Effects of age and gender on the pharmacodynamics of omapatrilat in healthy volunteers.

Omapatrilat is the most clinically advanced member of a new class of cardiovascular drugs, vasopeptidase inhibitors. Omapatrilat is a single molecule that simultaneously inhibits neutral endopeptidase and angiotensin-converting enzyme, thus preserving vasodilator peptides and inhibiting production of the vasoconstrictor angiotensin II. In healthy male volunteers, omapatrilat decreased blood pressure while being generally well tolerated, with no serious adverse events. This study was undertaken to determine the effect of age and gender on the pharmacodynamics of omapatrilat. Healthy male or female volunteers between the ages of 18 and 80 were given a single oral dose of omapatrilat 40 mg. Neither age nor gender affected the vasopeptidase inhibition by omapatrilat. There were no differences between subject groups in the effect of omapatrilat on supine systolic, diastolic, or mean arterial blood pressure. Based on this study of healthy subjects, it can be concluded that it is not necessary to adjust the initial dose of omapatrilat for the treatment of hypertension based solely on age or gender.

Estimation of oral bioavailability of a long half-life drug in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: To estimate and compare the oral bioavailability of a drug (BMS-187745) administered as single doses of oral solution of either the parent drug or its prodrug (BMS-188494). METHODS: A single-dose, two-period, three-treatment, control-balanced, residual-effect, incomplete block crossover study was completed in 16 healthy male subjects. All subjects received a 10 mg IV infusion of BMS-187745, and a single oral dose of either BMS-187745 (PO1) or BMS-188494 (PO2). A model is proposed to calculate the oral bioavailability of BMS-187745 which has a long half-life; incomplete data points were available to characterize its elimination phase. The plasma concentration-time data obtained following IV infusion of parent drug, and after administration of either PO1 or PO2 treatment were fitted simultaneously with systemic pharmacokinetic parameters shared by both the oral and IV routes of administration. RESULTS: The best simultaneous fittings of the plasma concentration-time data were obtained by using a biexponential pharmacokinetic model with a first-order absorption rate constant. The mean bioavailability (F) values of BMS- 187745 estimated by the proposed model were 26.5% and 2.6% when given as oral solution of its prodrug and as the parent drug. The coefficient of variation (CV) of these F values are reasonable, ranging from 38-40%. In contrast, F calculated by the model-independent AUC method exhibited high CV, ranging from 111-120%. CONCLUSIONS: The oral bioavailability values estimated by the proposed model were more reasonable compared to those calculated by the model-independent AUC method. The proposed approach may be useful for estimating bioavailability of long half-life drugs when incomplete data points are available to characterize their elimination phase.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new squalene synthase inhibitor, BMS-188494, in healthy volunteers.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, ascending, multiple-dose study was completed in 45 healthy male volunteers to assess the maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of BMS-187745, a squalene synthase inhibitor, administered as multiple oral doses of its prodrug BMS-188494. Participants received a daily oral dose of 10 mg for 2 weeks, or a daily oral dose of 25, 50, 100, or 200 mg for 4 weeks. The absorption rate constant (ka) and bioavailability (F) values were estimated by fitting the plasma BMS-187745 concentration-time data to a biexponential function with a first-order ka. Values for F were similar for all five dose levels, and thus were independent of dose. The ka values also were similar for all dose groups except the 50-mg group, for which ka values were somewhat higher. The change in urinary excretion rate of farnesyl pyrophosphate metabolite (dioic acid) was determined to be a pharmacodynamic measure. There was no significant change in dioic acid excretion at doses of less than 100 mg given for 4 weeks. An indirect pharmacodynamic response model with threshold concentration (CT) and based on inhibition of squalene synthase was proposed to describe the effect versus time data. The pharmacodynamic data from all dose levels were fitted simultaneously to the proposed model and the fitted parameters estimated as CT = 3.9 micrograms/mL, kout = 0.47 hr-1, IC50 = 4.1 micrograms/mL, and Imax = 1.0. The proposed indirect response model requiring a threshold concentration provides a useful means of quantitating responses for a new type of therapeutic agent.

Measurement of 2,4-toluenediamine in urine and serum samples from women with Même or Replicon breast implants.

The objective of this matched case-control study was to determine whether women with Même or Replicon polyurethane-covered silicone breast implants are exposed to clinically significant levels of free 2,4-TDA from biodegradation of the polyurethane foam. Urine and serum samples were obtained from 61 patients with Même or Replicon breast implants and 61 controls on two separate occasions separated by 10 +/- 3 days. Free TDA was analyzed by gas chromatography combined with negative chemical ionization mass spectrometry with lower limit of quantitation in both urine and serum of 10 pg/ml. The results were correlated with the length of time since implantation. No patients or controls had detectable free 2,4-TDA in their sera. Thirty patients had quantifiable levels of free 2,4-TDA, and 18 had detectable levels in their urine. Controls had no quantifiable levels, but 7 subjects had detectable levels. The biodegradative half-life of the polyurethane foam was estimated to be 2 years. A risk assessment using the cancer potency estimate calculated by the FDA from rat data and the National Academy of Sciences methodology provided a theoretical lifetime risk of approximately one in one million. It was concluded that the polyurethane foam cover on the Même and Replicon breast implants biodegrades. The risk assessment of approximately one in one million derived from this study strengthens earlier conclusions by the Health Protection Branch (Canada) that there is no significant risk of cancer from exposure to the 2,4-TDA formed from this biodegradation.

The effect of nefazodone on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of phenytoin in healthy male subjects.

The effect of nefazodone on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of phenytoin was evaluated in 18 healthy male subjects. The subjects received a single oral dose of phenytoin, 300 mg, on day 1 of the study and the pharmacokinetic profile of the drug was determined. After a washout period followed by oral administration of nefazodone, 200 mg twice daily for 7 days, subjects received a single dose of phenytoin, 300 mg concomitantly with the morning dose of nefazodone on day 12, and the pharmacokinetic profile of phenytoin was determined again. Minimum plasma concentrations of nefazodone and its main metabolites indicated that steady state had been achieved for nefazodone when phenytoin and nefazodone were administered concomitantly. No significant differences were demonstrated between mean single-dose pharmacokinetic parameters of phenytoin when administered alone on day 1 and concomitantly with nefazodone on day 12. Assessment of adverse events, clinical laboratory parameters, electrocardiograms, vital signs, and physical examinations indicated that concomitant administration of nefazodone and phenytoin was safe and well tolerated. These data demonstrate that nefazodone does not affect the single-dose pharmacokinetics of phenytoin, but do not preclude the possibility of such an interaction when phenytoin is administered on a long-term basis. A clinically significant interaction between nefazodone and phenytoin through a pharmacokinetic mechanism is unlikely.

The pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in patients on chronic hemodialysis.

OBJECTIVE: The single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of the HMG CoA reductase inhibitor pravastatin and its two metabolites, SQ 31,906 and SQ 31,945, were evaluated in 12 hemodialysis patients. A single 20-mg i.v. dose was employed, followed by daily oral dosing of 20 mg over four hemodialysis intervals. RESULTS: No statistical differences in the pharmacokinetics of pravastatin or SQ 31,906 were evident when comparing the first and last days of oral dosing with pravastatin. The pharmacokinetic parameters of pravastatin and SQ 31,906 were similar to those of healthy volunteers. SQ 31,945, the inactive polar metabolite, did accumulate in dialysis patients, as evidenced by an accumulation index of 1.7 +/- 1.0. Although metabolic clearance is the predominant mode of elimination of pravastatin, hemodialysis clearances of pravastatin, SQ 31,906 and SQ 31,945 will contribute to total body clearance since dialytic clearance ranged from 40 to 80 ml.min-1. CONCLUSION: Pravastatin can be safely administered in the usual dosages to subjects with renal failure on hemodialysis and no change in dosing is necessary.

The pharmacokinetics of irbesartan in renal failure and maintenance hemodialysis.

PURPOSE: An open-label, multiple-dose, parallel-group study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist irbesartan in subjects with varying degrees of renal function. METHODS: Forty subjects were divided into four treatment groups on the basis of 24-hour creatinine clearance (CLCR): normal renal function (> 75 ml/min/1.73 m2), mild to moderate renal impairment (30 to 74 ml/min/1.73 m2), severe renal impairment (< 30 ml/min/1.73 m2), and maintenance hemodialysis. Subjects received 100 mg irbesartan daily for 8 days (or 300 mg daily for 9 days for the hemodialysis group). Serial blood and urine samples were collected for 24 hours after the first and last of eight successive daily doses. In addition, arterial and venous blood samples were collected during two hemodialysis sessions from subjects requiring maintenance hemodialysis. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant linear relationship between CLCR and maximum plasma concentrations, dose-adjusted area under the plasma concentration time curve values on days 1 or 8, or any other pharmacokinetic parameters among the renal function groups studied. There was no indication of drug accumulation with repetitive dosing. In the subjects receiving hemodialysis, arterial-venous concentration differences for irbesartan were negligible, suggesting that this compound is not cleared through hemodialysis. In addition, irbesartan was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Based on pharmacokinetic parameters, no starting dose adjustment is necessary in subjects with mild to severe renal impairment, inclusive of hemodialysis. Subjects with volume depletion may have an exaggerated response to an initial dose of irbesartan and, under such circumstances, volume depletion should be corrected or a lower starting dose of irbesartan should be considered.

Single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of fosinopril and fosinoprilat in patients with hepatic impairment.

The single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor fosinopril and its active diacid, fosinoprilat, were evaluated in 6 healthy volunteers and 12 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. Fosinopril was administered at a dosage of 10 mg once daily for 14 days. Results in the two groups were similar, with no evidence of accumulation of fosinoprilat in hepatically impaired patients. Mean (+/- SD) maximum observed plasma concentrations of fosinoprilat in the healthy subjects were 112.0 +/- 67.2 ng/mL after the first dose and 144.1 +/- 61.7 ng/mL at steady-state. Corresponding values for the hepatically impaired patients were 111.4 +/- 40.1 ng/mL and 140.2 +/- 50.9 ng/mL. The area under the serum concentration versus time curve for healthy volunteers was 790.7 +/- 431.0 ng.hr/mL after the first dose and 940.3 +/- 400.4 ng.hr/mL at steady-state. Similar values were noted in hepatically impaired patients: 926.0 +/- 293.9 ng.hr/mL and 1,255.4 +/- 434.0 ng.hr/mL for first dose and steady-state, respectively. No statistically significant differences were detected in fosinoprilat pharmacokinetic values between healthy and hepatically impaired subjects. Absence of accumulation can be attributed to the dual route of elimination of fosinoprilat reported in previous studies. Renal excretion of fosinoprilat in hepatically impaired patients prevents increased accumulation. The present findings suggest that the starting dose of fosinopril used in hypertensive patients with normal renal and hepatic function can also be used in patients with hepatic impairment secondary to cirrhosis.

Pharmacokinetics and in vivo activity of liposome-encapsulated gentamicin.

Gentamicin sulfate was encapsulated in liposomes composed solely of egg phosphatidylcholine and administered via intravenous injection to rats and mice. The total gentamicin activity (regardless of whether it was free or liposome associated) in serum and selected tissues was determined for 24 h (serum) or up to 15 weeks (tissues) by using a microbiological assay. The mean half-lives in serum of a single 20-mg/kg dose of free (nonencapsulated) gentamicin in mice and rats were estimated to be 1.0 and 0.6 h, respectively, whereas a similar dose of encapsulated drug had apparent mean half-lives of 3.8 h in mice and 4.0 h in rats. In both species, the apparent half-life in serum of the liposomal formulation increased as the dose increased. Liposome encapsulation resulted in higher and more prolonged activity in organs rich in reticuloendothelial cells (especially spleen and liver). In acute septicemia infections in mice, the liposomal formulation showed enhanced prophylactic activity (as determined by calculation of the 50% protective dose). In a model of murine salmonellosis, liposomal gentamicin greatly enhanced survival when given as a single dose (10 mg/kg) at 1 or 2 days after infection as well as up to 7 days before infection.