Ascher's syndrome: a rare cause of lip swelling.

Ascher's syndrome is a rare, benign entity with just over 100 reported cases. The condition is characterised by a 'double' upper lip, blepharochalasis and non-toxic thyroid enlargement. It presents before the age of 20 years in the majority of cases and shows no racial or gender differences. While the exact cause is unknown, hormonal dysfunction and autosomal dominant inheritance have been suggested as possible aetiological factors. We present two cases of Ascher's syndrome referred for investigation of lip swelling.

Validation of an Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS) tool for use in oral mucous membrane pemphigoid.

BACKGROUND: Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a rare autoimmune bullous disease predominantly affecting the oral mucosa. Optimal management relies upon thorough clinical assessment and documentation at each visit. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to validate the Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS) for the assessment of oral involvement in MMP. We also compared its inter- and intraobserver reliability with those of the oral parts of the Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (MMPDAI), Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS) and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA). METHODS: Fifteen patients with mild-to-moderately severe oral MMP were scored for disease severity by 10 oral medicine clinicians from four U.K. centres using the ODSS, the oral sections of MMPDAI and ABSIS, and PGA. Two clinicians rescored all patients after 2 h. RESULTS: In terms of reliability, the interobserver ODSS total score intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0·97, MMPDAI activity 0·59 and damage 0·15, ABSIS total 0·84, and PGA 0·72. The intraobserver ICCs (two observers) for ODSS total were 0·97 and 0·93; for MMPDAI activity 0·93 and 0·70 and damage 0·93 and 0·79; for ABSIS total 0·99 and 0·94; and for PGA 0·92 and 0·94. Convergent validity between ODSS and MMPDAI was good (correlation coefficient 0·88). The mean ± SD time for completion of ODSS was 93 ± 31 s, with MMPDAI 102 ± 24 s and ABSIS involvement 71 ± 18 s. The PGA took < 5 s. CONCLUSIONS: This study has validated the ODSS for the assessment of oral MMP. It has shown superior interobserver agreement over MMPDAI, ABSIS and PGA, and superior intraobserver reliability to MMPDAI. It is quick and easy to perform. What's already known about this topic? There are no validated scoring methodologies for oral mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP). Proposed disease activity scoring tools for MMP include the Mucous Membrane Disease Area Index (MMPDAI) and the Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS). The Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS) has been validated for use in oral pemphigus vulgaris (PV). It has been shown to be reliable and sensitive in both lichen planus (LP) and MMP. What does this study add? The ODSS has been shown to be a thorough, sensitive and reproducible, yet quick scoring tool for the assessment of oral involvement in MMP. Its versatility for use in oral PV, MMP and LP is an added advantage over other scoring methodologies. What are the clinical implications of this work? We propose that the ODSS be used as a clinical scoring tool for monitoring activity in oral MMP in clinical practice as well as for use in multicentre studies.

An Oral Disease Severity Score validated for use in oral pemphigus vulgaris.

BACKGROUND: Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a rare autoimmune bullous disease, which can present with recalcitrant oral mucosal lesions. Optimal management of PV relies upon careful clinical assessment and documentation. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to validate the Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS) for the assessment of oral involvement in PV. A secondary aim was to compare its inter- and intraobserver variability and ease of use with the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) and the oral scoring methods used in the Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS) and the Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI). METHODS: Fifteen patients with mild-to-moderately severe oral PV were scored for disease severity by 10 oral medicine clinicians using the ODSS, the PGA and the oral sections of ABSIS and PDAI. Two clinicians rescored all patients after a minimum 2-h interval. RESULTS: Interobserver reliability was assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). For the ODSS total score the ICC was 0·83, for PDAI (oral total activity) 0·79, ABSIS (oral total) 0·71 and PGA 0·7. Intraobserver agreement between initial scoring and rescoring of the same patient by two clinicians demonstrated an ICC for each of 0·97 and 0·96 for ODSS total score; 0·99 and 0·82 for PDAI oral activity; 0·86 and 0·45 for ABSIS total; and 0·99 and 0·64 for PGA. Convergent validity was good, with a correlation coefficient > 0·5 (P < 0·001). The mean ± SD times taken to complete each scoring method were ODSS 76 ± 37 s, PDAI 117 ± 16 s and ABSIS 75 ± 19 s. CONCLUSIONS: This study has validated the ODSS for the assessment of oral PV. It has shown superior inter- and intraobserver reliability to PDAI, ABSIS and PGA and is quick to perform.

Azathioprine is effective for oral involvement in Crohn's disease but not for orofacial granulomatosis alone.

BACKGROUND: There have been no previous reports assessing the effectiveness of azathioprine (AZA) in the treatment of orofacial granulomatosis (OFG). This report is a review of patients receiving AZA for active OFG with or without concomitant gut Crohn's disease (CD) in a specialist tertiary referral centre. METHODS: Clinical response was defined by Global Physician Assessment at 4-, 12- and 24-month follow-up and a standardised oral disease activity score (ODAS). RESULTS: Sixty of 215 patients seen with OFG in our clinic over a 12-year period were treated with AZA. Of these, 22 had concomitant CD. The proportion of patients responding to AZA with a diagnosis of CD/OFG vs. OFG only at 4, 12 and 24 months were 54% vs. 21% (P = 0.03), 59% vs. 21% (P = 0.003) and 41% vs. 24% (P = 0.16), respectively. A statistically significant difference was seen between starting and follow-up ODAS scores at 4 months in the CD/OFG group which was not observed in the OFG only group. Factors predicting a need for AZA included a diagnosis of intestinal CD, sulcal swelling, sulcal ulcers and upper lip involvement. The factor predicting response to treatment was a diagnosis of CD at 12 months of follow-up. No difference in the number of adverse effects was observed between the two groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: AZA is significantly more effective in the treatment of oral disease with a concurrent diagnosis of CD rather than in the treatment of OFG alone.

A practical guide to the use of thiopurines in oral medicine.

Thiopurines are widely used as first-line immunosuppressive therapies in the management of chronic inflammatory oral disease. However, despite over half a century of clinical experience, the evidence base for their use is limited. The aims of this paper were to review the evidence for the use of thiopurines in oral medicine and provide a contemporary model of thiopurine metabolism and mechanism of action and a rationale for clinical use and safe practice.