Riociguat for interstitial lung disease and pulmonary hypertension: a pilot trial.

We assessed the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of riociguat, a soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator, in patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD). In this open-label, uncontrolled pilot trial, patients received oral riociguat (1.0-2.5 mg three times daily) for 12 weeks (n=22), followed by an ongoing long-term extension (interim analysis at 12 months) in those eligible (n=15). Primary end-points were safety and tolerability. Secondary end-points included haemodynamic changes and 6-min walk distance (6MWD). Overall, 104 adverse events were reported, of which 25 were serious; eight of the latter were considered drug-related. After 12 weeks of therapy, mean cardiac output increased (4.4 ± 1.5 L · min(-1) to 5.5 ± 1.8 L · min(-1)), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) decreased (648 ± 207 dyn · s(-1) · cm(-5) to 528 ± 181 dyn · s(-1) · cm(-5)) and mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) remained unchanged compared with baseline. Arterial oxygen saturation decreased but mixed-venous oxygen saturation slightly increased. The 6MWD increased from 325 ± 96 m at baseline to 351 ± 111 m after 12 weeks. Riociguat was well tolerated by most patients and improved cardiac output and PVR, but not mPAP. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the safety and efficacy of riociguat in patients with PH-ILD.

Almotriptan in migraine patients who respond poorly to oral sumatriptan: a double-blind, randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of almotriptan 12.5 mg in migraine patients who respond poorly to sumatriptan 50 mg. BACKGROUND: Poor response to sumatriptan therapy for acute migraine attacks has been documented in the literature, but few controlled trials have investigated the efficacy of an alternative triptan in this subgroup of patients. METHODS: Patients with an International Headache Society diagnosis of migraine who self-described as experiencing at least two unsatisfactory responses to sumatriptan treated their first migraine attack with open-label sumatriptan 50 mg. Patients who did not achieve 2-hour pain relief (improvement of headache from moderate/severe to mild/no headache) were then randomized to treat their second attack with almotriptan 12.5 mg or placebo under double-blind conditions. RESULTS: In the first attack, 221 of 302 participants (73%) did not achieve 2-hour pain relief with sumatriptan and were randomized to treatment of their second attack with almotriptan 12.5 mg or placebo. Of the 198 sumatriptan nonresponders who treated their second attack (99 almotriptan; 99 placebo), 70% had severe headache pain at baseline. Two-hour pain-relief rates were significantly higher with almotriptan compared to placebo (47.5% vs 23.2%; P<.001). A significant treatment effect for almotriptan was also seen in pain-free rates at 2 hours (33.3% vs 14.1%; P<.005) and sustained freedom from pain (20.9% vs 9.0%; P<.05). In the second attack, 7.1% of patients in the almotriptan group experienced adverse events compared to 5.1% in the placebo group (P=.77). CONCLUSIONS: Almotriptan 12.5 mg is an effective and well-tolerated alternative for patients who respond poorly to sumatriptan 50 mg. A poor response to one triptan does not predict a poor response to other agents in that class.

Almotriptan in migraine patients who respond poorly to oral sumatriptan: a double-blind, randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of almotriptan 12.5 mg in migraine patients who respond poorly to sumatriptan 50 mg. BACKGROUND: Poor response to sumatriptan therapy for acute migraine attacks has been documented in the literature, but few controlled trials have investigated the efficacy of an alternative triptan in this subgroup of patients. METHODS: Patients with an International Headache Society diagnosis of migraine who self-described as experiencing at least two unsatisfactory responses to sumatriptan treated their first migraine attack with open-label sumatriptan 50 mg. Patients who did not achieve 2-hour pain relief (improvement of headache from moderate/severe to mild/no headache) were then randomized to treat their second attack with almotriptan 12.5 mg or placebo under double-blind conditions. RESULTS: In the first attack, 221 of 302 participants (73%) did not achieve 2-hour pain relief with sumatriptan and were randomized to treatment of their second attack with almotriptan 12.5 mg or placebo. Of the 198 sumatriptan nonresponders who treated their second attack (99 almotriptan; 99 placebo), 70% had severe headache pain at baseline. Two-hour pain-relief rates were significantly higher with almotriptan compared to placebo (47.5 vs. 23.2%; p < 0.001). A significant treatment effect for almotriptan was also seen in pain-free rates at 2 h (33.3 vs. 14.1%; p < 0.005) and sustained freedom from pain (20.9 vs. 9.0%; p < 0.05). In the second attack, 7.1% of patients in the almotriptan group experienced adverse events compared to 5.1% in the placebo group (p = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Almotriptan 12.5 mg is an effective and well-tolerated alternative for patients who respond poorly to sumatriptan 50 mg. A poor response to one triptan does not predict a poor response to other agents in that class.

[New aspects in pain research at Bayer]. / Aktuelle Aspekte der Schmerzforschung bei Bayer.

Considerable advances in the fields of molecular biology and pain research during the last decade has led to the identification of a wide range of pharmacological targets for new analgesics. Genes of interesting targets may be regulated either upwards or downwards under pathophysiological, i. e. inflammatory or neuropathic pain conditions. Targets exclusively expressed in terms of tissues relevant for pain transmission, are potential promising candidates for the generation of analgesics devoid of serious side-effects. Especially those targets that are expected to be essential for the development and maintenance of a number of pains offer the opportunity to define courses of treatment for patients with a variety of different symptoms and causes. Modern drug-development is based on the identification of compounds directed against these specific targets. In a high throughput screening procedure, all substances of our drug library (about 1 million) are examined for their effects on this specific molecular mechanism. Predicted pain-relieving effects are then identified by a screening cascade where selected drugs are tested for their activity in in-vitro assays on isolated neurons, tissues or recombinant cell lines. The final validation of a drugs' antihyperalgetic or antiallodynic properties is carried out in the relevant animal models of chronic pain, which mirror the clinical situation as much as possible. Compounds being more efficient or having an improved side effect profile in these models than medications currently available (and which are toxicologically harmless) are interesting candidates for clinical development.