The Oral Cholate Challenge Test Quantifies Risk for Liver-Related Clinical Outcomes in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.

Background and Aims: We quantified hepatic functional impairment using quantitative function tests and linked severity of functional impairment to liver-related complications and outcome in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Methods: Forty-seven patients had baseline testing, and 40 were retested after 1 year. For each test, cholates labeled with cold, nonradioactive isotopes were administered orally (DuO, SHUNT tests) and intravenously (SHUNT test), and blood was analyzed at 20 and 60 minutes (DuO), or 0, 5, 20, 45, 60, and 90 minutes (SHUNT). Disease severity index (DSI), hepatic reserve (HR%), and portal-systemic shunting (SHUNT%) were calculated. Results: Three subgroups with low, moderate, and high disease severity were defined from the age-adjusted results for DSI, HR%, and SHUNT%. Standard laboratory tests, clinical scores, cytokine levels, and clinical outcome correlated with these subgroups. In univariate analysis of baseline tests, SHUNT% was a strong predictor of clinical outcome (n = 13 of 47; areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.84DuO, 0.90SHUNT). A model combining SHUNT%, DSI (or HR%), platelet count, and changes from baseline was most predictive of outcome (n = 10 of 40; areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.95DuO, 0.96SHUNT). Conclusion: DSI, HR%, and SHUNT% identified subgroups of primary sclerosing cholangitis based on the age-related severity of hepatic impairment that predicted risk for liver-related clinical outcome. Further study is warranted to confirm and validate these intriguing findings both in studies of natural progression of primary sclerosing cholangitis and in clinical trials. DuO enhances the utility of quantitative liver function testing.

A Validated LC-MS/MS Assay for the Quantification of Cholate Isotopes in Human Serum.

BACKGROUND: Current methods for evaluating liver health rely on nonspecific blood tests, elastography surrogates for fibrosis, and invasive procedures, none of which directly measure liver function and physiology. Herein we present the analytical validation of a unique, highly sensitive LC-MS/MS assay and dual-sample oral (DuO) cholate challenge test to reliably quantify serial serum concentrations of cholate isotopes administered to patients with liver diseases. The clearance of administered cholate isotopes measured by the assay provides information about liver function and physiology. METHODS: Analytical method validation of the cholate assay analytes (endogenous unlabeled cholic acid, 24-13C-cholic acid, and 2,2,4,4-D4-cholic acid) in terms of accuracy, precision, analytical sensitivity, analytical specificity, and range of reliable response was completed in human serum samples spiked with quality controls and calibrators in accordance with applicable guidelines. DuO test parameters were validated using samples from 48 subjects representing various liver disease etiologies. RESULTS: Accuracy (mean biases) for all analytes ranged from 0.1% to 3.7%. Using a nested components-of-variance design (20 days, 2 runs per day, 2 replicates per sample), total imprecision for all analytes ranged from 2.3% to 8.4%. Lower and upper limits of quantitation were established and validated at 0.1 to 10.0 µM. Matrix effects and potential interferents did not affect assay performance. DuO test validation met all prespecified acceptance criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The method validation studies described herein established the performance characteristics in terms of accuracy, precision, analytical sensitivity, analytical specificity, reportable ranges, and reference intervals of the LC-MS/MS cholate assay and DuO test.

Hepatic improvement within 27 days of avenciguat treatment in Child-Pugh A cirrhosis detected by an oral cholate challenge test.

New methods for measuring hepatic improvement in clinical trials and the clinic are needed. One new method, HepQuant SHUNT, detected dose-dependent improvements in hepatic function and portal physiology in the phase 1b study (NCT03842761) of avenciguat, an activator of soluble guanylyl cyclase that is being developed for the treatment of portal hypertension. Herein, we examined whether HepQuant Duo, an easy-to-administer test version, could similarly detect the effects of avenciguat. Twenty-three patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis and liver stiffness >15 kPa received either a placebo (n = 5) or a maximum twice-daily avenciguat dose of 1, 2, or 3 mg (n = 6 per group) for 28 days. The DuO test was performed at baseline and on days 11 and 27 in each subject. The test involved administering 40 mg of d4-cholate orally, measuring d4-cholate concentrations in serum at 20 and 60 minutes, and calculating portal hepatic filtration rate, disease severity index, portal-systemic shunting (SHUNT%), and hepatic reserve (HR%). Avenciguat demonstrated dose-dependent improvement in all test parameters. Changes from baseline in SHUNT% after 27 days' treatment were 0.1 ± 9.0% for placebo, 1.7 ± 5.5% for 1 mg twice-daily, -3.2 ± 2.7% for 2 mg twice-daily, and -6.1 ± 5.0% for 3 mg twice-daily (paired t test for change from baseline p = 0.98, 0.48, 0.04, and 0.03, respectively). The changes detected by HepQuant DuO were similar to those previously observed and reported for HepQuant SHUNT. The results support further study of avenciguat in treating portal hypertension and spotlight the utility of HepQuant DuO in the development of drug therapy for liver disease. HepQuant DuO facilitates the use of function testing to measure hepatic improvement in clinical trials and the clinic.

Liver function and portal-systemic shunting quantified by the oral cholate challenge test and risk for large oesophageal varices.

BACKGROUND: The quantitative HepQuant SHUNT test of liver function and physiology generates a disease severity index (DSI) that correlates with risk for clinical complications, such as large oesophageal varices (LEVs). A derivative test, HepQuant DuO, generates an equivalent DSI and simplifies testing by requiring only oral administration of the test solution and two blood samples at 20 and 60 min. AIMS: Since the DSIs measured from DuO and SHUNT are equivalent, we compared the diagnostic performance for large oesophageal varices (LEVs) between the DSIs measured from DuO and SHUNT tests. METHODS: This study combined the data from two prospectively conducted US studies: HALT-C and SHUNT-V. A total of 455 subjects underwent both the SHUNT test and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). RESULTS: DSI scores correlated with the probability of LEVs (p < 0.001) and demonstrated a stepwise increase from healthy lean controls without liver disease to subjects with chronic liver disease and no, small or large varices. Furthermore, a cutoff of DSI ≤ 18.3 from DuO had a sensitivity of 0.98 (missing only one case) and, if applied to the endoscopy (EGD) decision, would have prevented 188 EGDs (41.3%). The AUROC for DSI from DuO did not differ from that of the reference SHUNT test method (0.82 versus 0.81, p = 0.3500). CONCLUSIONS: DSI from HepQuant DuO links liver function and physiology to the risk of LEVs across a wide spectrum of patient characteristics, disease aetiologies and liver disease severity. DuO is minimally invasive, easy to administer, quantitative and may aid the decision to avoid or perform EGD for LEVs.

Within-individual reproducibility of a dual sample oral cholate challenge test (DuO) and simplified versions of the HepQuant SHUNT test.

Current noninvasive liver tests measure fibrosis, inflammation, or steatosis and do not measure function. The HepQuant platform of noninvasive tests uniquely assesses both liver function and physiology through the hepatic uptake of stable isotopes of cholate. However, the prototypical HepQuant SHUNT test (SHUNT V1.0) is cumbersome to administer, requiring intravenous and oral administration of cholate and six peripheral venous blood samples over 90 min. To alleviate the burden of test administration, we explored whether an oral only (DuO) version, and other simplified versions, of the test could provide reproducible measurements of liver function. DuO requires only oral dosing and two blood samples over 60 min. The simplified SHUNT test versions were SHUNT V1.1 (oral and IV dosing but four blood samples) and SHUNT V2.0 (oral and IV dosing but only two blood samples over 60 min). In this paper, we describe the reproducibility of DuO and the simplified SHUNT tests relative to that of SHUNT V1.0; equivalency is described in a separate paper. Data from two studies comprising 236 SHUNT tests in 94 subjects were analyzed retrospectively by each method. All simplified methods were highly reproducible across test parameters with intraclass correlation coefficients >0.93 for test parameters Disease Severity Index (DSI) and Hepatic Reserve. DuO and SHUNT V2.0 improved reproducibility in measuring portal-systemic shunting (SHUNT%). These simplified tests, particularly DuO and SHUNT V2.0, are easier to administer and less invasive, thus, having the potential to be more widely accepted by care providers administering the test and by patients receiving the test.

Hepatic Dysfunction Quantified by HepQuant DuO Outperforms Child-Pugh Classification in Predicting the Pharmacokinetics of Ampreloxetine.

HepQuant tests quantify liver function from clearance of deuterium- and 13C-labeled cholates administered either intravenously and orally (SHUNT) or orally (DuO). Hepatic impairment studies have relied on clinical or laboratory criteria like Child-Pugh classification to categorize the degree of hepatic dysfunction. We compared HepQuant tests with Child-Pugh classification in predicting the pharmacokinetics of ampreloxetine. Twenty-one subjects with hepatic impairment (8 Child-Pugh A, 7 Child-Pugh B, and 6 Child-Pugh C), and 10 age- and sex-matched controls were studied. The pharmacokinetics of ampreloxetine were measured after oral administration of a single dose of 10 mg. Disease severity index (DSI), portal-systemic shunting (SHUNT%), hepatic reserve, and hepatic filtration rates (HFRs) were measured from serum samples obtained after intravenous administration of [24-13C]-cholate and oral administration of [2,2,4,4-2H]cholate. Ampreloxetine plasma exposure (AUC0-inf) was similar to controls in Child-Pugh A, increased 1.7-fold in subjects with Child-Pugh B, and 2.5-fold in subjects with Child-Pugh C and correlated with both Child-Pugh score and HepQuant parameters. The variability observed in ampreloxetine exposure (AUC0-inf) in subjects with moderate (Child-Pugh B) and severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C) was explained by HepQuant parameters. Multivariable regression models demonstrated that DSI, SHUNT%, and Hepatic Reserve from SHUNT and DuO were superior predictors of ampreloxetine exposure (AUC0-inf) compared to Child-Pugh score. HepQuant DSI, SHUNT%, and hepatic reserve were more useful predictors of drug exposure than Child-Pugh class for ampreloxetine and thus may better optimize dose recommendations in patients with liver disease. The simple-to-administer, oral-only DuO version of the HepQuant test could enhance clinical utility.

Advances in noninvasive measurement of liver function and physiology: The HepQuant DuO test.

Current noninvasive liver tests are surrogates for fibrosis and lack ability to directly measure liver function. HepQuant tests measure liver function and physiology through hepatic uptake of stable cholate isotopes. HepQuant SHUNT (V1.0) involves oral and intravenous dosing and six blood samples over 90 min. We developed simplified test versions: SHUNT V2.0 (oral and intravenous dosing, two blood samples over 60 min) and DuO (oral dosing only, two blood samples over 60 min). The aim of this study was to evaluate equivalency of the simplified tests to the original SHUNT test. Data from three studies comprising 930 SHUNT tests were retrospectively analysed by each method. Equivalence was evaluated in terms of proportion of tests in which the difference between methods was less than any clinically meaningful difference and additionally by two one-sided t-test and bioequivalence methods. DuO and SHUNT V2.0 were equivalent to the original SHUNT test for Disease Severity Index, with >99% and >96% of tests falling within equivalence bounds. DuO and SHUNT V2.0 met equivalency criteria by two one-sided t-tests and bioequivalence. DuO and SHUNT V2.0 are easier to administer, are less invasive than the original SHUNT test and have potential to be more accepted by patients and providers.

Dynamic Elevation of Aromatic Amino Acids in Hepatitis C Virus-Induced Cirrhosis After a Standard Meal.

INTRODUCTION: Perturbations in aromatic (AAAs) and branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) are seen in decompensated liver disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dynamic, postprandial relationship between hepatitis C virus-induced liver disease and amino acid concentrations in patients with compensated liver disease. METHODS: Patients infected with hepatitis C virus underwent a baseline liver biopsy to determine Ishak Fibrosis Score and evaluate the liver transcriptome. Patients ate a standard meal and underwent peripheral vein sampling at defined intervals. Quantitative analysis of amino acids was performed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: At baseline, there was no difference in AAA and BCAA concentrations between patients with cirrhosis and non-cirrhotic patients. After a standard meal, AAAs, but not BCAAs, were elevated in patients with cirrhosis compared with non-cirrhotic patients at every time point. The HepQuant SHUNT fraction was significantly higher in patients with cirrhosis and positively correlated with AAA concentration at all time points, but not BCAA. Analysis of the hepatic transcriptome demonstrated greater downregulation of the AAA degradation pathways than the BCAA degradation pathways. DISCUSSION: At baseline, cirrhotic patients with compensated liver disease have adequate reserve liver function to metabolize AAAs and BCAAs. When faced with a metabolic stressor, such as a standard meal, patients with cirrhosis are less able to metabolize the increased load of AAAs. This impairment correlates with portosystemic shunting. Further evaluation of AAA levels in compensated liver disease might further the understanding of the liver-muscle axis and the role it may play in the development of sarcopenia in liver disease.

Compartmental model describing the physiological basis for the HepQuant SHUNT test.

The HepQuant SHUNT test quantifies hepatic functional impairment from the simultaneous clearance of cholate from the systemic and portal circulations for the purpose of monitoring treatment effects or for predicting risk for clinical outcome. Compartmental models are defined by distribution volumes and transfer rates between volumes to estimate parameters not defined by noncompartmental analyses. Previously, a noncompartmental analysis method, called the minimal model (MM), demonstrated reproducible and reliable measures of liver function (Translational Research 2021). The aim of this study was to compare the reproducibility and reliability of a new physiologically based compartmental model (CM) vs the MM. Data were analyzed from 16 control, 16 nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and 16 hepatitis C virus (HCV) subjects, each with 3 replicate tests conducted on 3 separate days. The CM describes transfer of cholates between systemic, portal, and liver compartments with assumptions from measured or literature-derived values and unknown parameters estimated by nonlinear least-squares regression. The CM was compared to the MM for 6 key indices of hepatic disease in terms of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a lower acceptable limit of 0.7. The CM correlated well with the MM for disease severity index (DSI) with R2 (95% confidence interval) of 0.96 (0.94-0.98, P < 0.001). Acceptable reproducibility (ICC > 0.7) was observed for 6/6 and 5/6 hepatic disease indices for CM and MM, respectively. SHUNT, a measure of the absolute bioavailability, had ICC of 0.73 (0.60-0.83, P = 0.3095) for MM and 0.84 (0.76-0.90, P = 0.0012) for CM. The CM, but not the MM, allowed determination of anatomic shunt and hepatic extraction and improved the within individual reproducibility.

HepQuant SHUNT Detects Portal Hypertension in Early Stages of Clinically Compensated Chronic Liver Disease.

Physicians use portal pressure measurements in clinical practice and research but the methods are invasive, can cause complications, and are resource intensive.1-3 Herein we describe preliminary findings of the minimally invasive HepQuant-SHUNT test in the diagnosis of portal hypertension in precirrhotic and compensated cirrhotic patients.

Predicting clinical decompensation in patients with cirrhosis using the Hepquant-SHUNT test.

BACKGROUND: Early identification of risk for decompensation in clinically stable cirrhotic patients helps specialists target early interventions and supports effective referrals from primary care providers to specialty centres. AIMS: To examine whether the HepQuant-SHUNT test (HepQuant LLC, Greenwood Village, Colorado, USA) predicts decompensation and the need for liver transplantation, hospitalisation or liver-related death. METHODS: Thirty-five compensated and 35 subjects with a previous episode of decompensation underwent the SHUNT Test and were followed for a median of 4.2 years. The disease severity index (DSI) (range 0-50) was examined for association with decompensation in compensated patients; and liver transplantation, liver-related death, and the number and days of liver related hospitalisations in all. DSI prediction of decompensation was also evaluated in 84 subjects with compensated cirrhosis from the Hepatitis C Antiviral Long-Term Treatment against Cirrhosis Trial (HALT-C) followed for a median of 5.8 years. RESULTS: At baseline, subjects with prior decompensation had significantly higher DSI than compensated subjects (32.6 vs 20.9, P < 0.001). DSI ≥24 distinguished the decompensated from the compensated patients and independently predicted adverse clinical outcomes (hazard ratio: 4.92, 95% confidence interval: 1.42-17.06). In the HALT-C cohort, 65% with baseline DSI ≥24 vs 19% with DSI <24 experienced adverse clinical outcomes (relative risk 3.45, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The SHUNT test is a novel, noninvasive test that predicts risk of decompensation in previously compensated patients. DSI ≥24 is independently associated with risk for clinical decompensation, liver transplantation, death and hospitalisation.

Assessing hepatic impairment in Fontan-associated liver disease using the HepQuant SHUNT test.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Fontan surgery for single ventricle congenital heart disease leads to Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD). Typical laboratory tests, imaging, and histopathology cannot predict clinical severity in FALD. HepQuant SHUNT is a proprietary serum test of hepatic function and physiology that has not yet been evaluated in FALD. METHODS: Fourteen adult FALD patients at a single urban tertiary care center who underwent a Fontan procedure in childhood received HepQuant SHUNT testing between September 2015 and April 2018. The HepQuant SHUNT disease severity index (DSI) assesses global liver function and physiology from systemic and portal hepatic filtration rates (HFRs, clearances adjusted for body mass) of orally and intravenously administered cholates labeled with deuterium or 13C. The SHUNT parameter of the test measures portal systemic shunting from the ratio of Systemic HFR to Portal HFR. Chart review included laboratory tests, imaging, and clinical findings. Data from FALD patients were compared with data from healthy controls. RESULTS: The average DSI and SHUNT values for the FALD patients were 17.5% and 36.1%, respectively, compared to 9.2% and 24.1%, respectively, for controls. Twelve (85.7%) FALD patients had a DSI >15 (upper limit of normal). Seven (50.0%) FALD patients had SHUNT values >30% (upper limit of normal), while three FALD patients (21.4%) had SHUNT values >49%. One FALD patient with preoperative SHUNT of 69%, who underwent a combined heart-liver transplant, had confirmed cirrhotic morphology within the liver explant. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated that most FALD patients had hepatic impairment detected by abnormal DSI, with a smaller number having markedly elevated SHUNT values >49% suggesting intrinsic liver disease. The HepQuant SHUNT test may be useful in detecting and quantifying liver disease severity in FALD patients.

Noninvasive assessment of liver function.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: It is our opinion that there is an unmet need in hepatology for a minimally or noninvasive test of liver function and physiology. Quantitative liver function tests define the severity and prognosis of liver disease by measuring the clearance of substrates whose uptake or metabolism is dependent upon liver perfusion or hepatocyte function. Substrates with high-affinity hepatic transporters exhibit high 'first-pass' hepatic extraction and their clearance measures hepatic perfusion. In contrast, substrates metabolized by the liver have low first-pass extraction and their clearance measures specific drug metabolizing pathways. RECENT FINDINGS: We highlight one quantitative liver function test, the dual cholate test, and introduce the concept of a disease severity index linked to clinical outcome that quantifies the simultaneous processes of hepatocyte uptake, clearance from the systemic circulation, clearance from the portal circulation, and portal-systemic shunting. SUMMARY: It is our opinion that dual cholate is a relevant test for defining disease severity, monitoring the natural course of disease progression, and quantifying the response to therapy.

Discovery and verification of protein differences between Er positive/Her2/neu negative breast tumor tissue and matched adjacent normal breast tissue.

This study was designed to quantify and identify differences in protein levels between tumor and adjacent normal breast tissue from the same breast in 18 women with stage I/II ER positive/Her2/neu negative invasive breast cancer. Eighteen separate difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE) gels were run (1 gel per patient). Relative quantification was based on DIGE analysis. After excision and tryptic digestion, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and peptide mass mapping were used to identify protein spots. Two hundred and forty-three spots were differentially abundant between normal and cancer tissues. Fifty spots were identified: 41 were over abundant and nine were less abundant in cancers than in normal breast tissue. Western blotting provided independent confirmation for three of the most biologically and statistically interesting proteins. All 18 gels were replicated by another technician and 32% of the differentially abundant proteins were verified by the duplicate analysis. Follow-up studies are now examining these proteins as biomarkers in blood.

Advances in management of polycystic liver disease.

The focus of this review is polycystic liver disease, a genetic disorder characterized by multiple macroscopic liver cysts that initially bud from biliary epithelium but subsequently lack communication with the biliary tree. There are two main clinical presentations: polycystic liver associated with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and isolated polycystic liver disease. Both of these forms of polycystic liver disease exhibit an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. Clinical manifestations of polycystic liver disease are related to either mass effect of the volume of hepatic cysts or to complications arising within the cysts. Polycystic liver disease rarely progresses to hepatic failure or clinical complications of portal hypertension. Management is directed at counseling patients and families, treating complications and reducing cyst load by surgical techniques: cyst fenestration, hepatic resection or, rarely, hepatic transplantation. Recent research suggests that blockade of cyst secretion or inhibition of epithelial cells might be useful in halting progression of disease--these observations are discussed in this review.

Discovery and validation of protein abundance differences between follicular thyroid neoplasms.

Distinguishing between benign follicular thyroid adenoma (FTA) and malignant follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) by cytologic features alone is not possible. Molecular markers may aid distinguishing FTA from FTC in patients with indeterminate cytology. The aim of this study is to define protein abundance differences between FTC from FTA through a discovery (proteomics) and validation (immunohistochemistry) approach. Difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE) and peptide mass fingerprinting were performed on protein extracts from five patients with FTC and compared with six patients with FTA. Individual gel comparisons (i.e., each FTC extract versus FTA pool) were also performed for the five FTC patients. Immunohistochemical validation studies were performed on three of the identified proteins. Based on DIGE images, 680 protein spots were matched on individual gels. Of these, 102 spots showed statistically significant differences in abundance between FTC and FTA in the individual gel analyses and were therefore studied further. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry was used to identify 54 of these protein spots. Three candidates involved in protein folding (heat shock protein gp96, protein disulfide isomerase A3, and calreticulin) were studied by immunohistochemistry. Moderate calreticulin immunohistochemical staining was the best single marker with a high negative predictive value (88%); combining all three markers (any marker less than moderate staining) had the best positive predictive value (75%) while still retaining a good negative predictive value (68%). With DIGE, we identified 54 proteins differentially abundant between FTC and FTA. Three of these were validated by immunohistochemistry. These findings provide further insights into the diagnosis, prognosis, and pathophysiology of follicular-derived thyroid neoplasms.

Calpain inhibition attenuates right ventricular contractile dysfunction after acute pressure overload.

Right ventricular contractile failure from acute RV pressure overload is an important cause of morbidity and mortality, but the mechanism of RV failure in this setting is incompletely defined. We hypothesized that RV dysfunction from acute RV pressure overload is, in part, due to activation of calpain, and that calpain inhibition would therefore attenuate RV dysfunction. Anesthetized, open chest pigs were treated with the calpain inhibitor MDL-28170 or with inactive vehicle, and then subjected to acute RV pressure overload for 90 min. RV contractile function was assessed by the regional Frank-Starling relation. RV myocardial tissue was analyzed for evidence of calpain activation and calpain-mediated proteolysis. RV pressure overload caused severe contractile dysfunction, along with significant alterations in the endogenous calpain inhibitor calpastatin typical of calpain activation. MDL-28170 attenuated RV free wall dysfunction by more than 50%. However, there were no differences in degradation of spectrin, desmin, troponin-I or SERCA2 between SHAM operated pigs and pigs subjected to acute RV pressure overload, or between vehicle and MDL-28170 treated pigs. Acute RV pressure overload causes calpain activation, and RV contractile dysfunction from acute RV pressure overload is attenuated by the calpain inhibitor MDL-28170; however, the effect is not explained by inhibition of calpain-mediated degradation of spectrin, desmin, troponin-I or SERCA2. Because this is the first report of any agent that can directly attenuate RV contractile dysfunction in acute RV pressure overload, further investigation of the mechanism of action of MDL-28170 in this setting is warranted.

Measurement of the NO metabolites, nitrite and nitrate, in human biological fluids by GC-MS.

In this article we critically review the development and application of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) techniques to the measurement of the nitric oxide (NO) metabolites, nitrite and nitrate, in human biological fluids. Our focus is on the issue of the fitness of any analytical strategy to its intended purpose and the validity of the analytical results generated. The accuracy, precision, recovery, selectivity and sensitivity of the various methods are evaluated and the potential pitfalls, both specific to the methods, and general to the area, are considered. Several examples of the applications of these techniques to clinical investigations of NO physiology are also critically evaluated.