Coronary Artery Anomalies: Diagnosis & Management.

Coronary artery anomalies encompass a spectrum of congenital abnormalities affecting the origin, course, or termination of the major epicardial coronary arteries. Despite their rarity, coronary artery anomalies represent a significant burden on cardiovascular health due to their potential to disrupt myocardial blood flow and precipitate adverse cardiac events. While historically diagnosed postmortem, the widespread availability of imaging modalities has led to an increased recognition of coronary artery anomalies, particularly in adults. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the classification, mechanisms, and clinical implications of coronary anomalies, focusing on prevalent variants with significant clinical impact. We discuss strategies for medical and surgical management, as well as contemporary screening recommendations, acknowledging the evolving understanding of these anomalies. Given the breadth of possible variants and the limited data on some presentations, this review provides a framework to aid clinicians in the recognition and management of coronary anomalies, with a particular emphasis on their stratification by anatomical location. By consolidating existing knowledge and highlighting areas of uncertainty, this review aims to enhance clinical decision-making and improve outcomes for individuals with coronary anomalies.

Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and cardiovascular disease: Pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and future directions.

Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is a well-studied phenomenon in hematologic malignancies. With advancements in gene sampling and analysis and the use of large cohort studies, CHIP has recently been linked to cardiovascular disease (CVD). The relationship between CHIP and CVD appears to be bidirectional, with traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease increasing the mutation burden in CHIP, and CHIP itself effecting the incidence or prognosis of a variety of CVD. The purpose of this review is to understand the epidemiology, risk factors, and pathogenesis of CHIP in the context of various CVD conditions.

Clinical Update in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the most recent clinical trials and data regarding epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with an emphasis on the recent trends in cardiometabolic interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction makes up approximately half of overall heart failure and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and overall burden on the healthcare system. It is a complex, heterogenous syndrome and clinical trials, to this point, have not revealed quite as many effective treatment options when compared to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Nevertheless, there is an expanding amount of data insight into the pathogenesis of this disease and the potential for newer therapies and management strategies. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction pathology has been found to be linked to abnormal energetics, myocyte hypertrophy, cell signaling, inflammation, ischemia, and fibrosis. These mechanisms also intricately overlap with the significant comorbidities often associated with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction including, but not limited to, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, obesity and coronary artery disease. Treatment of this disease, therefore, should focus on the management and strict regulation of these comorbidities by pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic means. In this review, a clinical update is provided reviewing the most recent clinical trials and data regarding epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with an emphasis on the recent trend in cardiometabolic interventions.

Target Heart Rate Formulas for Exercise Stress Testing: What Is the Evidence?

Exercise stress testing (EST) is commonly used to evaluate chest pain, with some labs using 85% of age-predicted maximum heart rate (APMHR) as an endpoint for EST. The APMHR is often calculated using the formula 220-age. However, the accuracy of this formula and 85% APMHR as an endpoint may be questioned. Moreover, failing to reach 85% APMHR (known as chronotropic insufficiency) may also indicate poor cardiovascular prognosis, but measurements, such as percentage heart rate reserve (%HRR), maximum rate pressure product (MRPP), and the maximum metabolic equivalent of tasks (METs) reached during EST may provide better prediction of cardiovascular outcomes than not reaching 85% of APMHR. There is a need to incorporate comprehensive measurements to improve the diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of EST.

Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Peripheral Artery Disease and Critical Limb Ischemia in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a progressive, systemic atherosclerotic disease that is associated with an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease (CVD), and critical limb ischemia (CLI). CLI represents the most severe stage of PAD, characterized by progressive endothelial dysfunction and arterial narrowing. We hypothesized that the incidence of CLI and PAD would increase over the study period and that the rates of in-hospital mortality and major amputations among patients admitted with CLI would rise correspondingly. METHODS: We utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from year 2016 to 2021 using the ICD-10-CM codes. Patients with a primary or secondary diagnoses of PAD were initially selected and subsequently hospitalization with CLI were appropriately identified. Cochran Armitage test was used to describe the trend of outcomes across the years. All statistical analyses were conducted using the software Stata version 17.0. RESULTS: From 2016-2021, there were 2,930,639 admissions for critical limb ischemia. 65% of these patients were over the age of 60 and 35.8% of these patients were women. Most of these individuals were white (64.7%), followed by African Americans (15.8%) and Hispanics (12.6%). In-hospital mortality rates varied by revascularization method, with hybrid revascularization showing the highest rate at 2.6%, followed by endovascular revascularization at 1.8%, and surgical revascularization at 1.6%. Additionally, hospitalization costs were highest for patients undergoing hybrid revascularization ($46,257 ± $36,417), compared to endovascular ($36,924 ± $27,945) and surgical revascularization ($35,672 ± $27,127). Endovascular revascularization rates seemed to increase while surgical revascularization rates decreased during this time period. CONCLUSION: PAD is a progressive, systemic atherosclerotic disease that is associated with an increased risk of CAD, CVD, and CLI. Our data showed that the rates of PAD and CLI hospitalizations has remained relatively stable from 2016-2021, but there seems to be a trend towards doing more revascularization via an endovascular approach as compared to a surgical approach.

Clinical implications of combination proton pump inhibitor and triple therapies in patients with atrial fibrillation following percutaneous intervention: a guide for clinicians.

INTRODUCTION: Patients on systemic oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) often require triple therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention, substantially increasing the risk of bleeding. Gastroprotective agents like proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are often employed to mitigate this risk, despite potential competitive inhibition between P2Y12-receptor inhibitors, NOACs, and VKAs. While the interactions and clinical outcomes of PPIs and DAPT have been frequently explored in literature, not many studies have evaluated the same outcomes for triple therapy. AREAS COVERED: This comprehensive narrative review of three studies on PPIs and triple from the PubMed/MEDLINE database supplemented by 23 other relevant studies aims to use the available literature to analyze the potential interactions between PPIs and triple therapy while shedding light on their mechanisms, clinical implications, and areas for optimization. EXPERT OPINION: If triple therapy is indicated following PCI, then patients at high-risk for bleeding may benefit from transition to apixaban and a PPI to lower the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. More research is needed to determine the role of PPIs in triple therapies in prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding or potentiation of other adverse outcomes.

Coronary Drug-Coated Balloons: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Applications and Controversies.

Drug-coated balloons have emerged as a promising therapeutic option in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. This review article provides an overview of the concept of drug-coated balloons and their clinical applications in both de novo and treated coronary artery disease. A summary of key clinical trials and registry studies evaluating drug-coated balloons is presented for reference. Overall, this article aims to provide clinicians and researchers with a comprehensive understanding of the current state of drug-coated balloon technology and its implications in clinical practice.

Human Papillomavirus as Nontraditional Cardiovascular Risk Factor: Fact or Fiction? Part 2.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the US and worldwide, with more than 42 million Americans infected with types of HPV that are known to cause disease. While the link between HPV and the development of a variety of cancers has been strongly established, recent literature has demonstrated a potential association between HPV and increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Nevertheless, despite plausible mechanisms for the development of cardiovascular disease with HPV infection, a causative relationship has yet to be firmly established, in part due to potential confounding risk factors between the two. In this 2-part series, we discuss the emerging relationship between HPV and cardiovascular disease. In part 2, we focus on novel risk factors for HPV infection and cardiovascular disease including adverse childhood events, socioeconomic status, and immunosuppression. We conclude with potential prevention and treatment strategies for HPV-related cardiovascular disease, as well as the future direction of the research.

Racial disparities in trend, clinical characteristics and outcomes in Takotsubo syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is an acute transient nonischemic cardiomyopathy often characterized by its hallmark feature of left ventricular apical ballooning. The correlation between racial backgrounds and the prognosis of individuals with TTS remains poorly defined. Our study aimed to explore the influence of race on the trends, clinical presentations, and outcomes in patients diagnosed with TTS. METHODS: We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2020 and identified hospitalizations with TTS. We compared the clinical features and outcomes across three different races - non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and Hispanic population. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: 76,505 weighted hospitalizations for TTS were identified, of which 65,495 (85.6%) were non-Hispanic White, 5,830 (7.6%) were non-Hispanic Black, and 5,180 (6.8%) were Hispanics. After propensity-score matching, NHB patients had higher odds of acute kidney injury (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.21-1.84, p < 0.001) and mechanical ventilation (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.04-1.68, p = 0.02). Hispanic patients had a higher incidence of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis when compared to NHW patients (OR: 2.53, 95% CI: 1.11-5.77, p = 0.027). There was no significant difference in terms of in-hospital mortality between NHB and Hispanic patients when compared to NHW patients. Notably, Hispanic populations experienced a higher mortality rate during the COVID-19 period. CONCLUSION: Our study suggested significant differences in the outcomes of TTS across different racial groups. Hispanic populations experienced a higher mortality rate with TTS during the COVID-19 era. Further research should emphasize discovering the factors contributing to the observed disparities.

Bivalirudin versus heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes.

INTRODUCTION: Data on outcomes between unfractionated heparin and bivalirudin anticoagulation during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remains inconclusive. We aimed to systematically analyze PCI outcomes comparing unfractionated heparin and bivalirudin. METHODS: We systematically searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception in 1966 through January 2024 for studies evaluating PCI outcomes comparing unfractionated heparin and bivalirudin. Two investigators independently reviewed data. Conflicts were resolved through consensus. Random-effects meta-analyses were used. RESULTS: Ten prospective trials were identified that enrolled 42,253 individuals who presented with an acute coronary syndrome. Our analysis found that heparin when compared to bivalirudin was associated with an increased risk of trial-based definition of major bleeding (RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.29-2.20), non-access site complications (RR 4.6, 95% CI 1.75-12.09), TIMI major bleeding (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.20-2.41), major bleeding risks (RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.49-2.36), cardiovascular disease death (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.02-1.57), and thrombocytopenia (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.07-2.62). There were no statistically significant differences between heparin and bivalirudin for all-cause mortality, MACE, stroke, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, acute or stent thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis demonstrates bivalirudin reduces major bleeding when used for anticoagulation during PCI in patients with acute coronary syndromes and is not associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis or MACE.

Diuretic Treatment in Heart Failure: A Practical Guide for Clinicians.

Congestion and fluid retention are the hallmarks of decompensated heart failure and the major reason for the hospitalization of patients with heart failure. Diuretics have been used in heart failure for decades, and they remain the backbone of the contemporary management of heart failure. Loop diuretics is the preferred diuretic, and it has been given a class I recommendation by clinical guidelines for the relief of congestion symptoms. Although loop diuretics have been used virtually among all patients with acute decompensated heart failure, there is still very limited clinical evidence to guide the optimized diuretics use. This is a sharp contrast to the rapidly growing evidence of the rest of the guideline-directed medical therapy of heart failure and calls for further studies. The loop diuretics possess a unique pharmacology and pharmacokinetics that lay the ground for different strategies to increase diuretic efficiency. However, many of these approaches have not been evaluated in randomized clinical trials. In recent years, a stepped and protocolized diuretics dosing has been suggested to have superior benefits over an individual clinician-based strategy. Diuretic resistance has been a major challenge to decongestion therapy for patients with heart failure and is associated with a poor clinical prognosis. Recently, therapy options have emerged to help overcome diuretic resistance to loop diuretics and have been evaluated in randomized clinical trials. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of the pharmacology and clinical use of loop diuretics in the context of heart failure, with attention to its side effects, and adjuncts, as well as the challenges and future direction.

The Current State of Coronary Revascularization: Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The optimal revascularization strategy for coronary artery disease depends on various factors, such as disease complexity, patient characteristics, and preferences. Including a heart team in complex cases is crucial to ensure optimal outcomes. Decision-making between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting must consider each patient's clinical profile and coronary anatomy. While current practice guidelines offer some insight into the optimal revascularization approach for the various phenotypes of coronary artery disease, the evidence to support either strategy continues to evolve and grow. Given the large amount of contemporary data on revascularization, this review aims to comprehensively summarize the literature on coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients across the spectrum of coronary artery disease phenotypes. RECENT FINDINGS: Contemporary evidence suggests that for patients with triple vessel disease, coronary artery bypass grafting is preferred over percutaneous coronary intervention due to better long-term outcomes, including lower rates of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Similarly, for patients with left main coronary artery disease, both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting can be considered, as they have shown similar efficacy in terms of major adverse cardiac events, but there may be a slightly higher risk of death with percutaneous coronary intervention. For proximal left anterior descending artery disease, both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting are viable options, but coronary artery bypass grafting has shown lower rates of repeat revascularization and better relief from angina. The Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery score can help in decision-making by predicting the risk of adverse events and guiding the choice between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting. European and American guidelines both agree with including a heart team that can develop and lay out individualized, optimal treatment options with respect for patient preferences. The debate between coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention in multiple different scenarios will continue to develop as technology and techniques improve for both procedures. Risk factors, pre, peri, and post-procedural complications involved in both revascularization strategies will continue to be mitigated to optimize outcomes for those patients for which coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention provide ultimate benefit. Methods to avoid unnecessary revascularization continue to develop as well as percutaneous technology that may allow patients to avoid surgical intervention when possible. With such changes, revascularization guidelines for specific patient populations may change in the coming years, which can serve as a limitation of this time-dated review.

Efficacy of Diagnostic Testing of Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: A Contemporary Review.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a highly prevalent condition which can lead to myocardial ischemia as well as acute coronary syndrome. Early diagnosis of CAD can improve patient outcomes through guiding risk factor modification and treatment modalities. SUMMARY: Testing for CAD comes with increased cost and risk; therefore, physicians must determine which patients require testing, and what testing modality will offer the most useful data to diagnose patients with CAD. Patients should have an initial risk stratification for pretest probability of CAD based on symptoms and available clinical data. Patients with a pretest probability less than 5% should receive no further testing, while patients with a high pretest probability should be considered for direct invasive coronary angiography. In patients with a pretest probability between 5 and 15%, coronary artery calcium score and or exercise electrocardiogram can be obtained to further risk stratify patients to low-risk versus intermediate-high-risk. Intermediate-high-risk patients should be tested with coronary computed tomography angiography (preferred) versus positron emission tomography or single photon emission computed tomography based on their individual patient characteristics and institutional availability. KEY MESSAGES: This comprehensive review aimed to describe the available CAD testing modalities, detail their risks and benefits, and propose when each should be considered in the evaluation of a patient with suspected CAD.

Sex Differences and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is more common in women, it is unknown whether sex is a risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients with MINOCA. We aimed to investigate the relationship between sex differences and outcomes of patients with MINOCA. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from their inception until August 2023 for relevant studies. End points were pooled using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random-effects model as odds ratio (OR) with 95% CIs. Nine studies, involving 30 281 patients with MINOCA (comprising 18 079 women and 12 202 men), were included in the study. Women were older and had a higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and stroke compared with men. The median duration of follow-up was 3.5 years, with an interquartile range of 2.2 to 4.2 years. Pooled analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality (OR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.87-1.22]), major adverse cardiovascular events (OR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.89-1.58]), heart failure (OR, 1.32 [95% CI, 0.57-3.03]), stroke (OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.56-2.26]), and myocardial infarction (OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.29-3.76]) between the 2 groups. Regarding short-term outcomes, women had a significantly higher risk of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events compared with men (OR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.16-1.53]) whereas there was no significant difference in the risk of in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.64-1.28]) between the 2 patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the differences in demographics and comorbidity profiles, there was no significant difference in the long-term outcomes for patients with MINOCA between sexes. However, it is noteworthy that women experienced a higher risk of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events compared with men.

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection with Cardiogenic Shock in the United States.

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is defined as a non-traumatic separation of the epicardial coronary artery walls that creates a false lumen. SCAD poses a difficult challenge in management, as decisions regarding revascularization and medical management seem to be tailored to the individual patient. We evaluated and compared outcomes based on cardiogenic shock in patients with SCAD utilizing Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) between January 1, 2016, to December 30, 2020. Methods: We utilized the NRD 2016-2019 to carry out this study. We evaluated demographics (e.g., age, gender), conventional risk factors, comorbidities present on the index admission, and in-hospital outcomes using their specific ICD-10-CM codes. The primary outcomes were In-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission, and the secondary outcome was to compare the complications in SCAD patient with cardiogenic shock (CS) compared to those without CS. Results: We analyzed 2473 individuals with SCAD, 2199 of these individuals did not have cardiogenic shock whereas 274 of these individuals did have cardiogenic shock. When comparing SCAD with cardiogenic shock to SCAD without cardiogenic shock, there was a statistically significant increased odds ratio (OR) for death (propensity matched OR 24.93 (7.49-83.05), use of mechanical circulatory support (propensity matched OR 15.30 (6.87-34.04), ventricular tachycardia (propensity matched OR 4.45 (1.92-10.34), utilization of blood transfusions (propensity matched OR 3.82 (1.86-7.87), acute kidney injury (propensity matched OR 4.02 (1.45-11.13), need for mechanical ventilation (propensity matched OR 8.87 (3.53-22.31), and respiratory failure (propensity matched OR 4.95 (1.83-13.41)))))))). There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day readmission rates between the two groups. Conclusions: SCAD is a unique condition that can lead to many complications. In our analysis, we showed that SCAD associated with cardiogenic shock compared to SCAD not associated with cardiogenic shock results in greater odds of complications including death, use of mechanical circulatory support, need for blood transfusions, ventricular tachycardia, acute kidney injury, use of mechanical ventilation, and respiratory failure. SCAD with cardiogenic shock represents a significantly critical clinical scenario that requires a multi-disciplinary approach to prevent the many potential complications associated with this disease process.

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: A Contemporary Review of Diagnosis and Management.

Significant left main coronary artery disease is a very high-risk subgroup of coronary artery disease that is a crucial indicator of heightened morbidity and mortality rates. Despite its clinical significance, uncertainties persist regarding the optimal management strategy for patients, particularly given its phenotypic variations. Existing evidence-based guidelines offer insights into revascularization options, yet questions remain regarding long-term prognoses and clinical outcomes when comparing percutaneous coronary intervention to coronary artery bypass grafting. This comprehensive review aims to provide an in-depth analysis of contemporary strategies for the diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of left main coronary artery disease. By synthesizing current literature and addressing the evolving landscape of revascularization modalities, this review seeks to contribute valuable insights for clinicians and researchers grappling with the complexities of managing left main coronary artery disease.

Management of patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure are often co-existing conditions due to a shared pathophysiological process involving neurohormonal activation and hemodynamic maladaptation. A wide range of pharmaceutical and interventional tools are available to patients with CKD, consisting of traditional ones with decades of experience and newer emerging therapies that are rapidly reshaping the landscape of medical care for this population. Management of patients with heart failure and CKD requires a stepwise approach based on renal function and the clinical phenotype of heart failure. This is often challenging due to altered drug pharmacokinetics interactions with various degrees of kidney function and frequent adverse effects from the therapy that lead to poor patient tolerance. Despite a great body of clinical evidence and guidelines that have offered various treatment options for patients with heart failure and CKD, respectively, patients with CKD are still underrepresented in heart failure clinical trials, especially for those with advanced CKD and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Future studies are needed to better understand the generalizability of these therapeutic options among heart failures with different stages of CKD.

Human Papillomavirus as Non-Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factor: Fact or Fiction? Part 1.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States and worldwide, with more than 42 million Americans infected with types of HPV that are known to cause disease. Although the link between HPV and the development of a variety of cancers has been strongly established, recent literature has demonstrated a potential association between HPV and increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Nevertheless, despite plausible mechanisms for the development of cardiovascular disease with HPV infection, a causative relationship has yet to be firmly established, in part due to potential confounding risk factors between the two. In this 2-part series, we discuss the emerging relationship between HPV and cardiovascular disease. In part 1, we focus on the pathophysiology of HPV infection and potential mechanisms for the development of cardiovascular disease.