RESUMO
Background: Scaphocapitate arthrodesis (SCA) is a described technique for chronic wrist pathology such as Kienbock disease and carpal instability. The technique aims to preserve motion, while maintaining carpal height, preserving the radioscaphoid articulation, and offloading the lunate. Limited case series evaluate the outcomes of this previously described technique. We aim to determine if the collective, updated literature on outcomes of SCA support its continued application by the wrist surgeon. Furthermore, we investigated if any technical variations offer an advantage in improving patient-reported outcomes after SCA. Methods: A literature search was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Articles selected for critical review were examined for patient demographic data, functional outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and complications. A qualitative analysis was then performed to synthesize the available date. Results: A total of 18 unique articles published between 1991 and 2022 were identified, representing a total of 285 individual cases of SCA. Nonunion rate ranged 0%-22%. Preoperative visual analog scale pain scores ranged from 3.2 to 10, whereas postoperative visual analog scale pain scores ranged from 0 to 4. Patient-reported outcomes are reported by validated instruments, including the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, QuickDASH, Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation, and Mayo Wrist Score. Conclusions: SCA is a viable treatment option for patients with Kienbock disease. SCA offers reliable improvements in patient pain, grip strength, and patient-reported outcomes.
RESUMO
Background: The paucity of pain management options in resource-limited settings is a significant and systemically unaddressed problem. To improve global health equity, it is important to bridge this gap in care without introducing the peril of opioid dependence. We present a proof-of-concept case series wherein virtual reality (VR) was successfully used to manage discomfort in patients undergoing burn dressing changes in sub-Saharan Africa. Methods: Nine patients presenting with burn injuries of variable severity underwent routine stabilization and dressing as part of standard-of-care treatment. During dressing changes, a VR intervention consisting of the Dream Flight interactive game displayed on an Oculus Quest 2 headset was offered to patients. Patient mood scores were collected before VR initiation and at the conclusion of the dressing change by a translator using the Youth Feelings Scale. Results: There were no adverse events associated with use of the VR headset and no patients elected to terminate the VR during their procedure. Patients and physicians subjectively reported satisfaction with the device's utility in the procedure. Before VR initiation, the 95% confidence interval for patient mood score was 4.89â ±â 1.725. After VR initiation, the 95% confidence interval for patient mood score was 8.78â ±â 1.40. Conclusions: Our results of this proof-of-concept case series to suggest both feasibility of use and positive influence on patient discomfort and periprocedural satisfaction. We propose that VR should be explored as an analgesic alternative and/or adjunct to narcotics in resource-limited countries, particularly for high-pain, low-duration procedures.
RESUMO
Scaphoid nonunion occurs in 10%-15% of scaphoid fractures, potentially resulting in scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse. Distal scaphoid excision without allograft interposition is a known treatment, but can result in loss of carpal height and pain. This report describes the application of human acellular dermal matrix as an interposition graft after distal scaphoid excision for stage I scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse. Postoperatively, the patient initiated early range of motion and returned to full activity at 6 weeks. He demonstrated resolution of his pain 6 years later.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Physician and surgeon involvement in industry has received considerable attention in recent decades. In this study, we outline the perspective of the general US population regarding (1) disclosure, (2) ownership, and (3) compensation between physicians/surgeons and industry. We hypothesize that the general population would be largely supportive of the physician/surgeon-industry relationship. METHODS: An online, survey-based, descriptive study was conducted through a crowdsourcing platform, Amazon Mechanical Turk. Survey respondents were presented with a seven-item questionnaire inquiring about the physician/surgeon and industry relationship. An "attention check" question was included; those who failed this question were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the data and a McNemar chi-squared test for paired, dichotomous data. RESULTS: A total of 993 respondents were included. Survey responses are summarized in Table 1. 70.6% of respondents stated that it was "important" or "extremely important" to disclose that the patient be informed whether implants used in surgery had been developed by the operating surgeon. 71.1% of respondents reported that it was "important" or "extremely important" to disclose partial ownership within industry. Seventy-one percent of respondents stated it was "important" or "extremely important" to disclose royalty payments pertaining to surgical implants. 95.6% of respondents suggested that it was acceptable for surgeons to accept free airfare and lodging, and 95.2% of respondents stated that it was acceptable for the surgeon to be compensated for time away from practice to learn about new equipment. DISCUSSION: In our survey of 993 respondents, we found that relationships with industry are considered acceptable if appropriate disclosure is given to patients. We also found that although respondents suggested that physicians and surgeons may be influenced by a free meal, compensation for trips to try new equipment and time spent away from practice is considered appropriate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c, Ecological studies.
Assuntos
Revelação , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Masculino , Feminino , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Adulto , Propriedade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ortopedia , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos , Conflito de Interesses , Indústrias , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is a mainstay of wrist arthritis treatment; however, it is traditionally contraindicated in patients with an affected capitate. The use of soft tissue interposition grafts to resurface the radiocapitate articulation has been previously described to allow for PRC in these patients. In the current study, we reviewed our outcomes using knee meniscus allograft interposition to resurface the radiocapitate articulation in patients who would have otherwise been contraindicated for PRC. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients who underwent PRC with or without meniscus interposition arthroplasty was performed from 2011 to 2022. Patient demographics (age, sex, occupation, hand dominance, etc) were collected. Improvement in pain was the primary outcome. Wrist range of motion and reconstructive failure requiring fusion were the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: We identified a total of 83 patients and 43 met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen patients (35%) underwent PRC with meniscus interposition arthroplasty, and 28 patients (65%) underwent PRC alone. Patients with and without meniscus interposition arthroplasty had documented improvement in pain postoperatively (93% vs 95%, P > .05) at a median follow-up time of 11 (range, 3-38 months) and 9 months (range, 3-64 months), respectively. Postoperative wrist range of motion (flexion: +9 vs -4, P > .05, extension: +12 vs -4, P = .10) trended toward increase in patients undergoing meniscus interposition arthroplasty compared with PRC alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our short- to mid-term outcomes in patients with end-stage wrist arthritis affecting the capitate who undergo PRC and meniscus interposition arthroplasty are comparable with those receiving PRC alone.
RESUMO
Radiocarpal fracture translocations are uncommon injuries without well-defined treatment. This case report presents a patient with this injury that was treated with repair of the volar and dorsal structures and dynamic external fixation. Eight weeks after the procedure, the external fixation device was unlocked to allow wrist flexion and extension only. Twelve weeks after the procedure, the external fixation device was removed completely to allow full wrist range of motion. Six months after surgery, the patient had no reported pain or dysfunction, and no recurrence of radiocarpal translation. Treatment with repair of both volar and dorsal structures and dynamic external fixation was effective for this historically challenging injury to manage.
RESUMO
Background: Knowing the questions and concerns that patients have regarding treatment options for lateral epicondylitis may allow for shared-decision making and potentially superior patient outcomes and satisfaction. In the present study, we aimed to further delineate patient preferences with treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Methods: An online, survey-based, descriptive study was conducted through Amazon Mechanical Turk. Survey participants were presented with a clinical scenario regarding lateral epicondylitis and asked four questions regarding treatment preferences for nonoperative treatment, whether they would consider platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection, and whether they would consider surgical intervention for recalcitrant symptoms. A Likert scale was used for responses. McNemar chi-square test was used for paired nominal data for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 238 survey responses were included. A majority (63%) of respondents elected to proceed with formal physical therapy. When given additional information regarding corticosteroid injections, 50.8% of respondents reported preferring physical therapy. There were no differences between groups for questions 1 and 2 (P = 0.90). Of the respondents, 75.2% were "likely" or "extremely likely" to consider PRP injection. When asked about surgical intervention, 74.8% of respondents were "likely" or "extremely likely" to proceed with continued symptoms. Conclusions: It is important to include patient preferences in treatment discussions of lateral epicondylitis. Survey respondents preferred formal physical therapy for initial treatment. A surprising majority of respondents were likely to consider a PRP injection. With prolonged symptoms, respondents were interested in discussions of surgical intervention and thus, it should continue to be offered to patients with recalcitrant symptoms.
RESUMO
Background: Medial ulnar collateral ligament (mUCL) injury can cause significant pain and alter throwing mechanics. Common autograft options for mUCL reconstruction (UCLR) include the palmaris longus (PL) and hamstring tendons. Allograft use may reduce donor site morbidity and decrease function related to PL autografts. Purpose: To compare varus stability and load to failure between a novel allograft for UCLR-knee medial collateral ligament (kMCL)-and a PL autograft in human donor elbow specimens. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 24 fresh-frozen human elbows were dissected to expose the mUCL. Medial elbow stability was tested with the mUCL intact (native), deficient, and reconstructed utilizing the humeral single-docking technique with either a (1) kMCL allograft (n = 12) or (2) a PL autograft (n = 12). A 3-N·m valgus torque was applied to the elbow, and valgus rotation of the ulna was recorded via motion tracking cameras. The elbow was cycled through a full range of motion 5 times. After kinematic testing, specimens were loaded to failure at 70° of elbow flexion, and failure modes were recorded. Results: The mUCL-deficient elbows demonstrated significantly greater valgus rotation compared with the intact and reconstructed elbows at every flexion angle tested (10°-120°) (P <.001). Both kMCL- and PL-reconstructed elbows exhibited significantly higher mean valgus rotation compared with the intact state between 10° and 40° of flexion (P < .01). There were no significant differences in valgus rotation at any flexion angle between the kMCL and PL graft groups. When loaded to failure, elbows reconstructed with both kMCL and PL grafts failed at similar torque values (18.6 ± 4 and 18.1 ± 3.4 N·m, respectively; P = .765). Conclusion: Fresh-frozen and aseptically processed kMCL allografts demonstrated similar kinematic and failure properties to PL tendon autografts in UCL-reconstructed elbows, although neither graft fully restored kinematics between 10° and 40°. Clinical Relevance: Prepared kMCL ligament allografts may provide a viable graft material when reconstructing elbow ligaments while avoiding the potential complications related to PL autografts- including donor site morbidity.
RESUMO
Upper-extremity mucormycosis is a rare, life-threatening fungal infection mainly affecting immunocompromised patients. We report a case of a 30-year-old woman with acute myelogenous leukemia who developed this infection during her hospital stay. The culprit was Mucorales, a subgroup of Zygomycetes species known for fast-progressing, highly lethal infections. She presented with fever, chills, and a lesion on her left forearm that worsened despite initial broad-spectrum antibiotics. A punch biopsy confirmed the diagnosis, leading to antifungal therapy with isavuconazonium sulfate and later amphotericin B, combined with surgery. Timely intervention is critical because delayed treatment can result in severe complications and death. Early suspicion, histology, microscopy, and fungal cultures are vital for accurate diagnosis. Treatment primarily involves amphotericin B, whereas adjunctive therapies such as topical amphotericin B and hyperbaric oxygen show promise. This case underscores the importance of prompt medical and surgical action, enhancing early detection of mucormycosis in immunocompromised patients.
RESUMO
We present a novel treatment for post-traumatic arthritis of the hand and fingers using joint resurfacing with cadaveric meniscus. A 20-year-old man presented to the clinic with chronic pain and stiffness after an intra-articular fifth metacarpal fracture. Meniscus allograft, which has been used successfully in treatments for thumb carpometacarpal and radiocarpal degenerative osteoarthritis, was used to reconstruct the joint surface with complete resolution of stiffness and pain.
RESUMO
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common nerve compression syndrome in the upper extremity and is one of the most common problems treated by hand surgeons. Despite its ubiquity-or perhaps because of it-there is a lack of unanimity regarding how best to treat CTS and what the options for treatment are. This study aimed to explore what patients find important when deciding on treatment of CTS in an effort to improve the physician-patient shared decision-making process. Methods: An online crowdsourcing platform was used to recruit participants for this study. Study participants were first led through a clinical scenario in which the symptoms of CTS were explained. They were then asked a series of questions regarding what was important to them when deciding upon treatment. A Likert scale was used for responses. Results: In total, 268 participant responses were included in the study. A majority of patients responded that all surveyed factors were either very important or important when considering treatment. The risk of surgery was most important, whereas postoperative pain was least important. The risk of surgery was significantly more important to patients than postoperative pain and time out of work. The cost of surgery was significantly more important to patients than postoperative pain. Conclusions: Given the lack of consensus regarding an algorithm for the treatment of CTS, the patient's preference is increasingly important when formulating a treatment plan. The results of this study may better help physicians frame the discussion of treatment options for CTS with their patients.
RESUMO
Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) is frequently performed among injured overhead-throwing athletes. One of the most common graft choices when performing a UCLR is the ipsilateral palmaris longus tendon (PL). The purpose of this study was to investigate the material properties of aseptically processed cadaveric knee collateral ligaments (kMCL) as a potential graft source for UCLR and compare them to the gold standard PL autograft. Each PL and kMCL cadaveric sample was subjected to cyclic preconditioning, stress relaxation, and load-to-failure testing, and the mechanical properties were recorded. PL samples exhibited a greater average decrease in stress compared to the kMCL samples during the stress-relaxation test (p < 0.0001). PL samples also demonstrated a greater average Young's modulus in the linear region of the stress-strain curve compared to the kMCL samples (p < 0.01). The average yield strain and maximum strain of kMCL samples were significantly greater than the PL, p = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively. Both graft materials had comparable maximum toughness and demonstrated a similar ability to deform plastically without rupture. The clinical significance of our result is that prepared knee medial collateral ligament allografts may provide a viable graft material for use in the reconstruction of elbow ligaments.
Assuntos
Articulação do Cotovelo , Ligamento Colateral Médio do Joelho , Reconstrução do Ligamento Colateral Ulnar , Humanos , Cotovelo/cirurgia , Músculo Esquelético/cirurgia , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , CadáverRESUMO
The radiographic staging of arthritic changes in the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is known to have poor correlation with pain level. This may be due to the limited ability of radiographs to evaluate degenerative changes. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between radiographic versus arthroscopic findings of thumb CMC and scaphotrapeziotrapezoidal (STT) joint arthritis. Methods: Twenty patients with symptomatic thumb CMC arthritis underwent arthroscopy of thumb CMC and STT joints with concomitant synovectomy or arthroplasty depending on the degree of articular degeneration found. All patients had preoperative radiographs of the thumb CMC and STT joints. Radiographic degeneration was graded based on the Eaton-Glickel classification. Intraoperative arthroscopic images were reviewed and graded based on the Brown grading system. Results: At the thumb CMC joint, five patients had discordant radiographic and arthroscopic findings of arthritis. At the STT joint, one patient had discordant radiographic and arthroscopic findings of arthritis. Conclusions: In comparing the two staging systems, we found a small subset of patients that demonstrated significant discrepancies. Clinical evaluation remains essential, and patients should be informed that radiographs may underestimate the actual severity of arthritis.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Advanced thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthritis is widely treated with trapeziectomy. To obviate the need for autologous tissue, maintain thumb length, and reduce the risk of scaphoid impingement, the senior author developed an interposition arthroplasty technique using meniscal allograft. We hypothesize that the use of meniscus improves outcomes and subsequent functionality compared with trapeziectomy alone. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with Eaton stage III-IV CMC osteoarthritis underwent arthroplasty with meniscal allograft, and 7 patients underwent trapeziectomy alone. Preoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), pain, grip and pinch strength, and range of motion scores were compared with postoperative scores at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 17 women and 6 men, and the control group consisted of 5 women and 2 men. The mean age was similar at 61.4 (48-72) years and 65.7 (56-78) years for the study and control groups, respectively. The DASH scores dropped by 61.8% in the study group compared with 38.8% in the control group (<0.01), whereas pain decreased 86.0% and 69.8%, respectively (P < .01). Strength and range of motion improvement was similar between the groups. Subsidence of the joint space was 1% in the study group compared with 18.4% in the control group. There were no surgical complications in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Joint resurfacing with meniscal allograft represents a viable joint salvage option in severe cases of CMC arthritis. Early results suggest that, compared with trapeziectomy alone, the approach results in greater reduction in subjective pain and disability scores, similar improvement in strength measures and range of motion, and less subsidence.
Assuntos
Menisco , Osteoartrite , Trapézio , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Trapézio/cirurgia , Artroplastia/métodos , Osteoartrite/cirurgia , Menisco/cirurgia , AloenxertosRESUMO
Implant-based breast reconstruction with immediate tissue expander placement is the predominant form of breast reconstruction in the United States. Closed-suction drains are frequently employed to minimize seroma accumulation, although they carry the risk of serving as a port of entry for bacteria, posing a concern in the presence of implanted materials such as breast implants or acellular dermal matrix. Introduction of a dual-port tissue expander designed to facilitate the collection and removal of seroma fluid provides a new way of performing breast reconstruction without external drains. Methods: We conducted a pilot study using the AlloX2 dual-port expander on five consecutive patients to demonstrate feasibility of this approach at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center by the two senior authors (E.R. and D.K.). Results: Patients averaged seven clinic visits before they were ready for expander exchange, totaling a mean of 137.5 days. Patients averaged 1.9 clinic visits before output was less than 40cm3 (1.6 for right breasts and 2.2 for left breasts), with two of the patients never reaching that output. There was one complication; a single patient had unilateral flap necrosis and implant exposure due to excessively large breasts and thin skin flaps, necessitating expander removal and latissimus flap reconstruction. The other four patients underwent successful implant reconstruction. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of breast reconstruction without external drains using a dual-port expander with built-in seroma reservoir. From these results, it is apparent that dual-port tissue expanders with built-in seroma reservoir offer a safe and effective way to perform breast reconstruction without drains in appropriately selected patients. A larger prospective cohort will be needed to definitively demonstrate lower infection and reconstructive failure rates.
RESUMO
The most common complaint after open surgical release for trigger finger is of pain and scarring at the surgical site. We hypothesized that use of a new nonpalmar endoscopic approach for release of the A1 pulley through an incision at the proximal digital crease would result in decreased scarring and faster recovery compared to those treated with standard open release. Methods: Patients with trigger finger were prospectively enrolled and treated with a nonpalmar endoscopic versus open surgical technique. Outcome measures included scar assessment based on the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) administered 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months postoperatively, time before return to work, occupational therapy visits, and overall satisfaction. Additional outcomes included pain medication use, operative time, and complication and recurrence rates. Results: POSAS scores were better in the endoscopic treatment group than in the open group at all time points with a statistically significant difference seen at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively. The endoscopic group returned to work sooner, required fewer occupational therapy visits, and had better overall satisfaction compared to the open group, but the differences were not statistically significant. Complication and recurrence rates did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: Patients treated for trigger finger with a nonpalmar endoscopic release through an incision at the proximal digital crease demonstrate significantly better scarring in the early postoperative period compared to patients treated with the open surgical approach. Treatment for trigger finger with this technique is as effective as the standard open technique.
RESUMO
Autologous fat grafting is a commonly used technique in plastic surgery that can also be applied broadly in hand surgery. We present a case series to demonstrate the diverse indications for fat grafting in hand surgery. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed cases of fat grafting in the upper extremity in 2020. Cases representing a unique application of fat grafting were identified. Patient data, including demographics, diagnoses, preoperative and postoperative assessments, complications, patient satisfaction, and surgical operative reports, were recorded. Results: Five patients representing distinct indications for autologous fat grafting in the upper extremity were identified. Indications included hand rejuvenation (20.0%), burn/scar management (20.0%), tenolysis (20.0%), revision nerve decompression (20.0%), and carpometacarpal joint arthritis (20.0%). Average patient age was 60.4 years (range, 42-71). Average volume of fat injected was 15.2 ml (range, 1-37 ml). No major complications were noted (0.0%). All patients expressed satisfaction with their overall result with good functional outcomes (100%). Conclusions: Autologous fat grafting can be applied broadly in hand surgery. Indications for fat grafting in hand surgery include hand rejuvenation, burn/scar management, tenolysis, revision nerve decompression, and thumb carpometacarpal arthritis. Hand surgeons can easily incorporate fat grafting into their daily practice. Current literature supports fat grafting as a viable technique in hand surgery with lower-level studies.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Osteochondral defects of the carpometacarpal (CMC), metacarpophalangeal (MCP), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints often necessitate arthrodesis or arthroplasty. Meniscal allograft has been used for large joint resurfacing, but its application to smaller joints is less well understood. We propose its use for hand joint resurfacing as an off-the-shelf alternative to address osteochondral defects and restore articular function. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with osteoarthritis of the CMC, MCP, or PIP joints underwent arthroplasty with meniscal allograft. Patient demographics and operative information were recorded. Preoperative Disability of the Shoulder, Arm, and Hand, Wong Baker pain, grip and pinch strength, and range of motion were compared to postoperative scores at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. RESULTS: Twenty-three women and 8 men, mean age 62.8 years, underwent 39 joint reconstructions, including CMC (n = 26), thumb MP (n = 2), thumb IP (n = 2), digit MP (n = 2), and digit PIP (n = 7). At 1 year, mean Disability of the Shoulder, Arm, and Hand scores decreased from 41.3 to 15.6 (P < 0.001) and pain scores from 6.9 to 1.0 (P < 0.001). Grip strength increased from 38.1 to 42.9 (P = 0.017) and radial and palmar abduction from 43.1 to 49.2 (P = 0.039) and 43.7 to 51.6 (P = 0.098), respectively. There were no complications related to the meniscus. CONCLUSIONS: Meniscal allograft represents an alternative to arthrodesis which obviates the need for a donor site and avoids many of the complications inherent to synthetic alternatives. Our early results demonstrate its successful use to reduce subjective pain and disability scores, improve objective strength measures, and maintain range of motion.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Anatomical characteristics that are incongruent with an individual's gender identity can cause significant gender dysphoria. Hands exhibit prominent dimorphic sexual features, but despite their visibility, there are limited studies examining gender affirming procedures for the hands. This review is intended to cover the anatomical features that define masculine and feminine hands, the surgical and non-surgical approaches for feminization and masculinization of the hand, and to adapt established aesthetic hand techniques for gender affirming care. METHODS: The authors performed a comprehensive database search of PubMed, Embase OVID and SCOPUS to identify articles on the characterization of masculine or feminine hands, hand treatments related to gender affirmation, and articles related to techniques for hand masculinization and feminization in the non-transgender population. RESULTS: From 656 possibly relevant articles, 42 met the inclusion criteria for the current literature search. There is currently no medical literature specifically exploring the surgical or non-surgical options for hand gender affirmation. The available techniques for gender affirming procedures discussed in this paper are appropriated from those more commonly used for hand rejuvenation. CONCLUSION: There is a dearth of literature addressing the options for transgender individuals seeking gender affirming procedures of the hand. Though established procedures used for hand rejuvenation may be utilized in gender affirming care, further study is required to determine relative salience of various hand features to gender dysphoria in transgender patients of various identities, as well as development of novel techniques to meet these needs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. .