Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros












Base de dados
Assunto principal
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Emerg Manag ; 21(7): 227-239, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37154456

RESUMO

This research employs Wildavsky's two -strategies-anticipation and resilience-as our conceptual framework to compare COVID-19 policies in the United States, South Korea, and Taiwan. Also, following Handmer and Dovers' three types of resilience, we develop theory-driven codes and then explain how governmental structures and cultural factors influenced governmental responses. We found that a key response to this pandemic is arguably correlated with how quick and flexible a government can adopt different types of resilient strategies. Our research provides a foundation for governmental emergency response discussions and management strategies to better cope with public health crises in the future.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Taiwan , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Saúde Pública
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...