Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros












Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lung Cancer ; 192: 107801, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38678830

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mirtazapine blocks 5-hydroxytryptamine type (5-HT)2A, 5-HT2C, 5-HT3 and histamine H1 receptors, similarly to olanzapine. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine plus granisetron and dexamethasone for carboplatin (CBDCA)-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with thoracic cancers. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial in four institutions in Japan. Registered patients were moderately to highly emetogenic chemotherapy-naïve, and were scheduled to receive CBDCA at area under the curve (AUC) ≥ 4 mg/mL per minute. Patients received mirtazapine 15 mg/day orally at bedtime for four consecutive days, in combination with granisetron and dexamethasone. Primary endpoint was complete response (CR; no emesis and no use of rescue medication) rate during the delayed period (24-120 h). RESULTS: Between July 2022 and July 2023, 52 patients were enrolled, and 48 patients were evaluated. CR rates in the delayed (24-120 h), overall (0-120 h), and acute periods (0-24 h) were 83.3%, 83.3%, and 100%, respectively. No grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were observed except for one patient who had grade 3 dry mouth as evaluated by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic antiemetic therapy with mirtazapine plus granisetron and dexamethasone shows promising efficacy and an acceptable safety profile. This three-drug combination appears to be a reasonable treatment approach in patients with thoracic cancers receiving a CBDCA-based regimen at AUC ≥ 4 mg/mL per minute.


Assuntos
Antieméticos , Carboplatina , Dexametasona , Granisetron , Mirtazapina , Náusea , Vômito , Humanos , Granisetron/administração & dosagem , Granisetron/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Mirtazapina/uso terapêutico , Mirtazapina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Náusea/induzido quimicamente , Náusea/tratamento farmacológico , Vômito/induzido quimicamente , Vômito/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Carboplatina/efeitos adversos , Carboplatina/administração & dosagem , Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Antieméticos/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Torácicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Torácicas/patologia , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Japão , Quimioterapia Combinada
2.
Anticancer Res ; 41(3): 1615-1620, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33788757

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: We evaluated the efficacy of primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim (PEG) for febrile neutropenia (FN) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients receiving amrubicin (AMR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with SCLC receiving AMR as second-line therapy. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients were treated with AMR (no PEG group), while 13 patients were treated with AMR plus prophylactic administration of PEG (PEG group). The severity of neutropenia was significantly reduced in the PEG group compared to the no PEG group (p=0.02). The incidence of FN in the no PEG and PEG groups was 27.3% and 7.7%, respectively. The time to development of FN tended to be longer in the PEG group compared to the no PEG group (p=0.132). CONCLUSION: Primary prophylaxis with PEG may be beneficial in reducing the risk of FN in patients with SCLC receiving AMR.


Assuntos
Antraciclinas/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neutropenia Febril/prevenção & controle , Filgrastim/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Neutropenia Febril/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/mortalidade
3.
Respir Med Case Rep ; 28: 100871, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31198679

RESUMO

Antibodies targeting the receptor programmed death 1 on T cells have been approved for the treatment of lung cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) induce various immune-related adverse events. Life-threatening hematotoxicity can be provoked by ICI therapy. Although ICI-related endocrinopathy and interstitial lung disease have been well documented, hematotoxicity requiring intensive treatment is relatively rare. We describe a case of nivolumab induced thrombocytopenia after transient mild fever. A 77-year-old man with non-small cell lung cancer was administered nivolumab (240 mg/body, every 2 weeks) as second line therapy. On the day 2 after the first nivolumab infusion, he had a fever and his C-reactive protein level was elevated. Thoracic computed tomography revealed no interstitial lung disease or pneumonia. The fever resolved on day 9 and was not seen thereafter. On day 15 after the first nivolumab infusion, severe thrombocytopenia suddenly emerged. A bone marrow examination revealed no dysplasia or invasion. Based on the presence of high platelet-associated IgG titer, normal bone marrow plasticity and a lack of effectiveness of platelet infusion, we diagnosed nivolumab-induced immune thrombocytopenia. Daily administration of 60 mg of prednisolone restored the patient's platelet count and platelet-associated IgG. We also found that there was significant shrinkage of the primary lesion and that stable disease was achieved. One must be aware of this relatively rare side effect and the unusual clinical findings that could be associated with immunoreaction.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...