Sustainability of an enhanced recovery after surgery program (ERAS) in colonic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Between 2006 and 2008 the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program was implemented in colonic surgery in one-third of all hospitals in the Netherlands (n = 33). This resulted in enhanced recovery and a decrease in hospital length of stay (LOS) from a median of 9 days at baseline to 6 days at one-year follow-up. The present study assessed the sustainability of the ERAS program 3-5 years after its implementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From the 33 ERAS hospitals, 10 initially successful hospitals were selected, with success defined as a median LOS of 6 days or lower and protocol adherence rates above 70 %. In 2012 a retrospective audit of 30 consecutive patients was performed in each of these hospitals. Sustainability of the ERAS program was assessed on hospital level, using median hospital LOS, protocol adherence rates and time to functional recovery. Data were compared with the implementation phase data. RESULTS: Overall median LOS in the selected hospitals increased from 5.25 days (interquartile range [IQR] 4.75-6.00; min, 4.00-max, 6.00) to 6 days (IQR 5.00-7.00; min, 5.00-max, 8.00), but this change was not significant (p = 0.052). Time to functional recovery was equal in both phases: median 3.00 days (p = 0.26). Protocol adherence decreased from 75 to 67 % (p = 0.32). Especially adherence to postoperative care elements dropped considerably. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a slight decrease in protocol adherence, the ERAS program was sustained reasonably well in the 10 selected hospitals, although there was quite some variation between the hospitals.

Sustainability of short stay after breast cancer surgery in early adopter hospitals.

Between 2005 and 2007 a short stay programme for breast cancer surgery was successfully implemented in early adopter hospitals. The current study evaluates the sustainability of this success five years following implementation. A retrospective audit of 160 consecutive patients undergoing breast cancer surgery was performed five years following implementation of short stay. The total proportion of patients treated in short stay was 82% (hospital 1 83%, hospital 2 78%, hospital 3 87%, hospital 4 80%) after five years follow-up, which was comparable to the proportion in short stay directly after implementation (p = 0.938). Overall compliance to the key recommendations to facilitate short stay after breast cancer surgery increased from 65% directly after implementation to 78% five years after implementation. This study shows that short stay after breast cancer surgery was successfully sustained in early adopter hospitals five years following implementation.

To eat or not to eat: facilitating early oral intake after elective colonic surgery in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It was shown that patients in the Netherlands remain exposed to unnecessarily prolonged starvation after abdominal surgery. The present study examined whether a structured collaborative effort would help to implement the early start of oral nutrition after colorectal surgery. METHODS: In 2006, twenty-six Dutch hospitals signed up to a "breakthrough project" concerning the implementation of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme with early oral feeding as one of the key elements. Each hospital determined the usual start of food intake by analyzing 50 patients who underwent a colorectal resection in 2004 (n=1126). Subsequently, over the course of one year 861 colorectal surgery patients were treated according to the ERAS programme. The first day that patients were eating before and after the breakthrough project was compared using Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression models. RESULTS: Patients treated according to the ERAS programme were eating 3 days earlier than the patients traditionally treated (p<0.000). Two days after surgery 65% of the ERAS patients were eating normal food versus 7% of the pre-ERAS patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present nationwide collaborative effort was successful in implementing a change towards an early start of oral nutrition after abdominal surgery.

Length of stay: an inappropriate readout of the success of enhanced recovery programs.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs are designed to reduce hospital length of stay by shortening the postoperative recovery period. The intended effect of an accelerated recovery on the length of stay may be frustrated by a delayed discharge. This study was designed to assess the influence of an ERAS program on the proportion, appropriateness, and extent of delay in discharge. METHODS: Patients who enrolled in the ERAS program (n = 121) between 2003 and 2006 were compared with 52 patients who were managed traditionally in 2001. RESULTS: Ninety percent of the pre-ERAS patients and 87% of the ERAS patients were not discharged on the day that discharge criteria were fulfilled. The additional stay of 59% of the pre-ERAS patients and 69% of the ERAS patients was inappropriate. Wound care (15% in the pre-ERAS and 3% of the ERAS group) and observation of any symptoms pointing to an anastomotic leakage (10% in both groups) were the most important reasons for a medical appropriate delay of discharge. The extent of delay in discharge decreased significantly from a median of two days in the pre-ERAS group to a median of 1 day in the ERAS group (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in length of stay up to a median of 2 days after start of an enhanced recovery program may relate to changes in organization of care and not to a shorter recovery period. Recovery statistics should replace or at least be added to the length of stay as outcome of enhanced recovery programs.