RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Approximately 40% of children aged 6-59 months worldwide are anaemic. Iron-containing multiple micronutrient powders (MNPs) and iron supplements (syrup/drops) are used to combat anaemia in children in different parts of the world. However, evidence for functional benefits of iron supplementation in children is scarce, and potential risks remain poorly defined, particularly concerning diarrhoea and malaria. This trial aims to determine if: (1) the efficacy of iron supplements or MNPs (containing iron) given with malaria chemoprevention is superior to malaria chemoprevention alone, or (2) if the efficacy of malaria chemoprevention alone is superior to placebo on child cognitive development. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: IRMA is a four-arm, parallel-group, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, triple-dummy, randomised trial in Southern Malawi. The study recruits 2168 infants aged 6 months, with an intervention period of 6 months and a post-intervention period of a further 6 months. Children are randomised into four arms: (1) No intervention (placebo); (2) malaria chemoprevention only; (3) MNPs and malaria chemoprevention; and (4) iron syrup and malaria chemoprevention. The primary outcome, cognitive development (Cognitive Composite Score (CogCS)), is measured at the end of the 6 months intervention. Secondary outcomes include CogCS at a further 6 months post-intervention, motor, language and behavioural development, physical growth and prevalence of anaemia and iron deficiency. Safety outcomes include incidence of malaria and other infections, and prevalence of malaria parasitaemia during and post-intervention period. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial is approved by the National Health Sciences Research Committee (#19/01/2213) (Malawi) and the Human Research Ethics Committee (WEHI: 19/012) (Australia). Written informed consent in the local language is obtained from each participant before conducting any study-related procedure. Results will be shared with the local community and internationally with academic and policy stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12620000386932.
Assuntos
Anemia , Malária , Lactente , Humanos , Criança , Ferro/uso terapêutico , Malaui/epidemiologia , Malária/prevenção & controle , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Anemia/tratamento farmacológico , Suplementos Nutricionais , Quimioprevenção , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos Multicêntricos como AssuntoRESUMO
Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, an artemisinin-based combination therapy, has been identified as a promising agent for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy. However, in pregnant women living with HIV (PLWH), efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) significantly reduces the plasma exposure of piperaquine. In an open-label, nonrandomized, fixed-sequence, pharmacokinetic study, we compared piperaquine plasma concentrations in 13 pregnant women during a 3-day treatment course of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine when coadministered with efavirenz-based versus dolutegravir-based ART in the second or third trimester of pregnancy. Piperaquine concentrations were measured over a 28-day period, while on efavirenz-based ART and after switching to dolutegravir-based ART. Noncompartmental analysis was performed, and geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated to compare piperaquine pharmacokinetic parameters between these two treatment periods. Compared with efavirenz-based ART, coadministration of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and dolutegravir-based ART resulted in a 57% higher overall piperaquine exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 672 h [AUC0-672 h]) (GMR, 1.57; 90% CI, 1.28 to 1.93). Piperaquine's day 7 concentrations were also 63% higher (GMR, 1.63; 90% CI, 1.29 to 2.11), while day 28 concentrations were nearly three times higher (GMR, 2.96; 90% CI, 2.25 to 4.07). However, the maximum piperaquine concentration (Cmax) remained similar (GMR, 1.09; 90% CI, 0.79 to 1.49). Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine was well tolerated, with no medication-related serious adverse events observed in this small study. Compared with efavirenz-based ART, a known inducer of piperaquine metabolism, dolutegravir-based ART resulted in increased overall piperaquine exposure with pharmacokinetic parameter values that were similar to those published previously for pregnant and nonpregnant women. Our findings suggest that the efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine will be retained in pregnant women on dolutegravir. (The study was registered on PACTR.samrc.ac.za [PACTR201910580840196].).
Assuntos
Antimaláricos , Infecções por HIV , Malária , Quinolinas , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Antimaláricos/efeitos adversos , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Malária/prevenção & controle , Gestantes , Quinolinas/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa, the burdens of malaria and HIV infections overlap. In settings with moderate-to-high malaria transmission intensity, pregnant women living with HIV (PLWH) require both ART and malaria intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp). Dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine has been identified as a promising alternative to sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine for IPTp. However, another antimalarial drug, artesunate/amodiaquine, similar to dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine, was previously shown to reduce dolutegravir exposure in non-pregnant adults. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine on dolutegravir plasma exposure in pregnant women on dolutegravir-based ART. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, non-randomized, fixed-sequence, pharmacokinetic study in PLWH in Malawi. Dolutegravir concentrations were measured over a 24â h period, before and after the recommended 3â day treatment dose of dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine in 12 pregnant women in their second or third trimester. Non-compartmental analysis was performed, and geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% CIs were generated to compare dolutegravir pharmacokinetic parameters between the two treatment periods. RESULTS: Co-administration of dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine and dolutegravir increased dolutegravir's overall exposure (AUC0-24) and Cmax by 30% (GMR 1.30; 90% CI 1.11-1.52) and 31% (GMR 1.31; 90% CI 1.13-1.51), respectively. The dolutegravir trough (C24) concentration increased by 42% (GMR 1.42; 90% CI 1.09-1.85). The combined treatments were well tolerated with no serious adverse events observed. CONCLUSIONS: Dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine may be administered with dolutegravir-based ART in pregnant women as the modest increase in dolutegravir exposure, similar to pharmacokinetic parameter values published previously, ensures its efficacy without any clinically significant adverse events observed in this small study.