Mechanical or biological prosthesis for aortic valve replacement in patients aged 45 to 74 years.

OBJECTIVE: The selection of valve prostheses for patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement remains controversial. In this study, we compared the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with biological or mechanical aortic valve prostheses. METHODS: We evaluated late results among 5762 patients aged 45 to 74 years who underwent biological or mechanical aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass from 1989 to 2019 at 4 medical centers. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare late survival; the age-dependent effect of prosthesis type on long-term survival was evaluated by an interaction term between age and prosthesis type. Incidences of stroke, major bleeding, and reoperation on the aortic valve after the index procedure were compared between prosthesis groups. RESULTS: Overall, 61% (n = 3508) of patients received a bioprosthesis. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.7% (n = 58) in the bioprosthesis group and 1.5% (n = 34) in the mechanical group (P = .75). During a mean follow-up of 9.0 years, the adjusted risk of mortality was higher in the bioprosthesis group (hazard ratio, 1.30, P < .001). The long-term survival benefit associated with mechanical prosthesis persisted until 70 years of age. Bioprosthesis (vs mechanical prosthesis) was associated with a similar risk of stroke (P = .20), lower risk of major bleeding (P < .001), and higher risk of reoperation (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with bioprostheses, mechanical aortic valves are associated with a lower adjusted risk of long-term mortality in patients aged 70 years or less. Patients aged less than 70 years undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement should be informed of the potential survival benefit of mechanical valve substitutes.

Survival Outcomes of Lung Transplant Recipients From Donors With Abnormal Kidney Function.

BACKGROUND: Recovering lungs with pulmonary edema due to abnormal kidney function is considered one of the expanded selection criteria for lung transplant. The aim of this study is to assess lung transplant recipients' survival from donors with abnormal kidney function and to determine differences in lung recovery rates from donors with and donors without abnormal kidney function. METHODS: We reviewed the United Network for Organ Sharing registry for first-time adult lung transplant donors and recipients from June 2005 to March 2017. Donor kidney function was categorized into three groups based on estimated glomerular filtration rate: group I, greater than 60 mL/min; group II, 15 to 59 mL/min; and group III, less than 15 mL/min. Recipient survival was stratified based on estimated glomerular filtration rate using Kaplan-Meier. A multivariate Cox Regression model with known risk factors that affect survival was used to compare survival among groups. Comparison of lung recovery among the three groups was also performed. RESULTS: Lung recovery rates were 29.7% (15,670 of 52,747), 19.4% (3879 of 20,040), and 18.1% (704 of 3898) for groups I, II, and III, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recipient survival rates were 86.2%, 69.2%, and 55.7% for group I; 84.9%, 66.9%, and 53.8% for group II; and 85.5%, 65.3%, and 50.3% for group III, respectively (adjusted P = .25; multivariate Cox regression method). When group I was used as reference, the adjusted hazard ratio for group II was 1.04 (95% CI, 0.98-1.10) and for group III, it was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.96-1.23), after adjusting with the multivariate Cox regression model. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in lung recipient survival. The lung recovery rate from donors with abnormal kidney function was lower compared with that of donors with normal kidney function.

Initial experience and outcomes with a hybrid extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and cardiopulmonary bypass circuit for lung transplantation.

Background: The utilization of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for intraoperative support during lung transplantation has increased over the past decade. Although veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has recently emerged as the preferred modality over cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), many centers continue to use both forms of ECLS during lung transplantation. Our novel hybrid VA-ECMO/CPB circuit allows for seamless transition from VA-ECMO to CPB at a significant cost savings compared to a standalone VA-ECMO circuit. This study describes our initial experience and outcomes in the first 100 bilateral lung transplantations using this novel hybrid VA-ECMO/CPB circuit. Methods: Medical records from September 2017 to May 2021 of the first 100 consecutive patients undergoing bilateral lung transplantation with intraoperative hybrid VA-ECMO support were examined retrospectively. We excluded patients with single lung transplants, retransplantations, preoperative ECLS bridging, and veno-venous (VV) ECMO and those supported with CPB only. Perioperative recipient, anesthetic, perfusion variables, and outcomes were assessed. Results: Of the 100 patients supported with VA-ECMO, 19 were converted intraoperatively to CPB. Right ventricular dysfunction was seen in 37% of patients, and the median mean pulmonary artery pressure was 28 mm Hg. No oxygenator clotting was observed with a median heparin dose of 13,000 units in the VA-ECMO group. Primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours was observed in 10.1% of all patients and observed 1-year mortality was 4%. Conclusions: The use of a hybrid VA-ECMO/CPB circuit in our institution allows for rapid conversion to CPB with acceptable outcomes across a diverse recipient group at a significantly reduced cost compared to standalone VA-ECMO circuits.

Safe heart flush technique during recovery from donors after circulatory death.

BACKGROUND: Donation after circulatory death is the donation after cardiac arrest. This technique has been employed and adopted by clinicians to overcome the shortage of available hearts for transplant. Warm ischemia time plays a pivotal role in the survival outcome of the heart recipients. AIM OF THE STUDY: To assess the efficacy of using the Foley catheter to flush the heart during procurement from donation after circulatory death donors. METHODS: We utilized a 2-WAY Foley catheter to flush the heart during procurement. The catheter was prepared and modified on the back table. RESULTS: We were successfully able to flush the heart within 3 minutes from skin incision with a good recipient outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Using the Foley catheter to flush the heart during recovery from donation after circulatory death donors was both efficient and fast.

Combined cardiac surgery procedures and liver transplant: a single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: Morbidity and mortality rates associated with liver transplant are high for patients with concomitant heart disease. Traditionally, such cases were considered contraindications for transplant. The objective of our study was to assess the outcome of combined surgical approaches. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was analyzed of patients undergoing cardiac surgery and liver transplant at our institution. Twelve identified patients underwent combined cardiac operation and liver transplant. A control group was created (n = 24) with the same selection criteria. RESULTS: Median patient age was 64.94 years in the combined group vs 63.80 in the control, and in both groups, 58% were male. Left ventricular ejection fraction (0.60), body mass index (30.1), and median (range) score of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (18 [9-33]) were the same in both groups. The cardiac operations combined with liver transplant were coronary artery bypass grafting, valve replacement procedures, and ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm repair. Piggyback liver transplant was performed for all patients. Survival periods of 1, 5, and 10 years for control vs combined cases were 90 vs 62%, 79 vs 55%, and 70 vs 45%, respectively (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Concomitant cardiac procedure and liver transplant is a valid treatment option and should be considered with risk stratification criteria of the patient with end-stage liver disease and cardiac surgical pathologic characteristics.

Heart-lung transplant in congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries and dextrocardia patient.

A 53-year-old male patient was presented to our institution with the clinical picture of biventricular failure. The echocardiogram revealed congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries, dextrocardia with situs solitus, atrioventricular discordance and ventriculoatrial discordance, severe systemic and mitral valves regurgitation, and severe pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure: 51 mm Hg). He underwent heart-lung transplant. He was discharged on postoperative day 25 with left ventricular ejection fraction of 60%-65%, and with oxygen independency.

Safe Lung Flush Technique During Recovery From Donors After Circulatory Death.

Donation after circulatory death is defined as donation after cardiac arrest and circulatory cessation. The number of circulatory death donors is growing and significantly increases the organ donor pool. Shortening the warm ischemia time is pivotal in the outcomes and survival after transplant. We describe simplified and safe technique for lung flush during lung recovery from donors after circulatory death.

Intraoperative management of a hybrid extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit for lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The use of extracorporeal circulation (ECC) for intraoperative cardiopulmonary support during lung transplantation has been increasing in the recent years. Our group previously described a novel hybrid extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuit for use in lung transplantation. TECHNIQUE: Our approach for intraoperative management of our novel hybrid ECMO circuit for lung transplantation is driven by two main goals: The first is to deliver management that ensures an appropriate balance between the native and ECMO cardiac outputs in order to provide a stable environment that promotes attenuation of ischemic-reperfusion injury during implantation. The second is to provide a stable hemodynamic environment that results in an appropriate global perfusion guided by multiple monitors and an organ systems-based approach during implantation. COMMENTS: Our novel technique for intraoperative management of this circuit during lung transplantation is described.