A step forward in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections: from machine learning to clinical practice.

Objectives: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common infections within the Emergency Department (ED), causing increased laboratory workloads and unnecessary antibiotics prescriptions. The aim of this study was to improve UTI diagnostics in clinical practice by application of machine learning (ML) models for real-time UTI prediction. Methods: In a retrospective study, patient information and outcomes from Emergency Department patients, with positive and negative culture results, were used to design models - 'Random Forest' and 'Neural Network' - for the prediction of UTIs. The performance of these predictive models was validated in a cross-sectional study. In a quasi-experimental study, the impact of UTI risk assessment was investigated by evaluating changes in the behaviour of clinicians, measuring changes in antibiotic prescriptions and urine culture requests. Results: First, we trained and tested two different predictive models with 8692 cases. Second, we investigated the performance of the predictive models in clinical practice with 962 cases (Area under the curve was between 0.81 to 0.88). The best performance was the combination of both models. Finally, the assessment of the risk for UTIs was implemented into clinical practice and allowed for the reduction of unnecessary urine cultures and antibiotic prescriptions for patients with a low risk of UTI, as well as targeted diagnostics and treatment for patients with a high risk of UTI. Conclusion: The combination of modern urinalysis diagnostic technologies with digital health solutions can help to further improve UTI diagnostics with positive impact on laboratory workloads and antimicrobial stewardship.

Clinical Decision Support System in laboratory medicine.

Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) have been implemented in almost all healthcare settings. Laboratory medicine (LM), is one of the most important structured health data stores, but efforts are still needed to clarify the use and scope of these tools, especially in the laboratory setting. The aim is to clarify CDSS concept in LM, in the last decade. There is no consensus on the definition of CDSS in LM. A theoretical definition of CDSS in LM should capture the aim of driving significant improvements in LM mission, prevention, diagnosis, monitoring, and disease treatment. We identified the types, workflow and data sources of CDSS. The main applications of CDSS in LM were diagnostic support and clinical management, patient safety, workflow improvements, and cost containment. Laboratory professionals, with their expertise in quality improvement and quality assurance, have a chance to be leaders in CDSS.

Clinical Decision Support systems: A step forward in establishing the clinical laboratory as a decision maker hubA CDS system protocol implementation in the clinical laboratory.

Background: New tools for health information technology have been developed in recent times, such as Clinical Decision Support (CDS) systems, which are any digital solutions designed to help healthcare professionals when making clinical decisions. The study aimed to show how we have adopted a CDS system in the San Juan de Alicante Clinical Laboratory and facilitate the implementation of our protocol in other clinical laboratories. We have user experience and the motivation to improve healthcare tools. The improvement, measurement, and monitoring of interventions and laboratory tests has been our motto for years. Materials and methods: A descriptive research was conducted. All stages in the design of the project are as follows: 1. Set up a multidisciplinary workgroup. 2. Review patients' data. 3. Identify relevant data from main sources. 4. Design the likely outcomes. 5. Define a complete integration scenario. 6. Monitor and track the impact. To set up this protocol, two new software systems were implemented in our laboratory: AlinIQ CDS v8.2 as Rule Engine, and AlinIQ AIP Integrated Platform v1.6 as Business Intelligence (BI) tool. Results: Our protocol shows the workflow and actions that can be done with a CDS system and also how it could be integrated with other monitoring systems, as well as some examples of KPIs and their outcomes. Conclusions: CDS could be a great strategic asset for clinical laboratories to improve the integration of care, optimize the use of laboratory tests, and add more clinical value to physicians in the interpretation of results.