Does HER2 status influence in the benefit of ramucirumab and paclitaxel as second line treatment of advanced gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma? Data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare ramucirumab-paclitaxel versus chemotherapy in second-line (2L) advanced gastroesophageal cancer (aGEC) based on HER2 status and analyze prognostic factors. METHODS: The study includes patients from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry with aGEC and known HER2 status who received 2L between 2016 and 2021. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and multivariable Cox regression analysis was done to adjust for confounding variables. RESULTS: Of the 552 patients who met the selection criteria, 149 (26.9%) had HER2-positive aGEC, 89 were treated with chemotherapy, and 60 with ramucirumab-paclitaxel, and 403 had an HER2-negative aGEC, 259 were treated with chemotherapy, and 144 with ramucirumab-paclitaxel. In the whole sample, 2L PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI 2.8-3.2), 2L OS, 5.7 months (5.2-6.3), and ramucirumab-paclitaxel versus chemotherapy was associated with increased PFS (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.53-0.78, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR 0.68, 0.55-0.83, p = 0.0002). Median PFS of ramucirumab- paclitaxel versus chemotherapy was 3.5 vs 2.8 months (HR 0.67, 0.54-0.83, p = 0.0004) in HER2-negative, and 4.7 vs 2.7 months (HR 0.57, 0.40-0.82, p = 0.0031) in HER2-positive aGEC, respectively. Median OS for ramucirumab-paclitaxel versus chemotherapy was 6.6 vs 5 months (HR 0.67, 0.53-0.85, p = 0.0007) in HER2-negative, and 7.4 vs 5.6 months (HR 0.70, 0.53-1.04, p = 0.083) in HER2-positive aGEC, respectively. ECOG-PS, tumor burden, Lauren subtype, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio were prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with an aGEC from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry, 2L treatment with ramucirumab-paclitaxel was superior to chemotherapy in PFS, OS and response rate, independent of HER2 status.

Biopsychosocial and clinical characteristics in patients with resected breast and colon cancer at the beginning and end of adjuvant treatment.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze biopsychosocial factors affecting how patients cope with cancer and adjuvant treatment and to appraise psychological distress, coping, perceived social support, quality of life and SDM before and after adjuvant treatment in breast cancer patients compared to colon cancer patients. METHODS: NEOcoping is a national, multicenter, cross-sectional, prospective study. The sample comprised 266 patients with colon cancer and 231 with breast cancer. The instruments used were the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer (Mini-MAC), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire-Patient (SDM-Q-9) and Physician's (SDM-Q-Doc), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ). RESULTS: Breast cancer patients reacted worse to the diagnosis of cancer with more symptoms of anxiety, depression, and somatization, and were less satisfied with their involvement than those with colon cancer (p = 0.003). Participants with colon cancer were older and had more physical symptoms and functional limitations at the beginning of adjuvant treatment, while there were scarcely any differences between the two groups at the end of adjuvancy, at which time both groups suffered greater psychological and physical effects and scored lower on coping strategies, except for anxious preoccupation. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer patients need more information and involvement of the oncologist in shared decision-making, as well as and more medical and psychological support when beginning adjuvant treatment. Both breast and colon cancer patients may require additional psychological care at the end of adjuvancy.

Efficacy and safety of chemotherapy in older versus non-older patients with advanced gastric cancer: A real-world data, non-inferiority analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is a common neoplasm in older adults. Nevertheless, there are few specific management data in the literature. The aim of this study was to assess non-inferiority of survival and efficacy-related outcomes of chemotherapy used in older vs non-older patients with AGC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 1485 patients from the AGAMENON registry of AGC treated with polychemotherapy between 2008-2017. A statistical analysis was conducted to prove non-inferiority for overall survival (OS) associated with the use of chemotherapy schedules in individuals ≥70 vs.<70years. The fixed-margin method was used (hazard ratio [HR]<1.176) that corresponds to conserving at least 85% efficacy. RESULTS: 33% (n=489) of the cases analyzed were ≥70 years. Two-agent chemotherapies and combinations with oxaliplatin (48% vs. 29%) were used more often in the older patients, as were modified schedules and/or lower doses. Toxicity grade 3-4 was comparable in both groups, although when looking at any grade, there were more episodes of enteritis, renal toxicity, and fatigue in older patients. In addition, toxicity was a frequent cause for discontinuing treatment in older patients. The response rate was similar in both groups. After adjusting for confounding factors, the non-inferiority of OS associated with schedules administered to the older vs. younger subjects was confirmed: HR 1.02 (90% CI, 0.91-1.14), P (non inferiority)=0.018, as well as progression-free survival: HR 0.97 (90% CI, 0.87-1.08), P(non-inferiority)=0.001. CONCLUSION: In this AGC registry, the use of chemotherapy with schedules adapted to patients ≥70 years provided efficacy that was not inferior to that seen in younger cases, with comparable adverse effects.