Antithrombin during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with heparin anticoagulation: A single-center cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Antithrombin (AT) is a natural anticoagulant essential to enhancing the unfractionated heparin (UFH) anticoagulant effect. Its supplementation in the management of UFH-based anticoagulation during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) has a strong pathophysiological rationale. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult VV ECMO patients with anticoagulation maintained by UFH targeting an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) of 40-50 s and AT activity >80%. We compare anticoagulation management and survival outcomes between AT subpopulations, defined by a threshold AT activity ≥80%. Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the variation in AT activity and its association with ICU survival. RESULTS: In 244 patients enrolled from 2009 to 2022, anticoagulation was maintained by a median heparin dose of 11.4 IU/kg/h [IQR: 8.2-14.7] with a mean aPTT of 46.1 s (±7.3) and AT activity of 88.9% (±17.0). A lower mean aPTT, higher dose of UFH and shorter fraction of time without UFH were associated with higher AT activity (p < .01). Higher AT activity showed a consistent association with ICU survival (for 10% increase of AT, odds ratio for ICU mortality: 0.95; 95% CI 0.93-0.97; p value <.01). CONCLUSIONS: There is a positive association between AT activity and UFH requirements but no significant difference in the rate of bleeding events. A higher mean AT during VV ECMO was associated with ICU survival. Future studies are needed to differentiate between exogenously supplemented versus endogenous AT effect.

Erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block for postoperative pain management in thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The 2018 guidelines for enhanced recovery in thoracic surgery recommend paravertebral block (PVB) for postoperative pain management. However, recent studies demonstrate that erector spinae plane block (ESPB) achieves similar postoperative pain control with reduced block-related complications. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of ESPB versus PVB for pain management after thoracic surgery. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched through December 2022 (PROSPERO registration - CRD42023395593). Primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores, resting at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours, and at movement at 24 and 48 hours. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption at 24 and 48 hours, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting or block-related complications in the first 48 hours. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Ten randomized control trials enrolling a total of 624 total patients were included. There were no significant differences in pain scores, resting or at movement, at any time points except reduced resting pain scores at 12 hours with PVB (mean difference [MD]) 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32 to 0.88). Opioid consumption demonstrated no significant differences at 24 hours; PVB reduced opioid consumption at 48 hours (MD 0.40, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.89). There were no significant differences in postoperative nausea or vomiting. ESPB exhibited a nonsignificant trend toward reduced cumulative block-related complications (risk difference [RD] 0.05, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PVB, ESPB is safe and demonstrates no clinically significant differences in pain management after thoracic surgery.

Measuring Performance on the ABCDEF Bundle During Interprofessional Rounds via a Nurse-Based Assessment Tool.

BACKGROUND: Nurse-led rounding checklists are a common strategy for facilitating evidence-based practice in the intensive care unit (ICU). To streamline checklist workflow, some ICUs have the nurse or another individual listen to the conversation and customize the checklist for each patient. Such customizations assume that individuals can reliably assess whether checklist items have been addressed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether 1 critical care nurse can reliably assess checklist items on rounds. METHODS: Two nurses performed in-person observation of multidisciplinary ICU rounds. Using a standardized paper-based assessment tool, each nurse indicated whether 17 items related to the ABCDEF bundle were discussed during rounds. For each item, generalizability coefficients were used as a measure of reliability, with a single-rater value of 0.70 or greater considered sufficient to support its assessment by 1 nurse. RESULTS: The nurse observers assessed 118 patient discussions across 15 observation days. For 11 of 17 items (65%), the generalizability coefficient for a single rater met or exceeded the 0.70 threshold. The generalizability coefficients (95% CIs) of a single rater for key items were as follows: pain, 0.86 (0.74-0.97); delirium score, 0.74 (0.64-0.83); agitation score, 0.72 (0.33-1.00); spontaneous awakening trial, 0.67 (0.49-0.83); spontaneous breathing trial, 0.80 (0.70-0.89); mobility, 0.79 (0.69-0.87); and family (future/past) engagement, 0.82 (0.73-0.90). CONCLUSION: Using a paper-based assessment tool, a single trained critical care nurse can reliably assess the discussion of elements of the ABCDEF bundle during multidisciplinary rounds.