Effect of Stabilization on the Healing Process of Femur Fractures in Aged Mice.

BACKGROUND: The influence of mechanical stability on fracture healing has previously been studied in adult mice, but is poorly understood in aged animals. Therefore, we herein studied the effect of stabilization on the healing process of femur fractures in aged mice. METHODS: Twenty-four 18-month-old CD-1 mice were stabilized after midshaft fracture of the femur with an intramedullary screw. In another 24 18-month-old mice, the femur fractures were left unstabilized. Bone healing was studied by radiological, biomechanical, histomorphometric, and protein expression analyses. RESULTS: After 2 and 5 weeks of healing, the callus of nonstabilized fractures compared to stabilized fractures was significantly larger, containing a significantly smaller amount of osseous tissue and a higher amount of cartilaginous tissue. This was associated with a significantly lower biomechanical stiffness during the early phase of healing. However, during the late phase of fracture healing both nonstabilized and stabilized fractures showed a biomechanical stiffness of ∼40%. Of interest, Western blot analyses of callus tissue demonstrated that the expression of proteins related to angiogenesis, bone formation and remodeling, i.e. VEGF, CYR61, BMP-2, BMP-4, Col-2, Col-10, RANKL, OPG, did not differ between nonstabilized and stabilized fractures. CONCLUSION: Nonstabilized fractures in aged mice show delayed healing and remodeling. This is not caused by an altered protein expression in the callus but rather by the excessive interfragmentary movements.

Characterization of the healing process in non-stabilized and stabilized femur fractures in mice.

BACKGROUND: Although a variety of suitable fracture models for mice exist, in many studies bone healing was still analyzed without fracture stabilization. Because there is little information whether the healing of non-stabilized fractures differs from that of stabilized fractures, we herein studied the healing process of non-stabilized compared to stabilized femur fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one CD-1 mice were stabilized after midshaft fracture of the femur with an intramedullary screw allowing micromovements and endochondral healing. In another 22 mice the femur fractures were left unstabilized. Bone healing was studied by radiological, biomechanical, histomorphometric and protein expression analyses. RESULTS: Non-stabilized femur fractures revealed a significantly lower biomechanical stiffness compared to stabilized fractures. During the early phase of fracture healing non-stabilized fractures demonstrated a significantly lower amount of osseous tissue and a higher amount of cartilage tissue. During the late phase of fracture healing both non-stabilized and stabilized fractures showed almost 100 % osseous callus tissue. However, in stabilized fractures remodeling was almost completed with lamellar bone while non-stabilized fractures still showed large callus with great amounts of woven bone, indicating a delay in bone remodeling. Of interest, western blot analyses of callus tissue demonstrated in non-stabilized fractures a significantly reduced expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and a slightly lowered expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and collagen-10. CONCLUSION: Non-stabilized femur fractures in mice show a marked delay in bone healing compared to stabilized fractures. Therefore, non-stabilized fracture models may not be used to analyze the mechanisms of normal bone healing.