Liver regeneration in 120 consecutive living-related liver donors.

BACKGROUND: Living-related liver transplantation for pediatric patients has become an acceptable, low-risk treatment option. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of donor liver regeneration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 1999 and January 2008, 120 living-related donors provided 109 grafts consisting of segments II and III and 11 grafts consisting of segments II, III, and IV. Volumetric assessment of the donor liver and selected segments was performed using computed tomography. After procurement every graft was weighed. At 7 and 30 days, as well as 12 months after the operation the donor liver remnant was evaluated for differences in volume. RESULTS: A significant correlation was observed between the liver graft mass and its volume as assessed by computed tomography (r = 0.781; P < .05). Twelve months after procurement, the average regeneration index was significantly higher among donors of segments II, III, and IV (144 +/- 23%) versus donors of segments II and III (114 +/- 15%; P < .05). CONCLUSION: Liver regeneration after procurement of selected liver segments from living donors is a consistent finding. Computed tomography is an accurate imaging modality to track changes in liver volume. This study showed a positive correlation between the size of the liver graft and the regeneration of the liver remnant in the donor.

Biliary complications in relation to the technique of biliary reconstruction in adult liver transplant recipients.

UNLABELLED: Biliary complications are known as a weak point of liver transplantation. Their occurrence can be related to the practice of draining the biliary anastomosis performed at the time of transplantation. At our institution, routine of anastomotic biliary drainage was abandoned in June 2004. AIM: We sought to assess the occurrence and character of biliary complications following orthotopic liver transplantation in relation to the technique of anastomosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In two groups of transplantees: last 100 transplantations with biliary drainage (48 females and 52 males aged 17 to 64 years) and last 100 transplantations without drainage (52 females and 48 males aged 18 to 67 years). The results of treatment were compared, for biliary complications and their influence on further management. In both groups, the main indications for transplantation were various types of cirrhosis as well as cholestatic diseases. In most cases (167) we performed a cholangiojejunal Roux-en-Y (CBD) end-to-end anastomosis, less commonly (33 cases) hepaticojejunal anastomoses. RESULTS: In the first group, biliary complications (bile leak at the site of drainage, bile leak after T-tube removal, CBD strictures) requiring surgical or endoscopic intervention, occurred in 17% recipients. In one case, the biliary complication resulted in retransplantation. In the second group, biliary complications occurred in 11% patients. None of them caused organ loss. CONCLUSION: Abandoning drainage of the biliary anastomosis has reduced the occurrence of early biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Evaluation of donor's liver regeneration after left lobe harvesting for living-related liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Computerized tomography-assisted volumetry permits one to estimate the volume of the liver graft as well as to monitor the regeneration in the donor for living- related liver transplantation (LRLT). METHODS: The size of the whole liver and of the segments II, III, and IV was assessed in 64 living-related liver donors by preoperative computerized tomography (CT) volumetry. Segments II and III were harvested in 56 cases; segments II, III, and IV in 8 cases. The remnant liver was assessed by CT volumetry on postoperative days 7 and 30. RESULTS: There was a linear correlation between the calculated volume of the graft and its weight (R = 0.61, P < .04). Postoperative CT volumetry of the liver from a living-related donor showed a different pattern of volume restoration (regeneration index) both at 7 and 30 days among donors who sacrificed segments II and III versus segments II, III, and IV. The mean regeneration indices were significantly higher among donors of segments II, III, and IV compared with donors of segments II and III after 7 and 30 days (P < .05). DISCUSSION: It is possible that the donor liver displays a different pattern of growth due to the alteration in the blood supply to segment IV.

Assessment of early biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation and their relationship to the technique of biliary reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Biliary complications are known as the weak point of liver transplantation. Their occurrence can be related to the practice of drainage of the biliary anastomosis, the routine use of which was abandoned in June 2004. The aim of the study was to assess the incidence and type of biliary complications following orthotopic liver transplantation in relation to the technique of biliary anastomosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We compared the results of two groups of adult liver transplant recipients: group I, recent 50 transplantations with biliary drainage (25 women: 25 men of age range: 17 to 63 years), and group II, first 50 transplantations without drainage (19 women and 31 men of age range, 20 to 65 years). We examined the problem of biliary complications and their influence on the further management of the patients. In both groups the main indications for transplantation were various types of cirrhosis as well as cholestatic diseases. In the majority of cases (n = 86) an end-to-end common bile duct anastomosis was performed and in 14 cases, hepaticojejunal anastomosis. RESULTS: In group I, biliary complications requiring surgical or endoscopic intervention occurred in 10 (20%) recipients. In one case, biliary complications resulted in the need for retransplantation. In group II, biliary complications occurred in only four (8%) patients, none of which caused organ loss. CONCLUSION: Cessation of biliary anastomosis drainage has reduced the occurrence of early biliary complications following orthotopic liver transplantation.

Anatomical alteration of the vascular tree observed during living related liver transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: The number of available cadaveric donor organs has reached a plateau. One current solution has been to increase number of living related liver transplantations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since October 1999 in the Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 40 living related liver transplantation have been carried out. RESULTS: In 31 (77.5%) cases, a normal arterial supply was observed: the common hepatic artery arose from a celiac trunk. In two cases (5.0%), there was a partial arterial blood supply by the right accessory hepatic artery originating from the superior mesenteric artery. In two cases (5.0%), a right hepatic artery arose completely from the superior mesenteric artery (replaced artery). In one case (2.5%), a common hepatic artery originated from the superior mesenteric artery. In two cases (5.0%), an accessory left segmental artery originated from the left gastric artery. In two cases (5.0%), the function of an absent left hepatic artery was assumed by a replaced left hepatic artery originating from the left gastric artery. In two (5.0%) cases, there were two separate ducts draining the right hemiliver. There were two (5.0%) cases of an accessory duct draining segment IV, originating within the confluence of the right and left hepatic ducts. In one (2.5%) case, the common hepatic duct showed a trifurcation. CONCLUSION: During harvesting from a living donor knowledge of anatomical variants must be used to optomize the liver graft.

Bile duct variations in partial liver transplantations from living-related donors.

The aim of this paper was to present anatomic variations of bile ducts and their effect on the perioperative course of living-related donors in partial liver transplantations in children. Liver fragments for partial transplantation were harvested from 41 related donors. Segments II and III were harvested from 35 and segments II, III, and IV from 6 donors. During the procedure, cholangiography through cystic duct was performed revealing a normal anatomy of the bile ducts in 33 (80.5%) cases. The rest of the donors showed anatomic variations. There was only one case of complications related to the bile duct. The intraoperative diagnosis of anatomic variations allowed for safe partial liver harvesting.

Harvesting liver fragments from living-related donors: a single-center experience.

The aim of the study was to estimate the risk of harvesting a liver fragment from a living-related adult donor. Liver fragments were harvested from 44 donors. Liver segments II and III were harvested from 36 donors. Liver segments II, III, IV were harvested from 6 donors, 2 donors gave segments V, VI, VII, and VIII. After preliminary donor selection volumetric assessment of liver segments by computed tomography and arteriography was performed to visualize the cenac trunk and superior mesenteric artery. None of the donors died. No complications were observed during the operation. Only one case, a bile collection, was observed after surgery. We treated this patient with a satisfactory result by sonography-guided drainage. We observed temporary elevation of bilirubin and transaminase levels and a decrease in prothrombin index value. Blood transfusion was not necessary during any of the procedures. Mean hospitalization time after the surgery was 9.4 days. Mean graft weight/recipient weight ratio was 2.54%. The risk of the harvesting liver fragment from a living-related adult donor seems to be minimal.

Hepatic artery reconstruction prior to orthotopic liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: This study examines the types of arterial reconstruction for grafts prepared for orthotopic transplantation procedures. METHODS: Between 1993 and February 2003, 200 organs were harvested for orthotopic liver transplantation. Arterial variations were found in 28 cases (14%), among which 16 cases (8%) required vascular reconstruction with 4 cases due to accidentally damaged during liver harvesting. RESULTS: Among the 200 organs harvested for liver transplantation, arterial variations requiring reconstruction were found in 12 cases (6%); these included: replacing an accessory left hepatic artery from the left gastric artery (9/1 reconstruction); replacing an accessory left hepatic artery from the upper mesenteric artery (2/1 reconstruction), and replacing an accessory right hepatic artery from the upper mesenteric artery (10/10 reconstructions). The splenic artery was typically used for anastomosis (seven cases, 58.3%) as well as the gastroduodenal artery (two cases, 16.7%) or the right gastric artery (one case, 8.3%). In the remaining two cases, a more complex technique was required. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of graft vessels before an orthotopic liver transplantation procedure does not increase the risk of vascular complications.

Biochemical assessment of the early liver graft function in relation to selected donor parameters.

The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of liver grafts procured from "marginal donors." Among 62 liver transplants in 2002, almost half were harvested from donors who were not deemed acceptable by other transplant units. The authors compared the data concerning the donor's status with the function of the transplanted liver. The relations between individual parameters were estimated, as well as the differences between two groups of recipients: those who received a graft from the "poorer" donors versus those who received "better" grafts. Regardless of the relations between particular parameters a statistical analysis revealed that differences of liver function that were detected during the first 5 days after transplantation disappeared thereafter.

Comparison of the results of liver transplantation for elective versus urgent indications.

The authors present an analysis of early and remote liver transplantation outcomes related to the presence of emergent indications among 196 of the 209 operations performed from 1989 to April 2003; namely 178 elective and 18 emergent transplantations. Perioperative mortality was 15%. The survival rate during the first 12 months was 79.8% and within 3 years 73.5% among patients operated on an elective basis (UNOS 3 and 2B). In contrast, patients with acute liver failure (UNOS 1 and 2A) showed rates of 45%, 50%, and 47%, respectively. Liver transplant outcomes depend primarily on the urgency of an operation. Longterm results are much better among patients operated on electively. Liver transplantation in patients with acute hepatic insufficiency is burdened with a high 45% mortality.

The impact of experience of a transplantation center on the outcomes of orthotopic liver transplantation.

The so-called learning factor has been disregarded for many years in analyzing the causes of surgical complications and post-operative mortality; it is also the case for OLT. In our center until April 2003, 209 OLT were performed in 196 patients. We evaluated the impact of experience of the transplantation team on the outcomes of liver transplantation. Thirty-four patients died (mortality rate, 16%) and 1-year survival rate, 64%. Mortality rates varied during different periods of observation due to increasing experience of the transplantation team. The causes of mortality were assessed for a series of 34 patients: it was 75% at the beginning of transplantation procedures while recent deaths have not recently exceeded 10% of cases.

Liver transplantation in hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis.

End-stage liver disease associated with HCV infection has become one of the leading indications for liver transplantation and it is the most common disease recurring after liver transplantation. The aim of this retrospective study was to asses factors potentially affecting outcome in patients transplanted for HCV-related liver disease. Among 164 adult patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation from December 1994 to December 2002, 134 survived >2 months, including 25 with HCV-related liver disease. Mean follow-up after LTx was 24.8 months (range, 2.1-99.4). Anti-HCV was negative in all donors. The parameters considered in our analysis were: the course, outcome, and liver function tests at 1-year follow-up after HCV reinfection: the potential impact of maintenance and induction immunosuppressive regimens; and episodes of acute rejection. Deterioration of graft function because of HCV reinfection occurred in 16 patients (64%). Mean time for deterioration of liver function related to reinfection was 4.5 months (range, 0.83-23). Induction and maintenance immunosuppression did not affect outcome of HCV-infected liver transplant recipients. Aminotransferases were significantly higher among HCV-infected recipients than among the other patients in our series. There was a slight tendency for earlier recurrence of HCV hepatitis among patients treated with high-dose steroids because of acute rejection.

Assessment of early graft function in relation to different preservation fluids--preliminary results.

The parameters of transplanted liver functions were exposed to a retrospective analysis during the past year. A group of 51 patients out of 223 were thoroughly examined, all of them having undergone orthotopic liver transplant in Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw until 1.09.2003. With transplants, two types of preservation fluids: UW (Viaspan) and Celsior were used alternatively. Liver function was assessed on the basis of the clinical feature and biochemical data. The results obtained were statistically verified. The way of fluid perfusion during the operation and the rinsing effectiveness were also evaluated, additionally the level of marked K during the reperfusion was checked. There were no statistically significant differences noticeable between both groups of recipients. Among all the liver and kidneys effectiveness parameters assessed with the recipients after OLTx, the considerable difference statistically, was visible only with the levels of AspAt, AlAt, INR and APTT during the first days and nights after the operations. Later the difference was gradually disappearing. However, in accordance with the harvesting teams' opinions, the usage of Celsior, owing to lower viscosity, allowed for faster and more exact blood rinsing from a vascular bed of the organ transplanted. The organ's even penetration was also possible. The lack of necessity to use additional stabilizers also simplified radically the harvesting technique. Celsior--the preservation fluid used in the authors' clinic meets all the requirements necessary to efficacious preservation and storage of a to be transplanted liver.

Liver regeneration in living-related donors after harvesting of liver segments II and III or II, III and IV.

BACKGROUND: CT-assisted volumetry permits an estimation of the volume of the graft in liver transplantation, as well as monitoring the donor's liver regeneration. The aim of the study was to observe the restitution of liver tissue in donors after harvesting of the liver fragment for living-related liver transplantation (LRLT). METHODS: The size of the whole liver and of segments II, III and IV was assessed by preoperative CT volumetry in 29 living-related liver donors. Segments II and III were harvested in 22 patients, segments II, III and IV in 6 patients. The remnant liver was assessed by CT volumetry on the 7th and 30th postoperative days. RESULTS: The correlation between the calculated volume of the graft and its weight was linear (r=0.56, p<0.04). Postoperative CT volumetry of the liver of living-related donors showed a different pattern of volume restoration (regeneration index) at both 7 and 30 days between donors who sacrificed segments II and III and those who sacrificed segments II, III and IV. The mean regeneration indexes were significantly higher in donors of segments II, III and IV as compared with donors of segments II and III (7 days, p<0.02; 30 days, p<0.05). DISCUSSION: It is possible that the donor's liver displays a different pattern of growth due to the alteration in blood supply to segment IV.

Serum cytokine concentration after liver lobe harvesting for transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate cytokine concentration after liver lobe harvesting for transplantation in order to prove that it is a relatively safe surgical procedure with limited tissue injury. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Study was performed in 17 healthy liver donors and 6 patients with benign liver tumors. Serum levels of IL-6, IL-1ra and sTNFRI were measured before surgery and on the days 1, 3 and 7 thereafter, by immunoassay (ELISA). RESULTS: There was a significant increase in serum concentrations of IL-6 on day 1-7 (from 2.4 pg/ml to 315.1 +/- 526, 47.3 +/- 48 and 15.3 +/- 15 pg/ml; p = 0.0002, p = 0.0006, p = 0.003), for IL-1ra on day 1-3 (from 472.5 +/- 436 pg/ml to 2072.6 +/- 3511 and 715.5 +/- 268 pg/ml; p = 0.001, p = 0.004), and for sTNFRI on day 1-3 (from 1075.7 +/- 338.0 pg/ml to 1601.4 +/- 317.0 and 1528.9 +/- 402.0 pg/ml; p = 0.0006, p = 0.003), following liver harvesting. No significant difference was observed between pre and postoperative IL-6 serum concentration, whereas IL-1ra and sTNFRI were elevated only on day 3 after liver resection (p = 0.02, p = 0.04). A significantly higher level of sTNFRI was seen in patients after liver resection, as compared to liver donors on day 1 (p = 0.01), 3 (p = 0.03) and 7 (p = 0.0006) after surgery, whereas on day 3 (p = 0.03) and 7 (p = 0.01) when IL-1ra was measured. CONCLUSION: The short period of elevated concentrations of IL6, sTNFRI and IL1ra after harvesting of lobes for transplantation and a relatively low serum level of these cytokines indicate that this type of procedure does not evoke any major postoperative SIRS-type reaction as seen not infrequently after resection of liver for primary or secondary liver pathology.