A rapid and convenient sample preparation method for the analysis of cannabinoids in oral fluid samples.

Cannabis is the world's most used illegal drug. The main psychoactive component of cannabis is Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). To aid the identification of cannabis-impaired individuals, a simple but effective workflow for reliable quantification of THC and its metabolites in oral fluid samples collected with the Greiner Bio-One Saliva Collection System is presented. Sampling involves rinsing the oral cavity with an extraction solution containing a citrate buffer stimulating salivary flow. Sample processing targeted the cannabinoid fraction interacting with proteins and other insoluble constituents that can be separated by centrifugation. Approximately 50% of the total amount of cannabinoids included in the oral fluid was recovered from the obtained pellet by extraction with acetonitrile. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used for cannabinoid quantification. Fitness of the developed workflow for application in forensic and clinical cannabis testing was demonstrated by evaluating multiple performance parameters, including selectivity, linearity, limits of quantification (LOQs), accuracy, precision, matrix effects, extraction recoveries, process efficiencies and stability. Furthermore, sensitivity and specificity of the developed oral fluid-based cannabis test was demonstrated by analysing 195 samples collected either from opioid addicts or persons suspected of driving under the influence of drugs. The accuracy of identifying a person with the presence of THC in blood was found to be 97.9%.

Feasibility of using breath sampling of non-volatiles to estimate the prevalence of illicit drug use among nightlife attendees.

The prevalence of drug use among nightlife attendees needs to be accurately estimated to, for example, evaluate preventive interventions. This study tested the feasibility of using a breath-sampling device to estimate the prevalence of drug use among nightlife attendees. The study was conducted at five nightclubs and a large music festival in Stockholm, Sweden. Participants were invited to participate and microparticles in exhaled breath were sampled and analyzed for 47 compounds using a state-of-the-art analytic method that follows forensic standards. In addition, participants' breath alcohol concentration was measured and they were interviewed about demographics, drinking habits, and drug use. Of the people invited, 73.7% (n = 1223) agreed to participate, and breath samples were collected from 1204 participants. Breath sampling was fast and well-accepted by participants. 13 percent of participants tested positive for an illicit drug, but only 4.3% self-reported drug use during the last 48 h. The most common substances detected were cocaine, amphetamine, and MDMA. There was no agreement between self-reported and measured use of any drug. Breath sampling is a convenient method to test illicit drug use among a large number of participants at events, and can be used as an estimate of drug use prevalence.

Hydromorphone and codeine concentrations in oral fluid specimens from patients receiving substitution therapy with Substitol™ (morphine sulfate).

This study aimed to determine whether hydromorphone and codeine can be detected in oral fluid specimens following administration of Substitol™, a slow-release formulation of morphine. This is of interest for those monitoring treatment compliance using drug testing. Oral fluid specimens collected for compliance assessment in routine clinical practice or as part of a clinical trial were subjected to quantitative analysis of hydromorphone, morphine, codeine, and 6-acetylmorphine using highly sensitive mass spectrometric methods. Oral fluid was collected using a Greiner Bio-One saliva collection system. Patients undergoing substitution treatment with Substitol™, methadone, or buprenorphine were included, together with patients undergoing pain treatment with hydromorphone. Hydromorphone was detected in 642 of the 663 (97%) samples from substitol-treated patients. Concentrations were not higher in methadone- and buprenorphine-treated patients who relapsed into heroin use, or in patients on hydromorphone therapy. Codeine was detected in 29% of the samples. These concentrations were lower than those in patients who had relapsed to heroin use. Clinical administration of morphine can lead to detectable concentrations of both hydromorphone and codeine in oral fluids. This should be taken into consideration when using drug testing in oral fluid samples for compliance assessment in this patient group.

Detection of heroin intake in patients in substitution treatment using oral fluid as specimen for drug testing.

BACKGROUND: Detection of heroin use is among the major tasks for drug testing and can be best performed by using 6-acetylmorphine as the target analyte. This study was performed to document analytical findings in oral fluid after OF heroin intake. METHODS: The samples were from routine drug testing of patients in substitution treatment. The analytical investigation was made with a forensic accredited liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. RESULTS: Out of 2814 samples, from 1875 patients, sent for routine drug testing, 406 contained one or more opiate in the drug screening when applying a cutoff limit of 1 ng/mL neat OF. Out of these 406, 314 had a measured 6-AM concentration in neat OF ≥ 1 ng/mL. The study demonstrated that 6-AM is a viable parameter in oral fluid drug testing with an about 80% sensitivity compared to using morphine and codeine as biomarkers. An additional value of using 6-AM is the confidence in concluding a heroin intake. The 6-AM concentrations varied between 1 and >1000 ng/mL, with a median value of 18.6 ng/mL. Heroin was measured in 35 samples with a median value of 0.72 ng/mL. The positive rate for opiates in urine and OF drug testing was the same, 13.5%, in similar populations of patients. CONCLUSIONS: 6-AM is a preferred parameter in OF drug testing for monitoring heroin use and makes OF drug testing for detecting heroin use more effective than urine drug testing when using highly sensitive mass spectrometry methods.

A validated workflow for drug detection in oral fluid by non-targeted liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Oral fluid is recognized as an important specimen for drug testing. Common applications are monitoring in substance abuse treatment programs, therapeutic drug monitoring, pain management, workplace drug testing, clinical toxicology, and driving under the influence of drugs (DRUID). In this study, we demonstrate that non-targeted LC-MS/MS with subsequent compound identification by tandem mass spectral library search is a valuable tool for comprehensive detection and confirmation of drugs in oral fluid samples. The workflow developed involves solid-phase extraction and chromatographic separation on reversed phase materials. Mass spectrometric detection is accomplished on a quadrupole-quadrupole-time-of-flight instrument operated with data-dependent acquisition control. The workflow was optimized for 500 µl of neat oral fluid collected with the Greiner Bio-One saliva collection system. The fitness of the developed method was tested and proven by analyzing blank and spiked samples as well as 59 authentic patient samples. We could demonstrate that compounds with logP values in the range 0.5-5.5 are efficiently detected at low nanograms per milliliter concentrations. The true positive and true negative rates of automated library search were equal or close to 100%. The beauty of the non-targeted LC-MS/MS approach is the ability to detect compounds hardly included in routinely applied targeted assays, and this was demonstrated by detecting the synthetic opioid U-47700 in two patient samples. Graphical abstract ᅟ.