Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros












Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Palliat Med ; 26(4): 464-471, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36260354

RESUMO

Introduction: As the field of palliative medicine continues to grow in community-based settings, outpatient palliative care clinics have become an important site for providing upstream palliative care to patients and families. It is unclear whether current training models, focused predominantly on the inpatient setting, adequately prepare clinicians for outpatient palliative care practice. Methods: We performed an online educational needs assessment survey of physicians and advanced practice providers working in outpatient palliative care clinics. Survey questions focused on the importance of specific palliative care knowledge, skills, and attitudes in outpatient practice using the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education Hospice and Palliative Medicine (HPM) curricular milestones to guide survey development. We also explored clinician perception of training adequacy and current educational needs relevant to outpatient practice. Results: One hundred sixty-four clinicians, including 122 (74.4%) physicians, 32 (19.5%) nurse practitioners, and 8 (4.9%) physician assistants, completed our survey. Clinicians had a median of 10 years of HPM experience and 6 years of outpatient experience. We identified two main areas of perceived knowledge or skill deficit: navigating insurance and prior authorizations and co-management of pain and opioid use disorder. Conclusion: Addressing gaps in education and preparedness for outpatient practice is essential to improve clinician competence and efficiency as well as patient care, safety, and care coordination. This study identifies practice management and opioid stewardship as potential targets for educational interventions. The development of curricula related to these outpatient skills may improve clinicians' ability to provide safe, patient-centered care with confidence.


Assuntos
Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida , Medicina Paliativa , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos , Avaliação das Necessidades , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Medicina Paliativa/educação
2.
J Palliat Med ; 23(12): 1658-1661, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33085936

RESUMO

Judaism, one of the world's oldest religions, claims an estimated 14.3 million members worldwide. There is great diversity in terms of identity, practice, and belief among people who identify as Jewish. As of 2017, 40% of the global Jewish community resided in the United States, making it essential for palliative care clinicians to understand religious and cultural issues related to their serious illness care. In this article, we will discuss 10 important concepts relevant to the inpatient care, advance care planning, and bereavement needs of Jewish patients and families.


Assuntos
Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados , Enfermagem de Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida , Humanos , Judeus , Judaísmo , Cuidados Paliativos , Estados Unidos
3.
J Healthc Qual ; 42(5): 269-277, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31688424

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients discharged against medical advice (AMA) have disproportionately high health care costs and increased morbidity, mortality, and hospital readmissions. Although patient risk factors for discharge AMA are known, there are little data regarding physician discharge practices surrounding AMA discharges. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of patients discharged AMA from a large, urban, academic medical center. Our study predictors included patient demographics and admission characteristics: primary service team, time of discharge, documentation of anticipated AMA discharge, and length of stay. The primary outcomes were physician discharge practices including a scheduled follow-up appointment, documentation of informed consent, documentation of a risk/benefit discussion, and notification of the attending physician. Our coprimary outcome was the incidence of 30-day hospital readmission. RESULTS: Among AMA discharges, 33% had follow-up appointments scheduled upon discharge. There was documentation of a risk/benefit discussion (69%), informed consent (63%), and notification of the attending physician (72%) in most discharges. Physician discharge practices were not associated with 30-day hospital readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to discharge best practices in AMA discharges was inconsistent and suboptimal, particularly for scheduling follow-up appointments, but was not associated with hospital readmission. Our results highlight the difficulty in facilitating safe transitions of care for patients discharged AMA.


Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Alta do Paciente/normas , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/normas , Médicos/psicologia , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/psicologia , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
4.
J Palliat Med ; 22(11): 1308-1317, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31329500

RESUMO

Background: Palliative care (PC) teams increasingly care for patients with cancer into survivorship. Cancer survivorship transcends distinctions between acute, chronic, malignant, and nonmalignant pain. Partnering with oncologists, PC teams manage pain that persists after disease-directed treatment, evaluate changing symptoms as possible signs of cancer recurrence, taper opioids and mitigate risk of opioid misuse, and manage comorbid opioid use disorder (OUD). While interdisciplinary guidelines exist for pain management in survivorship, there is a need to develop a conceptual model that fully translates the biopsychosocial framework of PC into survivorship pain management. Objective: This review frames a model for pain management in cancer survivorship that balances analgesia with the imperative to minimize risk of OUD, recognizes signs of disease recurrence, and provides whole-person care. Methods: Comprehensive narrative review of the literature. Results: Little guidance exists for co-management of pain, psychological distress, and opioid misuse in survivorship. We identified themes for whole-person pain management in survivorship: use of opioids and co-analgesic medications to prevent recurrent pain from residual tissue damage following cancer treatment, opioid tapering to the lowest effective dose, utilization of nonpharmacologic psychological interventions shown to reduce pain, screening for and management of OUD in partnership with addiction medicine specialists, maintaining vigilance for disease recurrence, and engaging in shared medical decision making. Conclusions: The management of pain in cancer survivorship is complex and requires interdisciplinary care that balances analgesia with the imperative to reduce long-term inappropriate opioid use and manage OUD, while maintaining therapeutic presence with patients in the spirit of PC.


Assuntos
Dor do Câncer/tratamento farmacológico , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/prevenção & controle , Manejo da Dor , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Sobrevivência , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...