Naldemedine for Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients With Cancer: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: Opioid-induced constipation is the most frequent and non-self-limiting adverse effect of opioid analgesia, reducing adherence and interfering with pain relief. This clinical trial aimed to clarify the preventive effect of naldemedine versus placebo for constipation in patients with cancer starting regularly dosed strong opioids therapy. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, confirmatory trial was conducted between July 2021 and May 2023 at four academic hospitals in Japan (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: jRCTs031200397). Patients with cancer starting a first-time regularly dosed strong opioid for cancer pain and age 20+ years were included. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to the naldemedine (Symproic 0.2 mg) or placebo group in a 1:1 ratio for 14 days with protocol treatment. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a Bowel Function Index (BFI) of <28.8 on day 14. The secondary end points included frequency of spontaneous bowel movements (SBM), quality of life (QOL), and frequency of opioid-induced nausea and vomiting (OINV). RESULTS: Of the 103 patients assessed for eligibility, 99 received either naldemedine (n = 49) or placebo (n = 50). A BFI of <28.8 on day 14 was significantly more likely to occur in the naldemedine group (64.6%; 95% CI, 51.1 to 78.1) versus placebo (17.0%; 95% CI, 6.3 to 27.8), and the difference between groups was 47.6% (95% CI, 30.3 to 64.8; P < .0001). The frequency of SBM, QOL, and the severity of OINV were nominally significant in the naldemedine group than in the control group. CONCLUSION: Naldemedine prevented constipation and improved constipation-related QOL, with possible preventive effect on OINV in patients with cancer starting regularly dosed opioids therapy.

Genomic Profiling of Small Intestine Cancers From a Real-World Data Set Identifies Subgroups With Actionable Alterations.

PURPOSE: Panel-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is used in clinical practice worldwide; however, large real-world data (RWD) of patients with advanced small intestine cancer have not been characterized. We investigated differences in the prevalence of clinically relevant alterations across molecularly defined or age-stratified subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a collaborative biomarker study of RWD from CGP testing (Foundation Medicine, Inc). Hybrid capture was conducted on at least 324 cancer-related genes and select introns from up to 31 genes frequently rearranged in cancer. Overall, 1,364 patients with advanced small intestine cancer were available for analyses and were stratified by age (≥40 years/<40 years), microsatellite instability (MSI) status, tumor mutational burden (TMB) status (high ≥10/low <10 Muts/Mb), and select gene alterations. The frequency of alterations was analyzed using a chi-square test with Yate's correction. RESULTS: Genes with frequent alterations included TP53 (59.8%), KRAS (54.8%), APC (27.7%), and CDKN2A (22.4%). Frequent genes with amplifications were MYC (6.7%), MDM2 (5.9%), GATA6 (5.5%), and CCND1 (3.4%). Patients younger than 40 years had significantly lower frequency of APC mutations than those 40 years and older (10.4% v 28.7%; P = .0008). Druggable genomic alterations were detected in 22.3% of patients: BRAF V600E (1.2%), BRCA1 (1.8%), BRCA2 (3.2%), ERBB2 amplification (3.2%), KRAS G12C (3.3%), NTRK1/2/3 fusion (0.07%), MSI-high (7.0%), and TMB-high (12.2%), with no significant differences in the frequency according to age (<40 years v ≥40 years; 22.1% v 22.3%). TMB of 10-20 Mut/Mb was observed in 4.8% of patients, and TMB ≥20 Mut/Mb was seen in 7.3% of the cohort. CONCLUSION: RWD from clinical panel testing revealed the genomic landscape in small intestine cancer by subgroup. These findings provide insights for the future development of treatments in advanced small intestine cancer.

Optimizing Organ-Preservation Strategies Through Chemotherapy-Based Selection in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Results From the CROC Multi-Institutional Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the viability of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) as an organ-preservation strategy for remarkable responders who were downstaged to stage IA after receiving induction chemotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with resectable ESCC (stage IB-III, Union for International Cancer Control, International Cancer Control seventh edition) were eligible for the study. All patients received 3 cycles of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU (DCF) therapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] 750 mg/m2 on days 1-5, repeated every 3 weeks). Remarkable response was defined as a reduction in the tumor to T1, metastatic lymph nodes <1 cm on the short axis, and downstaging to stage IA after 3 cycles of DCF therapy. Remarkable responders then underwent dCRT, which included 2 courses of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 to 4, repeated every 4 weeks, along with 50.4 Gy of concurrent radiation therapy. The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival in remarkable responders following DCF therapy and subsequent dCRT. Secondary endpoints included 3-year overall survival (OS) and esophagectomy-free survival. RESULTS: Of the 92 patients registered, 90 were analyzed. A remarkable response to 3 courses of DCF therapy was observed in 58.4% of patients. Among these responders, 89.8% achieved a complete response after dCRT. During the median follow-up period of 33 months (range, 1-85 months), the 1-year progression-free survival was 89.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.2%-95.6%, primary endpoint), and the 3-year OS was 83.7%. The 3-year OS and esophagectomy-free survival rates in the analysis group were 74.1% and 45.3%, respectively. An 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography response after 2 courses of DCF therapy was significantly associated with OS (P = .0049). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with resectable ESCC, dCRT for remarkable responders downstaging to stage IA after induction chemotherapy with 3 courses of DCF therapy is a feasible treatment option and provides an optimizing organ-preservation strategy of chemotherapy-based selection.

The Molecular Landscape of Gastric Cancers for Novel Targeted Therapies from Real-World Genomic Profiling.

BACKGROUND: Panel-based comprehensive genomic profiling is used in clinical practice worldwide; however, large real-world datasets of patients with advanced gastric cancer are not well known. OBJECTIVE: We investigated what differences exist in clinically relevant alterations for molecularly defined or age-stratified subgroups. METHODS: This was a collaborative biomarker study of a real-world dataset from comprehensive genomic profiling testing (Foundation Medicine, Inc.). Hybrid capture was carried out on at least 324 cancer-related genes and select introns from 31 genes frequently rearranged in cancer. Overall, 4634 patients were available for analyses and were stratified by age (≥ 40/< 40 years), microsatellite instability status, tumor mutational burden status (high 10 ≥ /low < 10 Muts/Mb), Epstein-Barr virus status, and select gene alterations. We analyzed the frequency of alterations with a chi-square test with Yate's correction. RESULTS: Genes with frequent alterations included TP53 (60.1%), ARID1A (19.6%), CDKN2A (18.2%), KRAS (16.6%), and CDH1 (15.8%). Differences in comprehensive genomic profiling were observed according to molecularly defined or age-stratified subgroups. Druggable genomic alterations were detected in 31.4% of patients; ATM (4.4%), BRAF V600E (0.4%), BRCA1 (1.5%), BRCA2 (2.9%), ERBB2 amplification (9.2%), IDH1 (0.2%), KRAS G12C (0.7%), microsatellite instability-high (4.8%), NTRK1/2/3 fusion (0.13%), PIK3CA mutation (11.4%), and tumor mutational burden-high (9.4%). CDH1 alterations and MET amplification were significantly more frequent in patients aged < 40 years (27.7 and 6.2%) than in those aged ≥ 40 years (14.7 and 4.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world datasets from clinical panel testing revealed the genomic landscape in gastric cancer by subgroup. These findings provide insights for the current therapeutic strategies and future development of treatments in gastric cancer.

Safety and Efficacy of Encorafenib, Binimetinib, and Cetuximab for BRAFV600E-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results of the Japanese Expanded Access Program.

BACKGROUND: The phase 3 BEACON CRC study demonstrated the survival benefits of encorafenib and cetuximab, with or without binimetinib (the BEACON triplet or doublet regimen), for BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This expanded access program (EAP) and subsequent follow-up study assessed the efficacy and safety of the BEACON triplet regimen in Japanese patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The EAP was an open-label, single-arm study including Japanese patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC whose disease progressed after 1 to 2 prior regimens. The patients received the BEACON triplet regimen with 28-day cycles. The subsequent follow-up study assessed the survival outcomes following EAP completion. Safety was assessed only during the EAP. RESULTS: Among the 86 enrolled patients, 81 received the BEACON triplet regimen. The objective response rate and median progression-free survival were 27.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.0%-39.1%) and 5.26 (95% CI, 4.14-5.52) months, respectively. Grade 3 to 4 adverse events and treatment-related adverse events occurred in 43.2% and 28.4% of patients, respectively. No new safety signals were observed during the EAP. Among 58 patients with confirmed survival at EAP completion, 57 were included in the follow-up study. With a median observation period of 9.17 months through the EAP and follow-up study, the median overall survival was 10.38 (95% CI, 9.00-16.16) months. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of the BEACON triplet regimen in Japanese patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC were consistent with those reported in the BEACON CRC trial, supporting its use as a standard treatment for pretreated patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC.

A Phase II Study of FOLFIRI Plus Ziv-Aflibercept After Trifluridine/Tipiracil Plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: WJOG 11018G.

BACKGROUND: Non-inferiority of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab (BEV) to irinotecan/fluoropyrimidine plus BEV in metastatic colorectal cancer was investigated in the phase III TRUSTY study, and we conducted a phase II study of FOLFIRI (5-FU+leucovorin+irinotecan) plus zib-aflibercept (AFL) after FTD/TPI plus BEV. However, the TRUSTY study failed during the recruitment of our patients. OBJECTIVE: We present the findings of a phase II study on the efficacy of FOLFIRI plus zib-aflibercept (AFL) after FTD/TPI plus BEV, including clinical results with plasma biomarker analyses. METHODS: This was a multicenter, single-arm, phase II study in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory or intolerant to oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidine, BEV, and FTD/TPI. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Fifteen plasma angiogenesis-associated biomarkers were analyzed using a Luminex® multiplex assay U-kit. RESULTS: Between January 2020 and May 2022, 26 patients (median age, 68 years) from 15 sites were enrolled. The median progression-free survival was 4.9 months (85% confidence interval, 3.4 month-not estimated). The overall response and disease control rates were 8% and 62%, respectively. The median levels of vascular endothelial growth factor-A and placental growth factor, both targets of AFL, were below the measurable limit of 30 pg/mL and 16 pg/mL, respectively. Patients were divided into two groups at the median levels of baseline biomarkers. The progression-free survival did not differ between high and low expressers of placental growth factor (p = 0.7), while it tended to be shorter in those with high levels of osteopontin (p = 0.05), angiopoietin-2 (p = 0.07), and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases-1 (p = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: This study did not meet the primary endpoint. Hence, FOLFIRI plus AFL should not be used after FTD/TPI plus BEV for metastatic colorectal cancer. Further studies are needed to determine factors not targeted by AFL that may affect the efficacy of the treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: jRCTs041190100.

Predictive value of CDC37 gene expression for targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: CDC37 is a key determinant of client kinase recruitment to the HSP90 chaperoning system. We hypothesized that kinase-specific dependency on CDC37 alters the efficacy of targeted therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two independent mCRC cohorts were analyzed to compare the survival outcomes between CDC37-high and CDC37-low patients (stratified by the median cutoff values): the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial (226 and 207 patients receiving first-line bevacizumab- and cetuximab-containing chemotherapies, respectively) and Japanese retrospective (50 refractory patients receiving regorafenib) cohorts. A dataset of specimens submitted to a commercial CLIA-certified laboratory was utilized to characterize molecular profiles of CDC37-high (top quartile, N = 5055) and CDC37-low (bottom quartile, N = 5055) CRCs. RESULTS: In the bevacizumab-treated group, CDC37-high patients showed significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) (median 13.3 vs 9.6 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.79, p < 0.01) than CDC37-low patients. In the cetuximab-treated group, CDC37-high and CDC37-low patients had similar outcomes. In the regorafenib-treated group, CDC37-high patients showed significantly better overall survival (median 11.3 vs 6.0 months, HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.11-0.54, p < 0.01) and PFS (median 3.5 vs 1.9 months, HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.94, p = 0.03). Comprehensive molecular profiling revealed that CDC37-high CRCs were associated with higher VEGFA, FLT1, and KDR expressions and activated hypoxia signature. CONCLUSIONS: CDC37-high mCRC patients derived more benefit from anti-VEGF therapies, including bevacizumab and regorafenib, but not from cetuximab. Molecular profiles suggested that such tumors were dependent on angiogenesis-relating pathways.

Dexamethasone-sparing on days 2-4 with combined palonosetron, neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, and olanzapine in cisplatin: a randomized phase III trial (SPARED Trial).

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the non-inferiority of dexamethasone (DEX) on day 1, with sparing on days 2-4 in cisplatin-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with malignant solid tumors who were treated with cisplatin (≥50 mg/m²) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either DEX on days 1-4 (Arm D4) or DEX on day 1 (Arm D1) plus palonosetron, NK-1 RA, and olanzapine (5 mg). The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) during the delayed (24-120 h) phase. The non-inferiority margin was set at -15%. RESULTS: A total of 281 patients were enrolled, 278 of whom were randomly assigned to Arm D4 (n = 139) or Arm D1 (n = 139). In 274 patients were included in the efficacy analysis, the rates of delayed CR in Arms D4 and D1 were 79.7% and 75.0%, respectively (risk difference -4.1%; 95% CI -14.1%-6.0%, P = 0.023). However, patients in Arm D1 had significantly lower total control rates during the delayed and overall phases, and more frequent nausea and appetite loss. There were no significant between-arm differences in the quality of life. CONCLUSION: DEX-sparing is an alternative option for patients receiving cisplatin; however, this revised administration schedule should be applied on an individual basis after a comprehensive evaluation. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY NUMBER: UMIN000032269.

Real-World Treatment Sequencing in Vulnerable Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding treatment sequence for vulnerable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a real-world setting are lacking. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess treatment outcomes in second-line or later chemotherapy for vulnerable patients with mCRC in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Vulnerable patients with mCRC who received less intensive treatment ('vulnerable') regimens, i.e. fluoropyrimidines with or without biologics (FP), reduced-dose doublet regimens with or without biologics (Doublet), and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monotherapy (Anti-EGFR), as first-line therapy between June 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients from 15 hospitals were analyzed. The median age was 78 years (range 28-90), and 44 patients (21%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score of 2. In the entire population, the median time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were 7.6 and 21.4 months, respectively. Following the failure of first-line therapy in 195 patients, 74 (38%), 24 (12%), and 13 (7%) patients received vulnerable regimens, full-dose doublet regimens with or without biologics, and other regimens, respectively, whereas 84 (43%) received best supportive care (BSC). In patients receiving vulnerable regimens as second-line therapy, the median TTF and OS were 4.4 and 13.7 months, respectively, while response rate and disease control rate were 18% and 62%, respectively. In 84 patients who received BSC, the median OS was 3.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Second-line chemotherapy for vulnerable patients with mCRC showed clinically meaningful outcomes; however, few patients received second-line therapy, and survival among patients who received BSC was dismal.

Mutational spectrum of TP53 gene correlates with nivolumab treatment efficacy in advanced gastric cancer (TP53MUT study).

BACKGROUND: Although nivolumab has a high efficacy, reliable biomarkers are needed to predict the efficacy. We evaluated the nivolumab efficacy according to the TP53 mutation in advanced gastric cancer patients enrolled in the GI-SCREEN project. METHODS: Sequence data of tumour specimens and clinicopathological information of 913 patients with advanced gastric cancer who were enrolled between April 2015 and March 2017 were obtained from the GI-SCREEN database. The follow-up information of 266 patients treated with nivolumab was also provided. RESULTS: Among 266 patients treated with nivolumab, the objective response rate (ORR) of TP53 wild type (wt) patients (24.6%) was higher than that of TP53 mutant patients (14.8%). Among TP53 mutant patients, the ORR of the frameshift type tended to be higher than the transition and transversion type (23.1%, 13.6%, and 13.0%, respectively). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was statistically longer in TP53 wt patients than in mutant patients (3.3 vs 2.1 months, HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.9). Among TP53 mutant patients, PFS was statistically longer in the frameshift type than in the transversion type. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab showed better efficacy in TP53 wt patients than in mutant patients. Among TP53 mutant patients, the frameshift type may have efficacy from nivolumab treatment.

Clinical utility of geriatric assessment tools in older patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Background: Geriatric 8 (G8) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) are recommended to predict overall survival (OS) or risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) in older cancer patients. However, the clinical utility is relatively unknown in older patients suffering malnutrition with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer, including gastric cancer (GC) and pancreatic cancer (PC). Materials and methods: We retrospectively included patients aged ≥65 years with GC, PC, and colorectal cancer (CRC) who received a G8 questionnaire at first visit from April 2018 to March 2020. The associations between G8/IADL and safety or OS were assessed in patients with advanced/unresectable tumors. Results: Of 207 patients (median age: 75 years), the median G8 score was 10.5 and normal G8 score rate was 6.8%. Both the median G8 score and normal G8 (>14) score rate numerically increased in the order of GC < PC < CRC. There was no clear association between the G8 standard cutoff value of 14 and SAEs or OS. However, OS was significantly longer in patients with G8 >11 than in those with G8 ≤11 (19.3 vs. 10.5 months, p = 0.0017). Furthermore, OS was significantly better in patients with normal IADL than in those with abnormal IADL (17.6 vs. 11.4 months, p = 0.049). Conclusion: The G8 cutoff value of 14 would not be clinically useful in patients with GI cancer for predicting OS or SAEs; however, the cutoff value of 11 and IADL may be useful to predict OS for older patients with GI cancers including GC and PC.

Phase II clinical trial to study the safety and efficacy of combined S-1 + oxaliplatin therapy as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer in older patients.

BACKGROUND: Gastrectomy with D2 dissection and adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) in Asia. However, administering chemotherapy with sufficient intensity after gastrectomy is challenging. Several trials demonstrated the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However, limited studies explored the feasibility of NAC-SOX for older patients with LAGC. This phase II study (KSCC1801) evaluated the safety and efficacy of NAC-SOX in patients with LAGC aged ≥ 70 years. METHODS: Patients received three cycles of SOX130 (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1, oral S-1 40-60 mg twice daily for two weeks every three weeks) as NAC, followed by gastrectomy with lymph node dissection. The primary endpoint was the dose intensity (DI). The secondary endpoints were safety, R0 resection rate, pathological response rate (pRR), overall survival, and relapse-free survival. RESULTS: The median age of 26 enrolled patients was 74.5 years. The median DI in NAC-SOX130 was 97.2% for S-1 and 98.3% for oxaliplatin. Three cycles of NAC were administered in 25 patients (96.2%), of whom 24 (92.3%) underwent gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy. The R0 resection rate was 92.3% and the pRR (≥ grade 1b) was 62.5%. The major adverse events (≥ grade 3) were neutropenia (20.0%), thrombocytopenia (11.5%), anorexia (11.5%), nausea (7.7%), and hyponatremia (7.7%). Postoperative complications of abdominal infection, elevated blood amylase, and bacteremia occurred in one patient each. Severe diarrhea and dehydration caused one treatment-related death. CONCLUSIONS: NAC-SOX130 is a feasible therapy for older patients, although systemic management and careful monitoring of adverse events are necessary.

A Phase II Trial of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Combination with Cetuximab Rechallenge in Patients with RAS Wild-Type mCRC Refractory to Prior Anti-EGFR Antibodies: WJOG8916G Trial.

BACKGROUND: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) improved the overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who had previously received standard chemotherapies; however, the clinical outcomes remain poor. OBJECTIVE: A multicenter phase II study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI plus cetuximab rechallenge. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed RAS wild-type mCRC refractory to prior anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibody were enrolled and treated with FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-5 and 8-12) plus cetuximab (initially 400 mg/m2, followed by weekly 250 mg/m2) every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR), expecting a target DCR of 65% and null hypothesis of 45% with 90% power and 10% one-sided alpha error. Gene alterations of RAS, BRAF, EGFR, PIK3CA, ERBB2, and MET in pre-treatment circulating tumor DNA were evaluated using the Guardant360 assay. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients (median age 60 years; left-sided tumors 91%; objective partial or complete response during the prior anti-EGFR therapy 61%) were enrolled. The DCR was 54% (80% confidence interval [CI] 44-63; P = 0.12), with a partial response rate of 3.6%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.4 months (95% CI 2.1-3.7). In the circulating tumor DNA analysis, patients without any alterations of the six genes (n = 20) demonstrated higher DCR (75% vs. 39%; P = 0.02) and longer PFS (median 4.7 vs. 2.1 months; P < 0.01) than those with any gene alterations (n = 33). The most common grade 3/4 hematologic adverse event was neutropenia (55%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: FTD/TPI plus cetuximab rechallenge did not demonstrate clinically meaningful efficacy in all mCRC patients, but might be beneficial for the molecularly selected population.

A Multicenter, Phase II Trial of Schedule Modification for Nab-Paclitaxel in Combination with Ramucirumab for Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: The B-RAX Trial (JACCRO GC-09).

BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether schedule modification of bi-weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) plus ramucirumab (RAM) is efficacious against gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GJC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable GC or GJC who were previously treated with fluoropyrimidine-containing regimens received nab-PTX (100 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 and RAM (8 mg/kg) on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Based on the incidence of severe adverse events (AEs) during the first cycle, patients were modified to bi-weekly therapy from the second cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in the bi-weekly therapy population. Based on the hypothesis that bi-weekly nab-PTX plus RAM would improve PFS from 4.5 to 7.0 months, 40 patients were required for power of 0.8 with a one-sided α of 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 81 patients enrolled, 47 patients (58%) were assigned to bi-weekly therapy. Patient characteristics were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 (19%) and diffuse type (45%). Median PFS was 4.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7-5.6 months) and overall response rate was 25% (95% CI 11-39%). Severe AEs of grade 3 or worse were mainly neutropenia (83%) and hypertension (23%). EQ-5D scores were maintained during the treatment. In patients who continued standard-schedule therapy, median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI 1.8-4.0 months). CONCLUSIONS: The primary endpoint for PFS was statistically not met, but modification of nab-PTX plus RAM to a bi-weekly schedule might be a feasible treatment option as second-line treatment for advanced GC/GJC patients, especially elderly patients, with severe AEs during the first cycle.

Perioperative TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: APOLLO-11 study.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the feasibility of perioperative chemotherapy with S-1 and leucovorin (TAS-118) plus oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients with clinical T3-4N1-3M0 gastric cancer received four courses of TAS-118 (40-60 mg/body, orally, twice daily for seven days) plus oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2, intravenously, day one) every two weeks preoperatively followed by gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy, followed by postoperative chemotherapy with either 12 courses of TAS-118 monotherapy (Step 1) or eight courses of TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin (Step 2). The primary endpoints were completion rates of preoperative chemotherapy with TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin and postoperative chemotherapy with TAS-118 monotherapy (Step 1) or TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin (Step 2). RESULTS: Among 45 patients enrolled, the preoperative chemotherapy completion rate was 88.9% (90% CI 78.0-95.5). Major grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were diarrhoea (17.8%) and neutropenia (8.9%). The R0 resection rate was 95.6% (90% CI 86.7-99.2). Complete pathological response was achieved in 6 patients (13.3%). Dose-limiting toxicity was not observed in 31 patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy (Step 1, n = 11; Step 2, n = 20), and completion rates were 90.9% (95% CI 63.6-99.5) for Step 1 and 80.0% (95% CI 59.9-92.9) for Step 2. No more than 10% of grade ≥ 3 AEs were observed in patients receiving Step 1. Hypokalaemia and neutropenia occurred in 3 and 2 patients, respectively, receiving Step 2. The 3-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates were 66.7% (95% CI 50.9-78.4) and 84.4% (95% CI 70.1-92.3), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative chemotherapy with TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin with D2 gastrectomy is feasible.

Feasibility of edoxaban for asymptomatic cancer-associated thrombosis in Japanese patients with gastrointestinal cancer: ExCAVE study.

BACKGROUND: Although initial therapy with a parenteral anticoagulant is required before edoxaban, this strategy is frequently avoided in actual clinical practice because of its complexity. This study assessed the feasibility of edoxaban without initial heparin usage for asymptomatic cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) in Japanese patients with gastrointestinal cancer (GIC) at high risk of bleeding. METHODS: In this multicenter prospective feasibility study conducted at 10 Japanese institutions, patients with active GIC who developed accidental asymptomatic CAT during chemotherapy were recruited. Edoxaban was orally administered once daily without initial parenteral anticoagulant therapy within 3 days after detecting asymptomatic CAT. The primary outcome was the incidence of major bleeding (MB) or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) during the first 3 months of edoxaban administration. RESULTS: Of the 54 patients enrolled from October 2017 to September 2020, one was excluded because of a misdiagnosis of CAT. In the remaining 53 patients, the primary outcome occurred in six patients (11.3%). MB occurred in four patients (7.5%), including gastrointestinal bleeding in three patients and intracranial hemorrhage in one patient. CRNMB occurred in two patients (3.8%), including bleeding from the stoma site and genital bleeding in one patient each. There were no deaths attributable to bleeding, and all patients who experienced MB or CRNMB recovered. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of bleeding after edoxaban without heparin pretreatment was acceptable, demonstrating new treatment options for asymptomatic CAT in patients with GIC.

Phase I study of envafolimab (KN035), a novel subcutaneous single-domain anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

Envafolimab is the first and only globally approved subcutaneously injectable PD-L1 antibody. This open-label, multicenter Phase 1 trial assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, and efficacy of envafolimab as a single agent in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. In the dose-escalation phase, 10 patients received subcutaneous (SC) envafolimab QW at 1.0 mg/kg, 2.5 mg/kg and 5.0 mg/kg. In the dose-expansion phase, 16 patients were treated at 2.5 or 5.0 mg/kg Q2W in part-1 and 9 patients received SC envafolimab 300 mg Q4W in part-2. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported. Envafolimab was well tolerated and no new safety signals were identified compared with other marketed products of the same class. Three patients reported Grade ≥ 3 envafolimab-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), including adrenal insufficiency, cerebral infarction, and immune-mediated enterocolitis. Envafolimab demonstrated dose-proportional increases in area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) and maximum serum concentration (Cmax). The overall response rate (ORR) was 11.4% (n = 4) and disease control rate (DCR) was 34.3% (n = 12). Consistent with that observed in other envafolimab Phase 1 trials and approved PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, the safety profile of SC envafolimab in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors was well tolerated with efficacy comparable to IV administered treatments. Pharmacokinetics data and preliminary anti-tumor response support dose regimens with longer dosing intervals (Q2W or Q4W). As such, envafolimab offers patients a more convenient treatment option than currently available intravenously administered PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03248843(August 14, 2017).

The Molecular Landscape of Pancreatobiliary Cancers for Novel Targeted Therapies From Real-World Genomic Profiling.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapies have limited efficacy in pancreatic cancer (PC) and biliary tract cancer (BTC), underscoring the need for new regimens. Recently, tumor-agnostic approaches have been developed for some targeted therapies in advanced solid tumors; however, the frequency of alterations by clinical and genomic background is unclear in PC and BTC. METHODS: To assess the frequencies of druggable gene alterations and investigate new potential therapeutic targetable genomic alterations, advanced PC and BTC patients were tested with comprehensive genomic profiling at Foundation Medicine during the course of clinical care. RESULTS: A total of 16 913 PC patients and 3031 BTC patients were available for analyses, and frequencies of genomic alterations were stratified by age (≥40 years or <40 years), microsatellite instability status, tumor mutational burden status (high ≥10 or low <10 Muts/Mb), and select genomic alterations. Alterations in BRCA2, BRAF, ERBB2, CDK12, PIK3CA, FGFR2, EGFR, and other potential targets were seen across cohorts, with enrichment observed within particular subsets such as in PC patients lacking a KRAS mutation. In BTC patients, the rate of ERBB2 amplification was statistically significantly higher in the tumor mutational burden-high population (23.3% vs 13.7%). Interestingly, CDK12 rearrangement was observed in BTC patients with ERBB2 amplification tumors. In patients younger than 40 years, FGFR2 rearrangement (4%) was observed in PC: GATA6 amplification (11.1%) and rearrangement of BRAF (2.8%)FGFR2 (5.6%) was observed in BTC patients. CONCLUSIONS: We identified an appreciable frequency of immunotherapy biomarkers and targetable gene alterations in both PC and BTC, with notable frequencies in PC samples lacking KRAS mutations and children or adolescent and young adult populations, that should encourage comprehensive genomic profiling testing.

Clinical Utility of Genomic Profiling Tests in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancers.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive analyses of cancer-related genomic alterations are expected to lead to increased availability of targeted therapies. However, in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, the utility of genomic profiling is unclear because of common non-druggable alterations and rapid disease progression that prevent a sufficient time period to seek targets. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the utility of genomic profiling tests in patients with GI cancers. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were patients with GI cancers and patients with non-GI cancers who underwent tissue-based genomic profiling at a single institution from April 2017 to October 2020. The profile of gene alterations, frequency of tumor mutational burden-high (≥ 10 Muts/Mb), and accessibility of recommended molecular targeted therapy were compared between patients with GI cancers and patients with non-GI cancers. RESULTS: In all, 133 patients with GI cancers and 63 patients with non-GI cancers were included. The genomic profiles of GI cancers showed the highest frequencies of TP53, KRAS, and APC mutations and a significantly lower frequency of PIK3CA mutations than those of non-GI cancers. Tumor mutational burden-high was significantly less prevalent in GI cancers (4% vs 20%, p = 0.008). Twenty-nine patients with GI cancers (40%) and 35 patients with non-GI cancers (56%) were recommended for targeted therapies based on the findings. Among them, seven patients each with GI cancers and non-GI cancers received the recommended therapy on their genomic findings, which showed similar treatment accessibility between the GI and non-GI cancer groups (10% vs 11%, p = 0.791). HER2-targeted and BRAF-targeted therapies were the primary treatments administered to patients with GI cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Although their genomic profiles revealed fewer druggable sites, patients with GI cancers accessed targeted therapies similarly to patients with non-GI cancers. The utility of genomic profile testing in patients with GI cancers was highlighted to determine if patients can receive specific treatments, such as HER2-targeted and BRAF-targeted therapies.