Exosome Therapy for a Nonhealing Scalp Wound Following Chemoradiation and Surgical Therapy.

This case report describes the safety and utility of a noninvasive therapy, Purified Exosome Product (PEP), for poorly healing scalp wounds in the setting of prior chemoradiation and surgery. A man in his 60s with a history of high-grade angiosarcoma of the right temporoparietal scalp reconstruction had a 1-year history of 2 nonhealing scalp wounds after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation therapy, wide local excision, and latissimus dorsi free flap and split-thickness skin graft. The patient underwent débridement followed by 4 collagen (Bellafill)-PEP and 4 fibrin (Tisseel)-PEP applications during 7 months in 2022. Photographs of the area of exposed bone of the temporoparietal wound were measured and standardized by ImageJ open-source software. The frontal wound was not routinely measured and therefore was qualitatively assessed by reviewing photographs over time. The frontal wound completely healed, and the temporoparietal wound showed a 96% decrease in overall size. The patient had no adverse effects of treatment and continues to demonstrate ongoing healing. This case exhibits the safety and utility of topical PEP therapy for noninvasive treatment of poorly healing scalp wounds and offers the potential for an alternative treatment of patients who are poor candidates for additional surgical intervention.

Addressing positive multi-cancer early detection tests in head and neck Surgery: Experience with head and neck work up for high-risk referrals.

OBJECTIVES: Blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests are now commercially available. However, there are currently no consensus guidelines available for head and neck cancer (HNC) providers to direct work up or surveillance for patients with a positive MCED test. We seek to describe cases of patients with positive MCED tests suggesting HNC and provide insights for their evaluation. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients referred to Otolaryngology with an MCED result suggesting HNC. Patients enrolled in prospective MCED clinical trials were excluded. Cancer diagnoses were confirmed via frozen-section pathology. RESULTS: Five patients were included (mean age: 69.2 years, range 50-87; 4 male) with MCED-identified-high-risk for HNC or lymphoma. Only patient was symptomatic. After physical exam and follow-up head and neck imaging, circulating tumor HPV DNA testing, two patients were diagnosed with p16 + oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas and underwent appropriate therapy. A third patient had no evidence of head and neck cancer but was diagnosed with sarcoma of the thigh. The remaining two patients had no evidence of malignancy after in-depth workup. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, 2 of 5 patients referred to Otolaryngology with a positive MCED result were diagnosed with HPV + oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. We recommend that positive HNC MCED work up include thorough head and neck examination with flexible laryngoscopy and focused CT or MRI imaging. Given the potential for inaccurate MCED tissue of origin classification, PET/CT may be useful in specific situations. For a patient with no cancer identified, development of clear guidelines is warranted.