Chronological Trend of Opportunistic Endoscopic Screening for Gastric Cancer and Atrophic Gastritis.

BACKGROUND: Opportunistic endoscopic screening for gastric cancer was initiated in 2004 at our institute. We investigated chronological trends in gastric cancer detection rates based on individual characteristics and atrophic gastritis prevalence. METHODS: Overall, 15,081 asymptomatic individuals aged ≥40 years without a medical history of gastric cancer underwent first-time esophagogastroduodenoscopy in our institute between February 2004 and December 2017. We retrospectively investigated individual characteristics and endoscopic diagnoses by period (early period: 2004-2007, middle period: 2008-2012, and late period: 2013-2017), clarified the long-term detection rate and the characteristics of endoscopic screening-detected gastric cancer, and evaluated the relationship between gastric cancer and atrophic gastritis. RESULTS: Gastric cancer detection rates in the early, middle, and late periods were 1.01% (76/7,503, men/women: 4,360/3,143, average age: 59.4 years, prevalence of atrophic gastritis: 72%), 0.69% (40/5,820, men/women: 3,668/2,152, average age: 56.8 years, prevalence of atrophic gastritis: 48%), and 0.46% (8/1,758, men/women: 1,083/675, average age: 58.7 years, prevalence of atrophic gastritis: 37%), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex (odds ratio 1.92, 95% confidence interval 1.28-2.95), age ≥75 years (2.73, 95% CI 1.32-5.05), and atrophic gastritis (C1-C3: 2.21, 1.36-3.73, O1-O3: 5.36, 3.17-9.30) were significantly associated with the incidence of gastric cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The gastric cancer detection rate and atrophic gastritis prevalence have decreased over time. However, continuing endoscopic screening is important, especially for those at a high risk of developing gastric cancer complicated by severe atrophic gastritis.

Visibility of early gastric cancer in texture and color enhancement imaging.

Objective: There are little data regarding the efficacy of texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI) for early gastric cancer (EGC) diagnosis. This study aimed to compare the color difference and visibility of EGC between white light imaging (WLI) and TXI. Methods: This study included 20 EGCs of 18 patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection. Still images of EGC in WLI, TXI mode 1 (with color enhancement), and TXI mode 2 (without color enhancement), which were consistent in distance, angle, and air insufflation, were constructed by computer simulation. The center of the lesion, eight equal peripheral points 5 mm outside the lesion, and eight inner points two-thirds of the distance from peripheral points to the EGC lesion center were annotated. Mean color differences (ΔE) of the area between peripheral and inner points per lesion in WLI, TXI mode 1, and TXI mode 2 were analyzed. In addition, four endoscopists independently scored the visibility of EGC images of TXI mode 1 and 2 compared with WLI. Results: Clinicopathological characteristics were as follows: 0-IIa/0-IIb/0-IIc/0-IIa+IIc = 6/1/11/2, reddish/pale = 10/10, differentiated/undifferentiated = 18/2, median tumor size = 13.5 mm. Mean ΔE ± SD = WLI/TXI mode1/TXI mode2 = 10.3 ± 4.7, 15.5 ± 7.8, and 12.7 ± 6.1, respectively. Mean ΔE was significantly higher in TXI mode 1 than in WLI. Visibility (improved/no change/decreased) was 7/13/0 and 4/16/0 in TXI mode 1 and 2, respectively. The visibility was significantly more commonly improved in the macroscopic type 0-IIc or 0-IIb than in 0-IIa or IIa+IIc in TXI mode 1. Conclusions: TXI could improve the visibility of EGC compared with WLI.

Diagnosis and treatment of colorectal tumors: Differences between Japan and the West and future prospects.

Dye-based chromoendoscopy has long been used routinely for endoscopic diagnosis of gastrointestinal tumors including colorectal tumors in Japan. In the West, on the other hand, dye-based chromoendoscopy was not so commonly used. However, with the development of narrow band imaging (NBI), image-enhanced endoscopy diagnosis has rapidly increased in the West. The most critical difference between Japan and the West is the histopathological evaluation of the lesions, which determines a major cause of differences in diagnostic and treatment strategies. In the West, intramucosal adenocarcinoma is not diagnosed until the cancer has invaded submucosal layer. In Japan, on the other hand, cancer is mainly diagnosed based on nuclear and structural atypia, and thus intramucosal adenocarcinoma is diagnosed in lesions that correspond to high-grade adenoma in the West. In the West, since intramucosal carcinoma is not diagnosed by pathology, all benign adenomas are treated by piecemeal endoscopic resection, and only cancer invading the superficial submucosal layer is indicated for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Because of the risk of lymph node metastasis in the deep submucosal invasion, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines state that only superficial submucosal cancer is an indication for ESD. Unfortunately, it is impossible to selectively extract only superficial submucosal invasive cancer even with the use of magnified NBI and pit pattern observation. Therefore, we think that pathologists need to diagnose intramucosal adenocarcinoma with the potential to invade the submucosal layer based on the nuclear and structural atypia. Consequently, intramucosal adenocarcinoma and superficial submucosal cancers should be considered for en-bloc ESD.