Real-World Performance of a Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Test Optimized for Small Tumor Samples.

PURPOSE: Tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is increasingly used for treatment selection in patients with advanced cancer; however, tissue availability may limit widespread implementation. Here, we established real-world CGP tissue availability and assessed CGP performance on consecutively received samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a post hoc, nonprespecified analysis of 32,048 consecutive tumor tissue samples received for StrataNGS, a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based comprehensive genomic profiling (PCR-CGP) test, as part of an ongoing observational trial (NCT03061305). Sample characteristics and PCR-CGP performance were assessed across all tested samples, including exception samples not meeting minimum input quality control (QC) requirements (< 20% tumor content [TC], < 2 mm2 tumor surface area [TSA], DNA or RNA yield < 1 ng/µL, or specimen age > 5 years). Tests reporting ≥ 1 prioritized alteration or meeting TC and sequencing QC were considered successful. For prostate carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma, tests reporting ≥ 1 actionable or informative alteration or meeting TC and sequencing QC were considered actionable. RESULTS: Among 31,165 (97.2%) samples where PCR-CGP was attempted, 10.7% had < 20% TC and 59.2% were small (< 25 mm2 tumor surface area). Of 31,101 samples evaluable for input requirements, 8,089 (26.0%) were exceptions not meeting requirements. However, 94.2% of the 31,101 tested samples were successfully reported, including 80.5% of exception samples. Positive predictive value of PCR-CGP for ERBB2 amplification in exceptions and/or sequencing QC-failure breast cancer samples was 96.7%. Importantly, 84.0% of tested prostate carcinomas and 87.9% of lung adenocarcinomas yielded results informing treatment selection. CONCLUSION: Most real-world tissue samples from patients with advanced cancer desiring CGP are limited, requiring optimized CGP approaches to produce meaningful results. An optimized PCR-CGP test, coupled with an inclusive exception testing policy, delivered reportable results for > 94% of samples, potentially expanding the proportion of CGP-testable patients and impact of biomarker-guided therapies.

Real world treatment patterns in chronic myeloid leukemia patients newly initiated on tyrosine kinase inhibitors in an U.S. integrated healthcare system.

Purpose To evaluate treatment patterns in patients diagnosed with incident chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) newly initiating therapy with imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib. Patients were followed to determine switching and discontinuation rates. Factors associated with switching or discontinuation from index TKI therapy, reasons for discontinuation based on electronic chart notes, and frequency of laboratory monitoring were assessed during the follow-up period. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted in chronic myelogenous leukemia patients aged ≥ 18 years who were identified from the Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) Cancer Registry database during the study time period of 1 January 2007 to 12 December 2013. The index date was defined as the date of the first TKI prescription (imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib) identified during the study time period with no prior history of TKI use within 12 months. Patients had to have continuous membership with drug benefit eligibility and no prior history of stem cell transplant (SCT) or other cancers during the 12 months prior to the index date. Baseline characteristics were identified during 12 months prior to the index date and outcomes were identified during the follow-up period after the index date. All patients were followed from index TKI therapy until end of study time period (12 December 2014), death, stem cell transplant, or disenrollment from the health plan unless one of the following occurred first: a patient switched their index therapy, or a patient discontinued their index therapy. Forward stepwise selection multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with patients who continued therapy compared to those who switched or discontinued therapy with the index TKI. Chart notes were reviewed 30 days prior and 30 days post index TKI discontinuation to evaluate reasons for discontinuation. Molecular and cytogenetic testing frequency was also assessed during the follow-up period among the different patient groups. Results Two hundred sixteen patients were identified with incident chronic myelogenous leukemia and use of TKI therapy: 189 (87.5%) received imatinib, 19 (8.8%) received dasatinib, and 8 (3.7%) received nilotinib. The mean age on index date was 53 years and 63% were male; 103 patients (48%) continued on their index therapy, while 62 patients (28%) switched, and 51 patients (24%) discontinued.

Economic burden related to chemotherapy-related adverse events in patients with metastatic breast cancer in an integrated health care system.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is treated with many different modalities, including chemotherapy that can be given as a single agent or in combination. Patients often experience adverse events from chemotherapy during the cycles of treatment which can lead to economic burden. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate costs related to chemotherapy-related adverse events in patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in an integrated health care delivery system. METHODS: Patients with mBC newly initiated on chemotherapy were identified and the first infusion was defined as the index date. Patients were ≥18 years old at time of index date, had at least 6 months of health plan membership and drug eligibility prior to their index date. The chemotherapy adverse events were identified after the index date and during first line of chemotherapy. Episodes of care (EOC) were created using healthcare visits. Chart review was conducted to establish whether the adverse events were related to chemotherapy. Costs were calculated for each visit, including medications related to the adverse events, and aggregated to calculate the total EOC cost. RESULTS: A total of 1,682 patients with mBC were identified after applying study criteria; 54% of these patients had one or more adverse events related to chemotherapy. After applying the EOC method, there were a total of 5,475 episodes (4,185 single episodes [76.4%] and 1,290 multiple episodes [23.6%]) related to chemotherapy-related adverse events. Within single episodes, hematological (1,387 EOC, 33.1%), musculoskeletal/pain related (1,070 EOC, 25.6%), and gastrointestinal (775 EOC, 18.5%) were the most frequent adverse events. Patients with adverse events related to single EOC with anemia and neutropenia had the highest total outpatient costs with 901 EOC ($81,991) and 187 EOC ($17,017); these patients also had highest total inpatient costs with 46 EOC ($542,798) and 16 EOC ($136,768). However, within multiple episodes, hematological (420 EOC, 32.6%), followed by infections/pyrexia (335 EOC, 25.9%) and gastrointestinal (278 EOC, 22.6%) were the most frequent adverse events. CONCLUSION: The economic burden related to chemotherapy adverse events in patients with mBC is substantial.

Clinical Impact of Chemotherapy-Related Adverse Events in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer in an Integrated Health Care System.

BACKGROUND: Stage IV breast cancer, also known as metastatic breast cancer (mBC), is not a curable condition. However, treatment can prolong life, delay the progression of the cancer, or improve quality of life. Currently, patients with mBC are often treated with chemotherapy. Patients often experience adverse events from chemotherapy during the treatment cycle, which leads to chemotherapy modifications such as dose delay, dose reduction, or discontinuation of chemotherapy. Previous studies have evaluated the rates of adverse events that occur from the use of chemotherapy; however, few studies have evaluated the clinical impact on the chemotherapy regimen once the adverse event occurs. This study evaluates the clinical impact on the chemotherapy regimen from chemotherapy-related adverse events in patients with mBC in an integrated health care delivery system.   OBJECTIVES: To assess the adverse events in patients with mBC and evaluate the clinical impact on the chemotherapy regimen from these adverse events in an integrated health care delivery system.  METHODS: This study is a retrospective cohort of patients with mBC newly initiated on chemotherapy. The first infusion was defined as the index date. Patients were aged greater than 18 years at time of index date and had 6 months or more of Kaiser membership and drug eligibility prior to the index date and continuous membership and drug eligibility throughout follow-up. Adverse events were identified after the index date and during the follow-up using ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes. Single or multiple episodes of care were created from the adverse events. Chart review was conducted to establish whether the adverse event was related to chemotherapy and if any modification to the chemotherapy regimen occurred-a dose delay, dose reduction, or discontinuation was considered a clinical impact on therapy. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with clinical impact versus no clinical impact from the delivery of chemotherapy treatment.  RESULTS: A total of 1,682 patients with mBC were identified during our time period with an average follow-up of 2.21 years on first-line chemotherapy (SD = 1.83). 909 patients (54%) had at least 1 adverse event, and 773 patients (46%) did not have any adverse events during follow-up. Significant differences at baseline between these 2 groups included race, peripheral vascular disease, and length of stay (P less than 0.05). From the 909 patients who had at least 1 adverse event, 185 patients (20%) experienced an impact on their chemotherapy regimens. Patients with single episodes of care with any chemotherapy regimen impact experienced mostly hematological, infection/pyrexia, and gastrointestinal-related adverse events. In multiple episodes of care, neurological impact was more frequent than gastrointestinal-related effects. Patients with hospitalizations of greater than 3 days experienced the most impact, demonstrating that severe adverse events have more impact on chemotherapy regimens. In our multivariate analysis, patients aged greater than 65 years, having more than 1 comorbidity and having longer duration in days for each episode of care were all associated with clinical impact. Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to have a modification in their chemotherapy compared with white patients. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis demonstrates that chemotherapy-related adverse events in patients with mBC have an impact on the delivery of chemotherapy regimens. Having multiple comorbidities, increased age, and prolonged hospitalizations because of adverse events appear to be some of the primary factors related to chemotherapy modification.