Is the Epithor conversion score reliable in robotic-assisted surgery anatomical lung resection?

OBJECTIVES: Despite an improvement in surgical abilities, the need for an intraoperative switch from a minimally invasive procedure towards an open surgery (conversion) still remains. To anticipate this risk, the Epithor conversion score (ECS) has been described for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Our objective was to determine if this score, developed for VATS, is applicable in robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS). METHODS: This was a retrospective monocentric study from January 2006 to June 2022, and data were obtained from the EPITHOR database. Patients included were those who underwent anatomic lung resection either by VATS or RATS. The ECS was calculated for all patients studied. Discrimination and calibration of the test were measured by the area under the curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test. RESULTS: A total of 1685 were included. There were 183/1299 conversions in the VATS group (14.1%) and 27/386 conversions in the RATS group (6.9%). Patients in the RATS group had fewer antiplatelet therapy and peripheral arterial disease. There were more segmentectomies in the VATS group. As for test discrimination, the area under the curve was 0.66 [0.56-0.78] in the RATS group and 0.64 [0.60-0.69] in the VATS group. Regarding the calibration, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was not significant for both groups but more positive (better calibrated) for the VATS group (P = 0.12) compared to the RATS group (P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: The ECS seems applicable for patients operated with RATS, with a correct discrimination but a lower calibration performance for patients operated with VATS. A new score could be developed to specifically anticipate conversion in patients operated on by RATS.

Venous concerns after lingula sparing left upper lobectomy.

Postoperative ischaemia of the lingula is a complication of left upper lobe trisegmentectomy, usually attributed to a twist of the remaining lingula. It can also be related to other factors such as venous interruption. We report 3 cases of reoperation after lingula-sparing left upper lobectomy for suspected ischaemia. None were related to torsion. Accidental injury of the lingular venous drainage or abnormal venous pattern can be the leading cause of these ischaemia.

Early air transport after thoracic surgery might be safe: A retrospective observational study in the French Caribbean.

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of early air transport (EAT) morbidity after transpleural surgery. We compared our cohort with our patients not requiring air transport. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study, in the Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Department of the University Hospital of Martinique over 40 months. We included all of the files (national and local database, and systematic postoperative consultation) of patients operated on for thoracic surgery or distinguished transpleural surgical intervention, whatever their geographical origin. Patients from another French department benefited from EAT. The complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo before or after the EAT. Diagnostic criteria were chest pain, dyspnea, and abnormal chest radiograph. Continuous variables are presented as mean, median, and SDs. Discrete variables are presented as n (%). Results: Of 491 patients operated on, 315 were transpleural surgeries, and 99 patients benefited from EAT. There were 55% resections, a percent predicted of forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and an average preoperative Tiffeneau ratio of respectively, 86% and 78. One complication was found: a pneumothorax in an emphysematous patient, 15 days after the flight, who had an index of prolonged air leak >10. The mean time between surgery and flight was 7.2 days (σ = 4.5), and 3.3 days (σ = 2.9) between removal of the last drain and flight. The morbidity of EAT after transpleural surgery was 1%. The 2 cohorts of "EAT" and "Locals" patients were statistically comparable, particularly in morbidity. Conclusions: EAT appears to be safe after transpleural surgery, following usual criteria for hospital discharge. It would be interesting to study, on a larger scale, the effect of IPAL as an independent risk factor (in case of high IPAL > 10) as well as pathologies that modify transpleural pressures restrictive ventilatory defect.