Consensus recommendations for the use of novel antiretrovirals in persons with HIV who are heavily treatment-experienced and/or have multidrug-resistant HIV-1: Endorsed by the American Academy of HIV Medicine, American College of Clinical Pharmacy: An executive summary.

Treatment options are currently limited for persons with HIV-1 (PWH) who are heavily treatment-experienced and/or have multidrug-resistant HIV-1. Three agents have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since 2018, representing a significant advancement for this population: ibalizumab, fostemsavir, and lenacapavir. However, there is a paucity of recommendations endorsed by national and international guidelines describing the optimal use (e.g., selection and monitoring after initiation) of these novel antiretrovirals in this population. To address this gap, a modified Delphi technique was used to develop these consensus recommendations that establish a framework for initiating and managing ibalizumab, fostemsavir, or lenacapavir in PWH who are heavily treatment-experienced and/or have multidrug-resistant HIV-1. In addition, future areas of research are also identified and discussed in the main document.

Consensus recommendations for the use of novel antiretrovirals in persons with HIV who are heavily treatment-experienced and/or have multidrug-resistant HIV-1: Endorsed by the American Academy of HIV Medicine, American College of Clinical Pharmacy.

Treatment options are currently limited for persons with HIV-1 (PWH) who are heavily treatment-experienced and/or have multidrug-resistant HIV-1. Three agents have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since 2018, representing a significant advancement for this population: ibalizumab, fostemsavir, and lenacapavir. However, there is a paucity of recommendations endorsed by national and international guidelines describing the optimal use (e.g., selection and monitoring after initiation) of these novel antiretrovirals in this population. To address this gap, a modified Delphi technique was used to develop these consensus recommendations that establish a framework for initiating and managing ibalizumab, fostemsavir, or lenacapavir in PWH who are heavily treatment-experienced and/or have multidrug-resistant HIV-1. In addition, future areas of research are also identified and discussed.

Dalbavancin Sequential Therapy for Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infection: A Multicenter Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Long-acting lipoglycopeptides such as dalbavancin may have utility in patients with Gram-positive bloodstream infections (BSI), particularly in those with barriers to discharge or who require prolonged parenteral antibiotic courses. A retrospective cohort study was performed to provide further multicenter real-world evidence on dalbavancin use as a sequential therapy for Gram-positive BSI. METHODS: One hundred fifteen patients received dalbavancin with Gram-positive BSI, defined as any positive blood culture or diagnosed with infective endocarditis, from 13 centers geographically spread across the United States between July 2015 and July 2021. RESULTS: Patients had a mean (SD) age of 48.5 (17.5) years, the majority were male (54%), with many who injected drugs (40%). The most common infection sources (non-exclusive) were primary BSI (89%), skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) (25%), infective endocarditis (19%), and bone and joint infection (17%). Staphylococcus aureus accounted for 72% of index cultures, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus accounted for 18%, and Streptococcus species in 16%. Dalbavancin started a median (Q1-Q3) of 10 (6-19) days after index culture collection. The most common regimen administered was dalbavancin 1500 mg as one dose for 50% of cases. The primary outcome of composite clinical failure occurred at 12.2%, with 90-day mortality at 7.0% and 90-day BSI recurrence at 3.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Dalbavancin may serve as a useful tool in facilitating hospital discharge in patients with Gram-positive BSI. Randomized controlled trials are anticipated to validate dalbavancin as a surrogate to current treatment standards.

A five-year quasi-experimental study to evaluate the impact of empiric antibiotic order sets on antibiotic use metrics among hospitalized adult patients.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of adult antibiotic order sets (AOSs) on antibiotic stewardship metrics has been limited. The primary outcome was to evaluate the standardized antimicrobial administration ratio (SAAR). Secondary outcomes included antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient days (PD); selected antibiotic use; AOS utilization; Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) cases; and clinicians' perceptions of the AOS via a survey following the final study phase. DESIGN: This 5-year, single-center, quasi-experimental study comprised 5 phases from 2017 to 2022 over 10-month periods between August 1 and May 31. SETTING: The study was conducted in a 752-bed tertiary care, academic medical center. INTERVENTION: Our institution implemented AOSs in the electronic medical record (EMR) for common infections among hospitalized adults. RESULTS: For the primary outcome, a statistically significant decreases in SAAR were detected from phase 1 to phase 5 (1.0 vs 0.90; P < .001). A statistically significant decreases were detected in DOT per 1,000 PD (4,884 vs 3,939; P = .001), fluoroquinolone orders (407 vs 175; P < .001), carbapenem orders (147 vs 106; P = .024), and clindamycin orders (113 vs 73; P = .01). No statistically significant change in mean vancomycin orders was detected (991 vs 902; P = .221). A statistically significant decrease in CDI cases was also detected (7.8, vs 2.4; P = .002) but may have been attributable to changes in CDI case diagnosis. Clinicians indicated that the AOSs were easy to use overall and that they helped them select the appropriate antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing AOS into the EMR was associated with a statistically significant reduction in SAAR, antibiotic DOT per 1,000 PD, selected antibiotic orders, and CDI cases.

Lenacapavir: A novel injectable HIV-1 capsid inhibitor.

Patients living with multidrug-resistant (MDR) HIV have limited antiretroviral regimen options that provide durable viral suppression. Lenacapavir is a novel first-in-class inhibitor of HIV-1 capsid function with efficacy at various stages of the viral life cycle, and it is indicated for the treatment of MDR HIV-1 infection in combination with optimized background antiretroviral therapy. The favourable pharmacokinetic profile supports an every sixth month dosing interval of subcutaneous lenacapavir after an initial oral loading dose, which may advocate for continued adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) through the reduction of daily pill burden. The role of lenacapavir in promoting virologic suppression has been studied in patients with MDR HIV-1 on failing ART at baseline. Lenacapavir was well tolerated in clinical trials with the most common adverse effects including mild to moderate injection site reactions, gastrointestinal symptoms, and headache. Substitutions on the capsid molecule may confer resistance to lenacapavir by changing the binding potential. Cross-resistance to other antiretrovirals has not been observed. The unique mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, and safety and efficacy of lenacapavir support its use for the management of MDR HIV-1 infection. Current studies are ongoing to evaluate the potential use of subcutaneous lenacapavir for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Future studies will confirm the long-term clinical safety, efficacy, and resistance data for lenacapavir.

Methenamine for urinary tract infection prophylaxis: A systematic review.

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) commonly affect many patient populations. Recurrent UTIs (rUTIs) can be particularly problematic and lead to potential hospitalizations, multiple antibiotic courses, and have a potential negative impact on quality of life. To prevent UTIs, antibiotics are frequently used for prophylaxis; however, antibiotic prophylaxis has notable untoward consequences including but not limited to potential adverse effects and development of antibiotic resistance. Methenamine, an antiseptic agent initially available in 1967, has re-emerged as a potential option for UTI prophylaxis in various populations, including older adults and renal transplant recipients. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of methenamine for UTI prophylaxis. A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance was performed. A PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library search was conducted to identify relevant English-language studies evaluating methenamine for UTI prophylaxis including randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, and meta-analyses through June 2023. Articles were excluded if the studies did not primarily describe or evaluate methenamine for UTI prophylaxis, were commentaries/viewpoints articles, point prevalence studies, review articles, studies that evaluated methenamine used with another agent, and any duplicate publications from searched databases. A total of 11 articles were identified for inclusion. This systematic review suggests methenamine generally appears to be an effective and well-tolerated antibiotic-sparing option for UTI prophylaxis. Furthermore, the pharmacology, dosage and formulation, warnings, precautions, and safety considerations of methenamine that provide potential clinical considerations regarding its use for UTI prophylaxis are described. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical utility of methenamine for UTI prophylaxis.

Daptomycin Plus Oxacillin for Persistent Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

BACKGROUND: The preferred antibiotic salvage regimen for persistent methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MSSAB) is unclear. Ertapenem with cefazolin or an antistaphylococcal penicillin has been primarily described, but identifying alternative carbapenem-sparing options may support antibiotic stewardship efforts and decrease the risk of antibiotic-associated Clostridioides difficile infection. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of daptomycin plus oxacillin (D/O) for persistent MSSAB. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort of patients with persistent MSSAB who received D/O between January 1, 2014, and January 1, 2023. Adult patients were included if they had blood cultures positive for MSSA ≥72 hours and received D/O combination for ≥48 hours. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, incarcerated, or received another antibiotic considered to have excellent activity against MSSA. The primary outcome was time to MSSA bacteremia clearance post-daptomycin initiation. Secondary outcomes included microbiological cure, hospital length of stay, 90-day all-cause mortality, MSSA bacteremia-related mortality, 90-day readmission for MSSAB, and incidence of antibiotic-associated adverse effects. Time to MSSAB clearance post-D/O initiation was plotted using Kaplan-Meier estimation. RESULTS: Seven unique patient encounters were identified including 4 with endocarditis. Despite a median MSSA bacteremia duration of 7.8 days, median clearance was 2 days post-daptomycin initiation. All achieved microbiological cure, and no adverse effects were reported. Ninety-day all-cause mortality, MSSAB-related mortality, and 90-day readmission for MSSAB occurred in 28.6%, 14.3%, and 14.3% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: D/O was an effective, well-tolerated salvage regimen in this cohort and may represent a carbapenem-sparing option for persistent MSSAB.

Impact of a Pharmacist-Conducted Preoperative Beta-Lactam Allergy Assessment on Perioperative Cefazolin Prescribing.

Background: Cefazolin is guideline recommended for perioperative prophylaxis in orthopedic surgery. Despite its unique R1 side chain, cefazolin is often avoided in patients with beta-lactam allergy with concern for cross reactivity. Objectives: The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who received cefazolin perioperatively. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of patients with a beta-lactam allergy clarified following the telephone interview and clinical outcomes including acute kidney injury, surgical site infection, Clostridioides difficile infection, and re-admission at 30 and 90 days. Methods: This single-center, quasi-experimental study evaluated a pilot program in which a pharmacist phoned patients > 18 years of age with a scheduled orthopedic surgery and a documented beta-lactam allergy to assess their allergy preoperatively. Recommendations to use cefazolin were based on an algorithm. Patients were divided into pre- and post-intervention cohorts. Results: A total of 832 patients were screened for inclusion with 135 and 66 patients included in the pre- and post-intervention cohorts. No significant difference was identified in the primary outcome. In the post-intervention cohort, 62% had a beta-lactam reaction updated in the electronic medical record. Those with a beta-lactam allergy delabeled or made less severe were numerically more likely to receive cefazolin than those with an unchanged reaction or a reaction made more severe (95.2% vs 68% vs 65%). There were no differences in clinical outcomes between groups. Conclusion: A pharmacist-conducted preoperative beta-lactam allergy interview in adult patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery improved beta-lactam allergy documentation but, did not result in increased utilization of cefazolin.

Real-world evaluation of linezolid-associated serotonin toxicity with and without concurrent serotonergic agents.

BACKGROUND: The risk of linezolid-associated serotonin toxicity remains unclear. This study sought to evaluate the incidence of serotonin toxicity among hospitalized patients who received linezolid with or without concurrent serotonergic agents (SAs). Secondary outcomes were to assess the dose, agent selection and number of SAs. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients aged ≥18 years who received at least one dose of linezolid with or without SAs between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2021 was performed. Patients were excluded if they were aged <18 years, had linezolid ordered but not administered, were pregnant or were incarcerated. Up to five concurrent SAs were assessed, and dose category was classed as low, moderate or high (dose <33%, 33-66% or >66% of maximum daily dose, respectively). Serotonin toxicity was identified by searching patients' electronic medical records. If identified, the Sternbach criteria and Hunter criteria were applied. RESULTS: Of 2022 patients screened, 1743 were included in this study. Mean age, weight and linezolid duration were 58.5 years, 90.7 kg and 3.8 days, respectively. Approximately 67% (1168/1743) of patients received linezolid with at least one SA, and several patients received multiple SAs. Most patients (53.8%; 616/1144) received moderate- and/or high-dose SAs. Only two patients (0.11%) were identified as possible cases of serotonin toxicity based on the electronic medical record search. However, the incidence of serotonin toxicity was 0.06% (1/1743) based on the Sternbach criteria and 0% (0/1743) based on the Hunter criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Serotonin toxicity among hospitalized patients who received linezolid with or without SAs was exceedingly rare, even among those who received multiple and high-dose SAs.

Single-Dose Antibiotic Prophylaxis with Ertapenem Increases Compliance with Recommendations for Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Retrospective, Single-Center Analysis.

Background: Compliance with guideline recommendations for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) in colorectal surgery, particularly redosing, has been suboptimal at many institutions including ours. This study aimed to evaluate if single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis with ertapenem improves compliance with guideline recommendations for SAP versus multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery. Methods: A retrospective, cohort study of the use of ertapenem compared with standard of care antibiotic agents was performed in adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery at an academic medical center between January 2020 and February 2022. The primary outcome was compliance with guideline-recommended SAP for colorectal surgery. The secondary outcome was surgical site infections (SSIs) within 30 days after surgery. Results: A total of 135 patients were included in this study. Fifty-eight patients received single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis with ertapenem and 77 patients received multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis. Cefazolin plus metronidazole was the most common multiple-dose regimen (65 of 77). Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis with ertapenem increased overall SAP compliance (96.6% vs. 64.9%; p < 0.001) as well as compliance with antibiotic administration within the recommended time period before incision (96.6% vs. 84.4%; p = 0.022), compliance with intra-operative antibiotic redosing when warranted (100% vs. 83.1%; p < 0.001), and compliance with guideline-recommended dosing (100% vs. 92.2%; p = 0.037). Surgical site infection rates were not statistically different between the groups (12.1% vs. 19.4%; p = 0.248). Conclusions: Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis with ertapenem increased compliance with guideline-recommended SAP for elective colorectal surgeries. No statistically significant difference was observed in SSI rates regardless of the antibiotic regimen used.

Does a Positive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Screen Predict the Risk for MRSA Skin and Soft Tissue Infection?

BACKGROUND: Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are often caused by gram-positive bacteria that colonize the skin. Given the overuse of antibiotics, SSTIs are increasingly caused by resistant bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Guidance on the utility of MRSA nasal screening for MRSA SSTI is limited. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether MRSA nasal screening predicts the risk of MRSA SSTIs. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult patients with an SSTI diagnosis that had MRSA nasal screening and wound cultures obtained within 48 hours of starting antibiotics. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated using VassarStats. Pretest and posttest probabilities were estimated with Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: A total of 884 patient encounters were reviewed between December 1, 2018, and October 31, 2021, and 300 patient encounters were included. The prevalence of MRSA SSTI was 18.3%. The MRSA nasal colonization had a sensitivity of 63.6%, specificity of 93.9%, positive predictive value of 70.0% (95% CI = 55.2%-81.7%), negative predictive value of 92.0% (95% CI = 87.7%-94.9%), positive likelihood ratio of 10.39 (95% CI = 6.12-17.65), negative likelihood ratio of 0.39 (95% CI = 0.27-0.55), positive posttest probability of 70.0%, and negative posttest probability of 8.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Given the high positive likelihood ratio, a positive MRSA nasal screen was associated with a large increase in the probability of MRSA SSTI at our institution, and a negative MRSA nasal screen was associated with a small but potentially significant decrease in the probability of MRSA SSTI.

Nephrotoxicity of Vancomycin in Combination With Beta-Lactam Agents: Ceftolozane-Tazobactam vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin (VAN)-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) is increased when VAN is combined with certain beta-lactams (BLs) such as piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) but has not been evaluated with ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T). Our aim was to investigate the AKI incidence of VAN in combination with C/T (VAN/C/T) compared with VAN in combination to TZP (VAN-TZP). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, observational, comparative study across the United States. The primary analysis was a composite outcome of AKI and risk, injury, failure, loss, end stage renal disease; Acute Kidney Injury Network; or VAN-induced nephrotoxicity according to the consensus guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to adjust for confounding variables and stratified Kaplan-Meir analysis to assess the time to nephrotoxicity between the 2 groups. RESULTS: We included VAN/C/T (n = 90) and VAN-TZP (n = 284) at an enrollment ratio of 3:1. The primary outcome occurred in 12.2% vs 25.0% in the VAN-C/T and VAN-TZP groups, respectively (P = .011). After adjusting for confounding variables, VAN-TZP was associated with increased odds of AKI compared with VAN-C/T; with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.308 (95% confidence interval, 1.560-6.993). Results of the stratified Kaplan-Meir analysis with log-rank time-to-nephrotoxicity analysis indicate that time to AKI was significantly shorter among patients who received VAN-TZP (P = .004). Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that TZP was consistent with the primary analysis (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, our results suggest that the AKI is not likely to be related to tazobactam but rather to piperacillin, which is a component in VAN-TZP but not in VAN-C/T.

Accuracy of 4 Free Online Dosing Calculators in Predicting the Vancomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Calculated Using a 2-Point Pharmacokinetic Approach.

BACKGROUND: Free online adaptive vancomycin dosing calculators are available to estimate area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), but the accuracy of predicting vancomycin AUC using these calculators compared with using a 2-point pharmacokinetic approach has not been described. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of calculator-predicted AUC (cpAUC) using 4 free online calculators compared with reference AUC (rAUC), and to assess pharmacists' impressions of the ease of use. METHODS: Vancomycin AUC was estimated using (1) the reference method via the Sawchuk-Zaske method and linear-logarithmic trapezoidal rule using 2 steady-state postdistributional vancomycin serum concentrations and (2) 4 free online vancomycin dosing calculators including ClinCalc, VancoPK, TDMx, and DMC. Accuracy was calculated by dividing cpAUC by rAUC. Ease of cpAUC estimation was determined by using a 10-point Likert scale. RESULTS: All 4 calculators had a median cpAUC accuracy ranging from 89% to 110%. Concordance between cpAUC and rAUC determinations of AUC <400 and > 600 mg·h/L occurred 63.3% to 71.4% and 74.5% to 78.6% of the time, respectively. Pharmacist investigators agreed that ClinCalc and VancoPK calculators were easiest to use. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: cpAUC accuracy varied among the 4 calculators, but all consistently identified patients with an rAUC <400 mg·h/L and an rAUC > 600 mg·h/L at comparable frequencies. All 4 calculators demonstrated some imprecision based on their wide 95% CIs and potential inaccuracies in predicting an rAUC <400 mg·h/L or an rAUC > 600 mg·h/L. Clin Calc and VancoPK were most user friendly based on our pharmacists' impressions.

Vancomycin plus ceftaroline for persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The preferred antibiotic salvage regimen for persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSAB) is unclear. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vancomycin plus ceftaroline for persistent MRSAB. The primary outcome was time to MRSAB clearance post-ceftaroline initiation. Secondary outcomes included microbiological cure, hospital length of stay, 90-day readmission for MRSAB, 90-day all-cause mortality, MRSAB-related mortality, and incidence of antibiotic-associated adverse effects. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective cohort study between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021. SETTING: State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, a 748-bed tertiary care, academic medical center in Syracuse, NY. PATIENTS: Adult patients were included if they had blood cultures positive for MRSA ≥72 h, received vancomycin monotherapy initially, and received vancomycin plus ceftaroline for ≥24 h. Patients were excluded if they received other anti-MRSA antibiotics, were pregnant, or were incarcerated. Of the 178 patients identified, 30 unique patients were evaluated. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were medically complex with a median Pitt bacteremia score of 3, 63.3% (19/30) were admitted to the intensive care unit, and 66.7% (20/30) had infective endocarditis. Vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury was observed in 10% (3/30) of patients, which resulted in dose adjustments. No patients experienced ceftaroline-associated neutropenia or Clostridioides difficile infection, but 6.7% (2/30) developed a rash attributed to ceftaroline. Median time to MRSAB clearance post-ceftaroline initiation was 2.6 days. Microbiologic cure occurred in nearly all patients 96.7% (29/30). Median hospital length of stay was 19.5 days, and 6.7% (2/30) of patients had 90-day readmission for MRSAB. 90-day all-cause mortality and MRSAB-related mortality occurred in 26.7% (8/30) and 13.3% (4/30) of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin plus ceftaroline may represent an effective and well-tolerated salvage regimen option for persistent MRSAB.

Pharmacy students' knowledge and confidence of COVID-19 following an interactive didactic class.

Background: COVID-19 education for the pharmacy workforce is important to ensure pharmacists are optimizing patient care for the prevention and management of COVID-19. However, there are currently no reports to our knowledge of education and training experiences for COVID-19 prevention and management in the Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) curricula. Objective: To evaluate pharmacy students' knowledge and confidence regarding COVID-19 prevention and management before and after an interactive didactic class (IDC). Methods: A multicenter, quasi-experimental, cross-sectional survey study was performed among pharmacy students before and after IDC on COVID-19 at two schools of pharmacy. The IDC on COVID-19 consisted of student-led presentations on a COVID-19 drug, an infectious disease pharmacist faculty-led interactive lecture on COVID-19 prevention and management, and clinical case vignettes to assess COVID-19 management strategies. An anonymous, voluntary, electronic survey was distributed to students (n = 85) before and after. The pre- and postintervention survey contained 10 COVID-19 knowledge-based questions and multi-step, 5-point Likert scale statements related to COVID-19 prevention and management confidence. The postintervention survey also evaluated students' perceptions of the COVID-19 IDC. Descriptive statistics were performed, and Student t test was used to compare pre- and postintervention responses. Results: About 61 surveys were completed resulting in a response rate of 72%. COVID-19 knowledge scores (mean ± SD) increased overall following the IDC (5.9 ± 1.31 vs 8.6 ± 1.29). Pharmacy students' COVID-19 confidence scores (mean ± SD) also improved following the IDC (2.66 ± 0.75 vs 4.03 ± 0.53). Students performed well on the COVID-19 clinical case vignettes with a mean ± SD score of 22.41 ± 0.46 out of 25. Pharmacy students' perceptions of the IDC on COVID-19 were also positive overall. Conclusion: Pharmacy students' knowledge and confidence of COVID-19 prevention and management improved following an IDC. This may be an effective strategy to provide COVID-19 education during the PharmD curricula.

Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of cefiderocol during successful treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii meningitis.

BACKGROUND: To date, no real-world data are available to describe cefiderocol use in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) meningitis. Furthermore, cefiderocol pharmacokinetic (PK) data to support CNS penetration in human subjects are limited. These gaps pose a significant concern for clinicians who are faced with treating such infections when considering cefiderocol use. OBJECTIVES: To describe cefiderocol CSF and plasma PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) data from two different dosing regimens [2 g IV q6h (regimen 1) and 2 g IV q8h (regimen 2)] during treatment of CRAB meningitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 61-year-old woman with CRAB meningitis was treated with cefiderocol and intraventricular gentamicin. Steady-state plasma and CSF cefiderocol concentrations were evaluated on Day 19 (regimen 1) and Day 24 (regimen 2) during the cefiderocol treatment course. RESULTS: CSF AUC was 146.49 and 118.28 mg·h/L, as determined by the linear-log trapezoidal method for regimens 1 and 2, respectively. Penetration into CSF estimated as the AUCCSF/AUCfree plasma ratio was 68% and 60% for regimens 1 and 2, respectively. Estimated free plasma and CSF concentrations exceeded the MIC of the isolate for 100% of the dosing interval. Microbiological and clinical cure were achieved, and no cefiderocol-associated adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Cefiderocol, when given as 2 g q8h and 2 g q6h, attained CSF concentrations that exceeded the organism-specific MIC and the CLSI susceptible breakpoint (≤4 mg/L) for 100% of the dosing interval.

Evaluation of ß-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring among US health systems with postgraduate year 2 infectious diseases pharmacy residency programs.

PURPOSE: While some guidelines recognize the need for ß-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), there is still a paucity of data regarding the prevalence of and barriers to performing ß-lactam TDM in the United States. We sought to estimate the prevalence of ß-lactam TDM, describe monitoring practices, and identify actual and perceived barriers to implementation among health systems in the US. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional, 40-item electronic survey was distributed to all postgraduate year 2 (PGY2) infectious diseases (ID) pharmacy residency program directors (RPDs) listed in the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists pharmacy residency directory. The primary outcome was the percentage of institutions with established ß-lactam TDM. Secondary outcomes included assessing ß-lactam TDM methods and identifying potential barriers to implementation. RESULTS: The survey was distributed to 126 PGY2 ID RPDs, with a response rate of 31.7% (40 of 126). Only 8% of respondents (3 of 39) performed ß-lactam TDM. Patient populations, therapeutic targets, and frequency and timing of obtaining repeat ß-lactam concentration measurements varied among institutions. The greatest barrier to implementation was lack of access to testing with a rapid turnaround time. Institutions were unlikely to implement ß-lactam TDM within the next year but were significantly more inclined to do so within 5 years (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ß-lactam TDM was infrequently performed at the surveyed US health systems. Lack of access to serum concentration testing with rapid turnaround and lack of US-specific guidelines appear to be considerable barriers to implementing ß-lactam TDM. Among institutions that have implemented ß-lactam TDM, there is considerable variation in monitoring approaches.