In-Depth Review of Loeffler Endocarditis: What Have We Learned?

Loeffler endocarditis, eosinophilic endocarditis or eosinophilic endomyocardial disease are conditions associated with hypereosinophilia and they affect the heart function. Loeffler endocarditis is a rare endomyocardial disorder thought to be caused by eosinophilic damage. The disorder is characterized by inflammatory infiltration, formation of thrombus within cardiovascular system, and ultimately fibrosis of the afflicted area. It can lead to multiple severe complications, including thromboembolic disease, thickening of fibrous tissue in the endocardium of ventricles, valve involvement, apical obliteration, and various heart disorders. Although early clinical intervention can lead to remission, the underlying mechanisms of the disorder remain unresolved. In the present article, we summarise the existing literature concerning Loeffler endocarditis based on PubMed, Web of Science, and other medical databases to conduct an in-depth review of the epidemiology, etiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, staging, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of Loeffler endocarditis. Meanwhile, we provide novel patients data and clinical figures of Loeffler endocarditis to supplement the understanding of this cardiac disorder. The findings presented in this article provide a basis for further studies and can be used to improve management of the disorder.

Two-sample mendelian randomization analysis investigates ambient fine particulate matter's impact on cardiovascular disease development.

PM2.5, a key component of air pollution, significantly threatens public health. Cardiovascular disease is increasingly associated with air pollution, necessitating more research. This study used a meticulous two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to investigate the potential causal link between elevated PM2.5 levels and 25 types of cardiovascular diseases. Data sourced from the UK Biobank, focusing on individuals of European ancestry, underwent primary analysis using Inverse Variance Weighting. Additional methods such as MR-Egger, weighted median, Simple mode, and Weighted mode provided support. Sensitivity analyses assessed instrument variable heterogeneity, pleiotropy, and potential weak instrument variables. The study revealed a causal link between PM2.5 exposure and higher diagnoses of Atherosclerotic heart disease (primary or secondary, OR [95% CI] 1.0307 [1.0103-1.0516], p-value = 0.003 and OR [95% CI] 1.0179 [1.0028-1.0333], p-value = 0.0202) and Angina pectoris (primary or secondary, OR [95% CI] 1.0303 [1.0160-1.0449], p-value = 3.04e-05 and OR [95% CI] 1.0339 [1.0081-1.0603], p-value = 0.0096). Additionally, PM2.5 exposure increased the likelihood of diagnoses like Other forms of chronic ischaemic heart disease (secondary, OR [95% CI] 1.0193 [1.0042-1.0346], p-value = 0.0121), Essential hypertension (secondary, OR [95% CI] 1.0567 [1.0142-1.1010], p-value = 0.0085), Palpitations (OR [95% CI] 1.0163 [1.0071-1.0257], p-value = 5e-04), and Stroke (OR [95% CI] 1.0208 [1.0020-1.0401], p-value = 0.0301). Rigorous sensitivity analyses confirmed these significant findings' robustness and validity. Our study revealed the causal effect between higher PM2.5 concentrations and increased cardiovascular disease risks. This evidence is vital for policymakers and healthcare providers, urging targeted interventions to reduce PM2.5 levels.

Long- and very long-chain ceramides are predictors of acute kidney injury in patients with acute coronary syndrome: the PEACP study.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) can be caused by multiple factors/events, including acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Ceramides are involved in atherosclerosis progression, cardiovascular events, and renal damage. Almost no studies have been conducted on the relationship between ceramide concentrations and AKI events. Therefore, we evaluated the association between plasma ceramide level at admission and AKI in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: We enrolled 842 ACS patients from the Prospective Multicenter Study for Early Evaluation of Acute Chest Pain. AKI was defined using the criteria from the 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes. Eleven C16-C26 ceramides were measured using the high-performance liquid chromatography interfaced to tandem mass spectrometer procedure. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate relationships between ceramides and AKI risk. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) was used to evaluate differences between ceramides. RESULTS: Overall, 139 (16.5%) patients developed AKI during hospitalisation. Patients who developed AKI had higher levels of Cer(d18:1/16:0), Cer(d18:1/18:0), Cer(d18:1/20:0), Cer(d18:1/21:0), Cer(d18:1/24:1), and Cer(d18:1/24:2) than patients who did not (P < 0.05). In risk-factor adjusted logistic regression models, these ceramides were independently associated with AKI risk (P < 0.05). Cer(d18:1/24:2) had the highest odds ratio of 3.503 (Q4 vs. Q1, 95% confidence interval: 1.743-7.040, P < 0.001). Ceramides had AUCs of 0.581-0.661 (P < 0.001) for AKI. Each ceramide combined with the Mehran risk score (AUC: 0.780) had AUCs of 0.802-0.808, greater than the Mehran risk score alone. CONCLUSION: Long-chain and very-long-chain ceramide levels may help determine the high AKI risk beyond traditional assessments.

Early extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as bridge for central airway obstruction patients caused by neck and chest tumors to emergency surgery.

Central airway obstruction caused by neck and chest tumors is a very dangerous oncological emergency with high mortality. Unfortunately, there is few literature to discuss an effective way for this life-threating condition. Providing effective airway managements, adequate ventilation and emergency surgical interventions are very important. However, traditional airway managements and respiratory support has only limited effect. In our center, using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a novel approach to manage patient with central airway obstruction caused by neck and chest tumors has been adopted. We aimed to show the feasibility: using early ECMO to manage difficult airway, provide oxygenation and support surgical procedure for patients with critical airway stenosis caused by neck and chest tumors. We designed a single-center, small sample size retrospective study based on real-world. We identified 3 patients with central airway obstruction caused by neck and chest tumors. ECMO was used to ensure adequate ventilation to emergency surgery. Control group cannot be established. Because traditional manner very likely led to death of such patients. Details of clinical characteristics, ECMO, surgery and survival outcomes were recorded. Acute dyspnea and cyanosis were the most frequent symptoms. All patients (3/3) showed descending arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2). Computed tomography (CT) revealed severe central airway obstruction caused by neck and chest tumors in all cases (3/3). All patients (3/3) had definite difficult airway. All cases (3/3) received ECMO support and emergency surgical procedure. Venovenous ECMO was the common mode for all cases. 3 patients weaned off ECMO successfully without any ECMO-related complications. Mean duration of ECMO was 3 h (range: 1.5-4.5 h). Under ECMO support, difficult airway management and emergency surgical procedure were finished successfully for all cases (3/3). The mean ICU stay was 3.3 days (range: 1-7 days), and the mean general ward stay was 3.3 days (range: 2-4 days). Pathology demonstrated the tumor dignity for 3 patients including 2 malignant cases and 1 benign case. All patients (3/3) were discharged from hospital successfully. We showed that early ECMO initiation was a safe and feasible approach to manage difficult airway for patients with severe central airway obstruction caused by neck and chest tumors. Meanwhile, early ECMO initiation could ensure security for airway surgical procedure.

Impact of the COVID-19 Epidemic on the Routine Emergency Services in a Tertiary Hospital, China: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The sudden outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has caused tremendous challenges to the medical system. The government and hospitals have taken robust measures to curb the spread of the deadly virus. Its impact on routine medical services is gradually being taken seriously. OBJECTIVE: To identify the impact of the novel Coronavirus pandemic on emergency department (ED) patient flow and the performance of the routine ED service. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was undertaken in a tertiary public teaching hospital ED in Chengdu, China. ED data of patients were routinely collected to compare demographic, clinical characteristics and outcomes during an 8-week period from January 1, 2019 to February 25, 2020. Data were analyzed with the chi-square statistical test. RESULTS: Over the study periods, there were 31855 and 25244 patients presented to the ED in 2019 and 2020 respectively. During the pandemic period in 2020, the daily number of average ED visits was lower than that in 2019 (430 ± 134.9 versus 572 ± 38.6, P = 0.00), with fewer triage 1&2 cases (145 ± 33.3 versus 178 ± 15.0, P = 0.00). Nevertheless, the mortality increased remarkably during the pandemic period in 2020 (0.2% versus 0.1%, P = 0.009), with higher APACHE II scores (28 versus 19, P = 0.022) and shorter ED elapsed time (0.2 versus 1.4 days, P = 0.016) among these death cases. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic had an evident impact on the patient's behavioral patterns and routine emergency services, which caused higher ED mortality.

Diagnostic and prognostic predictive values of circulating sTREM-1 in sepsis: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: With the increasing studies regarding the diagnostic value of soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (sTREM)-1 in sepsis in recent years, it is essential to make an updated meta-analysis to explore the sepsis differentiation value of circulating sTREM-1 from systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Recently, no meta-analysis was made to explore the prognostic predictive value of circulating sTREM-1 in sepsis. Thus, the present aimed to make meta-analyses to explore the diagnostic and prognostic predictive values of circulating sTREM-1 in sepsis. METHODS: Articles published before March 2021 were searched in databases: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Medline and Google Scholar. After a summary of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (PLR), negative likelihood ratios (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), the receive-operating characteristics (SROC) curve were performed to summarize true positive (TP) and false positive (FP) rates. Q test and I2 were used to explore heterogeneity between studies. RESULTS: Circulating sTREM-1 showed a high sensitivity (0.85 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-0.91)) and moderate specificity (0.79 (95% CI: 0.70-0.86)) to differentiate sepsis from SIRS. The study showed a high sensitivity (0.80 (95% CI: 0.66-0.89)) and moderate specificity (0.75 (95% CI: 0.69-0.81)) to predict 28-day mortality in sepsis. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the present study suggested that circulating sTREM-1 showed diagnostic and prognostic predictive values in sepsis.

Prognostic nutritional index may not be a good prognostic indicator for acute myocardial infarction.

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) has been applied in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) recently.However, the application of PNI in AMI needs verification. This was a prospective cohort study. Patients diagnosed with AMI were enrolled. PNI was calculated as (serum albumin (SA in g/L)) + (5 × total lymphocyte count (TLC) × 109/L). Modified PNI (mPNI) was analyzed by logistic regression analysis to reset the proportion of SA and TLC. The primary outcome was all-cause death. A total of 598 patients were enrolled; 73 patients died during follow-up. The coefficient of SA and TLC in the mPNI formula was approximately 2:1. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of SA, TLC, PNI, mPNI and GRACE in predicting death for patients with AMI was 0.718, 0.540, 0.636, 0.721 and 0.825, respectively. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) between PNI and mPNI was 0.230 (p < 0.001). Integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) was 0.042 (p = 0.001). Decision curve analysis revealed that mPNI had better prognostic value for patients with AMI than PNI; however, it was not superior to SA. Thus, PNI may not a reliable prognostic predictor of AMI; after resetting the formula, the value of PNI in predicting prognosis of AMI is almost entirely due to SA.

Significance of the thrombo-inflammatory status-based novel prognostic score as a useful predictor for in-hospital mortality of patients with type B acute aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation and thrombosis are associated with development and progression of acute aortic dissection (AAD). The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of Simplified Thrombo-Inflammatory Prognostic Score (sTIPS), in patients with early phase type B AAD. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 491 patients with type B AAD between November 2012 and September 2015. sTIPS was calculated from the white blood cell count (WBC) and mean platelet volume to platelet count (MPV/PC) ratio, at the time of admission. Patients with both, WBC > 10 (109/L) and MPV/PC ratio > 7.5 (102fL/109L-1) were assigned a score of 2, while patients with high levels of either one or none of the above markers, were assigned scores of 1 and 0 respectively. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the associations between the score and hospital survival. RESULTS: Of the 491 type B AAD patients included in this analysis, 24 patients (4.9%) died during hospitalization. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the cumulative mortality was significantly higher in patients with higher sTIPS (P = 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis further indicated that higher sTIPS was a strong predictor of in-hospital mortality after eliminating all confounding factors (sTIPS 2: hazard ratio 4.704, 95%; confidence interval [CI] 1.184-18.685; P = 0.028; sTIPS 1: hazard ratio 1.918, 95%; CI 1.134-3.537; P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: sTIPS at admission was a useful tool for stratifying the risk in type B AAD patients, for outcomes such as in-hospital mortality in the early phase.