aux urgences, leurs schémas et les coûts qui y sont associés, puis comparer ces résultats à ceux d'une population générale appariée. Type d'étude: Étudede cohorte populationnelle rétrospective. Cadre: Nous avons utilisé les bases de données couplées du système de santé de l'Ontario (Canada). Sujets: Nous avons inclus 25 379 patients (incidents et prévalents) qui recevaient des traitements d'hémodialyse en center entre le 1er janvier 2010 et le 31 décembre 2018. Les patients inclus ont été appariés,en fonction de leur date de naissance (± 2 ans), de leur sexe et de leur date d'entrée dans la cohorte, à 101 516 individus de la population générale dans un rapport de 1:4. Mesures: Nos principaux critères de jugement étaient les visites aux urgences (en permettant plusieurs visites par personne) et les admissions à l'hôpital à partir de l'urgence. Nous avons également évalué les hospitalizations toutes causes confondues, les réadmissions toutes causes confondues dans les 30 jours suivant le congé initial, la durée du séjour (en comptant les visites multiples par personne) et les coûts associés à ces admissions. Méthodologie: Nous avons présenté le nombre, le pourcentage, la médiane (25e et 75e percentile) et le taux d'incidence par 1000 années-personnes pour les visites aux urgences et les hospitalizations. Les coûts de santé par individu associés aux visites à l'urgence et aux hospitalizations toutes causes confondues ont été estimés en multipliant la pondération du volume des ressources par le coût pondéré par cas. Résultats: Les patients hémodialysés en center présentaient beaucoup plus de comorbidités (p. Ex. diabète) que la population générale appariée. Au cours d'un suivi médian respectif de 1,8 an (25e et 75e percentile: 0,7 et 3,6 ans) et de 5,2 ans (2,5 et 8,4 ans), 80 % (n=20 309) des patients hémodialysés en center ont visité l'urgence au moins une fois, contre 56 % (n= 56 452) des patients de la population générale appariée. Le taux d'incidence des visites aux urgences, en permettant plusieurs visites par personne, était de 2274 pour 1000 années-personnes (intervalle de confiance à 95% [IC 95%]: 2 263 à 2 286) chez les patients hémodialysés en center, soit presque cinq fois plus élevé que la population générale appariée (471 pour 1000 années-personnes; IC95 %: 469 à 473). Les taux d'admissions à partir de l'urgence et d'hospitalizations toutes causes confondues dans la population de patients hémodialysés en center étaient plus de sept fois plus élevés que dans la population générale appariée (admissions à partir de l'urgence: 786 contre 101 pour 1000 années-personnes; hospitalizations toutes causes confondues: 1056 contre 139 pour 1000 années-personnes). La durée médiane des hospitalizations toutes causes confondues par année-patient était de 4,0 jours (0 et 16,5 jours) chez les patients hémodialysés en center et de 0 jour (0 et 0,5 jour) dans la population générale appariée. Le coût par année-patient des visites à l'urgence chez les patients hémodialysés en center était environ 5,5 fois plus élevé que dans la population générale appariée, tandis que celui des hospitalizations était environ 11 fois plus élevé (visites à l'urgence: 1153 CAD contre 209 CAD; hospitalizations: 21 151 CAD contre 1873 CAD [coûts en dollars canadiens de 2023]). Limites: Généralisabilité externe; impossiblede déterminer si les visites aux urgences et les hospitalizations étaient évitables. Conclusion: Les patients hémodialysés en center sont de grands utilisateurs des soins de santé aigus. Ces résultats améliorent notre compréhension du fardeau de la maladie et des coûts associés à cette utilization dans cette population. Ces résultats soulignent également la nécessité d'améliorer les résultats des soins aigus et peuvent aider à la planification des capacités en matière de soins de santé. D'autres études sont nécessaires pour examiner le risque d'hospitalization après la gestion des comorbidités des patients.

Public and patient perspectives on the use of clinical and administrative health data to identify and contact people at risk of future illness-The case of chronic kidney disease.

For decades, researchers have used linkable administrative health data for evaluating the health care system, subject to local privacy legislation. In Ontario, Canada, the relevant privacy legislation permits some organizations (prescribed entities) to conduct this kind of research but is silent on their ability to identify and contact individuals in those datasets. Following consultation with the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, we developed a pilot study to identify and contact by mail a sample of people at high risk for kidney failure within the next 2 years, based on laboratory and administrative data from provincial datasets held by ICES, to ensure they receive needed kidney care. Before proceeding, we conducted six focus groups to understand the acceptability to the public and people living with chronic kidney disease of direct mail outreach to people at high risk of developing kidney failure. While virtually all participants indicated they would likely participate in the study, most felt strongly that the message should come directly from their primary care provider or whoever ordered the laboratory tests, rather than from an unknown organization. If this is not possible, they felt the health care provider should be made aware of the concern related to their kidney health. Most agreed that, if health authorities could identify people at high risk of a treatable life-threatening illness if caught early enough, there is a social responsibility to notify people. While privacy laws allow for free flow of health information among health care providers who provide direct clinical care, the proposed case-finding and outreach falls outside that model. Enabling this kind of information flow will require greater clarity in existing laws or revisions to these laws. This also requires adequate notification and culture change for health care providers and the public around information uses and flows.

Defining pre-emptive living kidney donor transplantation as a quality indicator.

Quality indicators in kidney transplants are needed to identify care gaps and improve access to transplants. We used linked administrative health care databases to examine multiple ways of defining pre-emptive living donor kidney transplants, including different patient cohorts and censoring definitions. We included adults from Ontario, Canada with advanced chronic kidney disease between January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018. We created 4 unique incident patient cohorts, varying the eligibility by the risk of progression to kidney failure and whether individuals had a recorded contraindication to kidney transplant (eg, home oxygen use). We explored the effect of 4 censoring event definitions. Across the 4 cohorts, size varied substantially from 20 663 to 9598 patients, with the largest reduction (a 43% reduction) occurring when we excluded patients with ≥1 recorded contraindication to kidney transplantation. The incidence rate (per 100 person-years) of pre-emptive living donor kidney transplant varied across cohorts from 1.02 (95% CI: 0.91-1.14) for our most inclusive cohort to 2.21 (95% CI: 1.96-2.49) for the most restrictive cohort. Our methods can serve as a framework for developing other quality indicators in kidney transplantation and monitoring and improving access to pre-emptive living donor kidney transplants in health care systems.

Candidate Kidney Protective Strategies for Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Secondary Analysis of the RELIEF Trial Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common after major abdominal surgery. Selection of candidate kidney protective strategies for testing in large trials should be based on robust preliminary evidence. METHODS: A secondary analysis of the Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy in Major Abdominal Surgery (RELIEF) trial was conducted in adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery and randomly assigned to a restrictive or liberal perioperative fluid regimen. The primary outcome was maximum AKI stage before hospital discharge. Two multivariable ordinal regression models were developed to test the primary hypothesis that modifiable risk factors associated with increased maximum stage of postoperative AKI could be identified. Each model used a separate approach to variable selection to assess the sensitivity of the findings to modeling approach. For model 1, variable selection was informed by investigator opinion; for model 2, the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) technique was used to develop a data-driven model from available variables. RESULTS: Of 2,444 patients analyzed, stage 1, 2, and 3 AKI occurred in 223 (9.1%), 59 (2.4%), and 36 (1.5%) patients, respectively. In multivariable modeling by model 1, administration of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, intraoperatively only (odds ratio, 1.77 [99% CI, 1.11 to 2.82]), and preoperative day-of-surgery administration of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker compared to no regular use (odds ratio, 1.84 [99% CI, 1.15 to 2.94]) were associated with increased odds for greater maximum stage AKI. These results were unchanged in model 2, with the additional finding of an inverse association between nadir hemoglobin concentration on postoperative day 1 and greater maximum stage AKI. CONCLUSIONS: Avoiding intraoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors is a potential strategy to mitigate the risk for postoperative AKI. The findings strengthen the rationale for a clinical trial comprehensively testing the risk-benefit ratio of these drugs in the perioperative period.

Implementation of a One-Day Living Kidney Donor Assessment Clinic to Improve the Efficiency of the Living Kidney Donor Evaluation: Program Report.

Purpose of program: A key barrier to becoming a living kidney donor is an inefficient evaluation process, requiring more than 30 tests (eg, laboratory and diagnostic tests), questionnaires, and specialist consultations. Donor candidates make several trips to hospitals and clinics, and often spend months waiting for appointments and test results. The median evaluation time for a donor candidate in Ontario, Canada, is nearly 1 year. Longer wait times are associated with poorer outcomes for the kidney transplant recipient and higher health care costs. A shorter, more efficient donor evaluation process may help more patients with kidney failure receive a transplant, including a pre-emptive kidney transplant (ie, avoiding the need for dialysis). In this report, we describe the development of a quality improvement intervention to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and patient-centeredness of the donor candidate evaluation process. We developed a One-Day Living Kidney Donor Assessment Clinic, a condensed clinic where interested donor candidates complete all testing and consultations within 1 day. Sources of information: The One-Day Living Kidney Donor Assessment Clinic was developed after performing a comprehensive review of the literature, receiving feedback from patients who have successfully donated, and meetings with transplant program leadership from St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton. A multistakeholder team was formed that included health care staff from nephrology, transplant surgery, radiology, cardiology, social work, nuclear medicine, and patients with the prior lived experience of kidney donation. In the planning stages, the team met regularly to determine the objectives of the clinic, criteria for participation, clinic schedule, patient flow, and clinic metrics. Methods: Donor candidates entered the One-Day Clinic if they completed initial laboratory testing and agreed to an expedited process. If additional testing was required, it was completed on a different day. Donor candidates were reviewed by the nephrologist, transplant surgeon, and donor coordinator approximately 2 weeks after the clinic for final approval. The team continues to meet regularly to review donor feedback, discuss challenges, and brainstorm solutions. Key findings: The One-Day Clinic was implemented in March 2019, and has now been running for 4 years, making iterative improvements through continuous patient and provider feedback. To date, we have evaluated more than 150 donor candidates in this clinic. Feedback from donors has been uniformly positive (98% of donors stated they were very satisfied with the clinic), with most noting that the clinic was efficient and minimally impacted work and family obligations. Hospital leadership, including the health care professionals from each participating department, continue to show support and collaborate to create a seamless experience for donor candidates attending the One-Day Clinic. Limitations: Clinic spots are limited, meaning some interested donor candidates may not be able to enter a One-Day Clinic the same month they come forward. Implications: This patient-centered quality improvement intervention is designed to improve the efficiency and experience of the living kidney donor evaluation, result in better outcomes for kidney transplant recipients, and potentially increase living donation. Our next step is to conduct a formal evaluation of the clinic, measuring qualitative feedback from health care professionals working in the clinic and donor candidates attending the clinic, and measuring key process and outcome measures in donor candidates who completed the one-day assessment compared with those who underwent the usual care assessment. This program evaluation will provide reliable, regionally relevant evidence that will inform transplant centers across the country as they consider incorporating a similar one-day assessment model.

Objectifs du programme: Devenir donneur de rein vivant est difficile, le principal obstacle étant le processus d'évaluation inefficace auquel les candidats doivent se soumettre. Ce processus comporte plus de 30 examens (p. ex. tests de laboratoire et tests diagnostiques), questionnaires et consultations avec des spécialistes. Les candidats donneurs font plusieurs visites dans les hôpitaux et cliniques, et passent souvent plusieurs mois à attendre des rendez-vous et des résultats de tests. En Ontario (Canada), le délai médian pour l'évaluation d'un candidat au don est de près d'un an. Les temps d'attente plus longs sont associés à de moins bons résultats pour les receveurs d'une greffe rénale, ainsi qu'à des coûts de soins de santé plus élevés. Un processus d'évaluation plus court et plus efficace des donneurs potentiels permettrait à un plus grand nombre de patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale de recevoir une greffe, y compris une greffe préventive (c.-à-d. permettant d'éviter la dialyse). Cet article décrit une intervention d'amélioration de la qualité visant à augmenter l'efficience, l'efficacité et la personnalisation du processus d'évaluation des candidats au don. Nous avons développé une clinique d'un jour pour l'évaluation des donneurs de reins vivants (One-Day Living Kidney Donor Assessment Clinic), soit une clinique condensée où les candidats passent tous les tests et consultent un spécialiste dans la même journée. Sources de l'information: La clinique d'un jour pour l'évaluation des donneurs de reins vivants a été développée à la suite d'un examen approfondi de la littérature, de la consultation des commentaires de patients ayant donné avec succès et de rencontres avec les dirigeants du programme de transplantation du St Joseph's Healthcare d'Hamilton. Une équipe multipartite a été formée; celle-ci réunit du personnel soignant en néphrologie, chirurgie de transplantation, radiologie, cardiologie, travail social et médecine nucléaire, ainsi que des patients ayant une expérience vécue du don de rein. L'équipe s'est réunie régulièrement pendant les étapes de planification pour déterminer les objectifs, les paramètres et le calendrier de la clinique, ainsi que les critères de participation et le flux de patients. Méthodologie: Les donneurs potentiels qui avaient complété les tests de laboratoire initiaux et qui acceptaient de se soumettre à un processus accéléré ont été évalués à la clinique d'un jour. Si des tests supplémentaires étaient nécessaires, ceux-ci étaient effectués un autre jour. Les candidats ont été rencontrés par le néphrologue, le chirurgien de transplantation et le coordonnateur des dons environ deux semaines après leur visite à la clinique pour l'approbation finale. L'équipe multipartite continue de se réunir régulièrement pour examiner les commentaires des donneurs, discuter des défis et trouver des solutions. Principaux résultats: La clinique d'un jour, mise sur pied en mars 2019, est en activité depuis quatre ans et permet des améliorations itératives grâce à la rétroaction continue des patients et des soignants. À ce jour, plus de 150 candidats au don ont été évalués à la clinique. Les commentaires des donneurs sont quasi unanimement positifs (98 % des candidats ont déclaré être très satisfaits de la clinique), la plupart soulignant l'efficacité de la clinique et les conséquences minimes du processus sur les obligations professionnelles et familiales. La direction de l'hôpital, tout comme les professionnels de la santé des services participants, continue d'appuyer la clinique d'un jour et de collaborer à la création d'une expérience fluide pour les donneurs potentiels qui la fréquentent. Limites: Les places à la clinique sont limitées; ainsi, certains candidats au don d'un rein vivant pourraient ne pas pouvoir être admis dans le mois où ils se présentent à la clinique. Conclusion: Cette intervention d'amélioration de la qualité axée sur les patients est conçue pour augmenter l'efficacité du processus d'évaluation et bonifier l'expérience des donneurs de rein vivants. Elle vise également à améliorer les résultats des receveurs d'une greffe rénale et, potentiellement, augmenter le don vivant. La prochaine étape sera une évaluation formelle de la clinique, c'est-à-dire la mesure de la rétroaction qualitative des professionnels de la santé qui y travaillent et des candidats au don qui la fréquentent, et l'analyse des processus clés et des résultats des candidats évalués à la clinique d'un jour par rapport à ceux qui suivent le processus d'évaluation habituel. Cette évaluation du programme fournira des données probantes fiables et propres à la région qui pourront informer les centres de transplantation de tout le pays qui envisagent d'intégrer un processus d'évaluation similaire.

Risk Factors for Developing Low Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Albuminuria in Living Kidney Donors.

Rationale & Objective: Chronic kidney disease is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in the general population, but little is known about the incidence and risk factors associated with developing low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and moderate-severe albuminuria in living kidney donors following nephrectomy. Study Design: Retrospective, population-based cohort study. Setting & Participants: Kidney donors in Alberta, Canada. Exposure: Donor nephrectomy between May 2001 and December 2017. Outcome: Two eGFR measurements <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 or 2 measurements of moderate or severe albuminuria from 1-year postdonation onwards that were at least 90 days apart. Analytical Approach: Associations between potential risk factors and the primary outcome were assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. Results: Over a median follow-up period of 8.6 years (IQR, 4.7-12.6 years), 47 of 590 donors (8.0%) developed sustained low eGFR or moderate-severe albuminuria with an incidence rate of 9.2 per 1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 6.6-11.8). The median time for development of this outcome beyond the first year after nephrectomy was 2.9 years (IQR, 1.4-8.0 years). Within the first 4 years of follow-up, a 5 mL/min/1.73 m2 lower predonation eGFR increased the hazard of developing postdonation low eGFR or moderate-severe albuminuria by 26% (adjusted HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.10-1.44). Furthermore, donors were at higher risk of developing low eGFR or albuminuria if they had evidence of predonation hypertension (adjusted HR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.28-4.96) or postdonation diabetes (adjusted HR, 4.72; 95% CI, 1.54-14.50). Limitations: We lacked data on certain donor characteristics that may affect long-term kidney function, such as race, smoking history, and transplant-related characteristics. Conclusions: A proportion of kidney donors at an incidence rate of 9.2 per 1,000 person-years will develop low eGFR or albuminuria after donation. Donors with lower predonation eGFR, predonation hypertension, and postdonation diabetes are at increased risk of developing this outcome.

The purpose of this study was to understand the risk of developing kidney disease in living kidney donors after donation. We followed 590 donors in Alberta, Canada for almost 9 years. Approximately 8% of donors developed reduced kidney function (low estimated glomerular filtration rate) or increased protein in the urine (albuminuria). Donors with lower kidney function before donation, hypertension before donation, or diabetes after donation had a higher likelihood of experiencing these kidney outcomes. This research provides important insights to patients and health care providers to better support the long-term kidney health of living kidney donors.

High-Throughput Computing to Automate Population-Based Studies to Detect the 30-Day Risk of Adverse Outcomes After New Outpatient Medication Use in Older Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Clinical Research Protocol.

Background: Safety issues are detected in about one third of prescription drugs in the years following regulatory agency approval. Older adults, especially those with chronic kidney disease, are at particular risk of adverse reactions to prescription drugs. This protocol describes a new approach that may identify credible drug-safety signals more efficiently using administrative health care data. Objective: To use high-throughput computing and automation to conduct 700+ drug-safety cohort studies in older adults in Ontario, Canada. Each study will compare 74 acute (30-day) outcomes in patients who start a new prescription drug (new users) to a group of nonusers with similar baseline health characteristics. Risks will be assessed within strata of baseline kidney function. Design and setting: The studies will be population-based, new-user cohort studies conducted using linked administrative health care databases in Ontario, Canada (January 1, 2008, to March 1, 2020). The source population for these studies will be residents of Ontario aged 66 years or older who filled at least one outpatient prescription through the Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB) program during the study period (all residents have universal health care, and those aged 65+ have universal prescription drug coverage through the ODB). Patients: We identified 3.2 million older adults in the source population during the study period and built 700+ initial medication cohorts, each containing mutually exclusive groups of new users and nonusers. Nonusers were randomly assigned cohort entry dates that followed the same distribution of prescription start dates as new users. Eligibility criteria included a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurement within 12 months before the cohort entry date (median time was 71 days before cohort entry in the new user group), no prior receipt of maintenance dialysis or a kidney transplant, and no prior prescriptions for drugs in the same subclass as the study drug. New users and nonusers will be balanced on ~400 baseline health characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weighting on propensity scores within 3 strata of baseline eGFR: ≥60, 45 to <60, <45 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Outcomes: We will compare new user and nonuser groups on 74 clinically relevant outcomes (17 composites and 57 individual outcomes) in the 30 days after cohort entry. We used a prespecified approach to identify these 74 outcomes. Statistical analysis plan: In each cohort, we will obtain eGFR-stratum-specific weighted risk ratios and risk differences using modified Poisson regression and binomial regression, respectively. Additive and multiplicative interaction by eGFR category will be examined. Drug-outcome associations that meet prespecified criteria (identified signals) will be further examined in additional analyses (including survival, negative-control exposure, and E-value analyses) and visualizations. Results: The initial medication cohorts had a median of 6120 new users per cohort (interquartile range: 1469-38 839) and a median of 1 088 301 nonusers (interquartile range: 751 697-1 267 009). Medications with the largest number of new users were amoxicillin trihydrate (n = 1 000 032), cephalexin (n = 571 566), prescription acetaminophen (n = 571 563), and ciprofloxacin (n = 504,374); 19% to 29% of new users in these cohorts had an eGFR <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Limitations: Despite our use of robust techniques to balance baseline indicators and to control for confounding by indication, residual confounding will remain a possibility. Only acute (30-day) outcomes will be examined. Our data sources do not include nonprescription (over-the-counter) drugs or drugs prescribed in hospitals and do not include outpatient prescription drug use in children or adults <65 years. Conclusion: This accelerated approach to conducting postmarket drug-safety studies has the potential to more efficiently detect drug-safety signals in a vulnerable population. The results of this protocol may ultimately help improve medication safety.

Contexte: Des problèmes d'innocuité sont détectés dans environ un tiers des médicaments d'ordonnance au cours des années qui suivent leur approbation par l'organisme de réglementation. Les personnes âgées, en particulier celles qui sont atteintes d'insuffisance rénale chronique, sont particulièrement exposées aux effets indésirables des médicaments d'ordonnance. Ce protocole décrit une nouvelle approche qui, à partir des données administratives du système de santé, pourrait permettre d'identifier plus efficacement les signaux crédibles sur la sécurité des médicaments. Objectif: Utiliser l'informatique à haut débit et l'automatisation pour mener plus de 700 études de cohorte sur l'innocuité des médicaments chez les adultes âgés résidant en Ontario (Canada). Chaque étude comparera 74 résultats aigus (30 jours) chez des patients qui commencent un nouveau médicament sur ordonnance (nouveaux utilisateurs) à ceux d'un groupe de non-utilisateurs avec des caractéristiques de santé initiales similaires. Les risques seront évalués par strates de la fonction rénale initiale. Cadre et type d'étude: Études populationnelles de cohortes de nouveaux utilisateurs de médicaments menées à l'aide des bases de données administratives couplées du système de santé ontarien (Canada). Période étudiée: du 1er janvier 2008 au 1er mars 2020. Population source: les Ontariens de 66 ans ou plus ayant rempli au moins une ordonnance pour patient non hospitalisé par l'entremise du Program de médicaments de l'Ontario (PMO) pendant la période de l'étude (tous les résidents de la province bénéficient d'un système de soins de santé universel; les personnes âgées de 65 ans et plus bénéficient d'une couverture universelle des médicaments d'ordonnance par l'intermédiaire du PMO). Sujets: Nous avons identifié 3,2 millions d'adultes âgés dans la population source au cours de la période d'étude et constitué plus de 700 cohortes de médicaments, chacune contenant des groupes mutuellement exclusifs de nouveaux utilisateurs et de non-utilisateurs. Les non-utilisateurs se sont vu attribuer au hasard des dates d'entrée dans la cohorte qui suivaient les dates de début d'ordonnance des nouveaux utilisateurs. Les critères d'admissibilité étaient d'avoir une mesure initiale du débit de filtration glomérulaire estimé [DFGe] dans les 12 mois précédant la date d'entrée dans la cohorte (dans le groupe des nouveaux utilisateurs, le délai médian était de 71 jours avant l'entrée dans la cohorte), ne pas suivre de dialyze chronique, ne pas avoir eu de greffe rénale et n'avoir jamais eu de prescription d'un médicament de la même sous-classe que le médicament à l'étude. Les nouveaux utilisateurs et les non-utilisateurs seront jumelés selon environ 400 caractéristiques de santé initiales à l'aide de la probabilité inverse de traitement pondérée selon les scores de propension dans les trois strates de mesure du DFGe initial: ≥60 ml/min/1,73 m2; 45 à <60 ml/min/1,73 m2 et <45 ml/min/1,73 m2. Résultats: Nous comparerons les groupes de nouveaux utilisateurs et de non-utilisateurs selon 74 critères de jugement cliniquement pertinents (17 critères composites et 57 critères individuels) pendant les 30 jours suivant l'entrée dans la cohorte. Une approche prédéfinie a permis de déterminer ces 74 résultats. Plan d'analyze statistique: Dans chaque cohorte, nous calculerons les différences de risque (par régression de Poisson) et les rapports de risque (par régression binomiale) pondérés pour chaque strate de DFGe. Les interactions additives et multiplicatives par catégorie de DFGe seront examinées. Les associations médicaments-résultats répondant à des critères prédéfinis (signaux identifiés) seront examinées plus avant dans des analyses supplémentaires (survie, exposition à des témoins négatifs, analyses de la valeur E, etc.) et des visualizations. Résultats: Dans les cohortes initiales de médicaments, les médianes sont de 6 120 nouveaux utilisateurs (intervalle interquartile de 1 469 à 38 839) et de 1 088 301 non-utilisateurs (intervalle interquartile de 751 697 à 1 267 009). Les médicaments comptant le plus grand nombre de nouveaux utilisateurs sont le trihydrate d'amoxicilline (n = 1 000 032), la céfalexine (n = 571 566), l'acétaminophène sur ordonnance (n = 571 563) et la ciprofloxacine (n = 504 374). De 19 à 29 % des nouveaux utilisateurs dans ces cohortes présentaient un DFGe < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Limites: Malgré l'utilization de techniques robustes pour équilibrer les indicateurs de base et pour contrôler le risque de confusion par indication, il pourrait subsister des facteurs de confusion résiduels. Seuls les résultats aigus (30 jours) seront examinés. Nos sources de données ne comprennent pas les médicaments sans ordonnance (en vente libre) ni les médicaments prescrits dans les hôpitaux, et n'incluent pas l'utilization de médicaments sur ordonnance en ambulatoire chez les enfants ou les adultes de moins de 65 ans. Conclusion: Cette approche accélérée pour la réalisation d'études d'innocuité des médicaments après leur mise en marché a le potentiel de détecter efficacement les effets indésirables de ces médicaments dans une population vulnérable. Les résultats de ce protocole serviront à améliorer l'innocuité des médicaments.