RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Heterologous prime boost immunization with chimpanzee adenovirus 63 (ChAd63) and Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara (MVA) vectored vaccines is a strategy previously shown to provide substantial protective efficacy against P. falciparum infection in United Kingdom adult Phase IIa sporozoite challenge studies (approximately 20-25% sterile protection with similar numbers showing clear delay in time to patency), and greater point efficacy in a trial in Kenyan adults. METHODOLOGY: We conducted the first Phase IIb clinical trial assessing the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of ChAd63 MVA ME-TRAP in 700 healthy malaria exposed children aged 5-17 months in a highly endemic malaria transmission area of Burkina Faso. RESULTS: ChAd63 MVA ME-TRAP was shown to be safe and immunogenic but induced only moderate T cell responses (median 326 SFU/106 PBMC (95% CI 290-387)) many fold lower than in previous trials. No significant efficacy was observed against clinical malaria during the follow up period, with efficacy against the primary endpoint estimate by proportional analysis being 13.8% (95%CI -42.4 to 47.9) at sixth month post MVA ME-TRAP and 3.1% (95%CI -15.0 to 18.3; p = 0.72) by Cox regression. CONCLUSIONS: This study has confirmed ChAd63 MVA ME-TRAP is a safe and immunogenic vaccine regimen in children and infants with prior exposure to malaria. But no significant protective efficacy was observed in this very highly malaria-endemic setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01635647. Pactr.org PACTR201208000404131.
Assuntos
Vacinas Antimaláricas/uso terapêutico , Adenovirus dos Símios/genética , Método Duplo-Cego , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Quênia , Leucócitos Mononucleares/imunologia , Malária/imunologia , Malária/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Plasmodium falciparum/imunologia , Plasmodium falciparum/patogenicidade , Linfócitos T/metabolismo , Vaccinia virus/genéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The safety and immunogenicity of PfAMA1, adjuvanted with Alhydrogel(®) was assessed in malaria-experienced Malian adults. The malaria vaccine, PfAMA1-FVO [25-545] is a recombinant protein Pichia pastoris-expressed AMA-1 from Plasmodium falciparum FVO clone adsorbed to Alhydrogel(®), the control vaccine was tetanus toxoid produced from formaldehyde detoxified and purified tetanus toxin. METHODS: A double blind randomized controlled phase 1 study enrolled and followed 40 healthy adults aged 18-55 years in Bandiagara, Mali, West Africa, a rural setting with intense seasonal transmission of P. falciparum malaria. Volunteers were randomized to receive either 50 µg of malaria vaccine or the control vaccine. Three doses of vaccine were given on Days 0, 28 and 56, and participants were followed for 1 year. Solicited symptoms were assessed for seven days and unsolicited symptoms for 28 days after each vaccination. Serious adverse events were assessed throughout the study. The titres of anti-AMA-1 antibodies were measured by ELISA and P. falciparum growth inhibition assays were performed. RESULTS: Commonest local solicited adverse events were the injection site pain and swelling more frequent in the PfAMA1 group. No vaccine related serious adverse events were reported. A significant 3.5-fold increase of anti-AMA-1 IgG antibodies was observed in malaria vaccine recipients four weeks after the third immunization compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: The PfAMA1 showed a good safety profile. Most adverse events reported were of mild to moderate intensity. In addition, the vaccine induced a significant though short-lived increase in the anti-AMA1 IgG titres. Registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov with the number NCT00431808.
Assuntos
Antígenos de Protozoários/imunologia , Vetores Genéticos , Vacinas Antimaláricas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Antimaláricas/imunologia , Proteínas de Membrana/imunologia , Pichia/genética , Plasmodium falciparum/imunologia , Proteínas de Protozoários/imunologia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/sangue , Antígenos de Protozoários/genética , Método Duplo-Cego , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/patologia , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Feminino , Expressão Gênica , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Vacinas Antimaláricas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Antimaláricas/genética , Masculino , Mali , Proteínas de Membrana/genética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Plasmodium falciparum/genética , Plasmodium falciparum/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Proteínas de Protozoários/genética , Proteínas Recombinantes/genética , Proteínas Recombinantes/imunologia , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas/genética , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Sintéticas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Sintéticas/genética , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Clinical trials conducted in Africa often require substantial investments to support trial centres and public health facilities. Trial resources could potentially generate benefits for routine health service delivery but may have unintended consequences. Strengthening ethical practice requires understanding the potential effects of trial inputs on the perceptions and practices of routine health care providers. This study explores the influence of malaria vaccine trials on health service delivery in Ghana, Kenya and Burkina Faso. METHODS: We conducted: audits of trial inputs in 10 trial facilities and among 144 health workers; individual interviews with frontline providers (n=99) and health managers (n=14); and group discussions with fieldworkers (n=9 discussions). Descriptive summaries were generated from audit data. Qualitative data were analysed using a framework approach. RESULTS: Facilities involved in trials benefited from infrastructure and equipment upgrades, support with essential drugs, access to trial vehicles, and placement of additional qualified trial staff. Qualified trial staff in facilities were often seen as role models by their colleagues; assisting with supportive supervision and reducing facility workload. Some facility staff in place before the trial also received formal training and salary top-ups from the trials. However, differential access to support caused dissatisfaction, and some interviewees expressed concerns about what would happen at the end of the trial once financial and supervisory support was removed. CONCLUSION: Clinical trials function as short-term complex health service delivery interventions in the facilities in which they are based. They have the potential to both benefit facilities, staff and communities through providing the supportive environment required for improvements in routine care, but they can also generate dissatisfaction, relationship challenges and demoralisation among staff. Minimising trial related harm and maximising benefits requires careful planning and engagement of key actors at the outset of trials, throughout the trial and on its' completion.
Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde , Burkina Faso , Atenção à Saúde , Gana , Instalações de Saúde , Humanos , Quênia , Vacinas AntimaláricasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend the use of appropriate informed consent procedures in low literacy research settings because written information is not known to guarantee comprehension of study information. OBJECTIVES: This study developed and evaluated a multimedia informed consent tool for people with low literacy in an area where a malaria treatment trial was being planned in The Gambia. METHODS: We developed the informed consent document of the malaria treatment trial into a multimedia tool integrating video, animations and audio narrations in three major Gambian languages. Acceptability and ease of use of the multimedia tool were assessed using quantitative and qualitative methods. In two separate visits, the participants' comprehension of the study information was measured by using a validated digitised audio questionnaire. RESULTS: The majority of participants (70%) reported that the multimedia tool was clear and easy to understand. Participants had high scores on the domains of adverse events/risk, voluntary participation, study procedures while lowest scores were recorded on the question items on randomisation. The differences in mean scores for participants' 'recall' and 'understanding' between first and second visits were statistically significant (F (1,41)=25.38, p<0.00001 and (F (1, 41) = 31.61, p<0.00001 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our locally developed multimedia tool was acceptable and easy to administer among low literacy participants in The Gambia. It also proved to be effective in delivering and sustaining comprehension of study information across a diverse group of participants. Additional research is needed to compare the tool to the traditional consent interview, both in The Gambia and in other sub-Saharan settings.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: GMZ2 is a fusion protein of Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein 3 (MSP3) and glutamate rich protein (GLURP) that mediates an immune response against the blood stage of the parasite. Two previous phase I clinical trials, one in naïve European adults and one in malaria-exposed Gabonese adults showed that GMZ2 was well tolerated and immunogenic. Here, we present data on safety and immunogenicity of GMZ2 in one to five year old Gabonese children, a target population for future malaria vaccine efficacy trials. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Thirty children one to five years of age were randomized to receive three doses of either 30 µg or 100 µg of GMZ2, or rabies vaccine. GMZ2, adjuvanted in aluminum hydroxide, was administered on Days 0, 28 and 56. All participants received a full course of their respective vaccination and were followed up for one year. Both 30 µg and 100 µg GMZ2 vaccine doses were well tolerated and induced antibodies and memory B-cells against GMZ2 as well as its antigenic constituents MSP3 and GLURP. After three doses of vaccine, the geometric mean concentration of antibodies to GMZ2 was 19-fold (95%CI: 11,34) higher in the 30 µg GMZ2 group than in the rabies vaccine controls, and 16-fold (7,36) higher in the 100 µg GMZ2 group than the rabies group. Geometric mean concentration of antibodies to MSP3 was 2.7-fold (1.6,4.6) higher in the 30 µg group than in the rabies group and 3.8-fold (1.5,9.6) higher in the 100 µg group. Memory B-cells against GMZ2 developed in both GMZ2 vaccinated groups. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Both 30 µg as well as 100 µg intramuscular GMZ2 are immunogenic, well tolerated, and safe in young, malaria-exposed Gabonese children. This result confirms previous findings in naïve and malaria-exposed adults and supports further clinical development of GMZ2. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00703066.
Assuntos
Antígenos de Protozoários/imunologia , Vacinas Antimaláricas/uso terapêutico , Malária Falciparum/prevenção & controle , Proteínas de Protozoários/imunologia , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/uso terapêutico , África , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Malária Falciparum/imunologia , Malária Falciparum/metabolismo , Masculino , Plasmodium falciparum/imunologia , Plasmodium falciparum/isolamento & purificação , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/imunologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Malaria is still one of the major public health threats in sub-Saharan Africa. An effective vaccine could be a sustainable control measure that can be integrated into existing health infrastructures. The malaria vaccine candidate GMZ2 is a recombinant fusion protein of conserved parts of Plasmodium falciparum Glutamate Rich Protein and Merozoite Surface Protein 3 adjuvanted with aluminium hydroxide. GMZ2 is immunogenic and well tolerated in malaria-naive adults from Germany. To assess safety and immunogenicity in malaria-exposed individuals, 40 adults from Lambaréné, Gabon were randomly assigned to receive either 100 µg GMZ2 or a rabies control vaccine three times in monthly intervals. Both vaccines were well tolerated. One month after a full course of vaccination, GMZ2-vaccinated individuals had 1.4-fold (95% confidence interval: [1.1, 1.7]) higher baseline-corrected anti-GMZ2 antibody levels and more GMZ2-specific memory B-cells compared to the rabies group (p=0.039), despite a high prevalence of GMZ2-specific immune reactivity due to previous intense exposure to P. falciparum.
Assuntos
Antígenos de Protozoários/imunologia , Vacinas Antimaláricas/imunologia , Malária Falciparum/prevenção & controle , Proteínas de Protozoários/imunologia , Adulto , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/sangue , Linfócitos B/imunologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Gabão , Humanos , Memória Imunológica , Vacinas Antimaláricas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Antimaláricas/efeitos adversos , Malária Falciparum/imunologia , Masculino , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/imunologia , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Comitês Consultivos/organização & administração , Vacinas Antimaláricas/imunologia , Malária/imunologia , Malária/prevenção & controle , Vacinação , Adenoviridae/genética , Adulto , África , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Europa (Continente) , Vetores Genéticos , Humanos , Lactente , Cooperação Internacional , Vacinas Antimaláricas/genéticaRESUMO
Over the past ten years, EMVI has continually strived to maintain its main goal of accelerating the development of candidate malaria vaccines by facilitating the translational gap between promising experimental malaria vaccines and subsequent clinical trials in Europe and in Africa. To date, EMVI has funded approximately ten vaccine formulations (antigen-adjuvant combination) by developing GMP materials and sponsoring subsequent human clinical trials. In recent years EMVI's role has expanded into harmonization activities relevant to malaria vaccine development as well as making contributions to global coordination efforts in the field of malaria vaccine research and development (R&D). In the next five years, EMVI will be coordinating the European Network of Vaccine Research and Development, an European Commission supported action implementing a vaccine development infrastructure for Europe. By stimulating collaboration, cooperation, networking and joint integrated activities across various fields of research and diseases, and by facilitating the federation of research infrastructures, EMVI is acting today as a catalyst for tomorrow's vaccines.
Assuntos
Vacinas Antimaláricas/imunologia , Malária/epidemiologia , Malária/prevenção & controle , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica/organização & administração , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica/tendências , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Comportamento Cooperativo , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Plasmodium/imunologiaRESUMO
Malaria is a major public health problem in Sub-Saharan Africa. In highly endemic regions infants, children and pregnant women are mostly affected. An effective malaria vaccine would complement existing malaria control strategies because it can be integrated in existing immunization programs easily. Here we present the results of the first phase Ia clinical trial of GMZ2 adjuvanted in aluminium hydroxide. GMZ2 is a malaria vaccine candidate, designed upon the rationale to induce immune responses against asexual blood stages of Plasmodium falciparum similar to those encountered in semi-immune individuals. Ten, 30 and 100 microg of GMZ2 were well tolerated in 30 healthy malaria-naïve German volunteers when given three times in monthly intervals. Antigen-specific antibodies as well as memory B-cells were induced and detectable throughout the one year follow-up of the study. We conclude that GMZ2 is a safe and immunogenic malaria vaccine candidate suitable for further clinical development.