Evaluation of the right heart using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac devices.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) necessitate comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) examinations. The aim of this study was to provide data on CMR image quality and feasibility of functional assessment of the right heart in patients with CIED depending on the device type and imaging sequence used. METHODS: 120 CIED carriers (Insertable cardiac monitoring system, n = 13; implantable loop-recorder, n = 22; pacemaker, n = 30; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), n = 43; and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D), n = 12) underwent clinically indicated CMR imaging using a 1.5 T. CMR protocols consisted of cine imaging and myocardial tissue characterization including T1-and T2-weighted blackblood imaging and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging. Image quality was evaluated with regard to device-related imaging artifacts per right-ventricular (RV) segment. RESULTS: RV segmental evaluability was influenced by the device type and CMR imaging sequence: Cine steady-state-free-precision (SSFP) imaging was found to be non-diagnostic in patients with ICD/CRT-D and implantable loop recorders; a significant improvement of image quality was achieved when using cine turbo-field-echo (TFE) sequences with a further improvement on post-contrast TFE imaging. LGE scans were artifact-free in at least 91% of RV segments with best results in patients with a pacemaker or an insertable cardiac monitoring system. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CIED, artifact-free CMR imaging of the right ventricle was performed in the majority of patients and resulted in highly reproducible evaluability of RV functional parameters. This finding is of particular importance for the diagnosis and follow-up of right-ventricular diseases.

Intragastric acidity during administration of generic omeprazole or esomeprazole - a randomised, two-way crossover study including CYP2C19 genotyping.

BACKGROUND: Generic omeprazole has been approved in many countries for the treatment of acid-related gastrointestinal disorders. However, clinical studies comparing generic to original proton pump inhibitors are limited. AIMS: To compare the effect of generic omeprazole 20 mg/day with esomeprazole 20 mg/day on intragastric acidity and to investigate the influence of the CYP2C19 metabolizer status. METHODS: In this randomised, single-blinded, two-way crossover study, 24 healthy Helicobacter pylori-negative subjects, received generic omeprazole (Omep; Hexal AG, Holzkirchen, Germany) 20 mg once daily or esomeprazole 20 mg once daily for five consecutive days. Twenty-four-hour intragastric pH was recorded on day 5 of each treatment. CYP2C19 status was determined by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. RESULTS: Over all, there were no statistically significant differences between generic omeprazole and esomeprazole with respect to median intragastric pH (3.5 and 3.9, P = 0.07), the total hours with intragastric pH >4 (10.4 and 11.3, P = 0.29), and during upright (9.6 and 9.1, P = 0.77) or supine (2.2 and 2.2, P = 0.94) position. However, in CYP2C19 rapid metabolizers, esomeprazole was superior to omeprazole, with the percentage of time with intragastric pH >3.0 and pH >3.5 being higher with esomeprazole than with generic omeprazole [Δ = 9% (P = 0.026) and Δ = 8% (P = 0.046), respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, generic omeprazole 20 mg appears to provide a similar intragastric acid control when compared with esomeprazole 20 mg. However, esomeprazole might be advantageous in subjects with a rapid CYP2C19 metabolizer status.