Cancer-Related Worry as a Predictor of 5-yr Physical Activity Level in Childhood Cancer Survivors.

PURPOSE: Cancer-related worry (CRW; concerns related to cancer and its late effects) is prevalent among childhood cancer survivors. Elevated CRW has been associated with self-reported suboptimal physical activity. The aim of this investigation was to describe associations between CRW and objectively assessed physical activity in childhood cancer survivors. METHODS: CRW was assessed at a baseline evaluation using six survey items. Weekly minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity were captured by actigraphy 5.25 (3.8-8.0) yr later. Factor analysis was used to identify types of worry; multiple regression determined independent associations between CRW and moderate and vigorous physical activity adjusting for sex, race, diagnosis, age at baseline, anxiety level at baseline, self-reported physical activity at baseline, and pain interference at baseline. RESULTS: Participants ( n = 1223) were an average of 30.9 (SD, 6.9) yr at baseline and 36.1 (SD, 7.1) yr at follow-up. Thirty-seven percent were survivors of leukemia, 26% of non-CNS solid tumors, 19% of lymphoma, 11% of CNS tumors, and 6% of other malignancies. Two types of CRW were identified: "body-focused" and "general fear." Body-focused CRW ( ß = -19.6, P = 0.012), endorsing pain interference ( ß = -27.7, P = 0.002) at baseline, and having a diagnosis of CNS tumor ( ß = -41.3, P = 0.0003) or non-CNS solid tumor ( ß = -19.4, P = 0.02) were negatively associated with physical activity at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: CRW related to bodily function and appearance is associated with decreased physical activity. Clinicians should consider the potential negative impact of CRW on physical activity levels and provide behavioral counseling.

Progression of Frailty in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Report.

BACKGROUND: Some adult survivors of childhood cancers develop frailty at higher rates than expected based on their chronological age. This study examined the incidence of frailty among survivors at 10 or more years after diagnosis, frailty prevalence 5 years later, and risk factors for becoming frail. METHODS: Frailty was measured at study entry and 5 years later. Logistic regression tested the associations of several factors with having frailty at 5 years for all participants and separately by sex and by study entry frailty status. Cox models evaluated the hazard of death associated with entry frailty considering covariates. RESULTS: Cancer survivors (range = 0-22 years at diagnosis, median = 7 years) were ages 18-45 years (median = 30 years) at study entry. Frailty prevalence increased from 6.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.0% to 7.5%) to 13.6% (95% CI = 11.9% to 15.4%) at 5 years. Risk factors for frailty at follow-up among all survivors included chest radiation 20 Gy or higher (odds ratio [OR] = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.29 to 3.05), cardiac (OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.02 to 2.46), and neurological (OR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.69 to 3.92) conditions; lack of strength training (OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.14 to 2.66); sedentary lifestyle (OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.18 to 2.59); and frailty at study entry (OR = 11.12, 95% CI = 6.64 to 18.61). The strongest risk factor for death during follow-up was prior frailty (OR = 3.52, 95% CI = 1.95 to 6.32). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalent frailty more than doubled at 5 years after study entry among adult childhood cancer survivors. Frailty at entry was the strongest risk factor for death. Because treatment exposures cannot be changed, mitigation of other risk factors for frailty, including lack of strength training and sedentary lifestyle, may decrease risk of adverse health events and improve longevity in survivors.

Protein Supplementation and Resistance Training in Childhood Cancer Survivors.

PURPOSE: Muscle weakness, low lean body mass, and poor physical performance are prevalent among adult survivors of childhood cancer (survivors). We evaluated the feasibility and effects of resistance training with and without protein supplementation on lean body mass and muscle strength among survivors. METHODS: This double-blind placebo-controlled trial enrolled survivors ≥18 to <45 yr old. Participants were randomized to resistance training with protein supplement (21 g whey protein per day, 90 kcal) (RT + S) or resistance training with placebo (sucrose, 90 kcal) (RT + P). Participants received educational materials, access to a local fitness center, and a tailored resistance training program with tapered supervision. Participant retention and adherence were used to evaluate feasibility. Lean body mass and muscle strength were assessed at baseline and 24 wk, using dual x-ray absorptiometry, and dynamometer testing or one-repetition maximum testing, respectively. Mean changes were compared with two-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Of 70 participants randomized, 57 completed the 24-wk intervention (24 in RT + S, 33 in RT + P). The RT + S group completed 74.8% and the RT + P group completed 67.0% of exercise sessions. Mean ± SD age for those who completed was 33.1 ± 7.0 yr, 67% were White and 47% female. There were no differences in change in lean mass (RT + S, 1.05 ± 2.34 kg; RT + P, 0.13 ± 2.19 kg; P = 0.10) or strength (grip RT + S, 1.65 ± 4.17 kg; RT + P, 1.63 ± 4.47 kg; P = 0.98; mean leg press RT + S, 58.4 ± 78.8 kg; RT + P, 51.0 ± 65.1 kg; P = 0.68) between groups. Both lean mass (P = 0.03) and strength (grip P = 0.003, leg press P < 0.001) increased over time. CONCLUSIONS: Supervised resistance training among survivors with protein supplementation is feasible but not more effective at increasing total lean body mass than resistance training alone.