Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros













Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38810928

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Tuberculous pleurisy is one of the most common types of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis, but the sensitivity of conventional mycobacterial culture (Culture) or Xpert MTB/RIF assay (Xpert) is not satisfying. This multicentre cohort study evaluated the accuracy of a new cell-free DNA droplet digital PCR assay (cf-ddPCR) for diagnosing tuberculous pleurisy. METHODS: Patients with suspected tuberculosis (≥5 years of age) with pleural effusion were consecutively recruited from nine research sites across six provinces in China between September 2020 to May 2022. Culture, Xpert, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay (Ultra), real-time PCR, and cf-ddPCR were performed simultaneously for all specimens. RESULTS: A total of 321 participants were enrolled, and data from 281 (87.5%) participants were available, including 105 definite tuberculous pleurisy, 113 possible tuberculous pleurisy and 63 non-tuberculous pleurisy according to the composite reference standard. The sensitivity of cf-ddPCR was 90.5% (95/105, 95% CI, 82.8-95.1%) in the definite tuberculous pleurisy group, which was significantly higher than those of Culture (57.1%, 60/105, 95% CI, 47.1-66.6%, p < 0.001), Xpert (46.7%, 49/105, 95% CI, 37.0-56.6%, p < 0.001), Ultra (69.5%, 73/105, 95% CI, 59.7-77.9%, p < 0.001) and real-time PCR (75.2%, 79/105, 95% CI, 65.7-82.9%, p < 0.001). In possible tuberculous pleurisy, whose results of Culture and Xpert were both negative, the sensitivity of cf-ddPCR was 61.1% (69/113, 95% CI, 51.4-70.0%), which was still significantly higher than that of Ultra (27.4%, 31/113, 95% CI, 19.7-36.8%, p < 0.001) and real-time PCR (38.9%, 44/113, 95% CI, 30.0-48.6%, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The performance of cf-ddPCR is superior to Culture, Xpert, Ultra, and real-time PCR, indicating that improved diagnostic accuracy can be anticipated by incorporating this new assay.

2.
Clin Chim Acta ; 553: 117699, 2024 Jan 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38072300

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is difficult to distinguish between malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and benign pleural effusion (BPE). The purpose of this study was to determine the best specimen type by evaluating the DNA methylation status of SHOX2 and RASSF1A in 3 matched PE components. METHODS: In total, 94 patients were enrolled, including 45 MPE, 35 BPE, and 14 undefined PE (UPE) with malignancies. PE samples were processed into supernatants, fresh-cell pellets, and formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cell blocks, respectively. A quantitative real-time PCR was used to detect the methylation status of SHOX2 and RASSF1A. RESULTS: SHOX2 and RASSF1A methylation levels were significantly higher in the 3 MPE sample types than those of BPE (P < 0.05). The area under the curve using cell-free DNA (cf-DNA) was the highest. The detection sensitivity of SHOX2 and RASSF1A in fresh-cell DNA, cf-DNA and FFPE cell-block were 71.1% (32/45), 97.8% (44/45) and 66.7% (28/42), respectively, with specificities of 97.1% (34/35), 94.3% (33/35), and 96.9% (31/32). Notably, a combination of the cytological analysis and cf-DNA methylation assay showed an increase in positivity rate from 75.6% to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The SHOX2 and RASSF1A methylation assay using cf-DNA, the primary recommended specimen type, can excellently increase the diagnostic sensitivity of MPE. A combination of methylation assay with cytological analysis can be used for auxiliary diagnosis of PE.


Assuntos
Ácidos Nucleicos Livres , Derrame Pleural Maligno , Derrame Pleural , Humanos , Derrame Pleural Maligno/diagnóstico , Derrame Pleural Maligno/genética , Proteínas de Homeodomínio/genética , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Metilação de DNA , Derrame Pleural/diagnóstico , Derrame Pleural/genética , DNA
3.
Cancer Med ; 12(7): 7982-7991, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36621813

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The plasma sample has emerged as a promising surrogate sample for EGFR mutation detection in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In clinical practice, whether EGFR variants in baseline plasma ctDNA of advanced NSCLC can predict prognosis in addition to guiding targeted therapy remains to be further explored. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 315 NSCLC patients were retrospectively enrolled. EGFR mutation data from tissue detected by ARMS-PCR and paired plasma samples within 1 month of admission detected by SuperARMS or ARMS-PCR were collected. The correlation between baseline plasma ctDNA EGFR mutation status and survival was compared. RESULTS: EGFR mutation detection rates in tumor samples and plasma samples were 65.1% (205/315) and 43.8% (138/315). Referred to tissue results, the consistent rate of test ctDNA EGFR alteration by SuperARMS was higher than that detected by ARMS (79.5% vs. 69.0%, p = 0.04), either in stage I-IIIA patients (85.7% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.4) or stage IIIB-IV patients (79.1% vs. 69.4%, p = 0.04). Patients' treatment status and pathological subtype were the two factors that affected plasma ctDNA EGFR alteration detection accuracy. The concordance in non-adenocarcinoma patients was obviously higher than that in adenocarcinoma (p = 0.02), and the concordance in treatment naïve patients was significantly higher than that in relapse patients (p = 0.047). In treatment naïve patients, the median PFS (mPFS) in plasma ctDNA EGFR-positive patients was shorter than that in plasma ctDNA EGFR negative patients (7.0 vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.01). In relapsed patients, the mPFS in plasma ctDNA EGFR-positive patients was 9.0 months versus 11.0 months in plasma ctDNA EGFR negative patients (p = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: A plasma sample could be an alternative for a molecular test when tissue samples was unavailable. The SuperARMS-PCR detection method has high sensitivity in real-world clinical practice. Furthermore, in patients with stage IIIB-IV, baseline plasma ctDNA EGFR mutation positivity not only guides targeted therapy but also predicts a worse prognosis.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Receptores ErbB/genética , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Mutação , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico
4.
J Oncol ; 2023: 5888844, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36691467

RESUMO

Objectives: The differential diagnosis of pleural effusion (PE) is a common but major challenge in clinical practice. This study aimed to establish a strategy based on a PE-cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation detection system for the differential diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and benign pleural effusion (BPE). Methods: A total of 104 patients with PE were enrolled in this study, among which 50 patients had MPE, 9 malignant tumor patients had PE of indefinite causes, and the other 45 patients were classified as benign controls. The methylation status of short stature homeobox 2 (SHOX2) and RAS association domain family 1, isoform A (RASSF1A) was detected using PE-cfDNA specimens by real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR. Total methylation (TM) was defined as the combination of the methylation levels of SHOX2 and RASSF1A. The electrochemiluminescence immunoassay was applied to evaluate the levels of multiple serum tumor markers. Results: The PE-cfDNA methylation status of either SHOX2 or RASSF1A was much higher in MPE samples than in benign controls. The combination of SHOX2 and RASSF1A methylation in PE yielded a diagnostic sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 100%, respectively. When compared with the corresponding serum tumor marker detection results, TM showed the highest diagnostic efficiency (AUC = 0.985). Furthermore, the combination of the SHOX2 and RASSF1A methylation panels using PE-cfDNA could apparently improve the differential diagnostic efficacy of BPE and MPE and could help compensate for the deficiency of cytology. Conclusions: Our results indicated that SHOX2 and RASSF1A methylation panel detection could accurately classify BPE and MPE diseases and showed better diagnostic performance than traditional serum parameters. The SHOX2 and RASSF1A methylation detection of PE-cfDNA could be a potentially effective complementary tool for cytology in the process of differential diagnosis. In summary, PE-cfDNA could be used as a promising non-invasive analyte for the auxiliary diagnosis of MPE.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA