Post-Transplantation Seroprotection Rates in Liver, Lung, and Heart Transplant Recipients Vaccinated Pre-Transplantation against Hepatitis B Virus and Invasive Pneumococcal Disease.

Vaccination before solid organ transplantation is recommended since post-transplantation immunosuppression is known to impair vaccine responses. However, little is known about post-transplantation seroprotection rates in organ transplant recipients vaccinated pre-transplantation. We aimed to investigate the proportion of transplant recipients vaccinated against hepatitis B virus (HBV) and invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) pre-transplantation at the time of listing for transplantation with post-transplantation seroprotection. We included 136 solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients vaccinated at the time of listing for transplantation. We investigated post-transplantation antibody concentrations against HBV and IPD. Established antibody thresholds were used to define seroprotection. The proportions of SOT recipients with post-transplantation seroprotection were 27.9% (n = 38) and 42.6% (n = 58) against HBV and IPD, respectively. Compared to completing HBV vaccination pre-transplantation, completing post-transplantation vaccination (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 7.8, 95% CI: 2.5-24.5, p < 0.001) and incomplete vaccination (aOR: 6.3, 95% CI: 1.2-32.6, p = 0.028) were associated with non-response against HBV, after adjustment for confounders. Importantly, patients with seroprotection at the time of listing had lower odds of non-response against HBV (aOR: 0.04, 95% CI: 0.0-0.1, p < 0.001) and IPD (aOR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1-0.7, p = 0.007) compared to those without seroprotection. SOT recipients vaccinated pre-transplantation had low post-transplantation seroprotection rates against HBV and IPD. However, SOT recipients with seroprotection at the time of listing had lower odds of non-response, suggesting early vaccination should be a priority.

Inhaled Corticosteroids Particle Size and Risk of Hospitalization Due to Exacerbations and All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Background: Extra-fine particle inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) improve peripheral airway distribution, but their effect on risk of exacerbations and all-cause mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unclear. Methods: This observational cohort study compares patients with COPD who received extra-fine particle ICS to those who received standard particle size ICS from 2010 to 2017 while followed in outpatient clinics. The primary outcome was the time to a COPD exacerbation that required hospitalization, with all-cause mortality as a secondary outcome. Data were analyzed using an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model and a competing risk analysis. Two predefined subgroup analyses of patients treated with pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and patients with a previous exacerbation history, was carried out. Lastly, we created a propensity score matched cohort as a sensitivity analysis. Results: Of the 40,489 patients included, 38,802 (95.8%) received stand particle size ICS and 1,687 (4.2%) received extra-fine particle ICS. In total 7,058 were hospitalized with a COPD exacerbation, and 4,346 died. No significant protective effect of extra-fine particle ICS against hospitalization due to COPD exacerbations (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.82-1.05, p=0.23) or all-cause mortality (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.85-1.17, p=0.99) was found when compared to standard particle size ICS. However, in the subgroup analysis of patients treated with pMDIs, extra-fine particle ICS was associated with reduction in risk of exacerbations (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.82, p<0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.86, p<0.001). Conclusion: The administration of extra-fine particle ICS was not associated with reduced risk of exacerbations or all-cause mortality in our primary analysis. A subgroup consisting of patients treated with pMDIs suggested potential protective benefits.

Clinical Manifestations and Outcomes in Adults Hospitalized With Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Influenza a/B: A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study.

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza cause significant health challenges, particularly for individuals with comorbid conditions and older adults. However, information on the clinical manifestations and outcomes of adults hospitalized with RSV in Europe remains limited. Methods: This multicenter observational cohort study of adults hospitalized with RSV or influenza A or B from March 2016 to April 2020 investigated the clinical manifestations, mortality risk factors, and association with 90-day mortality rates by logistic regression analysis after adjustment for covariates. Results: Of 988 patients hospitalized with either virus, 353 had RSV, 347 had influenza A, and 288 had influenza B infection. Patients with RSV, compared with those with influenza A or B, were more likely to have comorbid conditions (83% for RSV vs 72% for influenza A [P = .03] and 74% for influenza B [P = .001]) or pneumonia (41% vs 29% [P = .03] and 24% [P < .001], respectively). After adjustment for covariates, RSV infection was associated with an increased all-cause mortality rate within 90 days compared with influenza B (odds ratio, 2.16 [95% confidence interval, 1.20-3.87]; P = .01) but not influenza A (1.38 [.84-2.29]; P = .21). Increasing age and present pneumonia were identified as independent mortality risk factors in patients with RSV. Conclusions: Older adults hospitalized with RSV infections are at a higher risk of dying within 90 days of hospitalization than patients admitted with influenza B but at a similar risk as those admitted with influenza A, emphasizing the detrimental effects and severity of older patients being infected with RSV. Our findings underscore the need for strategic testing and vaccination approaches to mitigate the impact of RSV among older adults.

Should SARS-CoV-2 serological testing be used in the decision to deliver a COVID-19 vaccine booster? A pro-con assessment.

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination has saved millions of lives in the past few years. To maintain a high level of protection, particularly in at-risk populations, booster doses are recommended to counter the waning of circulating antibody levels over time and the continuous emergence of immune escape variants of concern (VOCs). As anti-spike serology is now widely available, it may be considered a useful tool to identify individuals needing an additional vaccine dose, i.e., to screen certain populations to identify those whose plasma antibody levels are too low to provide protection. However, no recommendations are currently available on this topic. We reviewed the relevant supporting and opposing arguments, including areas of uncertainty, and concluded that in most populations, spike serology should not be used to decide about the administration of a booster dose. The main counterarguments are as follows: correlates of protection are imperfectly characterised, essentially owing to the emergence of VOCs; spike serology has an intrinsic inability to comprehensively reflect the whole immune memory; and booster vaccines are now VOC-adapted, while the commonly available commercial serological assays explore antibodies against the original virus.

Immune cell populations and induced immune responses at admission in patients hospitalized with vaccine breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Background: Vaccine breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections are common and of clinical and public health concern. However, little is known about the immunological characteristics of patients hospitalized due to these infections. We aimed to investigate and compare immune cell subpopulations and induced immune responses in vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19. Methods: A nested case-control study on adults (≥ 18 years) who received at least two doses of a mRNA-COVID-19 vaccine and were hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections and severe COVID-19 between January 7, 2021, and February 1, 2022, were eligible for inclusion. Age- and sex-matched non-vaccinated controls were identified. Immunophenotyping was performed using a custom-designed 10-color flow cytometry prefabricated freeze-dried antibody panel (DuraClone, Beckman Coulter (BC), Brea, Calif). TruCulture (Myriad RBM, Austin, USA) was used to assess induced immune response in whole blood, revealing different critical signaling pathways as a proxy for immune function. All samples were obtained within 48 hours of admission. Results: In total, 20 hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 and a breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection were included, ten vaccinated and ten non-vaccinated patients. Vaccinated patients had lower concentrations of CD19 B cells (p = 0.035), naïve CD4 T cells (p = 0.015), a higher proportion of γδ1 T cells (p = 0.019), and higher unstimulated immune cell release of IL-10 (p = 0.015). Conclusion: We observed immunological differences between vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients hospitalized due to severe COVID-19 that indicate that vaccinated patients had lower B cell concentrations, lower concentrations of CD4 naïve T cells, a skewed gamma-delta V1/V2 ratio, and an exaggerated IL-10 response at admission. These results could indicate a suboptimal immune response involved in SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections that cause severe COVID-19 in vaccinated adults. However, the sample size was small, and further research is needed to confirm these results.

Systemic antibiotics for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in outpatients with non-hospitalised exacerbations of pre-existing lung diseases: a randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The effect of dual systemic antibiotic therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with pre-existing lung disease is unknown. To assess whether dual systemic antibiotics against P. aeruginosa in outpatients with COPD, non-cystic fibrosis (non-CF) bronchiectasis, or asthma can improve outcomes. METHODS: Multicenter, randomised, open-label trial conducted at seven respiratory outpatient clinics in Denmark. Outpatients with COPD, non-CF bronchiectasis, or asthma with a current P. aeruginosa-positive lower respiratory tract culture (clinical routine samples obtained based on symptoms of exacerbation not requiring hospitalisation), regardless of prior P. aeruginosa-status, no current need for hospitalisation, and at least two moderate or one hospitalisation-requiring exacerbation within the last year were eligible. Patients were assigned 1:1 to 14 days of dual systemic anti-pseudomonal antibiotics or no antibiotic treatment. Primary outcome was time to prednisolone or antibiotic-requiring exacerbation or death from day 20 to day 365. RESULTS: The trial was stopped prematurely based in lack of recruitment during the COVID-19 pandemic, this decision was endorsed by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board. Forty-nine outpatients were included in the study. There was a reduction in risk of the primary outcome in the antibiotic group compared to the control group (HR 0.51 (95%CI 0.27-0.96), p = 0.037). The incidence of admissions with exacerbation within one year was 1.1 (95%CI 0.6-1.7) in the dual antibiotic group vs. 2.9 (95%CI 1.3-4.5) in the control group, p = 0.037. CONCLUSIONS: Use of dual systemic antibiotics for 14 days against P. aeruginosa in outpatients with chronic lung diseases and no judged need for hospitalisation, improved clinical outcomes markedly. The main limitation was the premature closure of the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03262142, registration date 2017-08-25.

Evidence for Immunity against Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Pertussis through Natural Infection or Vaccination in Adult Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review.

(1) Background: We aim to systematically review the current evidence on immunity against tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis in adult solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients, either through natural infection or vaccination. (2) Methods: This systematic review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 2 and ROBINS-I and summarized the findings narratively due to the heterogeneity of the studies. (3) Results: Of the 315 screened articles, 11 were included. Tetanus immunity varied between 55% and 86%, diphtheria immunity from 23% to 75%, and pertussis immunity was between 46% and 82%. Post-vaccination immunity showed variation across the studies, with some indicating reductions and others no change, with antibody responses influenced by transplanted organs, gender, age, and immunosuppressive regimens. The single randomized study exhibited a low risk of bias, while of the ten non-randomized studies, six showed moderate and four serious risks of bias, necessitating cautious interpretation of results. (4) Conclusions: SOT recipients exhibit considerable immunity against tetanus and diphtheria at transplantation, but this immunity decreases over time. Although vaccination can enhance this immunity, the response may be suboptimal, and the increased antibody levels may not persist, underscoring the need for tailored vaccination strategies in this vulnerable population.

Follow-Up Study of Effectiveness of 23-Valent Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine Against All-Type and Serotype-Specific Invasive Pneumococcal Disease, Denmark.

As a follow-up to a previous study, we investigated vaccine effectiveness (VE) of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) against invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) among 1,254,498 persons >65 years of age as part of a vaccination program in Denmark during April 2020-January 2023. We assessed VE by using a Cox regression model and adjusted for age, sex, and underlying conditions. Using nationwide data, we estimated a VE of PPSV23 against all-type IPD of 32% and against PPSV23-serotype IPD of 41%. Because this follow-up study had more statistical power than the original study, we also estimated VE against IPD caused by PPSV23-serotypes excluding serotype 3; serotype 3; serotype 8; serotype 22F; PPSV23 non-PCV15 serotypes; PPSV23 non-PCV20 serotypes; and IPD over time. Our findings suggest PPSV23 vaccination can protect persons >65 years of age against IPD caused by all serotypes or serotype groupings, except serotype 3.

Changes in vaccination uptake against pneumococcal disease, influenza, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) before and after a Head and Neck cancer diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is one of the main contributors to non-cancer mortality among patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). This study aimed to determine the vaccine uptake for pneumococcal polysaccharide and conjugate vaccines, quadrivalent influenza vaccines, and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines before and after an HNC diagnosis. Furthermore, the study investigated the timing of vaccination after a cancer diagnosis. MATERIALS & METHODS: This register based multicentre study included Danish patients ≥ 18y diagnosed with HNC between 2018 and 2021. The vaccine uptake was assessed by calculating cumulative incidence (CI), while the timing of vaccination after an HNC diagnosis was explored by calculating incidence rates of vaccination the first and second half year after a cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of vaccine uptake for pneumococcal vaccines was estimated to be 8 % and 16 % one year before and after an HNC diagnosis, respectively. The CIs were 36 % and 38 % for quadrivalent influenza vaccines, respectively, whereas the CIs of vaccine uptake for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were 60 % and 89 %. The IR of mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations the first half year after HNC diagnosis were 273 per 1000 person-months of follow-up (PMFU) and 111 per 1000 PMFU the second half year, respectively (IRR: 0.38, p < 0.001). Comparing the same periods, the IR of quadrivalent influenza vaccination was 28 per 1000 PMFU and 51 per 1000 PMFU (IRR: 1.95, 0 < 0.001). The IRs of pneumococcal vaccinations were 11 per 1000 PMFU and 14 per 1000 PMFU (IRR 1.28, p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Although our study shows a significant increase in pneumococcal and COVID-19 vaccine uptake after HNC diagnosis, a gap remains in vaccine uptake before diagnosis, underscoring the need for increased awareness of vaccination options and recommendations. Our findings could serve as a reference for future recommendations.

Risk of Mortality and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treated with Azithromycin, Roxithromycin, Clarithromycin, and Amoxicillin.

Background: Prior research has raised concerns regarding the use of macrolides and their association with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Methods: We conducted a cohort study, where we explored the cardiovascular risks associated with the treatment of COPD patients using macrolide antibiotics-namely azithromycin, clarithromycin, and roxithromycin-with amoxicillin serving as a reference. The study focused on COPD patients in an outpatient setting and included a thorough 3-year follow-up. Patients were categorized into four groups based on their treatment. The primary analysis utilized an adjusted Cox model, supplemented by sensitivity analysis through inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results: No significant differences were found in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE-stroke, acute myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death) between the macrolide groups, and the amoxicillin/hazard ratios (HR) were azithromycin HR = 1.01, clarithromycin HR = 0.99, and roxithromycin HR = 1.02. Similarly, sensitivity analysis showed no disparities in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death among the groups. Conclusions: Overall, the study revealed no evidence of increased risk of MACE, all-cause mortality, or cardiovascular death in COPD patients treated with these macrolides compared to amoxicillin over a 3-year period.

Vaccines against respiratory syncytial virus.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV is) a common respiratory virus responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality among infants, elderly with comorbidity, and immunocompromised adults. Two vaccines, Abrysvo and Arexvy, have been approved for prevention of severe RSV infection in adults ≥ 60 years of age. In addition, Abrysvo is approved for use during pregnancy to protect infants from RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection. Currently, there is no national recommendation for the use of the vaccines, but vaccination of elderly at highest risk of severe RSV infection should be considered in a shared clinical decision making.

Herpes Virus Infections in Kidney Transplant Patients (HINT) - a prospective observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients receive maintenance immunosuppressive therapy to avoid allograft rejection resulting in increased risk of infections and infection-related morbidity and mortality. Approximately 98% of adults are infected with varicella zoster virus, which upon reactivation causes herpes zoster. The incidence of herpes zoster is higher in kidney transplant recipients than in immunocompetent individuals, and kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk of severe herpes zoster-associated disease. Vaccination with adjuvanted recombinant glycoprotein E subunit herpes zoster vaccine (RZV) prevents herpes zoster in older adults with excellent efficacy (90%), and vaccination of kidney transplant candidates is recommended in Danish and international guidelines. However, the robustness and duration of immune responses after RZV vaccination, as well as the optimal timing of vaccination in relation to transplantation remain unanswered questions. Thus, the aim of this study is to characterize the immune response to RZV vaccination in kidney transplant candidates and recipients at different timepoints before and after transplantation. METHODS: The Herpes Virus Infections in Kidney Transplant Patients (HINT) study is a prospective observational cohort study. The study will include kidney transplant candidates on the waiting list for transplantation (n = 375) and kidney transplant recipients transplanted since January 1, 2019 (n = 500) from all Danish kidney transplant centers who are offered a RZV vaccine as routine care. Participants are followed with repeated blood sampling until 12 months after inclusion. In the case of transplantation or herpes zoster disease, additional blood samples will be collected until 12 months after transplantation. The immune response will be characterized by immunophenotyping and functional characterization of varicella zoster virus-specific T cells, by detection of anti-glycoprotein E antibodies, and by measuring cytokine profiles. DISCUSSION: The study will provide new knowledge on the immune response to RZV vaccination in kidney transplant candidates and recipients and the robustness and duration of the response, potentially enhancing preventive strategies against herpes zoster in a population at increased risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05604911).

Inhalation devices and inhaled corticosteroids particle size influence on severe pneumonia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are associated with an increased risk of pneumonia among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The introduction of extrafine particle ICS has aimed to improve the distribution of medicine in the airways by altering deposition within the lungs, potentially affecting efficacy and side effects. It remains unclear if extrafine particle ICS administration alters the risk of pneumonia compared with standard particle size ICS. METHODS: An observational cohort study including all Danish COPD outpatients receiving ICS from 2010 to 2017. The primary outcome was pneumonia hospitalisation in the different ICS particle dosing regimens. The primary analysis was an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. For sensitivity analysis, a subgroup analysis of patients receiving spray devices was done. Further, we created a propensity score matched cohort, in which we matched for the same covariates as adjusted for in the main analysis. RESULTS: A total of 35 691 patients were included of whom 1471 received extrafine particle ICS. Among these patients, 4657 were hospitalised due to pneumonia. Patients with COPD receiving extrafine particle ICS had a lower risk of hospitalisation due to pneumonia compared with patients receiving standard particle size ICS in our primary analysis (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.89; p=0.002), subgroup analysis (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.65; p<0.0001) and the propensity-matched population (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.87; p=0.0006). INTERPRETATION: The use of extrafine particle ICS administration was associated with a lower risk of pneumonia hospitalisation in patients with COPD compared with those who received standard size treatment.

Implementation of a vaccination clinic for adult solid organ transplant candidates: A single-center experience.

Vaccination is an evidence-based strategy to prevent or reduce the severity of infectious diseases (ID). Here, we aimed to describe the experience of implementing a vaccination clinic specifically targeting liver, heart, lung, and combined dual organ transplantation at a single transplantation center in Denmark. In this cohort of 242 solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates, we investigated seroprotection and the proportion of recommended vaccinations documented before transplantation. Furthermore, we registered completed vaccinations after ID consultations. The median age in our cohort was 53 years (IQR, 42-60), 60% were males (n = 135), and liver transplants (n = 138; 57%) were the most frequently planned organ transplants. Before the consultation to the vaccination clinic, influenza and pneumococcal vaccines had the highest proportion of documented vaccination (58% and 37%, respectively). Serological protection was more frequently observed for measles, mumps, or rubella (MMR, approximately 90% for each), while only 30% (n = 72) of SOT candidates showed seroprotection against pneumococcal disease. All SOT candidates required at least one of the recommended vaccines, and over 90% required three or more. At least 10% of patients in our cohort needed a live attenuated vaccine for either MMR or yellow fever. The most frequently administered vaccine was the tetanus-diphtheria-acelullar pertussis (Tdap) booster (n = 217; 90%), influenza vaccination was either administered (n = 16; 7%) or recommended (n = 226; 93%), PCV13 was administered (n = 155; 64%) or recommended (n = 27; 11%), and PPSV23 was either administered (n = 18; 7.4%) or recommended (n = 140; 58%). All SOT candidates adhered completely to their vaccination schedules. Based on our findings, we recommend prioritizing vaccination before transplantation by providing ID consultations for SOT candidates.

Exclusion of older adults and immunocompromised individuals in influenza, pneumococcal and COVID-19 vaccine trials before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Older adults and immunocompromised individulas are often excluded from vaccine trials. AIM: We hypothesised that during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the proportion of trials excluding these patients decreased. METHODS: Using the US Food and Drug Administration and and European Medicines Agency search engines, we identified all vaccines approved against pneumococcal disease, influenza (quadrivalent vaccines), and COVID-19 from 2011 to 2021. Study protocols were screened for direct and indirect age exclusion criteria and exclusion of immunocompromised individuals. In addition, we reviewed the studies with no explicit exclusion criteria and investigated the actual inclusion of those individuals. RESULTS: We identified 2024 trial records; 1702 were excluded (e.g., use of other vaccine or risk group); and 322 studies were eligible for our review. Among the pneumococcal and influenza vaccine trials (n = 193), 81 (42%) had an explicit direct age exclusion, and 150 (78%) had an indirect age-related exclusion. In total, 163 trials (84%) trials were likely to exclude older adults. Among the COVID-19 vaccine trials (n = 129), 33 (26%) had direct age exclusion and 82 (64%) had indirect age exclusion; in total, 85 (66%) trials were likely to exclude older adults. Therefore was a 18% decrease in the proportion of trials with age-related exclusion between 2011 and 2021 (only influenza and pneumococcal vaccine trials) and 2020-2021 (only COVID-19 vaccine trials) (p = 0.014). In a sub-analysis assessing observational and randomised trials, the decrease was 25% and 9%, respectively. Immunocompromised individuals were included in 87 (45%) of the pneumococcal and influenza vaccine trials compared with 54 (42%) of the COVID-19 vaccine trials (p = 0.058). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, we found a decrease in the exclusion of older adults from vaccine trials but no significant change in the inclusion of immunocompromised individulas.

Treatment effect modifiers in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 receiving remdesivir and dexamethasone.

BACKGROUND: The combined effectiveness of remdesivir and dexamethasone in subgroups of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 is poorly investigated. METHODS: In this nationwide retrospective cohort study, we included 3826 patients with COVID-19 hospitalised between February 2020 and April 2021. The primary outcomes were use of invasive mechanical ventilation and 30-day mortality, comparing a cohort treated with remdesivir and dexamethasone with a previous cohort treated without remdesivir and dexamethasone. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting logistic regression to assess associations with progression to invasive mechanical ventilation and 30-day mortality between the two cohorts. The analyses were conducted overall and by subgroups based on patient characteristics. RESULTS: Odds ratio for progression to invasive mechanical ventilation and 30-day mortality in individuals treated with remdesivir and dexamethasone compared to treatment with standard of care alone was 0.46 (95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.57) and 0.47 (95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.56), respectively. The reduced risk of mortality was observed in elderly patients, overweight patients and in patients requiring supplemental oxygen at admission, regardless of sex, comorbidities and symptom duration. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with remdesivir and dexamethasone had significantly improved outcomes compared to patients treated with standard of care alone. These effects were observed in most patient subgroups.