Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros













Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
N Engl J Med ; 387(25): 2356-2361, 2022 12 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36546627

RESUMO

A 27-year-old patient with a history of severe obstetrical complications and arterial thrombosis received a diagnosis of hereditary thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) due to severe ADAMTS13 deficiency when she presented with an acute episode in the 30th week of her second pregnancy. When the acute episode of hereditary TTP became plasma-refractory and fetal death was imminent, weekly injections of recombinant ADAMTS13 at a dose of 40 U per kilogram of body weight were initiated. The patient's platelet count normalized, and the growth of the fetus stabilized. At 37 weeks 1 day of gestation, a small-for-gestational-age boy was delivered by cesarean section. At the time of this report, the patient and her son were well, and she continued to receive injections of recombinant ADAMTS13 every 2 weeks. (Funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation.).


Assuntos
Complicações Hematológicas na Gravidez , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Trombótica , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Proteína ADAMTS13/administração & dosagem , Proteína ADAMTS13/deficiência , Proteína ADAMTS13/genética , Proteína ADAMTS13/uso terapêutico , Cesárea , Plasma , Contagem de Plaquetas , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Trombótica/diagnóstico , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Trombótica/genética , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Trombótica/terapia , Resultado da Gravidez , Complicações Hematológicas na Gravidez/genética , Complicações Hematológicas na Gravidez/terapia
2.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 15: 13, 2015 Jan 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25971791

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Underreporting of intraoperative events in anaesthesia is well-known and compromises quality documentation. The reasons for such omissions remain unclear. We conducted a questionnaire-based survey of anaesthesia staff to explore perceived barriers to reliable documentation during anaesthesia. METHODS: Participants anonymously completed a paper-based questionnaire. Predefined answers referred to potential barriers. Additional written comments were encouraged. Differences between physician and nurse anaesthetists were tested with t-tests and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Twenty-five physician and 30 nurse anaesthetists (81% of total staff) completed the survey. The reported problems referred to three main categories: (I) potential influences related to working conditions and practices of data collection, such as premature entry of the data (indicated by 85% of the respondents), competing duties (87%), and interfering interruptions or noise (67%); (II) problems referring to institutional management of the data, for example lacking feedback on the results (95%) and lacking knowledge about what the data are used for (75%); (III) problems related to specific attitudes, e.g., considering these data not useful for quality improvement (47%). Physicians were more sceptical than nurses regarding the relevance of these data for quality and patient safety. CONCLUSIONS: The common perceived difficulties reported by physician and nurse anaesthetists resemble established barriers to incident reporting and may similarly act as barriers to quality documentation during anaesthesia. Further studies should investigate if these perceived obstacles have a causal impact on quality reporting in anaesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is NCT01524484. Registration date: January 21, 2012.


Assuntos
Anestesiologia , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Documentação/normas , Sistemas Computadorizados de Registros Médicos/normas , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar , Coleta de Dados , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Notificação de Abuso , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA