Double-blind, placebo-substitution study of nefazodone in the prevention of relapse during continuation treatment of outpatients with major depression.

The efficacy of nefazodone in prevention of relapse of depression was evaluated in a 36-week double-blind, placebo-substitution, continuation treatment trial. After 16 weeks of acute, single-blind treatment with nefazodone, 131 patients responding to treatment and in stable remission were randomized in a 36-week double-blind trial to either nefazodone (n = 65) or placebo (n = 66). Patients were defined as having relapsed if they had a total score > or = 18 on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale on two consecutive visits or if they discontinued treatment for lack of efficacy. Relapse rates were significantly lower for patients randomized to continued nefazodone treatment than for patients switched to placebo. Kaplan-Meier estimates of relapse rates 9 months (36 weeks) after the end of acute treatment were 1.8% for nefazodone versus 18.3% for placebo (P = 0.009) by the Hamilton Depression Scale and 17.3% versus 32.8% (P = 0.028) by discontinuation for lack of efficacy. The mean modal dose of nefazodone was 412 mg/day at study endpoint. These results demonstrate the clinical effectiveness of up to 1 year's treatment (16 weeks acute and 36 weeks continuation) with nefazodone in depressed patients. Long-term efficacy of nefazodone was accompanied by a good safety profile without any weight gain and with minimal symptoms of withdrawal upon abrupt discontinuation of treatment.

Comparative effects of nefazodone and fluoxetine on sleep in outpatients with major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbances are common in major depressive disorder. In previous open-label trials, nefazodone improved sleep continuity and increased rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, while not affecting stage 3/4 sleep or REM latency: in contrast, fluoxetine suppressed REM sleep. This study compared the objective and subjective effects of nefazodone and fluoxetine on sleep. METHODS: This paper reports combined results of three identical, multisite, randomized, double-blind, 8-week, acute-phase trials comparing nefazodone (n = 64) with fluoxetine (n = 61) in outpatients with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder and insomnia. Sleep electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings were gathered at baseline and weeks 2, 4, and 8. Clinical ratings were obtained at weeks 1-4, 6, and 8. RESULTS: Nefazodone and fluoxetine were equally effective in reducing depressive symptoms; however, nefazodone differentially and progressively increased (while fluoxetine reduced) sleep efficiency and reduced (while fluoxetine increased) the number of awakenings in a linear fashion over the 8-week trial. Fluoxetine, but not nefazodone, prolonged REM latency and suppressed REM sleep. Nefazodone significantly increased total REM sleep time. Clinical evaluations of sleep quality were significantly improved with nefazodone compared with fluoxetine. CONCLUSIONS: Nefazodone and fluoxetine were equally effective antidepressants. Nefazodone was associated with normal objective, and clinician- and patient-rated assessments of sleep when compared with fluoxetine. These differential sleep EEG effects are consistent with the notion that nefazodone and fluoxetine may have somewhat different modes and spectra of action.

The safety profile of nefazodone.

Comprehensive review of safety data from approximately 3500 patients who received nefazodone in premarketing clinical trials demonstrates the drug to be very well tolerated, with a favorable side effect profile compared with other antidepressant drugs. Nefazodone treatment was associated with fewer side effects than were the control drugs. The incidence of side effects was generally low, and treatment discontinuations for adverse effects were less frequent with nefazodone than with imipramine and comparable with fluoxetine. No late-appearing side effects or toxicity emerged during the long-term treatment (1 year or longer) of several hundred patients. There were no drug-related fatalities and no evidence that nefazodone caused specific organ toxicity, although some cardiovascular side effects were noted (e.g., asymptomatic reduced systolic blood pressure, asymptomatic sinus bradycardia). Experience in 488 elderly patients treated with nefazodone yielded no evidence of increased susceptibility of older patients to nefazodone-associated adverse experiences, including those pertaining to the cardiovascular system. However, treatment should be initiated at a reduced dose in elderly patients because of reduced hepatic clearance of nefazodone in this age group. Final dose range may be similar in healthy younger and older patients. Although nefazodone may interact with some other medications (e.g., increases at steady state in AUC: alprazolam, twofold; triazolam, fourfold), drug-drug interactions involving patients have been clinically minor. On the basis of the inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4 isoenzyme by nefazodone in vitro, coadministration of terfenadine or astemizole with nefazodone is contraindicated because nefazodone can increase the plasma levels of these two drugs. Extensive clinical experience provides substantial evidence that nefazodone is an extremely safe and effective treatment for depression, with important advantages over existing therapies. Therapeutic benefits include a low incidence of clinically troublesome side effects and lack of unwanted psychic activation, sexual dysfunction, weight change, and the cardiotoxicity of other antidepressants.