The prognostic value of radiogenomics using CT in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review.

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combining radiomic and genomic models in predicting the long-term prognosis of patients with lung cancer and to contribute to the further exploration of radiomics. This study retrieved comprehensive literature from multiple databases, including radiomics and genomics, to study the prognosis of lung cancer. The model construction consisted of the radiomic and genomic methods. A comprehensive bias assessment was conducted, including risk assessment and model performance indicators. Ten studies between 2016 and 2023 were analyzed. Studies were mostly retrospective. Patient cohorts varied in size and characteristics, with the number of patients ranging from 79 to 315. The construction of the model involves various radiomic and genotic datasets, and most models show promising prediction performance with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.64 to 0.94 and the concordance index (C-index) values from 0.28 to 0.80. The combination model typically outperforms the single method model, indicating higher prediction accuracy and the highest AUC was 0.99. Combining radiomics and genomics in the prognostic model of lung cancer may improve the predictive performance. However, further research on standardized data and larger cohorts is needed to validate and integrate these findings into clinical practice. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The combination of radiomics and genomics in the prognostic model of lung cancer improved prediction accuracy in most included studies. KEY POINTS: The combination of radiomics and genomics can improve model performance in most studies. The results of establishing prognosis models by different methods are discussed. The combination of radiomics and genomics may be helpful to provide better treatment for patients.

Prediction of short-term progression of COVID-19 pneumonia based on chest CT artificial intelligence: during the Omicron epidemic.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The persistent progression of pneumonia is a critical determinant of adverse outcomes in patients afflicted with COVID-19. This study aimed to predict personalized COVID-19 pneumonia progression between the duration of two weeks and 1 month after admission by integrating radiological and clinical features. METHODS: A retrospective analysis, approved by the Institutional Review Board, encompassed patients diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia between December 2022 and February 2023. The cohort was divided into training and validation groups in a 7:3 ratio. A trained multi-task U-Net network was deployed to segment COVID-19 pneumonia and lung regions in CT images, from which quantitative features were extracted. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm was employed to construct a radiological model. A clinical model was constructed by LASSO method and stepwise regression analysis, followed by the subsequent construction of the combined model. Model performance was assessed using ROC and decision curve analysis (DCA), while Shapley's Additive interpretation (SHAP) illustrated the importance of CT features. RESULTS: A total of 214 patients were recruited in our study. Four clinical characteristics and four CT features were identified as pivotal components for constructing the clinical and radiological models. The final four clinical characteristics were incorporated as well as the RS_radiological model to construct the combined prediction model. SHAP analysis revealed that CT score difference exerted the most significant influence on the predictive performance of the radiological model. The training group's radiological, clinical, and combined models exhibited AUC values of 0.89, 0.72, and 0.92, respectively. Correspondingly, in the validation group, these values were observed to be 0.75, 0.72, and 0.81. The DCA curve showed that the combined model exhibited greater clinical utility than the clinical or radiological models. CONCLUSION: Our novel combined model, fusing quantitative CT features with clinical characteristics, demonstrated effective prediction of COVID-19 pneumonia progression from 2 weeks to 1 month after admission. This comprehensive model can potentially serve as a valuable tool for clinicians to develop personalized treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes.

Predictive value of radiomic features extracted from primary lung adenocarcinoma in forecasting thoracic lymph node metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The application of radiomics in thoracic lymph node metastasis (LNM) of lung adenocarcinoma is increasing, but diagnostic performance of radiomics from primary tumor to predict LNM has not been systematically reviewed. Therefore, this study sought to provide a general overview regarding the methodological quality and diagnostic performance of using radiomic approaches to predict the likelihood of LNM in lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Studies were gathered from literature databases such as PubMed, Embase, the Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane library. The Radiomic Quality Score (RQS) and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) were both used to assess the quality of each study. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the best radiomics models in the training and validation cohorts were calculated. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: Seventeen studies with 159 to 1202 patients each were enrolled between the years of 2018 to 2022, of which ten studies had sufficient data for the quantitative evaluation. The percentage of RQS was between 11.1% and 44.4% and most of the studies were considered to have a low risk of bias and few applicability concerns in QUADAS-2. Pyradiomics and logistic regression analysis were the most commonly used software and methods for radiomics feature extraction and selection, respectively. In addition, the best prediction models in seventeen studies were mainly based on radiomics features combined with non-radiomics features (semantic features and/or clinical features). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of the training cohorts were 0.84 (95% confidence interval (CI) [0.73-0.91]), 0.88 (95% CI [0.81-0.93]), and 0.93(95% CI [0.90-0.95]), respectively. For the validation cohorts, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.89 (95% CI [0.82-0.94]), 0.86 (95% CI [0.74-0.93]) and 0.94 (95% CI [0.91-0.96]), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomic features based on the primary tumor have the potential to predict preoperative LNM of lung adenocarcinoma. However, radiomics workflow needs to be standardized to better promote the applicability of radiomics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42022375712.

Could the underlying biological basis of prognostic radiomics and deep learning signatures be explored in patients with lung cancer? A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To summarize the underlying biological correlation of prognostic radiomics and deep learning signatures in patients with lung cancer and evaluate the quality of available studies. METHODS: This study examined databases including the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Library, for studies that elaborated on the underlying biological correlation with prognostic radiomics and deep learning signatures based on CT or PET/CT for predicting the prognosis in patients with lung cancer. Information about the patient and radiogenomic analyses was extracted for the included studies. The Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool were used to assess the quality of these studies. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included with 7,338 patients from 2014 to 2022. All studies except for one were retrospective. Supervised machine learning was adopted in six studies, and the remaining used unsupervised machine learning methods. Gene sequencing and histopathological data were analyzed by 83.33% and 16.67% of the included studies, respectively. Gene set enrichment analysis and correlation analysis were most used to explore the biological meaning of prognostic signatures. The median RQS for supervised learning articles was 13.5 (range 12-19) and 7.0 (range 5-14) for unsupervised learning articles. The studies included in this report were assessed to have high risk of bias overall. CONCLUSION: The biological basis for the interpretability of data-driven models mainly focused on genomics and histopathological factors, and it may improve the prognosis of lung cancer with more proper biological interpretation in the future.

Can quantitative peritumoral CT radiomics features predict the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer? A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overarching evaluation of the value of peritumoral CT radiomics features for predicting the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer and to assess the quality of the available studies. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies predicting the prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using CT-based peritumoral radiomics features. Information about the patient, CT-scanner, and radiomics analyses were all extracted for the included studies. Study quality was assessed using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included with 2942 patients from 2017 to 2022. Only one study was prospective, and the others were all retrospectively designed. Manual segmentation and multicenter studies were performed by 69% and 46% of the included studies, respectively. 3D-Slicer and MATLAB software were most commonly used for the segmentation of lesions and extraction of features. The peritumoral region was most frequently defined as dilated from the tumor boundary of 15 mm, 20 mm, or 30 mm. The median RQS of the studies was 13 (range 4-19), while all of included studies were assessed as having a high risk of bias (ROB) overall. CONCLUSIONS: Peritumoral radiomics features based on CT images showed promise in predicting the prognosis of NSCLC, although well-designed studies and further biological validation are still needed. KEY POINTS: • Peritumoral radiomics features based on CT images are promising and encouraging for predicting the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer. • The peritumoral region was often dilated from the tumor boundary of 15 mm or 20 mm because these were considered safe margins. • The median Radiomics Quality Score of the included studies was 13 (range 4-19), and all of studies were considered to have a high risk of bias overall.

The long-term course of subsolid nodules and predictors of interval growth on chest CT: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To calculate the pooled incidence of interval growth after long-term follow-up and identify predictors of interval growth in subsolid nodules (SSNs) on chest CT. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, and Embase was performed on November 08, 2021, for relevant studies. Patient information, CT scanner, and SSN follow-up information were extracted from each included study. A random-effects model was applied along with subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Study quality was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and publication bias was assessed by Egger's test. RESULTS: Of the 6802 retrieved articles, 16 articles were included and analyzed, providing a total of 2898 available SSNs. The pooled incidence of growth in the 2898 SSNs was 22% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15-29%). The pooled incidence of growth in the subgroup analysis of pure ground-glass nodules was 26% (95% CI: 12-39%). The incidence of SSN growth after 2 or more years of stability was only 5% (95% CI: 3-7%). An initially large SSN size was found to be the most frequent risk factor affecting the incidence of SSN growth and the time of growth. CONCLUSIONS: The pooled incidence of SSN growth was as high as 22%, with a 26% incidence reported for pure ground-glass nodules. Although the incidence of growth was only 5% after 2 or more years of stability, long-term follow-up is needed in certain cases. Moreover, the initial size of the SSN was the most frequent risk factor for growth. KEY POINTS: • Based on a meta-analysis of 2898 available subsolid nodules in the literature, the pooled incidence of growth was 22% for all subsolid nodules and 26% for pure ground-glass nodules. • After 2 or more years of stability on follow-up CT, the pooled incidence of subsolid nodule growth was only 5%. • Given the incidence of subsolid nodule growth, management of these lesions with long-term follow-up is preferred.