Crosschecking the subjective everyday Parkinson's experience among patients and their caregiving spouses: French versions of the Belastungsfragebogen Parkinson Kurzversion (Bela-P-k and Bela-A-k).

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) affects all dimensions of the patient's and the caregiver's daily life. There are two questionnaires in German, Bela-A-k (for caregivers) and Bela-P-k (for PD patients), that can be used to assess the PD-related psychosocial burden in a dyad. The patient's and the caregiver's perspective of living with PD can be crosschecked. Four dimensions are explored: physical performance, emotional load, social relationships, and couple/family life. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to translate these questionnaires into French and to test them among patients and caregivers. METHODS: The questionnaires were translated from German into French by forward and backward translation, followed by a cultural crosscheck. Participants were invited to test the consensual French version in its online administered version created via Lime Survey® software. Participants filled out the questionnaires twice (five-day interval) according to the test-retest method. Data analysis was performed with SPSS software. RESULTS: Thirty dyads were recruited and eighteen completed the study. Bela-A-K showed strong temporal stability, though it was weak for the social relationships dimension. Bela-P-k showed strong internal consistency, but significant test-retest differences for ten items due to day-by-day changes in patient status. CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaires are useful and reliable for dyad-centered follow-up in case of PD. Some items of the Bela-P-k were simplified to improve its temporal stability, considering the patient's changing status through the day. The items concerning social relationships were adjusted for the Bela-A-k.

Physicians' and medical students' beliefs and attitudes toward psychotic disorders: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze physicians' and medical students' (MS) beliefs and attitudes toward people with psychotic disorders. METHODS: This systematic review follows the PRISMA guidelines. It was conducted on 5 databases (Pubmed, PsycINFO, Pascal & Francis, Scopus and EMBASE) with a keyword string combining words for physicians' and students' professional status, attitudes toward people, and psychotic disorders. No limitations on publication dates were imposed. RESULTS: This review includes 39 articles, among which quantitative studies are in the majority, and general practioners are mainly represented. Schizophrenia is the main condition used to illustrate psychotic disorders and measure stigmatizing attitudes. Physicians' and MS' beliefs toward people with psychotic disorders are mainly represented by dangerousness and unpredictability. They can be reinforced with socio-demographic criteria (age and female gender) or physicians' beliefs about the disease's etiology. The desire for social distance is higher toward patients with schizophrenia compared to other psychiatric disorders, and medical care could be impacted with a tendency to refer them at psychiatric specific care or to anticipate their difficulties and to modify their treatment plan. Stigma scores remain globally high during medical training. Even if specific anti-stigma trainings have a positive impact on beliefs and attitudes, these effects do not last in time. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the importance to explore physicians' and medical students' representations about patient with psychosis to understand better their difficulties in the management of these patients.

[Linguistic markers in improving the predictive model of the transition to schizophrenia]. / Les marqueurs linguistiques dans l'amélioration du modèle prédictif de la transition vers la schizophrénie.

Over the past twenty years, research in psychiatry has focused primarily on the early detection of schizophrenia. The objective has been to engage the patient with prodromal symptoms in a trajectory of care. It has also been a question of being able to offer treatment as soon as the patient "at risk" of schizophrenia triggered a possible first psychotic episode. Standardized clinical tools were developed and now allow identification of subjects at risk of developing psychotic disorders. However, the reliability of predictions of the psychotic transition, which is between 15 and 25%, remains insufficient. In order to improve care, it is now necessary to highlight markers to refine the prediction of the risk of developing schizophrenia. Some teams are trying to identify linguistic anomalies in UHR subjects (disorganized speech, illogical thoughts, poor speech, altered semantic verbal fluencies…). Some of these abnormalities could be specific to the transition to psychosis. The severity of these markers could be proportional to the progressive stage of the disorder, consistent with the hypothesis of a continuum from normal to pathological in schizophrenia. In addition, automated speech analysis techniques in UHR subjects allow identification of subtle semantic and syntactic anomalies (a decrease in semantic coherence, but also the use of possessive pronouns and a poverty of speech) predictive in 79% of cases of psychotic transition. Some authors demonstrate the value of using linguistic markers and automated speech analysis methods to improve the predictive model of the transition to schizophrenia. However, from reification of language to desubjectification of the individual, this transformation in clinical practice raises ethical and epistemological challenges.

[The philosophical roots of "connectedness": The care clinic]. / Les racines philosophiques du « rester en lien ¼ : la clinique du souci.

If suicide remains "the only really serious philosophical problem" (A. Camus), historically a certain number of philosophers have legitimized it while others have condemned it. Among the philosophers who admitted that suicide could be a possibility, some showed understanding and others remained more modest. Kierkegaard's philosophical stance, demonstrating that one can never decide for the other where existential problems are concerned, opens a third way. Following him, Michel Cornu coined the expression "ethics of concern". That restlessness, etymologically, can be understood at the same time at the epistemological level (lack of a single constituted knowledge, hence the need to resort to a fully interdisciplinary approach of the "suicide" object), but as a relational attitude as well, namely a restlessness vis-à-vis the other, in other words concern for the other. This concept of concern does not exist in philosophical literature as such, but it has been addressed by philosophers. Therefore, it is essential to begin with a differential reflection on the notions of concern, care and solicitude. Then three "philosophies of solicitude" will be developed, those of Heidegger (concern in itself), Ricœur (concern as reciprocity) and Levinas (concern as responsibility). The monitoring devices, which will be widely discussed in other articles of this special issue, are based on philosophical notions borrowed from Heidegger (thoughtful solicitude), or Ricœur (solicitude) and Levinas (responsibility) or Cornu (ethics of concern). In addition, throughout our text we have mentioned a certain number of tensions inherent to these notions themselves, such as that intrinsic to the term solicitude (both care and concern), or peculiar to the authors' work (substitutive solicitude - thoughtful solicitude for Heidegger), or related to the debate of ideas (solicitude for Ricœur - responsibility for Levinas). Implementing these monitoring devices in clinical practice as well as in the territories will raise other problems, in particular, between benevolence and monitoring, but also between justice and equity, which will be our conclusion.