Individual Meropenem Clearance in Infants on ECMO and CVVHDF is Difficult to Predict: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVES: Meropenem is a broad-spectrum carbapenem antibiotic with mostly renal excretion. Conflicting data are available regarding meropenem pharmacokinetics in critically ill neonates on concomitant continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Our objectives were to assess meropenem clearance in a neonate on CRRT and ECMO, compare it to previously published data and assess whether dose recommendations can be generalized in this population. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 2.5 kg male infant with a large diaphragmatic hernia was delivered by cesarean section at week 35 and immediately mechanically ventilated due to shock and respiratory insufficiency. He underwent surgical correction of the hernia, but developed recurrent sepsis, multiorgan failure and pulmonary hypertension. He remained mechanically ventilated and required ECMO and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration. He was started on meropenem 40 mg/kg/dose, every 8 hs for Enterobacter cloacae bacteremia and sepsis, but due to lack of clinical and microbiologic response despite in vitro susceptibility, he was started on a continuous meropenem infusion of 240 mg/kg/d, based on dose recommendations in a similar case. We measured steady state meropenem plasma concentrations on 2 occasions, during ECMO and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) and then on CVVHDF only. RESULTS: Meropenem serum concentrations were 90 and 64 mg/L on the first and second occasion (therapeutic target concentration, 10 mg/L) corresponding to a clearance of 1.9 and 2.6 mL/kg/min. This clearance estimate was substantially lower than that reported in toddlers on CRRT and ECMO in some studies. CONCLUSION: In neonates and infants, meropenem clearance is difficult to predict because of dynamic ontogenetic changes in renal function. This problem is further aggravated in acutely ill infants with decreased renal function, renal replacement therapy and/or ECMO. Therefore, Target Concentration Intervention based on meropenem plasma concentrations is indispensable to ensure therapeutic exposure in this population.

Effective elimination of high-dose methotrexate by repeated hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis in patients with acute kidney injury.

INTRODUCTION: Acute kidney injury (AKI) after high dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is associated with delayed MTX-excretion and life-threatening toxicity. Glucapridase, the recommended therapy, is expensive and not always available. CASE SERIES: We describe 3 cases (69, 67, 73 years) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who developed AKI and early-onset severely delayed MTX elimination after HD-MTX. MTX serum concentrations were 101 and 69 µmol/L at 24 h after administration in two patients and 34 µmol/L at 32 h in the third. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Since glucarpidase was unavailable, we performed daily high-flux hemodialysis (HF-HD) or online hemodiafiltration (HDF) sessions (median duration, 6 h). The median serum MTX elimination half-life during HDF/HF-HD sessions was similar in all patients (median, 4.4 h; IQR, 3.8-5.3 h), but serum MTX concentrations rebounded after each dialysis by a median of 40% of the trough concentrations. The three patients underwent multiple dialysis sessions, until MTX serum concentrations remained sufficiently low to be neutralized by leucovorin. Only 1 patient developed severe pancytopenia, and renal function normalized in all patients after 3-6 weeks. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, when glucarpidase is unavailable or delayed, early, repeated and prolonged HDF/HF-HD effectively enhance MTX elimination and prevent toxicity in patients with AKI and severely delayed MTX elimination after HD-MTX.

Treatment with antiepileptic drugs in patients with stroke. A change in clinical practice may be required.

BACKGROUND: Stroke prevention is an important socio-economic aim. Epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), roughly divided into enzyme-inducers and non-enzyme-inducers, have been associated with increased risk of stroke. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients admitted with a diagnosis of anytime stroke and taking at least one AED was performed. A subgroup of subjects admitted for acute strokes was separately studied. Potential interactions between AEDs and other consumed medications were identified using MicroMedex and Lexi-Interact. RESULTS: The study included 827 patients, 59% of them using 5-10 medications. Two thirds of the patients received at least one enzyme-inducer AED, with phenytoin being the most commonly used AED (38% of the patients). Among the subgroup of 82 patients admitted for stroke, 61% were prescribed AEDs after the stroke. More patients had large vessel and embolic strokes among these than among the patients that had strokes while on AEDs. Statins, antiplatelet drugs, antidiabetics and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) were the most frequently used non-AED drugs, by 56, 55, 30 and 28%, respectively. The most common combinations between AEDs and non-AED medications bearing risk for potential major interactions were those of AEDs with statins, warfarin, calcium channel blockers and anti-depressants. CONCLUSIONS: A change in the AEDs prescription practice in stroke patients should be implemented, to avoid interactions with major groups of other medications prescribed to these patients.